![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
:reading:
Flavour Analysis wrote:silavor wrote:Vote: Flavour Analysis
You've got a broken sarcasm detector
silavor wrote:...I have this vague feeling there's some sarcasm I'm just not detecting.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... 8#p2991458
Unvote Vote: Silavor
You are hypocritical.
Flavour Analysis wrote:FoS: Jil
I was cussing as well.
Flavour Analysis wrote:@Elvis Knits: Yes I know it wasn't the best reason to vote Silavor but I found it quite amusing so I brought it up. I admit it wasn't a good lead but I moved on from that.
DeityKabuto 245 wrote:Ellibereth wrote:I daycopped you and got scum mmkay?
Earworm, why you felt need to point out fakedaykill was probably fake btw?
You are a daycop and who did you investigate?
I doubt you are telling the truth, the daycop thing flipped my head, and I was going to post something like that tommorow, so people may lie.
silavor wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Flavor:
Scum is Atilysan and pappums Rat and Lowell.
Fate: started out with a great Lowell vote, but then flew around like crazy. Probably scum.
ZeLink: Scum
Flavor himself- town
Woah woah woah. Slow down. You suggesting we've got a five-man scum team?
elvis_knits wrote:How was jil "selectively tunneling" on fate when she never even voted him? There was no vote, she even said she doesn't think he's scum. It was just a petty fight that you tried to blow out of proportion with your BS FOS.
ZeL1nK wrote:elvis, can you read silavor in ISO and tell me what you think?
I was getting massive scum vibes from him even before his "slow down..." post to pere. Interested in why you thought he was town prior to that.
silavor wrote:Seacore wrote:evilpacman18 wrote:Sigh... what did vezok just claim?
What, this?
Vezok wrote:I'm anteloping like my role-name suggests.
Please, how could this be a role claim? It's so subtle.
Seacore wrote:vezokpiraka wrote:Yuppy.
Fate and elli in the same game. That's more like it.
First thing first.
vote Flavor
I'm antelopinglike my role-name suggests.
I want to get rid of DK like right now. Also jyl is pretty annoying too.
vezokpiraka wrote:I was claiming Antelope.
I'm not claiming role lol.
This sure as hell seems to be a claim to me
Seacore. What's with the change in heart all of a sudden?
elvis_knits wrote:
JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE NAMES 5 SUSPECTS DOESN'T MEAN THEY HAVE SLIPPED AND SAID THERE IS A 5-MAN SCUM TEAM.
ZeL1nK wrote:@elvis,
1) There are a few people that I'll suggest a PL on every game I'm in with them. DK is one. andrew94 is another. But I don't ever seriously push it. I just suggest it for discussion/reaction purposes.
2) It was a joke, clearly.
silavor wrote:...Exactly what I said it was at the time, obviously. I was genuinely wondering if he was suggesting we've got a five-man scum team.
silavor wrote:Hmm. Fine.
unvote
vote: earworm
The cases against earworm make the most sense to me right now. Having a vote on Ze's not doing anything productive anymore.
Cirno wrote:>is elvis the only one attacking FA?
Doesn't matter how many people were attacking FA. The one I most had a problem with was elvis.
Cirno wrote:>Cirno [...] dislikes me and amrun's FA cases
I dislike elvis' attack on FA. Amrun is just someone I dislike in general so far, not particularly for anything in relation to FA.
>not an answer to the question
I gave two. dealwithit.jpg
Flavour Analysis wrote:
Now, you have not answered my question and I’d like for you to answer it please:
Question: “Why exactly is Earworm town to you? So you found Silavor town for agreeing with you, not for pro-town motivation? How do you feel about Amrun buddying you so adamantly?”
I think your reason for voting me is pretty weak. I have never role fished. Again, my Silavor and Elli votes were early in RVS. You didn’t even get here until page 7, #156. You had more content to read and analyze, while I had little to base my reads on and had actually started discussion myself. If you self vote, I will yell at you. If you self hammer, I will yell at you endgame and lose respect for you (if you were town).
elvis wrote:The earworm problem generally seems to be this:
People say that earworm was coaching FA by pointing out the loldayvig was fake.
earworm is following ellifate
earworm says snarky was rolefishing, people don't see it
I'm not that concerned with the above because, 1)I don't think scum coach each other in thread if they can avoid it; 2)I don't think earworm is actually following ellifate; 3)bandwagoning in general does not bother me, context is what matters to me with that 4)I can see that earworm would say snarky was rolefishing.
I Isoed earworm to take another look at him though in case I was being dumb.
There were a few things I didn't like:
1)Don't agree about evilpacman
2)I think the peregrine 5-scum thing is preposterous.
silavor wrote:elvis_knits wrote:ZeL1nK wrote:silavor has expressed no suspicion of Snarky all game...
THIS IS SO TRUE!
silavor wrote:
Anyway, FA, with regards to the snarky votes they're neither RVS or PL votes; they're just votes. Some of his posts earlier on really seem like subtle rolefishing, and that's why the bandwagon started. Nothing to do with RVS or PL.
Can y'all stop being dumbasses long enough to at least get your facts straight? Please?
silavor wrote:I was too busy voting Ze to vote snarky. If I had multiple votes I would have, but I don't so I didn't.
GreyICE wrote:Nah, not today. But you and Tajo get to play the Silavor wagon challenge:elvis_knits wrote:populartajo wrote:WHY ARE WE DEFUSING THE SILAVOR WAGON?
QFT
FOCUS GUYS!
