![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
Pariah, if you don't have a post restriction, post something normal.
If you can only vote and unvote, vote and unvote me.
If you can only vote and unvote CES, vote and unvote him twice.
Yes, I have, I was just checking -.-Coron wrote:PBuG, have you been reading the thread? Obv not.
Oh, and number two is yes. But like I said, my sanity changes, and he doesn't tell me what it changes to.arimnaes wrote:Two things:
Wasn't this a day start? When did you target Shamrock with an investigation?PBuG wrote:I investigate someone, and the mod sends me my results at a random point throughout the day.
......confirmed by the bastard mod?PBuG wrote:My sanity is confirmed, but if I do a certain thing, it changes.
If you provide satisfactory answers, I'll gladly vote Shamrock, of course.
My sanity changes. It changed after I posted this because the first change condition was a full roleclaim. So, I'm not longer sane. If I get an innocent, I'm naive so I'll try to fulfill the change condition. If I get guilty, I'm insane or paranoid, so when I investigate Shamrock again, if I get guilty, I'm paranoid, and if I get innocent, I'm insane. I have a very confusing role. I hope random isn't one of the sanities I can get.PBuG wrote:Y'know, screw it. I don't care if my sanity changes or not, I caught scum and I can figure out my sanity over the next two days.
I may investigate at any time, but there are two weird limits (well, investigating at any time is weird on its own). One, I have to wait at least 24 hours for the result, and at most a week. Two, I must wait at least 72 hours to investigate again, and if I don't investigate within 48 hours of that, I lose the investigation. If I lose the investigation, I must wait 96 hours to investigate again.
Again, I don't particularly like this role. For my next investigation, I'm going to investigate myself. I find out under what condition my sanity changes next when I get my next result.
Yes, because that would give us a day lasting at least a few months and at most almost a year.Thok wrote:PBug, is there anything stopping you from simply getting investigations on all 24 people in the game today?
XD I love you.DrippingGoofball wrote:You're welcome, Sugar. May I offer you some tea?Primate wrote:How very polite DrippingGoofball.
Can I ask Millie to toast some fresh crumpets for you, dear?
You must be hungry, coming to visit us like this on horseback. Here, let me take your hat. Pray tell, how's Aunt Alma?
He's not aMariyta wrote:No. I voted for him because my pm said townies wouldn't utter that word. Therefore, he's not a townie. And I hinted to get someone to say it, silly.
I was sane, now I'm insane.Masterchief wrote: Wait, by sanity change, do you mean you were an insane cop or what?
It wasn't, it was so I could win. Think: why did I claim to get scum on a certain person, and get that person lynched, to take it all back and say that my win condition, which I accomplished, changed? Hint about previous post: If this post was coded in the same way, it would be ITHIT. There are five letters and five sentences.marc.six wrote:To PBuG: Why was a false cop claim for your safety?
No, it had to happen at some point in the game, but since I was mistaken and thought I was lyncher, I did it yesterday to win sooner.al_kohaulec wrote:PBuG, did that have to happen yesterday, or could it have happened today instead, and your condition to have a chance to win would still be fulfilled? From what I understand, it had to happen yesterday no matter what, but if you could clarify please...
Agreed, considering the mod said anything in a PM is the truth. I think DGB is lying through her keyboard.Machiavellian-Mafia wrote:Scenario 1: DG is unnightkillable godfather pulling gambit and CD tells the truth
Scenario 2: CD is actually scum while DG nailed him on the scumtell
Scenario 3: The bastard mod is messing with both of them and everything is moot.
I'd say we lynch DGB and then judge CD based on what the lynch reveals.
Not a lyncher, that was a mistake I made. A townie who, to be able to win, had to act like one.Glork wrote:Oh, that's right. The whole "I'm a lyncher but now I'm a townie" thing. Don't buy it. PBuG is scum.
I thought (and was very wrong) that it was the best way to get things done. I was working under the assumption that once I did what I did, I would no longer need to defend any previous actions.M4yhem wrote:PBug- Did you have to claim cop because of your role? Or did you just think it was the best way to get want you needed to do done?