League of Legends Mafia (Game Over!)
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Up to page 20. I started glazing over and taking less notes on later pages so I took a bit of a break.
This is plainly a townslip if anything and anyone saying the opposite is scummy. Running tally: Reck, dex, kthx, TBG, Kise, Andrius, CF Riot (who gets a pass for reasons I'll discuss).In post 102, kdowns wrote:Where does it say that Blue is Town and Red is Scum? I am think that Red and Blue might be two different Town Teams and Mafia could possibly be Jungle since it said 'Ganks"?
This is a better argument against kdowns. I don't agree with it, but the fake-townslip perspective is a vastly better argument than the possibility that it could be a scumslip. A lot of players, myself included, don't acrefully read their win conditions and if anything confusing Red and Purple is an indication of not being Purple.In post 134, CF Riot wrote:Idk why everyone thinks town having a lot of ults will win the game. Like, I'm sure us having ults is better than not, but I feel like people are way more concerned with night play than day play and I've always thought day play is what wins town games.
FoS PoPP: The third point he gives against Venmar is silly.
Vote: Kdowns
Took a shot wifoming town and it backfired. Sorry bro.
This is a ridiculous point, but one that others will later parrot. Trying hard (the trying is mostly done in other posts) to make it sound like kdowns is reacting strongly when he isn't. Brandi agrees right after this... I don't get it, he seems calm enough to me...In post 151, pieceofpecanpie wrote:FoS@ kdowns Your reaction does not equal 3 votes. L-9??? Why are you soooo concerned, why is this pressure? Do you have anything else to say beyond this small blip of opening post and subsequent votes?
:badposting:In post 162, Ankamius wrote:Town vibes from dramonic and xRECKONERx, scum vibes from Bitmap. Not convinced of ActionDan-town right now.
d3x #35: This is pretty much what I'm thinking; I'm very skeptical of the no lynch strategy right now. I like the idea of everyone tower hugging at night, but I'm completely lost as to why we would no lynch on top of it.
ActionDan #46: Without risk? The scum are gaining experience as well.
To be honest, I'm liking this no lynch wagon less and less. The speed that it sprung up with little discussion is really off-putting.
IPie #50 is giving town vibes.
I don't really see CF Riot #61's issue with Venmar.
Too much speculating here in general. Trying to guess roles on day one without information isn't useful. This outguessing-the-mod thing is also never going to get anywhere. Everyone tower hugging N1 makes sense, but I still don't see the reason why we would no lynch on top of it. I don't see how having more information when we get our ultimates is a bad thing, even if it results in a mislynch.
Andrius #65: Town vibes here
Brandi #86: ... what
pieceofpecanpie #123: What makes Venmar's speculation more problematic than everyone else's speculation? The third post you quoted was obviously a joke.
Venmar #144: Brandi town? I'm leaning the opposite way, actually.
kdowns #149: How is it ironic? Say something more concrete in response to the pressure or about something else. That said, I'm not convinced kdowns is scum from that 'slip'. The fact that he mentioned blue and red sides doesn't scream scum at me by itself.
Panzerjager #158: oh my god wow
VOTE: Panzerjager
Not so much the Panzer part although I don't think the vote is justified. Starts out by mentioning some really arbitrary players. "Obviously a joke", suspecting Brandi, and overall scummy vibes here.
The words were pretty good words, town mindset, but bad vote.In post 170, Bella wrote: A ton of words
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOTE: Reckoner. He's on the kdowns wagon and has been pushing the no lynch/tower hug strat, the two least townie things happening in the game right now.
Venmar's reaction to this post sucks- lazy scum?
Scummy for suspecting Brandi (I think she's already obvtown at this point, I don't remember for sure, but def not suspicious), and for a garbage reason for unvoting.In post 196, Ankamius wrote:
UghIn post 189, PJ. wrote:V/LA until Monday
UNVOTE: Panzerjager
VOTE: Brandi
I'll let Panzer go for right now until his V/LA is over. There's other targets I'd like to pressure at the moment anyway.
Very much a town frame of mind in this post even though your suspects are wrong.In post 198, CF Riot wrote:
I have no experience with kdowns, but knowing we're all supposed to be at least semi-experienced with LoL as the source material and having "Blue Team" written out in the role PMs I expect him (as town) to assume the scumteam is purple. I assumed as much before role PMs were even sent, so him failing to read the OP doesn't sound like the best excuse. So people with experience with kdowns, is it beyond him as a player to do this intentionally as scum trying to gain townpoints for "not knowing" the scumteam is purple? That is how I interpreted the post from the beginning.In post 170, Bella wrote:Given his use of "red team", I'd hazard a guess that he's not a member of the purple team, which either makes him a) a hidden third party or b) town who didn't read his role PM or the OP properly. My experience of kdowns leads me to conclusion b.
As of now, scum: kdowns>Brandi>Venmar>VoidedMafia.
Brandi is being unnecessarily confrontational. My disclaimer for my VM read is I don't like VM so I probably want him to be scum.
The claim that Brandi was trying to get others on the kdowns wagon without being on it herself is kind of silly. And if she wanted a wagon on kdowns to succeed, why would she turn around and suspect the wagoners? Point about the choice of the word "townplay" is stupid as well. I will concede, however, that Brandi 205 is kind of dodgy and I can see suspecting her somewhat, but the 2nd paragraph and 2nd last paragraph of this post strike me as painfully fabricated-sounding.In post 209, pieceofpecanpie wrote:In post 62, Brandi wrote:That's pretty weak CF. Everyone knows Poppy is the queen of towerdiving, if anyone would have that as an ult, it would be her. It's not too crazy of an idea.
That's a really really convoluted explanation.In post 205, Brandi wrote:popp I was never confused at kdowns reactions, but I did in fact poke at him for his reactions. There are reasons to poke an innocent target if it causes scum to take it as a reason to jump on.
You know, I can boil that down to a much more obvious one: you exacerbate kdowns' reactions enticing others to jump on it, but you stay off the wagon so you in turn can both feign innocence in case of a mislynch and/or sit back and call those on it scummy.
So if I take you're explanation to be the truth then you've just found the perfect out if a kdowns lynch turns out to be a mislynch: "Sure I poked at him for his reactions, but that was only to lure scum out"This makes no sense because A. How do you know kdowns is an innocent target, and if you do how does poking him help you root out scum from town on his wagon? and B. If kdowns flips scum you don't look poke-y at all, you instead look like a scumbuddy caught between a rock and a hard place (ie. not on his wagon, but seemingly endorsing it).
Ah I see, let's find your "other" things.In post 62, Brandi wrote:And your second issue, those two things are not mutually exclusive. They are scummy for being on the wagon as well as other things.
You mean this?In post 62, Brandi wrote:I made posts earlier that implied suspicion of CF Riot [...]
That's implied suspicion??? How is that linked to his alignment whatsoever? There's a subjective speculation debate going on there, the only thing that weakly appears as "earlier implied suspicion" is the statementIn post 62, Brandi wrote:That's pretty weak CF. Everyone knows Poppy is the queen of towerdiving, if anyone would have that as an ult, it would be her. It's not too crazy of an idea."That's pretty weak CF."But the fluff that follows this statement makes it unlikely to be so.
Well you've certainly blown me away with your "other things" on these two players.In post 62, Brandi wrote:I said I'm not sure if kthx, just a bad feeling about the way he posts. I'm not entirely certain of him though because what Im thinking could just be null.
I've never played with you before. I've never seen your "townplay". But as a general rule of thumb, people do not refer to their play in an ongoing game as "townplay" when trying to justify why other players are scummy and they are not.In post 62, Brandi wrote:But there has been a consistent way that certain players react to my townplay D1 that generally ends up in them being scum. All of my reads on people are based on never played with them before. (Except Reck)
Let's see, you've "poked" at kdowns for "scumhunting" purposes, which has resulted in you catching at least two scummy players. And they are scummy for no compelling reasons, apart from being on a wagon that you've had a little go at exacerbating. This is all town play, mind you. Well... That does not compute.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Brandi
Do you literally ever do anything except pop in every 5 pages to remind us you still think kdowns is scum? Useless.In post 217, d3x wrote:Wouldn't Ockham's Razor support kdowns is Scum in that the easiest answer is that he doesn't have the Town WinCon?
Please stop going after an obvtownie literally for towntelling. Brandi could not sound any more like emotown.In post 236, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Oh I'm sorry, I was just trying to make a few logical points and rationalise how they made you scummy. I didn't realise this game was about making bitchy statements and clawing at each others eyes.In post 218, Brandi wrote:Sure, but who would I convince? You? No because you don't understand logic. It would be a waste of time going back and forth with quote stripes.
Why was his vote terrible? Why were his reasons terrible and scummy? Oh and stop trying to educate me, first Ockham's razor now strawmanning? You're digging a hole. It's got nothing to do with strawmanning. II'll pick out one tidbit for you:
You quoted my response to CF but didn't look at his post in comparison. His vote was terrible. His reasons were terrible and scummy. What you did is called a strawman.hadto take that quote of yours because you directed me to it when you said"I made posts earlier that implied suspicion of CF Riot [...]and I pulled it apart in it's entirety (ie. NOT strawmanning). Your defence equates to"But CF is scum [therefore] I'm town", which is not something I'm prepared to blindly accept.
Actually, in this case your plan was to base things on how people react to kdowns. Not how they react to you. Again, saying you're town because you're town because you're town doesn't work.In post 218, Brandi wrote:Secondly, I most certainly CAN base my reads off of how people react to my townplay. Just because others may not know my alignment doesn't mean I don't know my own. Of course I'm going to base things on how they react to me.
Geez, I'd better stop hopping all over what you're saying and deny my better instincts, because clearly I'd be scum for doing so.In post 218, Brandi wrote:Scum always like to hop all over the things I say, tunnel me hard, and end up being scum, because they think that they can get me lynched or that I'm an easy target. (Oddly enough I never get mislynched, though I have been left alive by scum until end game to lose) I'm not afraid of votes or pressure, and even if I were to be lynched somehow it would make the scum that much more obvious.
Literally the total opposite of my reads stop being grade A 100% wrongIn post 245, Kthxbye wrote:In post 238, InflatablePie wrote:...plus having a very bad read on me (usually indicative of reckscum)...
Scum really don't have reads...care to explain this thought?
Also, Brandi is completely purple. Called it early and the ugly elephant keeps piling on posts full of reasons she's anti-blue.
Then again, so is kdowns. Who to lynch first, who to lynch first......
Also, popp is blue team too. yay!
The idea that walls of text are antitown could not be more wrong. The more words a person says the more information we have and the more easily we can judge them. But thinking this is not scummy and yall are scummy for thinking so (popp, ipie).In post 267, Brandi wrote: @PoPP: Okay, sorry then. I feel like the only way for you to understand how my mind works is to have played with me before. It feels pretty anti-town to argue back and forth on points neither party will agree with while simultaneously clogging up pages with a bunch of eyesores that will only help scum to hide out and be ignored. I don't want to argue with you because I think you'r town, and townvstown arguments that take up a lot of space are just REALLY bad.
Somewhere between this post and the next one I wrote down "esurio is both right as fuck and town as fuck".
Not a direct response just to this post but this prompted the following thought: I know I shouldn't suspect every single person who wants to vote Brandi but god you are all doing it in such terrible ways.In post 328, Ankamius wrote:What the hell, guys. I was gone for TWO HOURS and suddenly there's 5 more pages to read.
