Dang I missed all the action.... well it's probably a good thing seeing as i wouldn't really know how to defend myself against a bad case of indigestion..
I will obviously have to point a smallish FOS at Leonidas and Fishbulb.
I will
unvote: rite, vote: MeMe
for the following reasons:
1. (As has already been mentioned) she said nothing to clarify her "hunch" after it started a very quick bandwagon rolling. A player of MeMe's experience would've known that some people may think she had information.
2. After the pressure goes on, she comes forward with her actual reasons for her hunch. Now it may be just me, but she seems to be twisting the intent of my posts to serve her own purposes.
MeMe wrote:As for my reasons on Talitha -- whenever someone minimizes the threat to the town (like she did when suggesting one killing group), I think they might be trying to make us feel all warm and fuzzy -- getting our guard down. Then she questioned Cadmium's thoughts that Quagmire might have killed bloojay -- I made a quick note that she looked like she was watching out for Quagmire. That's it, folks.
Here's what I actually said:
Talitha wrote:Any thoughts on how many anti-town groups we might have? Just one death, so there might only be one killing group. Is that very likely for a 20 player game?
To me, I wasn't minimizing anything, I really wanted to hear people's opinions and was trying to get some discussion going. And why would having only one killing group make the town feel all warm and fuzzy?? It would mean a whole bunch of them working together against us.
And as for asking Cadmium about his reasoning, I wanted to know his reasons for voting Quagmire and whether they were good enough to warrant switching my vote. [quote="Talitha] Can I ask what your reasons are for this, or is it just a gut feeling?[/quote]
How does asking for elaboration on reasoning for a vote mean that I'm trying to protect someone? My intent was the opposite.