WE ARE LYNCHING SILAVOR!
silavor () - evilpacman18, ZeL1nK, Seacore, elvis_knits, Amrun, populartajo, Llamarble, inHimshallibe, Snarky, earworm
You have to tell me that you have town reads on half this wagon, name which players, and then give me reasons why. 'cause this wagon is radioactive.
evilpacman wrote:These games that get 10 pages within a couple hours of opening always scare me into lurking.
evilpacman wrote:I'm willing to bet that scum are humans with guns.
evilpacman18 wrote:Flavour Analysis wrote:"Into Africa, a 24 player preditor-prey large theme is underway [0] spots remaining."
I think this most likely disprove's Pacman's theory.
Bah.
unvote
vote: silavor
silavor wrote:stupidposting
silavor wrote:elvis_knits wrote:silavor wrote:stupidposting
Are you trying to say that you were stupidposting on purpose and then purposely ignoring my questions to get a better read? Like acting scummy to see how I reacted?
In a word, yes.
earworm wrote:So, Silavorseemstown right now
earworm wrote:
Thankfully there is wagon I fully support up here.
VOTE: Evilpacman
elvis_knits wrote:
evilpacman wrote:I'm willing to bet that scum are humans with guns.
evilpacman18 wrote:Flavour Analysis wrote:"Into Africa, a 24 player preditor-prey large theme is underway [0] spots remaining."
I think this most likely disprove's Pacman's theory.
Bah.
unvote
vote: silavor
So. I've been thinking about this. Predator-prey doesn't mean that humans are not scum, does it? I mean, I think the thinking here from FA, and then evilpacman was that predator means animal and not human. But I think human can be predators too, technically. ANYWAY, whether it is right or wrong, we see pacman throw out an idea about scum roles and then get convinced that he's wrong. pacman is likely town, unless you think this was a tricksy faked townslip. There's always that chance, but it's low, IMO.
Sidenote: FA was quick to "disprove" evilpacman's human scum role theory, even though llama's predator-prey statement doesn't actually rule out humans in my mind. Because FA has a scum role and he is not human? I think if we kill a scum and see what the role is (human or animal), it may be enlightening.
Flavor Analysis wrote:@Elvis Knits:
Again, disagree. I told you my vote on him was semi-serious. The Jil FoS was due to a misunderstanding.
FA wrote:
I know that, that was why I asked. I didn’t like that you didn’t explain why you didn’t get the case on Earworm. You didn’t explain Earworm until your #322, and I have asked before and you only explained Earworm because Atil asked you. I feel if someone bandwagons a lot, they make it harder to read them because we can’t really see their motive except “trying to pressure people” from it. So Earworm and InHim falls into that. InHim always does that.
FA wrote:In your #322, you say that Earworm is following ElliFate. Which wagon to you mean he was following? Define ‘voting moderately well’ please. Not quite, seeing as I have a question addressed to you about him. Almost though.
FA wrote:
Re: Sillyvore: See, I don’t like you attacking him now, since you DID have a town read. That gets at me. Now because of his dumbpostingz I have a null on him (because it can go either way, either town gambiting to catch opportunistic scum, or scum faking town motivation to avoid a D1 lynch), and my read on him will depend on what he does after this. I don’t usually look for people ‘slip hunting’ but it seems you and Amrun both do look for those things and I have seen her do this before so I think it’s legit in her case.
ZeL1nK wrote:elvis, how can you think vezok and pacman are town for their clams/townslips but not FA? pacman's 'townslip' was based on FA's zebra claim. Unless you're talking about a different town slip here. Like yeah, I can understand that you have problems with his play, but he's town.
Llamarble wrote:Amrun wrote:DA FUCK?!
I hope I didn't actually cause that.
evilpacman18 wrote:Mmmm... the votes on llamarble are getting worse and worse. Least favorite is definitely Snarky's. And this wagon looks set to build as quickly as silavor's.
Flavour Analysis wrote:I didn't like Elvi's reaction to the final four votes. I do agree that Llama only seemed to care if he caused the commotion instead of yelling at Pacman for hammering.
Snarky wrote:Some NK speculation:
-I've been accused of rolefishing Elli
-I've been accused of not being a bright light
-Elli started the case on me
Thus, because I'm not a bright light, as scum I would have killed Elli. It would only be logical that town goes after me today. But hey that's not happening! That's why ZeLink remembers town the case on me without saying exactly why he thinks I'm scum and without voting me.
unvote
vote:Zelink
Prediction of Zelink next post: blabla speculation bullshit OMGUS vote Snarky
(I usually get killed when I make such speculation posts but I don't mind. You can not agree with me, everything makes sense in my head, and Zelink is 99,9% scum from my POV)
Llamarble wrote:What I hoped I had not caused was EPM's hammer.
Amrun wrote:elvis_knits wrote:Llamarble explained nothing though.
He explained the "did I cause that?"
Llamarble, why did you ecourage a claimless hammer onnly to detract that after someone followed your advice?
llamarble 670 excerpt wrote:Tempted to just quickhammer Silavor before he fakeclaims. "I was purposely stupidposting" reminds me of BGG, except Silavor is not bgg.
Why purposely stupidpost?
That wall smells of scumwall. Grey why is he town again?
Sketchy wagon should count against him not for him since if there aren't CWs scum are likely bussing.
Llamarble 676 wrote:Amrun wrote:DA FUCK?!
I hope I didn't actually cause that.
Hez wrote:Tajo already got silavor wrong. How many more does he need to lynch before this scumbag hangs?
Amrun wrote:Elvis-knits: You are right; there is more to the llamarble case, as you have (solidly) provided. However, I am not abandoning that case. Instead, I think that Snarky got scummier in the meantime and that his nk spec is lynchworthy. Not sure why it is being ignored. In addition, llamarble is promising content and I'd like to see it. Llamarble is a good wagon.