I've skimmed up to page 12 or so, but I'm more firm on my choice of Brandi-scum today. I'll get something up when I'm not in class, since I don't know when I'll be leaving here for the day. Panzer can wait until tomorrow, definitely.
kdowns disappearing is actually interesting and is the first remotely scummy thing he's done. But anyway this post is more reasonable than kthx's other posts, I don't mind him as much when he's at least thinking a little rather than overridden by some sort of id monster screaming "KDOWNS IS SCUM AND EVERYONE NOT VOTING HIM IS DUMB!!!11"In post 333, Kthxbye wrote:
I disagree with just writing it off as it being a busy thread. I've see far too often that when scum come under such heat so quickly, they tend to /logout and just ignore the thread for awhile. Thus my vote is still on kdowns.In post 329, Brandi wrote:
I think that it's barely been a day since kdowns last posted and the thread has just been moving fast by people who have free time (like mysself)In post 326, Kthxbye wrote:sigh...Brandi, stop posting for awhile. Whenever I read your posts all I read is "I'm scum, I'm scum, I'm scum, I'm scum, I'm scum, I'm scum"
What do you think of kdowns coming in, posting, getting heat for it and then disappearing? Specifically the disappearing part.
also just curious if you think Im scum scum scum why are you asking me stop being scummy? Do you not like scum being obvious scum? what is your objective here? That stance feels pretty anti-town to me.
As for asking you to stop posting, I mainly want you to stfu for a little bit so half the players who haven't posted anything to reads on will feel like they can post. Look at your activity post and tell me you don't think we would all benefit from you unplugging your keyboard.
Claims to have a "scum read on Panzer" after the aforementioned's like literally one post. You do a lot of jumping to big conclusions based on a little data, I don't think I would ever want to lynch someone exclusively for one post unless it was a lot worse than the infamous nolynch post.In post 339, Ankamius wrote:
Really? I find giant walls of text a lot easier to ignore. Quote stripes tend to break up text into really small chunks which compels me to read them.In post 297, Brandi wrote:Giant walls of text are more distarcting and detrimental to the town than quote stripes.
---
Getting decent town reads on Kise and Kthxbye right now for today's posts. Scum reads on Brandi and Panzerjager.
Dramonic is a light scum read for basically tunnelling on anti-TH and Brandi-town without providing anything else so far.
Venmar is giving me a light town vibe.
VoidedMafia has town vibes. Primarily gut.
TehBrawlGuy is probably town.
A lot of others are virtually null, primarily because of either fluff or lack of anything posted.
This game is just hard to read because of all these random tangents that aren't leading anywhere.
I'd especially like to see more from kdowns, Venmar, ActionDan, dramonic, d3x, and a few others.
PEdit: @popp: esuriospiritus is a she.
Also, that was the first post you made since #200 that didn't fall under one of these categories:
1. Arguing with Brandi or focusing on her in general
2. Arguing with esuriospiritus about random crap (kdowns, her vote, ???), although I guess technically it would fall here after all.
3. Fluff
By my count, that's 21 posts. We get now that you think Brandi is scum. What are you going to achieve by continuing on this same train of thought until everyone falls asleep listening to it? Other things have happened in the past 150 pages. I want to know what your thoughts on them are. It would be infinitely better than whatever fight you're having with esurio that isn't going anywhere. A read on her would be a good start, since I don't recall seeing one.
Kise's 341 and this post are solid entries into the game even though I heavily disagree on nearly every single thing.In post 347, Kise wrote:
This was actually a pretty interesting catch up. Not much else I want to quote but it gave some good reads.In post 276, Kise wrote:
I should clog up the thread after a solid plan has been presented? I didn't see any flaws other than "maybe the mod has a monkey wrench in place!"In post 52, Andrius wrote:Oh yeah
The only one I agree with as being scummy is Kise from Pie's list, only because Kise NoLynched and didn't say anything else.
esurio hasn't posted yet and do not pursue reck at this point. I like what I see atm.
So I'll read the 10 pages or whatever it is when I catch up and let's see how much of it is useful. Starting the clock at 8:15 pm EST
look at that, 2 ninjas already I BET THIS IS A SPAMMY GAME
Gonna say here that I find you and popp town, and kind of drifted away from reading the walls. Sorry popp, just don't think you're onto anything against Brandi, and your rebuttal didn't show any definitely inconsistency with her. I admit I had to read her posts again to be sure she wasn't scumfucking up.In post 291, Brandi wrote:GIANT WALLS OF TEXT WITH TOWN ARGUING BACK AND FORTH ABOUT NULL POINTS THAT NO ONE IS GOING TO AGREE WITH HURTS THE TOWN AND DOESN'T HELP ANYONE AT ALL EVER.
..In post 304, InflatablePie wrote:it takes me longer to comprehend Image
Toaster?
Gimme head til I'm deadIn post 318, InflatablePie wrote:disclaimer: I am usually bad at reading esurio surprisingly
Hm?In post 345, pieceofpecanpie wrote: wait for an apology.
unvote; vote Kdowns
Got Kd and esu as scum. I'm also looking at KTB, Andy and Panz with weak scumreadings - I'd rather see more from them instead of voting any of them right now. When we're done THing and blowing our ults, I think attacking (if not lynching) the lurkers is a sound strat, but ofc TH or do whatever else by all means if you want to.
Still a fan of the way CF is going at kdowns. Further scumpoints for everyone else who is still attacking him for reasons other than these.In post 353, CF Riot wrote:
Not what I'm saying. I have no reason to believe there is more than 1 scumteam this game. I also strongly believe the actual scumteam is purple. What I was trying to say about kdowns is he (as purple scum) could have made the post referencing a red teamIn post 199, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Roughly translated CF Riot: kdowns is likely scum and part of a "red team", because if he didn't have this knowledge he would've done what most LoL players would do and assuming that the team opposing blue is purple.knowing the scumteam was purplein an attempt to fake a townslip, which is to say he was trying to gain towncred by saying something scum would know is false.
In post 200, esuriospiritus wrote:color-blind mode?
I don't feel this adequately excuses his statement. I understand in this mode the health bars above creeps and such change colors, however the creeps themselves, towers, and nexus are all still blue and purple. Plus the role PM doesn't say "green team", AND we can't forget kdowns didn't just imply a red team, he was suggesting a possible second town team or 3rd party and a scumteam consisting of junglers or jungle creeps. So at worst, I feel he's trying to plant misinformation and deceptively gain towncred, but even at best he's posting useless setup spec which, unlike the towerhugging discussion, is unprovoked at this point in the game.In post 216, Bella wrote:Colorblind mode
This is some tongue-tied, scum fumbling if I've ever seen it.In post 195, Brandi wrote:No I suggested that there are people on the Kdowns wagon that are likely scum and that it's probably within the two people that I listed, I never specifically stated that it as because of the wagon they were scummy.
However, anyone being on the wagon is slightly scummy by default, regardless of their reasons, because there is no legitimate reason to be on it.
Let's go, Brandi. Make a case on me bby. It may have been implied but humor me because I don't know which vote this post is referencing. And I'm sure you've got more than this to throw at me.In post 218, Brandi wrote:His vote was terrible. His reasons were terrible and scummy.
If I'm wrong and Brandi is town, Venmar are Esu look like whiteknighting scum. Alternatively I could also see Venmar just looking at Brandi through rose tinted glasses cause she has sort of a "popular girl" presence on this site. Despite having scumreads on both Venmar and Brandi independently I feel they are less likely to be scum together for this post.In post 222, Venmar wrote:Right now I doubt Brandi is scum. Call it gut.
I think IPie is town. I think Popp's arguments with Brandi aren't the best, but I kinda see the thought process so leaning town. KTB is one to watch, I find him hard to read as of now. Lean town on Kise, his thought process is sort of similar to mine. Dram, Reck and Anakimus are the other names I remember seeing more than once but haven't really formed an opinion on any of them.
Someone explain the Panzer votes to me. I feel like he only had 1-2 posts and I think the controversial one was him voting no-lynch. Someone tell me if there's more to it than that or why this is important.
Okay, I think I understand your thought process a bit more now. Still not much to base a vote on.In post 356, Ankamius wrote:It's not only the no lynch vote.
"Brandi could be the scums but i think no-lynching is better than mislynching." This reeks. It was after kdowns made his 'slip' as well, so there's enough content there to have SOMETHING to add to the game. My initial vote was basically pressure, but I decided to switch gears after he announced V/LA because I know that it would never get anywhere.
The no lynch thing had pretty much died down for a while before that (that I can see), so it really came out of left field that he would make a post like that. Speaking of which, I still don't see the sense behind no lynch in the first place.
Nope, kdowns 138 still doesn't read as that upset. You're leagues ahead of other kdowns voters but still bad.In post 359, Andrius wrote:a big long wall
"Hey enough about me everyone look at random lurker I'm pulling out of thin air!"In post 363, Venmar wrote:I think Kdowns is more likely town than scum. I've had a facepalm moment when I saw his comment, but really it sounded so out of the blue I can't pin it on to him as either townie or scummy, but if I had to say one of them I would say townie simply because i don't think scum would say that even as a gambit.
I can't really comment on everything, but I didn't consider the wagon a problem or point of interest until recently. I feel like if Kdowns is town then his wagon possesses at least 1 or 2 opportunistic scum that I don't think can pick out just yet.
I'm curious, what does everyone think of Bella? Am I the only one with some sort of scum vibes coming from this slot?
If you have 3 suspects Y U NO VOTEIn post 397, TehBrawlGuy wrote:(the assertion that voting isn't important for xyz reasons)
You give a reason but it sucks, voting is protown because it allows for easier lategame analysis and it is not the case that people only care about a given player's vote if it doesn't move much. I dunno about you but I feel more pressured based mostly on the number of votes I have rather than the "strength" of said votes. Though I do tend to care less if the votes are from players I've written off as morons.
In post 438, Kthxbye wrote:
Sorry, even with confusing purple with red, it explicitly states that blue teams win condition is when purple (red) team is eliminated. No way you can confuse that with meaning purple could be another town team.In post 102, kdowns wrote:Where does it say that Blue is Town and Red is Scum? I am think that Red and Blue might be two different Town Teams and Mafia could possibly be Jungle since it said 'Ganks"?
This is some damn hard pushing over what basically amounts to nothing. Applies to some posts nearby 438 as well. Calm down and talk about something else FFS. Though Zepher leading the kthx wagon does earn him some points, I have to admit there's a good chance I'd be on it at this point. At this point hypothetical Day 1 Ceph is voting for popp, Ank or kthx. Strongest town reads on esurio, Brandi, CF Riot.In post 457, Kthxbye wrote:
Wrong wrong so very wrong.In post 455, MrZepher wrote:@Kthnx
Assuming that you've been playing the game long enough in colorblind to assume the teams are REDvBLUE it would make sense that he would automatically assume purple=3rd party. Since the only other team in League that would make sense are neutral monsters I can see where his misconceptions lye (lie?).
Yes, this has to assume that he didn't properly read the OP and his role PM but I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt with things that I can admit that I've done.
It was entirely possible for the game to not be run 100% like you would expect it. It IS a mafia game. It's just taking the theme of League of Legends. That doesn't mean it's not going run like a normal mafia game. Do you see what I'm getting at here? YES Kdowns was an idiot, but he had every right to ask questions about the setup. There's no tell there. Get over it.
If you switched to color blind mode on your first game of LoL ever, that would have absolutely zero to do with fucking up a blue team role PM. Period.
blah blah blah,member of blue team
**
blah blahPurple team eliminated
^You literally can't fuck that up if you are on the blue team. There is zero room for thinking anything other than that in this game, even though its mafia scum, purple is the enemy of blue and thus purple is the scum team. None, what-so-ever. That is the only conclusion and that's not even taking into account this specific themed game rules!
No way that he has a blue team WINCON. If he isn't purple team, he certainly isn't blue thus he needs to die.
That's not even the whole case on him either. 3 people pick up on this and he freaks out. Then, most recently, we get the super OMGUSy post:
There is zero town perspective coming from any of his posts.kdowns wrote:KTB, you're really are try hard scum aren't you?
I MAKE IDIOTIC MISTAKES ALL THE DAMN TIME.
Giving him the benefit of the doubt as a blue team member is stupid at best...your continual defense of him is noted."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Pages 21-40
Those two sentences read exactly the same to me. This line of questioning is a bit scummy for both TBG and Kise, one of them really needed to say "shut up I'm done let's move on" sooner. TBG is worse though because his argument sucks.In post 507, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
1) Panz's stances are what's concerning about him, his votes are merely indicators of them. You claim to be able to read me just fine, as seen by your vote on me. Your point is?In post 504, Kise wrote:
It's not limited to who's BEING voted. We can read Panz via his voting pattern.In post 495, TehBrawlGuy wrote:1) Because I have not yet seen anyone but kdowns react to a wagon on them.
I was answering esu's question to argue my point about Venmar. Shut the fuck up with this.In post 495, TehBrawlGuy wrote: FUD = Fear, Uncertainy, Doubt. He's spreading paranoia and worry, essentially.
We can only ult once. Once you hit level 5 and bust that nut, you only have the other actions. There's no need to TH for the sake of leveling up at that point. Survival needs to be considered.In post 495, TehBrawlGuy wrote:So, would you be in line with a plan of "TH all game, only come out to ult or use other strong abilities."? Do you think we would stop all ganks if we all THed all game?
I'm fine with KTB & Pan wagons. Multi-way bus on D1 is not out of the question (Gay Mafia II).
2) There are literally a thousand other ways you could have said that. My first impression was that Ven made an off-the-cuff remark and it was nothing to be concerned with. Someone with no outside knowledge wouldneverhave posted"I'm not concerned with Ven thinking about TPs, because maybe the mods are trying to hide the possibility of them existing with how they worded our wincon."; they would have said something more like"I'm not concerned with Ven thinking about TPs, since the way our PMs are worded doesn't rule them out". The difference is that the former is either coming from the mindset of someone whoknowsthere are TPs, or someone who intends to FUD up the town with TP scares, as you continue to do.
Antitown.In post 511, Kthxbye wrote:FTR, my vote isn't moving from kdowns today.
Please continue to regale me with your refreshing perspective and insightful contributionsIn post 530, ActionDan wrote:no reason just kthx feels townie
Posting is never anti-town D:In post 537, Brandi wrote:Zepher I haven't been absent, I just haven't been posting 24/7 as before. My incessant posting was anti-town and I don't want to clog up the thread needlessly. I've said what I needed to say and I'm voting for who I need to vote for.
My thoughts are that while Kthx isn't the towniest of players, Panzer is infinitely more scummy and I'd even bet that if Panzer is scum kth is more than likely town.
Why would any alignment ever say this... it literally sounds like you're excited to be lynched. Guilty conscience or fed up with the game?In post 543, Kthxbye wrote:
Why not? Someone has to die, as long as I'm not quick hammered I'm fine with it. Just needs a few more votes....In post 526, Voidedmafia wrote:
I don't think the one getting wagoned is allowed to talk about his wagon like this...In post 525, Kthxbye wrote:Hush, I like it just fine for now.
This is somewhat accurate. Panzer's hop onto kthx did not look very good.In post 557, Ankamius wrote:UNVOTE: Brandi
VOTE: Panzerjager
This guy is scum. Guaranteed. Put him and me into a double iso and look at #470. His Kthx vote is really bad. I have a really hard time believing that after being gone for a lot of the game, he would both have valid suspicion on Kthx as well as not understand why I find him scummy as shit after I explained it twice. The second post was a short and basic summary, but my point stands. The vote is only worse by the fact that 4 of the 5 votes before his own were within 15 posts before his own.
Sorry for not keeping my promise on putting thoughts out on Kthxbye yesterday. I'm lazy and easily distracted.
"I can't hear you lalalalala"In post 559, Kthxbye wrote:Z: Don't bother arguing any of the points I've made against your case. Not going to clog up the thread trying to make the blind see something they don't want to see and have to swallow pride long enough to admit they are wrong. Do however address my question about your p550 and how it's not completely coaching Panz.
Knowing Zepher is scum this becomes kind of interesting. It sounds like he doesn't want to get into a prolonged argument, but I'd think he *would* want to if they were scumbuddies. As I write this up with knowledge of the coming pages, kthx's interactions with Zepher are pretty much his only redeeming quality at this point.
Thinking about pairings on day 1 is pointless and distracting. You're useless.In post 575, InflatablePie wrote:unvote
some questions for the class:
out of kthx, kdowns, and panzer: who is most likely to be scum?
does anyone think it's possible all three are scum? two? is anyone certain only one can be scum?
does anyone have buddies for any of the three (and reasons why)?
is there another player who's been heavily focused that should be added to this list? was going to add brandi but I might be biased
Would Zepherscum end this post the way he does if d3x is his scumbuddy? Well, on the yes side, he's likely to notice if his scumbuddy isn't around, but on the no side, he probably wouldn't then post it if so. I say this earns d3x some town points.In post 577, MrZepher wrote:Ank
He knows how to play this game.
@pie
As far as buddies go CF is scum in Kthnx flips scum. Associative tells based on Kthnx pretty much ignoring CF while CF has been drawing a lot of his own opinions from Kthnx.
I could go more into detail and bringing up specific posts but I'm not going to pursue it until either one of them flips. It's a waste of time otherwise.
Idk about Panzer. Hasn't said much so there's no real way to discern associations.
Why the sudden change in play?
Where is d3x?
This.In post 583, esuriospiritus wrote:...nevermind, I'm not on my phone anymore and can read isos >_>
I'd like to point out for the class inthat kthxbye hasBIG FUCKING BOLD LETTERSEvery single one. This is as recently as post 558, a mere two iso-posts ago.LITERALLY CALLED EVERY OTHER POTENTIAL WAGON THAT ISN'T HIM SCUM.
Kthxbye just wants to see someone, anyone die that isn't him. Can we kill it with fire yet?
This isn't a good mindset. Slowrolling your suspicions in order to wait until your point is more poignant is scummy. Town post what they're thinking when they're thinking it.In post 594, kdowns wrote:Kise, You're wrong. I waited for something I can actually nail him for. Trying to call me scum because my wagon never took off? That's Horseshit, and you know it.
Also, I never gave up on the game. I was just really busy which I did state in my last response to KTB which was about my response to you. Kinda like this 2 on 1 action here.
Literally every case in this post is complete garbage. Especially Kdowns and Bub.In post 605, Kthxbye wrote:Alrighty, time for some analysis. Enjoy.
Kdowns:
Spoiler:
Bub:
Spoiler:
Panz:
Spoiler:
MrZ:
Although wrong about me, I have a town read on him. p577 specifically doesn't come from scum as I don't see him making a point about CF being scum if I'm scum if he knew that I'd flip town. Not going to spend a lot of time here.
d3x:
This is his town play. Logical. All points that have been made are agreeing with strategy that is best for town and worst for scum. As town in a large game, he isn't very active in D1's.
esurios:
Spoiler:
Reck:
p591, townie Mctownerton posting at it's finest. (not sarcasm, he's town)
Kise:
Not sure why he's on my wagon except to be on the largest wagon. Can't get a good read on him. Leaning town atm. Anyone else have an opinion of Kise?
CFRiot:
p522andp527, I don't like these one bit. Although I agree with the words (my wagon is baaaad), in these 2 posts, it looks like he's trying to separate himself from what looks like at this time the probable mis-lynch. He doesn't make an attempt to explain why my wagon is bad, just that it's bad. I read these as trying to run the fine line of not making comments that will make him look like he knows I'm a mis-lynch while trying to distance himself FROM the mislynch.
Also, in the ISO there are no comments on Panz poor play while sticking to kdowns poor play. Welcome to my scum list. Look here if Panz flips scum.
Brandi:
Aside from what I've already said about her...
p271, Using vote counts to prove not scum? Not sure what to think of this, but it's, what did esurio say earlier?, a logical fallacy.
p476, Wants to be on my wagon, but Panz looks scummier. This I actually read as more town than scum. Would have been easy for her to jump onto a mislynch instead of going after scum.
All in all, I may be leaving her in my possible scum pile because I'm stubborn. She's certainly not a lynch I'd support today anymore.
This. Esurio is still town as fuck.In post 611, esuriospiritus wrote:
Sounds like I'm doing something right.In post 605, Kthxbye wrote:This chick pisses me off.also, awfully convenient you start calling me scummy after I hop on your wagon. You sure seem to have an awful lot of scumspects for pretty tenuous reasons, which really isn't doing anything to help defend you against my earlier point that you just want someone to die that isn't you.
I don't think venmar is scum(my enough to warrant a vote). Why are you trying to deflect?
Oh please, there's no way you can actually think kdowns and kthx are mutually bussing, right? I understand that's a thing, but kthx has talked about almost nothing else since the legendary post 102.In post 619, Kise wrote:
So there we go. KD calls you scum and doesn't vote cus it wasn't a sure bus yet.In post 613, Kthxbye wrote:
I was actually at 1.In post 593, Kise wrote:I just checked, KTB was only at 4 votes at the time of this quote.
Not even remotely.In post 636, Kthxbye wrote:In post 631, esuriospiritus wrote:
"LITERALLY EVERYONE IS SCUM" - kthxbyeIn post 629, Kthxbye wrote:
What a weak ass way to continue the push of my mislynch. Why not comment on anything else? Did I peg too many of your scumbuddies or something?In post 624, InflatablePie wrote:so I actually skimmed kthx's post and the kdowns section in particular is so much of a stretch that I'm lacking a witty analogy for it
willing to proxy my vote for a witty comment, provided the vote is proxied onto kthx.
also kise stop being bad at this game
^ that's not even that much of a misrep at this point
seriously
Yes you moron, people pushing for my mislynch is in fact scummy.
I don't think kthx is being as hyperaggressive as you claim, and more importantly I don't actually care.In post 677, d3x wrote:
It has a lot to do with knowing him iRL for something like 20 years. The way he plays his Town game is always more scummy. He's a lot more brash, snarky, and aggressive. I don't think I've read/played in a game where as Town, he wasn't almost {or all the way} MisLynched. He usually runs up a really fast Wagon and Scum inevitably jump at it as it seems like an easy out. Unless he's playing countermeta {which I highly doubt}, his Scum game is much more palatable and pliable. My read on him isn't foolproof, but I don't really have any doubts atm.In post 675, MrZepher wrote:What makes you think Kthnx isn't scum exactly?
Holy balls is this post the absolute worst ever. This post is deserving of the votes it gets.In post 695, Bitmap wrote:I think InflatablePie and Reck are townish for now. I'm going by post count.
I think Brandi is null. She's been driven up a wall really badly and reacts weirdly.
Okay, I'll be totally honest. This is a clusterfuck. I have no idea what is going on. Stop posting shitty walls of texts that have no relevance to actual scumhunting. I can't be assed to read Brandi's novel.
With that being said, I think I'll vote kthxbye. He seems kinda iffy.
VOTE: kthxbye
Please just lynch someone gaise.
The case on you is leagues better than either of those cases at this point as it's the only one that isn't completely terrible. Nope nope nope nopeIn post 698, Kthxbye wrote:@Bub and esur: First of all, of course I'm damn suspicious of every vote on my wagon. Fucking duh. Pull your heads out your asses and use some common fucking sense. Let's pretend you magically were in the lead wagon. Where would you look for scum if you were town? Oh shit, I'm betting you'd look at your wagon first.
Let's look at the facts from my perspective. I'm town, my wagon and the cases against me are shit compared to kdowns and Panz body of posts which are nowhere near coming from a town mindset. My wagon obviously has scum on it.
You can see perfectly well that it's an exaggeration and pretending otherwise is scummy.In post 698, Kthxbye wrote:Secondly, very nice try at misrepping me! Seriously, commendable /golfclap. Let's look at my wagon: MrZepher, Bub Bidderskins, Dramonic, esuriospiritus, Panzerjager, Kise, kdowns (7)
Now, let's look at those I'm calling scummy for good reason (as outlined in p605): Bub Bidderskins, esuriospiritus, Panzerjager, kdowns (4) That's only 1/2 of of the pile of people on my wagon that I find most suspicious. This is the 1/2 where scum are likely hiding.
Then, I go on to show suspicion of people NOT on my wagon for good reason (also found in p605): CFRiot and to an extent Brandi
Oh shit, did I just call you out on your blantant bullshit of "So basically everybody on your wagon is scum."? Why, yes, yes I did.
Am I saying everyone I'm calling scummy is going to flip scum? No. I'm pointing out posts that look scummy in reference to my wagon and the reasons they are scummy. ZOMG, I think that's called scum hunting not "flailing".
As has been pointed out, this entire post basically just says "guys no I'm town".In post 698, Kthxbye wrote: At town on my wagon, look at the posts of both myself and those who I'm calling out as scummy. Now ask yourself, which of those are actively using the information to find scum and which are blindly pushing for my mislynch (or in some cases vocally saying I'm not a good wagon but not looking for scum ON my wagon). Get with the program.
At the scum on my wagon, please, by all means, keep pushing it and misrepping me. Continue to try and ignore me as town. Continue to ignore the person who's known me 20+ years telling you that this is my town posting style. It will make things easier for town to win.
I'm reading d3x as town at this time which makes his read of me as town legit. Even if he were scum and I'm reading him horribly, is scum him going to call me town when I'm town? If he's scum, doing so would gain him at best a 1 for 1 trade (he flips scum, people think I'm his scumbuddy...I flip before him, people say he's scum who knew I was town). Why completely ignore his read of me either way?
Use your brains and lynch scum Panz today. Would also be willing to lynch kdowns or Bub.
kthxbye
This is a really bizarre reaction. After flipping at everyone on his wagon, someone joins it in the actual scummiest manner of all time and gets a warm welcome and pushing for some thoughts? What the actual fuck? Diescumdie and if you flip scum this is almost worth lynching Bitmap for on its own.In post 699, Kthxbye wrote:
Bitmap, nice of you to join us.In post 695, Bitmap wrote:I think InflatablePie and Reck are townish for now. I'm going by post count.
I think Brandi is null. She's been driven up a wall really badly and reacts weirdly.
Okay, I'll be totally honest. This is a clusterfuck. I have no idea what is going on. Stop posting shitty walls of texts that have no relevance to actual scumhunting. I can't be assed to read Brandi's novel.
With that being said, I think I'll vote kthxbye. He seems kinda iffy.
VOTE: kthxbye
Please just lynch someone gaise.
What are your thoughts of Panz. Is he "kinda iffy" too? What about in the event I am town? Who's the likely scum on my wagon? How bout Panz's wagon? If he were to flip town, who's the likely scum on it? Also, reverse that and if either of us is scum, do you think scum are bussing at this point? If so, who?
WutIn post 741, InflatablePie wrote:townasfuck:
Bella
VoidedMafia
pieceofpecanpie
town I guess:
Ankamius
d3x
MrZepher
TehBrawlGuy
kdowns
Kise
idklol:
Venmar
Bub Bidderskins
Bitmap
ActionDan
CF Riot
Dramonic
scummeh:
Panzerjager
Esuriospiritus
Andrius
Brandi
xRECKONERx
kthxbye
me:
InflatablePie
Just....wut
Not helpful.In post 818, Bella wrote:
The old gut feeling, entirely useless to the rest of the team but often the only way to express how and why you feel about someone's alignment.In post 536, Voidedmafia wrote:
Helpful. Very helpful.In post 530, ActionDan wrote:no reason just kthx feels townie
How is that all you have to say about this postIn post 818, Bella wrote:
Well, this is an entirely helpful and useful post.In post 695, Bitmap wrote:I think InflatablePie and Reck are townish for now. I'm going by post count.
I think Brandi is null. She's been driven up a wall really badly and reacts weirdly.
Okay, I'll be totally honest. This is a clusterfuck. I have no idea what is going on. Stop posting shitty walls of texts that have no relevance to actual scumhunting. I can't be assed to read Brandi's novel.
With that being said, I think I'll vote kthxbye. He seems kinda iffy.
VOTE: kthxbye
Please just lynch someone gaise.
Yep. I was going to express confusion as to why you wouldn't vote Bitmap for this but then, well, you did (IIRC).In post 818, Bella wrote:Quick jump. Way to respond to kthx challenging you with about your vote for him.
Also, why bother multiquoting so many posts if your responses are going to be 80% sass and 20% content?
So it's scummy when kdowns disappears under pressure, and now you're going to do the same, deliberately and explicitly I might add, because you're mad? Die die die die die.In post 853, Kthxbye wrote: At this point, I'm done. Nobody is listening to me. My questions are being ignored either because those I ask them to are town who really think I'm scum or they are scum and don't want to be linked to whatever they would say today. kdowns and panz are both scum. If by some freak accident only 1 is scum (at LEAST one of them is scum, of this I am 100% sure and will eat all hats for all times if both are town), it's kdowns over panz.
There are plenty of people doing scummy shit all over the place in reference to my wagon and them blindly pushing it to the fullest. If the only way I actually get to contribute is through being dead and flipping for you people to actually look back through and see all the points I've made in light of me flipping town, so be it.
Expect me to magically disappear for awhile. Do what you will.
This just in: If you have a tantrum you'd better keep having it continuously for the rest of the game 'cause otherwise you're scum.In post 912, Venmar wrote:Guys, Panzers "I give up" attitude is completely gone now and now he's trying to shit the focus onto other potential wagons, if his tantrum is what made you think he is town well he isn't doing it anymore, and is trying to do the opposite. IT looks like his tantrum was all just an act.
Mad his scumbuddy is playing poorly?In post 947, MrZepher wrote:It doesn't make any sense to me that Pie would play like a fucking retard if he was scum. I know that's Wifom but I know he's not that garbage of a player to just troll and think that makes him look town. In my head it seems to me like he's playing that way for a reason; like his role is similar to that of a Jester or something (where you WANT to be targeted by negative actions). That last part was a recent development in the thought process.
Vs Panzer who's trying to play but I don't see much town motivation from most of his actions.
His little tantrum just seems like an attempt to get people to froth at the mouth or just crying about his wagon instead of giving us some reason to get onto another wagon.
There are a lot of people with bad play this game. That doesn't mean any of them are necessarily scum.
Likewise it doesn't mean they're necessarily town. Good/Bad play just shows how likely you are to be lynched.
tl;dr: Pie and Panzers intentions read differently, and I don't understand the point of your last question.
Andy do you think it's possible that you've convinced yourself Panzer is town to the point where you're not able to see the other side of the argument?
Brandi? Now? Not long after your Panzer hop, which you apparently unvoted from (because you were pressured about it?)? Ick.In post 964, Bitmap wrote:So Andy is probably town. I suggest if Panzer is a doc, then focus on Andy.
Umm, I unvoted because I started to question the wagon on Panzer.
The more I think about it, the more I think Brandi is scum. :/
VOTE: Brandi
Interesting.In post 967, MrZepher wrote:I honestly haven't even been paying attention to Bitmap.
Guess I have to now.
You sound really, really sure about this.In post 985, Andrius wrote:In post 981, Brandi wrote:Hey Andy how about you stop over-defending panzer so hard and making excuses for his one sentence posts when the only way you can know what's going through his head or in his role pm unless you're his scumbuddy.
Scum or town he has put 0 effort into his play, and honestly his motivations fit scum more than town.
You're right. I don't actually know what's going on in his head.In post 982, Brandi wrote:like seriously what town PR would want to hop onto any wagon that seemed to be getting the most attention, offer to claim at 3 votes, self vote and give little to no info on their actual claim and hardcore lurk the entire game while producing no real content or even any essence of wanting to help the town at all. He literally said he wanted scum to win, and that's not someone I want alive regardless of their alignment.
But that does NOT mean I'm going to sit by and let some townie die while good scumbags are out there doing NOTHING while WAITING for panzer to get lynched.
But fine. Let's do it your way. Let's just see what happens. While I will NOT vote panzer I support his lynch because MAYBE THEN, MAYBE ONCE HE'S DEAD WE CAN FINALLY START LOOKING FOR SCUM.
Kthx is now my top suspect. D1 Ceph is now 100% voting him. Bitmap is also very scummy here. Popp and Ank have dropped off the face of the earth but nothing has redeemed them thus far. I was slightly suspicious of d3x after page 20 but not as much anymore."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
First part: The trying hard was mostly done by those who were parroting you, but I still find the initial point scummy. Thanks for quoting kdowns as his statement only reinforces my point: he says "I am getting pressure on me". That is not an overblown statement, it is literally exactly what was happening.In post 2257, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Uhhh, I don't get how the point is ridiculous? You call it such and then back that up by sayingIn post 2248, Cephrir wrote:
This is a ridiculous point, but one that others will later parrot. Trying hard (the trying is mostly done in other posts) to make it sound like kdowns is reacting strongly when he isn't. Brandi agrees right after this... I don't get it, he seems calm enough to me...In post 151, pieceofpecanpie wrote:FoS@ kdowns Your reaction does not equal 3 votes. L-9??? Why are you soooo concerned, why is this pressure? Do you have anything else to say beyond this small blip of opening post and subsequent votes?"Trying hard (the trying is mostly done in other posts) to make it sound like kdowns is reacting strongly when he isn't."
My response was not focused on the idea of trying to paint kdowns as "reacting strongly" or whether he was or wasn't sounding calm, but rather on his overblown statement of pressure coming from so few votes. I think it flows just fine when looking at his post I was addressing. Incidentally he didn't speak again until #431 (12 pages later!).
So again, how is my post ridiculous?In post 149, kdowns wrote:As I stated, I read everything and then I skimmed over it again to answer my question before even asking it, but I overlooked it both times.
I am honestly on the blue team, and I find it ironic that I am getting pressure on me from one stupid question."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Yes.
This is implying that he's overreacting. He's not. Literally all he did was say that he was being pressured. The point of early game votes is pressure. Don't see what's difficult about that.popp 151 wrote:FoS @ kdowns Your reaction does not equal 3 votes. L-9??? Why are you soooo concerned, why is this pressure?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Pages 41-50, because I'm not sure if I'm gonna get to 60 tonight and I want to get this down.
Not sure whether this plan is actually good, didn't have to think about it because I knew it wasn't going to matter. But coming up with said plan gets you a few town points (Still voting you though). On the whole lynching scum when you have them is good because they have a tendency to be forgotten. Funny how the plan ends up leading to kthx's permanent agenda.In post 1013, Kthxbye wrote: Now, I've given this some thought, and if he is soraka AND on the blue team, we can actually prove he at least has heals AND make him work against the scum team. Here's how I'm thinking.
If most of us are THing and scum try and gank a TH'ed target...no kill. If scum AA someone (abilities aside, this is the only way they are going to control getting kills at night), that can come to light D2 as whoever was AA'ed has no reason to not say so (since scum will know who they targeted with AA's or damaging abilities, town should know too). Come N2, if Panz heals that person, good, it's working against scum. If he doesn't, easy lynch D3. If Panz is scum soraka, then he will have to continually work against his team to keep up the facade. If Panz is town soraka, then scum have to decide if they want to gank someone (since he will be healing and not TH'ing) who looks scummy. Win win for town I think.
So, all aboard kdowns.
CF Riot: Still town.In post 1025, CF Riot wrote:
This is brilliant for D1 in a 22 player large and I feel certain it will be ignored by many people or someone will suddenly decide to hammer Panzer soon.In post 1013, Kthxbye wrote:Now, I've given this some thought, and if he is soraka AND on the blue team, we can actually prove he at least has heals AND make him work against the scum team. Here's how I'm thinking.
If most of us are THing and scum try and gank a TH'ed target...no kill. If scum AA someone (abilities aside, this is the only way they are going to control getting kills at night), that can come to light D2 as whoever was AA'ed has no reason to not say so (since scum will know who they targeted with AA's or damaging abilities, town should know too). Come N2, if Panz heals that person, good, it's working against scum. If he doesn't, easy lynch D3. If Panz is scum soraka, then he will have to continually work against his team to keep up the facade. If Panz is town soraka, then scum have to decide if they want to gank someone (since he will be healing and not TH'ing) who looks scummy. Win win for town I think.
I really doubt we can convince this town to lynch kdowns still but I admire your persistence. There are several places I would put my vote that aren't Panzer. I'm pretty much just waiting for any of them to gain steam.
Swing and a miss.In post 1031, Kthxbye wrote:
^That's how.In post 1030, kdowns wrote:HOW AM I FUCKING CONFIRMED SCUM?
Okay, this is actually kinda fair.In post 1032, esuriospiritus wrote:CF Riot just moved to my possiblescum list. His latest post just pings my 'dar insomany ways, most noticeably where he basically says "hey, there are lots of people I'd like to vote, but I don't want to be the one sticking my neck out to make any cases on them or anything." and the rest of his play has been fairly reactive as well. I get the vibe that he's just trying to coast.
Although CF comes up with counterexamples, he also does do a lot of wishing for wagons to come to him. Kind of a TBG-esque stance on voting I guess.In post 1040, esuriospiritus wrote:
But see, there you go doing it again. You complain that there's no real momentum, but have you don't anything in an effort toIn post 1039, CF Riot wrote:The only reason my vote has been stuck on kdowns is because there has been no real momentum towards anyone else I would like to lynch since I voted him.createthe momentum you want to see or are you just sitting back and expecting someone else to do the real work for you?
Unless you can quote me somewhere where you've done this, my original point stands.
Interesting how he dismisses Bitmap here (under false pretenses- it's very different) then later ends up voting Bitmap. Not completely sure what to make of the interactions.In post 1045, MrZepher wrote:That's not even a good post so I'm going to ignore it.
Explain some reasoning behind your little list there and I'd be more inclined to investigate (in fact I'd look into it as soon as it was posted!)
But you can't so you won't so I'm not going to continue to waste my time trying to convince myself you might be town.
Esurio has it spot on with CF
You guys are trying to lynch Bitmap for the same reasons we could have lynched Riot ages ago. I could be wrong, but that how it appears to me at this time.
@VF
I wasn't saying Pie IS a Jester, I was trying to make the point that he's acting the way he is intentionally (durr) in order to draw in night actions. Therefore he should just be ignored for now. It's a distraction and a waste of time to pursue him. Do you get the point I'm making now?
Hm. Okay, let's investigate post 1054.In post 1057, Kthxbye wrote:
@Ank: At least Void had the where-with-all to plan D2 out in regards to a flip. You just go setting up my lynch regardless of Panz alignment. Speaking of which, if Panz does flip town, p1054 looks a hell of a lot like you already knew. You're off the hook if he flips scum though.
Yeah no how could he sound any less like he knows Panzer will flip town.In post 1054, Ankamius wrote:Yeah, I'm 100% willing to off kthx once Panzer is dead. I don't even have to look him up anymore than I already have. Regardless of Panzer's alignment, I'll be taking a good look at d3x if Kthx flips scum at any point.
This makes me want to policy lynch you. Although this is done in kind of a townie manner, I feel like scum get away with quickhammering way too often.
I know it's been said but I still can't not say it. Are *you* seriously criticizing that wagon after doing *literally nothing ever*? I lol'd. Scum points (not to mention Zepher does exactly the same thing, although at least he was *playing*.)In post 1084, ActionDan wrote:that was the dumbest lynch.
who the hell said that he was the doc for the scum-team?
Such a ridiculous statement had to have been made by scum
Asking 700 questions is neither contributing nor scumhunting. Classic way to score free town points. None from me, sir. Also fishing for amount of damage taken is scummy.In post 1112, Kthxbye wrote:ADp1084: I agree that the lynch was dumb. I proposed a strategy that would both confirm Panz was Soraka and use him regardelss of alignment...it got shot down. Even with it, Panz wanted to be lynched thus he was. I was one of the players who said that even if he was Soraka, that didn't mean he was on blue team. It's still true. Claiming a champ isn't going to put you on one team or another in this set-up so saying that thought only comes from scum is dumb.
Bubp1085: More 'kthxbye is scum' posts...continue to push that and do literally nothing else. Super town motivated right there.
Kisep1086: I'm sitting at full health though that should be obvious since I asked the question to begin with. Do you find something scummy about the questions in p1083. If so, explain why.
Bellap1087: Why Bitmap again? Does any of the information we have gained add to the case on him? How?
Ankp1088: What info do you think we gained from lynching Panz that out weighs the hit to the blue team?
Reckp1091: Was it damage or some other sort of pewpew? Was it high or low damage (exact numbers prolly not needed at this juncture)? Was there any other affect that you are aware of or just damage? Do you think scum or town hit you?
Andp1092: That makes sense I suppose. I had a question into Ank about it, but your explanation makes sense. Only thing is, if we were to have followed my plan of proving he was Soraka and made him work for town, we could have postponed his lynch. Someone did some AtF surrounding my plan saying something about maybe he's got a super awesome Ult and just needs to push the lane or something to discredit my plan. Will look into that after this post.
Also, do you think town or scum pewpew'ed Reck (and Void for that matter)?
ADp1094: Dude, he claimed soraka...the whole plan for confirming himself and negating damage to town thing was me trying to use him even if he was scum soraka. Where were you yesterday when this was all going down if you feel so strongly about it now? What are your guesses at the 2-3 scum?
CFp1099: Awful...just awful
Void: Same questions to you as to Reck.
This.In post 1128, esuriospiritus wrote:PSA: If you're town and you've claimed that damage has been done to you... you're probably just making yourself a more appealing target. Stahp.
Why doesn't anyone else see this except like one person?In post 1177, Bella wrote:
Was scum yesterday, is still scum today. Still a better lynch than any of the other wagons springing up at this point.In post 1112, Kthxbye wrote:Bellap1087: Why Bitmap again? Does any of the information we have gained add to the case on him? How?
(Catching up at the moment, been busy today).
But actually. Rarely have I seen such a concerted effort at being useless.In post 1184, esuriospiritus wrote:also reck if you're going to spend the entire game being terrible, just fucking replace out or scumclaim so you can lay down and die.
I expect better from you.
"Look over there! He's worse, and you were even just talking about him!" 0/10.In post 1185, Bitmap wrote:I am back from PAX East and will get to this shortly. >:3
And how the fuck am I at 4 votes when Reck has been doing less shit than me?
Chances there's a scum or two in that list: really high. I mean outside of the fact that I already suspect 3 of those players.... yeah OK I don't know why I bothered pointing this out.In post 1195, MrZepher wrote:Reck stop being useless. And "No u" isn't anything other than a pointlessly subjective answer.
I'm okay with this lynches atm:
ActionDan, CF Riot, KTB, Bitmap, Reck
Also I think I can be convinced to lynch Kise but not over any of the listed people.
I can write more later. this is just a reminder for myself.
Agreed on IPie, sort of (not giving him a pass for being useless though). Not as convinced on Venmar's reaction, especially it being as strong as strong a tell as you seem to be suggesting.In post 1198, CF Riot wrote:IPie hammered like a boss the first chance he got and didn't bother given an excuse for it. His lack of concern for what people may think of this says town to me.
Voided reacts with "..." and another post which both imply the hammer was bad, but he doesn't tell why it's bad. He's also on the wagon, so it doesn't make sense that he should not want the hammer to drop. This tells me he knows Panz is town and is setting up to put the blame for that on IPie. Scummy.
Venmar is on the wagon and is glad the hammer dropped. He was one of the first to vote Panzer, his reaction reads as very genuine. Town.
MrZepher reacts negatively to the hammer despite being on the wagon. This tells me he knows Panz is town. Scummy.
Awfully convenient, why would you not have said that at the time?In post 1203, InflatablePie wrote:<3 you too brandimuffin
also esu, just remembered: I did say I pulled roughly 4.5% of the list out of my ass, that 4.5% happened to be Brandi because I was still confus
Hoo boy that is quite a slam dunk out of nowhere. I'm gonna go ahead and say this catapults you all the way back to neutral.In post 1211, pieceofpecanpie wrote:(case against MrZepher)
The first time I read this post I felt like it was semantics. Then I read it again and completely agreed.In post 1220, CF Riot wrote:
In joke form, you basically said "this lynch was bad," before the flip. That coming from someone who strongly felt Panz was town would make sense. Coming from you, I would expect a joke form of "yay, we lynched my scumread." It doesn't make sense to me that town would react negatively to a lynch they were pursuing.In post 1208, MrZepher wrote:Did CF seriously call out my obviously joke post as being scummy?
Really?
I'm not even going to go any further with that. You should be ashamed of yourself.
asdfjtiwerngvwr NO you didnt aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaIn post 1239, Bitmap wrote:So I think Esurio is scum. Kthx.
VOTE: esuriospiritus
And no I will not be bribed for skins.
Also, I have my ultimate. No one attacked me. What a shocker.
Hrrg. I don't think this actually gets Bitmap any points, as this is a self-preservation vote on the only other wagon, and I think just about anyone would bus the hell out of Bitmap in that situation if Bitmap were on their scumteam.In post 1238, MrZepher wrote:You can't just SAY you're town and think your argument holds any significance based on your word.
I believe I've stated this on multiple occasions.
VOTE: Bitmap
I might come back and unvote later if I'm not comfortable with the reading I've done, for now I'm too busy to read into CF and Venmar like I would like to.
(I haven't said anything about Venmar, I'm aware.)
Bitmap has done too much shuffling of peas to make them appear eaten. I don't like it. Vote goes here until I find time to put it somewhere better.
V/LA until Friday
Suspects haven't changed much. Bitmap and kthx are roughly on the same level followed by Ank."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
*yawn* can we kill you now?In post 1274, Bitmap wrote:So can I just use my ultimate tonight and you guys can kill me tonight or lynch me tomorrow?
Reply of the centuryIn post 1251, InflatablePie wrote:
I'm confus D:In post 1230, esuriospiritus wrote:@Pie: I'd meant to reply to you earlier but got sidetracked; your last few lines of your most recent post come off asincrediblydisingenuous when we've been hydraing almost every game for the last few months. I know your meta, yes, but more importantly you shouldalreadyhave known that I know your meta, so there's no way that sentence was actually written at me.
Who were you trying to fool, and why bluff?
For one, I don't see what's so wrong with town AAing. The lynch is controlled by 80%-ish town players, and an individual townie's autoattack is controlled by one solitary 100% town player. It's kind of like the point of vigs? Except this way you have the ability to change your mind later. So basically AD looks pretty scummy, and the not-even-active-lurking does not help.In post 1277, Andrius wrote:Unvote, Vote: Actiondan
Calling panzer lynch "awful as fuck" without trying to do anything about it (let alone play the gorramn game). Overplaying Panzer's roledrops, calling the wagon scum without ANY suspects AT ALL.
Calling the town Vig/AA FUNCTION "terrible" even before THE PLAN.
Against a plan that "cripples town" (it doesn't) while initially proposing the plan that cripples town.
Namely because that last post was horrendous. Yeah.
p.s. I'm currently happy with d3x, though he should vote.
While I don't necessarily agree with the plan, killing 2nd/3rd lynch targets, especially in a game chock full of useless players, seems useful in a vacuum.In post 1280, ActionDan wrote:
it was awful as fuck. People who lynch claimed docs without counterclaims D1 are reprehensible. Overplaying what roledops. He claimed Soraka, the Doc.In post 1277, Andrius wrote:Unvote, Vote: Actiondan
Calling panzer lynch "awful as fuck" without trying to do anything about it (let alone play the gorramn game). Overplaying Panzer's roledrops, calling the wagon scum without ANY suspects AT ALL.
Calling the town Vig/AA FUNCTION "terrible" even before THE PLAN.
Against a plan that "cripples town" (it doesn't) while initially proposing the plan that cripples town.
Namely because that last post was horrendous. Yeah.
p.s. I'm currently happy with d3x, though he should vote.
The wagon contains scum, the majority of them even. I have barely given more than 1-2 hours time to this game, largely due to how repugnant it had become over the span of a few days, so I can't tell you who they are. No one had stuck out as scummy for me prior.
Autoattacking is anti-town in general. Killing off people arbitrarily on the basis of them being 2nd 3rd 4th lynches (depending on how many mob squads you are planning on) entails the requirement of everyone doing what they are supposed to do when there are scum that can manipulate the outcome. Not to mention you give scum perfect information and reduces town to being forced to kill off someone because if they don't, the target might not die, causing problems the next day + suspicion would come their way if anyone learned that they went off and did their own thing. 2ndly the problem with killing people is that they die. cool beans if they are mafia, not so great if town. I don't trust popular opinion to triumph over scum's ability to affect the desired outcome in their favor.
I also resent your hyperbole in your condemnation of the strategy I presented without providing your own argument as to why you think it would be "Crippling" to implement it for 2 days.
A girl after my own heart.In post 1293, esuriospiritus wrote:seriously
I'm pretty sure AD is scum. But now he's gonna slip through the nets because people like you are gonna go "oh herpaderp he's just another clownfuck not putting effort into the game but look! he has townreads! that means he IS trying, he just doesn't havetime, poor soul. He must be town."
No. Fuck that shit. The scum clownfucks are now catching on to the fact that they can try do the same thing as the town clownfucks and just lurk all game and probably get away with it because NOBODY IN THIS GAME FUCKING CARES.
Honestly I should just replace out and leave you fucks to your own apathetic devices, but I want to win so I'm going to yell at you all until you fucking shape up instead.
This is pretty much all AD has going for him in my book right now.In post 1310, d3x wrote:side note- I'd say the ADWagon was Scum driven due to the proximity of Voting to the MrZWagon forming, but I have most of those peeps in my TownReads pile... meh.
Words straight out of my mouth.In post 1311, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
There's a reason IIoA is considered a tell. (although all tells are subject to context) I've played games as Scum where I've walked Town through optimal play, largely ignored scumhunting, and proceeded to laugh as I rode the towncred from the advice unopposed, because I didn't do anything big enough to make waves.In post 1302, Kthxbye wrote:Here is the problem with AD being scum. ALL of the strategy talk he has done is beneficial for town wincon and hindering to scum wincon. It's the same reason I see Dex as town. The basis of the argument for ad is he is lurking, not scum hunting, and isn't posting reads. Um...hi, have you met kdowns, Reck, bub?
I really do not like AD's recent posts. Look at the below:
I just have no words as to how this got posted. He just flat out said that he doesn't care about scumhunting and is largely concerned with everyone seeing him as Town . It's not like the mafia doesn't need to scumhunt and wins by being viewed as the most Town or anything...In post 1288, ActionDan wrote: scumhunting is something I've barely done in any of my town games for months now. elaborate cases and questions are a rarity nowadays. I get by by pronouncing my town reads which I pick up easily enough and by promoting a town image of myself to try to protect myself from a lynch.
What he said:
What I read:In post 1296, ActionDan wrote: And I'm one of those people that spends hours making a case. so yes. If I want to be correct. And making correct, worthwhile cases, it takes large amounts of time. Time I really don't have at the moment.
In post 1296, ActionDan wrote: I'm Scum, and I want to make sure I don't look scummy for posting a bad case, so I'm only going to post one when I can be sure it won't backfire.
His (null)reads list definitely helped cement that for me. I'd be on him right now if I didn't think the run-up on him and off MrZ was weird, but I really like him as an AA target tonight.
Just because you like to OMGUS your wagon doesn't mean everyone else feels the same way. A plyer voting for you, even if you know you're town, is never a scumtell in and of itself (unless you're esurio)-- it's about how they do it...In post 1318, Kthxbye wrote:MrZepher (4): pieceofpecanpie, CF Riot, kthxbye, TehBrawlGuy
I find it odd that you don't comment on any of those on your wagon. Why are you not looking into those on YOUR wagon if you're town? The most you have said recently is that CF should be ashamed, popp's case is shallow, and you'd be okay with my lynch.
Do you think there is scum voting you right now? If so, other than voting you, why are they scum?
Very interesting points. Good to see you trying and going after an unconventional target. I'd like to take this opportunity to say I nearly cried at your Bitmap ISO.In post 1429, InflatablePie wrote:
nah, already have been reading through the game, iso-ing everyone in a vacuum is better and I can still look at stuff in context if necessaryIn post 1427, esuriospiritus wrote:If your plan is to go through and iso everyone individually, don't you think it'd be better to instead just re-read the whole game, take notes while you're doing it, and get to read everyone in context that way?
I'd like if you could try to explain further why exactly it is you think andy is scum because as far as I can tell you disagreed with a few strategy-posts and decided to TUNNELTUNNEL from there, which isn't exactly a convincing case.
re: andy, tl;dr:
- first post is so... forced. You disagree?
- helps push the panzer lynch when it was gaining steam while staying on kdowns
- defends panzer incredibly hard once the lynch gains steam (read above comment then this again)
- pushes a plan to co-ordinate AAs: either scum gain info or everyone does what they want anyway. there is no pro-town point to this plan, looks like scum trying to gain towncred by coming up with AWESOME TOWN LEADER PLANS YEAH
- in addition to the above, wants damaged targets to claim (how does this help town if scum can AA?)
- does NOT want those AAing to claim (again, read above comment and tell me how this makes sense)
- does not want people that have not taken damage to claim
Like this post a lot, town-minded and careful analysis.In post 1466, Ankamius wrote:MrZephyr - Popp's initial case in #1211 is on the weak side. I could go into more detail if it's wanted, but this isn't conclusive for me by any stretch. D3x's #1309 is more convincing. #1317 by Popp is weak at best.
Venmar - After Panzer's lynch, he's been fine being on the sidelines and being reactive. This is off-putting, but not really enough for a vote at this point.
Kthxbye - Actions near the end of D1 are a significant source of my scumread on him. I don't really have the willpower to go through his entire ISO, but I get scum vibes every time he mentions kdowns being a top contender for a lynch. It's rather tiring to see him talk about kdowns 5x as much as MrZ, even though the latter is where his vote is at. Just ISO him and highlight kdowns, then tell me it's not confirmation bias. #1234 is only giving me a stronger scumread since he realizes that his kdowns wagon is going to be ignored, but just tunnels down on him anyway. Scumread.
CF Riot - Yeah, Brandi vote is bad. #134 is mixed town and scum vibes. I don't like #453 at all. His stance on Voided also gets set up early but doesn't really take off for several hundred posts. #522 and #547 together are giving me pause. It feels like he has a concrete stance in the former, but explains it like he's not entirely sure in the latter. He states that he voiced disagreement with the Panzer wagon in #1047, but the only posts he could possibly be thinking of is #353, #599, #1025, and #1038. The first two aren't disagreements, the third is saying that there's other people he'd like to vote first (not exactly disagreement although that post in general gives me bad vibes), and the last is just more of the same.
He also comments about how nobody really follows his opinions and forms wagons with him, then makes a weak meta argument in #1049 with the VM vote. This would have been a great time to go through all your reasons why VM is scum. It's very warying that he's suddenly calling the Panzer wagon a false wagon here as well, since the only real read he ever gave about Panzer (and his disagreement argument is weak at best) is that he could be scum. Overall scumread.
TehBrawlGuy - He's hard to read for me. I'll put him on the backburner and take a look at him later
Bitmap - Scummy for #718, #841, #871, #886, #894, #1185, #1274. Out of the pile of useless people, he's the scummiest overall.
Kise - Nothing he says really stands out for me. Unless someone can point me to something significant, I'm not going to read through his entire ISO. I was waiting to post this so I could see what ActionDan has so I could look through with more focus, but it's obvious now that I'm not going to get an answer to this.
Andrius - Very minor scum vibes on his first post of D1. I looked for when he voted after that initial Brandi vote, and found that he voted kdowns in #359 for his reaction. I actually find that really weak and it's giving me bad vibes. Fluff is null, but get minor town vibes from his admitting the vote is bad. Overall scum read up to this point. CFRiot vote is townish. Null/town on most posts after that until #938, which gives me a bad feeling in my gut. Otherwise, his Bitmap and ActionDan pressure read town.
Overall Andy is pretty much null. There's plenty of people I'd like gone before him.
pieceofpecanpie - Cases in day 2 read fairly town. I didn't have any particular suspicion outside of my initial 'clash' with him, which wasn't that conclusive in of itself. Overall on the town side; he's one of those people I'm willing to pass off for a while and look at in more detail in later days. #1258 give me big town vibes.
---
I'm staying far from the AD wagon, since it looks more scum driven than town driven.
I currently do not have an opinion on Andrius because I'm too tired to actually read 1499.
Things aren't really changing that much when I only do 10 pages at a time. Still suspect kthx, Bitmap, Reckslot, ActionDan."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Well first of all, nothing is set in stone until I fully catch up.In post 2280, Kise wrote:
When you are all caught up and ready to cast your vote, I'd like to point out Bella is the leading wagon.In post 2267, Cephrir wrote:
Why doesn't anyone else see this except like one person?In post 1177, Bella wrote:
Was scum yesterday, is still scum today. Still a better lynch than any of the other wagons springing up at this point.In post 1112, Kthxbye wrote:Bellap1087: Why Bitmap again? Does any of the information we have gained add to the case on him? How?
(Catching up at the moment, been busy today).
How flexible are you with your reads, Cephrir?
I'm not exactly sure what you mean by flexible, but they certainly change with time. Others can change my reads but there has to be a pretty good case involved."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Thirded"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
@Kise: You'll see me changing my mind somewhat based on Brandi's day 2 play, but I still hold suspecting D1-Brandi against popp because I don't see how anyone can read her D1 posts as scummy. I can acknowledge that he wasn't the only one thinking this at the time but attacking her so heavily for it bothered me. As for whether I can change my reads at all, I think you can already see I've changed on popp and as of this post I no longer consider Brandi above suspicion, just town.
Pages 61-70
Yep. Brandi really needs to step it up, her towniness is no longer obvious but nonetheless factual.In post 1504, Andrius wrote:
Yeah this won't fly.In post 1487, Brandi wrote:I don't like throwing down a votes unless I feel something really click in my mind.
Quit telling everyone else how to play.
This argument borders on "too townie" v.vIn post 1509, Brandi wrote:you guys should lynch me, then when andy/esurio is still alive kill them
Esurio has been playing "hurr hurr Im in control of the town I tell everyone what to do X IS SO TOWN Y IS SO TOWN"
calling me town like crazy d1 and now suddenly thinks its safe to change her read, even though it makes no sense at all for her to feel so confident I was town in the first place. She doesn't know how I play so why go against everyone else?
Oh because maybe she thought I'd get lynched D1, so she'd look good in comparison by calling me town.
She's said a lot of words this game to do so little. My reasoning for voting her earlier is the way she pushed on AD. AD said some of the towniest shit ever and she didn't like that, so she felt like arbitrarily calling him scum. All of her reasons against him were horrible.
I figured the way her play was D1 and D2 were completely different. She's not playing to get scum lynched, just trying to look like shes in control while suttly trying to get the not-so-obv townies to go down.
Using this post as a proxy for all the emotional raging. I don't know how I feel about this. Pretty huge overreaction to VM's fairly innocuous posts, but Brandi is an emotional player. I may have to just ignore the flip-out for now.In post 1514, Brandi wrote:I am voting someone?
And no I didn't check yourself. Plenty of people who have called me scum I've called town.
@VOID: Are you serious? Why is everyone in this game such a toxic asshole. This is a /game/ not "hey lets gang up on one person and treat them like shit"
You're a horrible person.
Not sure how her reaction could possibly be considered acceptable play or a reason for an unvote.
Seriously, what the fuck? I've seen kthx's claim and I don't see how it makes this point any less prominent.In post 1581, Voidedmafia wrote:
...Right.In post 1575, Kthxbye wrote:VM: gotta ask, is your 'trust me esur is town' just a read on her play or champ ability confirmation?
Vote: Kthnx
(Followed by switching to kthx)
Same argument applies here that I used with Bitmap, I don't think this counts in kthx's favor, as he is incredibly bussable.
This post is pretty great. Ank is back on my scumlist.In post 1585, esuriospiritus wrote:Cool, was waiting on that zephereaction. (although... that is a bad vote on d3x and you should feel bad)
VOTE: Ankamius
I knew there was gonna be at least one scum who couldn't resist a sweet and juicy Brandi mislynch.
In post 1554, Ankamius wrote:I'm not reading Brandi's recent posts as scum.
PEdit: Seriously? 4 posts in 3 minutes?
I'm really not sure what Ank is referring to with OMG CAN'T BELIEVE I MISSED THAT; probably Voided's post that was in between these two posts, but that's really not the point. Point being... either he read Brandi's posts (as he implies in the first post) or he didn't (as implied in the second one). Can't have it both ways. At the very least he's certainly caught in a lie, but I think there's more to it than that. The way he suddenly switched stances here reads incredibly disingenuous.In post 1565, Ankamius wrote:Oh my god. I can't believe I missed that the first time.There's so much damn spam going on that I'm just skimming everything.
UNVOTE: Kthxbye
VOTE: Brandi
PEdit: Both Kthx and Brandi need rope. Bitmap's slot is a strong third choice.
I don't buy this. Brandi is losing her shit, you can't expect her posts to be even remotely thought-out. And the second line isn't really an AtE. An AtE is "look at all the scum ganging up and being mean to me" or something like that, asking to die is just asking to die- I don't think someone would ever say this if they weren't legitimately flipping the fuck out.In post 1594, Ankamius wrote:In post 1554, Ankamius wrote:I'm not reading Brandi's recent posts as scum.
PEdit: Seriously? 4 posts in 3 minutes?
Above is what she was referring to below.In post 1565, Ankamius wrote:Oh my god. I can't believe I missed that the first time.There's so much damn spam going on that I'm just skimming everything.
UNVOTE: Kthxbye
VOTE: Brandi
PEdit: Both Kthx and Brandi need rope. Bitmap's slot is a strong third choice.
This post specifically was what brought me back to Brandi-scum.In post 1585, esuriospiritus wrote:I'm really not sure what Ank is referring to with OMG CAN'T BELIEVE I MISSED THAT; probably Voided's post that was in between these two posts, but that's really not the point. Point being... either he read Brandi's posts (as he implies in the first post) or he didn't (as implied in the second one). Can't have it both ways. At the very least he's certainly caught in a lie, but I think there's more to it than that. The way he suddenly switched stances here reads incredibly disingenuous.
The first line and the second line are the specific reason. I have a very hard time believing that stating that she's not using AtE and immediately using it is genuine.In post 1529, Brandi wrote:its not AtE when Im not trying to fucking appeal to anyone
please fucking kill me
unvote
vote: Brandi
Get your easy win scum
youll never have to play with me again
fuck
A very good point, this is one of my pet peeves. I hate it when players make a point that can obviously be easily flipped the reverse way if player X turns out to be the opposite of alignment Y and still used to suspect Z.In post 1615, Andrius wrote:
See this is a massive fucking lose-lose for me.Zepher wrote:Andy's conviction in Panzer flipping town feels weird to me now that we know that Panzer actually was town. Could just be me though.
If he flipped scum I would have DEFINITELY been the next lynch as OVEREAGER DEFENDER.
But now he flipped town and I'm scum for defending someone who was town.
So yeah. wat do zepher. wat do.
I pretty much agree with the reads, and I like that Andy is analyzing players that aren't likely to be lynched immediately. I'm not looking at the current VC but I have to wonder what can have changed on Bella if he's voting her. Only thing I don't agree with, and this is a point that comes up often, is the point that kdowns is town but needs to die anyway...like half the game seems to think this, I don't get it. I only see kdowns as null, but these stances seem asynchronous.In post 1622, Andrius wrote:Bub Bidderskins
Low postcount. Automatic WHAT HAVE YOU BEEN DOING.
Starts off with reads. Good.
Sees what I saw with the CFR vote on Brandi.
Good analysis.
Good response to kdowns.
Calling pie scummy is good, reads are good. Responses to wagon is also good.
Reck is NOT a godsend. :/
Brandi's line was passable in the theory sense.
kthx's vote was stretching.
Bub's pressues is good.
I agree with Bub's vote on kthx.
Bub, if kthx turns out to be scum remind me this post exists.In post 584, Bub Bidderskins wrote:Panzer's vote isn't great, but it's on the right wagon. Right now my strongest scumread is Kthx, and that trumps all.
Gee, I wonder if there's somebody else we can mislynch other than my scumbud kthx?Pie wrote:unvote
some questions for the class:
out of kthx, kdowns, and panzer: who is most likely to be scum?
does anyone think it's possible all three are scum? two? is anyone certain only one can be scum?
does anyone have buddies for any of the three (and reasons why)?
is there another player who's been heavily focused that should be added to this list? was going to add brandi but I might be biased
If you don't know how to lie, then how do you know when you're being lied to?
kthx's squirming is bad. Bub's analysis is good.
His CFR argument in 834 is a bit stretch but I like the thought.
No I definitely agreed with that.BB wrote: Action Dan was totally null until esurio called him out. His response to that was super-scummy. He was basically coasting until he couldn't coast anymore, and when he came back into the game he just defended his coasting instead of producing content.
The only thing I don't like is how he's not really suspecting/pushing anyone besides kthx, save for a couple nods at CFR.
Town. Scum betting ALL THE MARBLES is something I don't see here.
kdowns is kdowns and therefore town.
Don't see scumkdowns particularly.
Also Bella's PURPLE/RED argument is great here.
BELLA
Bella's thing at Reck in her first post is great. Definitely a town mindset there.
If Bella IS actually scum look at kdowns, namely her PURPLE/RED defense as it pretty much clears kdowns if it holds.
Bella is beautiful.
She's a bit behind, but still great.
ActionDan. I'm going to do something radical and write off all the SETUP SPEC as null.
In other news, depriving the town of lynches is NOT a good idea.
He has townreads.
Says Brandi might be rolefishing, yet does not imply her being scum. wut
Votes pie. Nothing reasoning-wise though let's be honest pie's play was rather lacking.
Implies Brandiscum.In post 1084, ActionDan wrote:that was the dumbest lynch.
who the hell said that he was the doc for the scum-team?
Such a ridiculous statement had to have been made by scum
Doesn't vote brandi or pursue the lead.
Either sarcasm or scum throwing stuff out there.
But did he mean:
or:Brandi wrote: Still confident that Panzer is scum.
"Doc"
Hah. He could easily have some sort of healing ability... one that heals his scummy teammates.
HRMKise wrote: Yeah. No doc wants to claim at 3 votes. I think Panzer's confidence that town wouldn't lynch him comes from claiming doctor. Thing is, why wouldn't scum need a doctor when all of town could attack them?
So apparently he meant Kise.
Iiiiii dont really remember where I was taking this so I'll leave it here. :/
Presents a list of all the players. Lots of ?'s, not many scumreads. Some leaning, but no SCUM! reads.
whatIn post 1364, ActionDan wrote:VOTE: Kise
I don't believe in his vote after looking through his iso. And I dislike his suggestions that lurkers are acceptable AA targets in lieu of THing.
why would you want to keep lurkers (kdowns) alive indefinitely? Because otherwise we're going to have to lynch them...
Someone is going to have to explain d3x scum to me because I just dont get scummotives from his posts.
tl;dr
Bub - Town
kdowns - Town AA Target
Bella - Town
AD - Scum
d3x - Town
What I've seen of kthx through Bub's ISO: Scum
More town points for popp.In post 1630, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
No, what you said was this:In post 1582, MrZepher wrote:I put the ball in Popp's court and he's done nothing with it.
That's notIn post 1224, MrZepher wrote:@Popp: Do you even know how to read?
Like, at all? Literally every point you've made on anybody could have been solve by actually reading and not skimming pages like it seems you've been doing."putting the ball in my court", as you choose to describe it, that's you saying"You're a big dumb-dumb who can't understand words and make complicated judgements because you don't have the vocabulary or the patience to look at entire posts."So the thing about something like that is I don't have to doanythingwith it. My original case stands, I believe it shows I'm anything but illiterate and do take the entire scope of the game into consideration.
Awww hell no! Perhaps you need to work on your reading comprehension skills. The only reason I've "admitted" to skimming, is becauseIn post 1582, MrZepher wrote:I've called him out for skimming (or at least I remember doing so, I could be wrong here) and he admitted to doing it on this page.I was V/LA for two daysand just popped in to say I was back and in the process of catching up.
Nice job on the mudflinging, I don't need to spend time openly speculating about whether your absence has be the 'ol back-away-till-interest-in-my-wagon-dies-down or the other frequently used I-totally-have-a-life-away-from-here-and-have-been-busy-right-nao-guiyse-foar-realz, because your initial response to my case and this little arbitrary and bogus link you've drawn between me reading posts or just skimming is scumtells enough for me.
You didn't need to defend yourself at all, there's no obligation to, unless you're worried how ignoring "weak cases" on you would've looked. However, thanks to your #1582 my interest in seeing you lynched has flared right up again. Honestly, you should've just kept your mouth shut instead of openly lying in an attempt to discredit me. I didn't skim read when making your case, and I don't make strong judgements based off skimming. When I'm here and active, you better believe I put some thought into my words. If you shared that quality, you wouldn't be digging your own grave.
@everyoneMy interest in the Zepher wagon was waning, and I was starting to consider shifting my vote,howeveras of now I'm much happier about it again and will be pushing this wagon for the next few days.
I'm also continuing with the catch up.
Revises this statement later but I'm more interested in the constant popping in to say one fairly useless thing that still conveys he's mostly reading the thread. This guy should have been on And's lurker list.In post 1643, Venmar wrote:Heh, interestingly, Voided claimed that the supporters of the "All Towerhug and NL" were scum, yet the largest supporter for the idea was Dramonic, who was town and got killed off last night.
Worth noting I guess, I am otherwise un-caught up, not used to large games guys. I'll keep trying.
Thank goodness.
Why VM over kdowns? Why VM at all, I don't recall you suspecting him?In post 1681, Kthxbye wrote:I'm shen. Last night I taunted vm hense the 1 damage. It doesn't prove he's not scum, but he didn't take an action last night that I'm aware of.
Using this post as a proxy for eveything that comes up to do with this. It seems like the suspicion just rolls off him after the inexplicably magical claim (it seemed way too early to call that out willy-nilly to me, by the way). Are we going to let everyone off the hook if they claim something mildly interesting? That's just going to happen almost every time someone claims, right...?In post 1701, Kthxbye wrote:By the by, I will continue to taunt till scum get worried and take me out with a gank. There is really no need to lynch me today as my targets will have to explain their actions which gives town more info. Obviously calling out my target is stupid. I can list my other abilities if the class would like.
Good point on Venmar as well as kthx.In post 1711, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
This doesn't prove anything, which is why I'm going to unvote you!In post 1691, Venmar wrote:
I imagine your taunt cancels whatever action they were making and instead they autoattack you. Which also probably means VM only auto attacks for 1 damage.In post 1681, Kthxbye wrote:I'm shen. Last night I taunted vm hense the 1 damage. It doesn't prove he's not scum, but he didn't take an action last night that I'm aware of.
This doesn't prove much at all actually, is my assumption correct?
Unvote
wut
Kind of don't like that Kthx isn't outing his other abilities upfront when he's said he's just going to taunt all game. There's no use hiding them if you're not going to use them."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Interesting. This is still in time for the wagon to be derailed and she basically completely supports it without trying to get any bussing-cred. Town.In post 1761, Brandi wrote:vote:MrZepher
Of the "three options" that is the one I'm most willing to vote.
I absolutely will not vote actiondan, and I absolutely will not vote Kthx. (Two of my strongest town reads) I feel pretty null on Ank. Zepher is the only one who has been remotely scummy.
I'm having trouble finding time to post but its not as if I don't want to play. I'm thankful for the extension.
I just wanted to find a few hours to sit down to respond to voided's questions like I promised but none of my free time involves multiple hours. :/
Oh come on.In post 1770, Brandi wrote:I don't care for your "cues" scum, and I will not take orders from you, thanks.
Don't agree on AD but this is a town post.In post 1775, Brandi wrote:
The weak reasons would be sheeping off of others reasons that sounded logical to me. Sometimes I don't see things myself right away, but others make good points and it makes me think "hmm, maybe they are onto something;" So my "weak reasons" would be mostly gut, POE, and things others have already stated.Void wrote:You say I and two others are scum, but for weak reasons. I've asked what those reasons are.
AD's defense of me was incredibly townie. Not -because- he defended me- but the way he did it. He actually gave logical reasons and promoted me in a way that he could never go back on it. Esurio on the otherhand just said I was "towntowntown" - no reasons given, something easy to say but without reason she couldn't really be held accountable as easily if she were to "change her mind"C.) How? What has AD posted since the beginning of D2 that's so town?
AD's read on me felt genuine, and not artificial like Esurio's.
I feel like this set something off in Esu in particular. She was calling me town before, but didn't like that AD was giving real reasons as to why I was town. She wanted him to shut up and die, so that she could more easily get townies like myself lynched in the future.
Sure, D1 Esurio was harping really hard on how I was definitely town. I found this strange, that someone who has never played with me would feel so confident in me being town when the rest of the town was pretty much calling me scum/scummy. This alone made me feel esu was scum. Because I wasn't being the towniest player, and it's easy for scum to call someone heavily under fire town when they feel they might get lynched regardless of one nay-sayer. I feel she was pre-emptively presevering herself. But D2, she calls me scum. The way that she was so "confident" yesterday about my towniness despite not being a very obv-town player, and the complete 180 where she calls me scum when nothing of my own has changed much. (I'm still over emotional, still unhelpful, still kind of crazy and confusing...) It feels disingenuous.D.) her D1 and D2 play are different.- Can you explain this?
Valid points. The Zepher case is pretty much the only reason popp isn't on my scumlist.In post 1806, esuriospiritus wrote:You don't have to think someone is scum to pressure them. It can be as simple as "hey lurkertownfuck, post more and stop sucking atlifethe universethis game. And here are some questions I want you to answer."everything
There are also times where it's advantageous to pressure a townread like you think they're scum so you can get more info out of them (see: pretty much every post I've made @Pie this game <_<)
@andy, pie: I want you to fucking promise you'll keep a close eye on popp if I die and you're still around... I realize pretty much no one else thinks he's scum and I'm probably the one who's wrong here but the way he comments on things from the sidelines without ever getting down and dirty and in the thick of things pings my gutreallyfucking hard.
you guys are like the only non-clownfucks that I really trust this game sooooooooooooo yeah
it's like he got enough people calling him town d1 that he was just like "k I can sit back for the rest of the game and coast, no need to rock any more boats this game"
at least kill that cheekyfuck before lylo please and thank you
Nope try again.In post 1815, Elscouta wrote:So, here are my thoughts about what happened:
#105 "dear Brandi, please understand that it looks like you are scum. <no vote>". Feels like scum trying to add momentum to a wagon without officially commiting.
Attacking people for knowing that the game they are playing is in fact mafia? For real?In post 1815, Elscouta wrote:The kdowns wagon
As already written above, this one is complete crap. Ignoring the color of the scum team is atownslip, not ascumslip. To make this even worse, some people were acting like "oh it's so obvious from the role PM". No it is not. Actually, from the role PM i got, there is no precision about whether i'm on the majority side, the minority side, or on a 50/50 battle.
#150 This one feels like someone that actually doesn't know the town PM doesn't really refer on being on the majority side.
#168 Oh another one that acts as if the role PM is enough to know it's not a 50/50 split.FoS: xRECKONERx. That's already two strikes.
"Hey you guys know how you lynched a townie day 1? You totally shouldn't have done that." No shit, Sherlock.In post 1815, Elscouta wrote:KThxbye wagon
A solid wagon, that I 100% support. The crew on it is pretty decent too. On the other side, the Panzer wagon is awful, and strangely enough the crew on it is also awful (Brandi, Reck, KThxBye? wow). However it quickly stalls, despite people strongly advocating for him (with in my vision, pretty good reasons).
Fence sit the flipped scum harder please.In post 1815, Elscouta wrote: - I'm not totally oppposed to Zepher lynch, but i don't find anything particularly scummy.
Vote: KThxBye
Like Brandi, hops on the wagon without, hypothetically, trying to cash in on towncred when Zepher flips scum. If he'd flipped town I would find this suspicious (trying to avoid the blame) but in this case I like it. Only issue is that he was probably being lynched anyway at this point.In post 1824, Bella wrote:Goddammit, I thought the deadline had passed...
unvote, VOTE: MrZepher
I'd rather have a lynch over no lynch and I feel more strongly that the kthx spot is town. I remain unconvinced that Zepher is scum.
To some extent the point I made about Bella and Brandi applies here, except it also contains an apparent complete certainty the kthx is town- seriously, a townie should never prefer no lynch to lynch this early this unless he's a cop with an innocent- and continually demonstrates AD's unsurpassed levels of uselessness.In post 1831, ActionDan wrote:##Vote Zephir
this is better than no-lynch.
But no-lynch better than kthx.
I have to go to play a poker tournament.
In post 1862, esuriospiritus wrote:more serious answer: are you mad because I out-WIFOMed your scum-team, and/or are you still butthurt about that D1 shit, and/or are you trying to suggest you find my "town-heavy fluff" suspicious?
Those are the only possible reasons I can see you having for bringing it up.
Additional return question: You were the first vote on the Zepher lynch. Why vote him but not devote time to rallying people to your cause? IME people who are among the first to champion a wagon are usually the louder ones about it.
and what does the zepher flip say for your AD read?In post 1804, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Will move my vote to ActionDan if it's needed. That won't be because of a weak scumread on him, but more because of the interaction between Zepher and AD. So for me, lynching either one gives me some insight into the other one. I still prefer Zepher, as on the whole he is helping my reads on more than just AD.
pedit: ...you DO know what wifom is, right
Some more interesting points here. I'm curious as to esurio's opinion about popp starting the Zepher wagon, though it seems she's gone now. She sort of addresses it IIRC but continues suspecting him?In post 1868, Kthxbye wrote:
Too late scum..In post 1864, Bub Bidderskins wrote:I might need to rethink my kthx scumread....
I thought I'd pull the gank last night, hence why I tower hugged....ah well, at least I'm level 4 now...
Also, someone used an ability on me (did 1 whole damage). Maybe scum with a role block? hrm....
Seriously, kthx, that's fucking ridiculous.In post 1871, Andrius wrote: in other news kthx's post reads like absolute shit. "oh no i was damaged must be scum RB" and "oh no i thought i'd draw the gank so i towerhugged"
YEAH BULLSHIT
SCUM DONT GANK THE LEADING FUCKING WAGON FOR TWO DAYS RUNNING
way to be useful
also and to the haters who thought VM was scum: LOLNOPE
Vote: kise
HAHAHAHAHAIn post 1878, Kthxbye wrote:
Well, I'm damn near the most conf town currently alive with that flip. I'm not getting lynched. Only way to kill me is with a NK. I have a taunt which is pretty powerful and a good way to catch scum misbehaving. I said I was going to taunt constantly. Thus...why wouldn't scum target me last night? And...uh...how would the most conf town player alive getting ganked and dying NOT be a bad thing? Are you saying it would have been better for me to die last night?In post 1875, Andrius wrote:also im sorry kthx i dont mean to be rude or an asshat
but why would you think you would draw the gank
and if you honestly did
why would you think that would be a BAD thing?
This may partially be confirmation bias but this post seems really plausible. Kthx -> Zepher looks like bussing to me but I'm not as convinced about the reverse.In post 1887, Ankamius wrote:Kthx puts a small amount of pressure early onto Zephyr here, posts this directly afterwards, then soon after THAT posts this.
This is a definite early bus possibility. Early pressure, followed by a request not to make it big, then completely dropping it.
Here, Kthx first starts putting pressure on MrZephyr again, this time about 20 posts after popp first makes his case. However, it's barely anything until here and here. Normally this would be town, but not in this case.
First of all, he's still focusing primarily on kdowns while having his vote on Zephyr. With basically no reasoning between him calling Zephyr town and his vote, he looks like he doesn't give a shit whether Zephyr is scum or not. He's mindlessly bandwagoning and it gives me the sense that he wants town cred for this if it goes through. This isn't dissuading me at all. Primarily the last line.
This is absolutely hilarious to me, since he still hasn't given any kind of reasoning towards why he thinks Zephyr is scum.
Here he abandons the wagon entirely to try forming up a new one. He still hasn't given me a sense that he was ever truly interested in Zephyr because he was scummy. This is even worse with this post where he not only states that Zephyr isn't scummy anymore, but he's also moved on to preparing to sheep someone else's scumread (namely Andrius' on me). I even asked him what changed, but this was the response. He flip flopped hard on Zephyr and started adding me as a primary focus to his scum list.
TL;DR
Early Kthx/Zephyr scuffle looks like a possible bus.
Kthx puts his vote on Zephyr fast after he starts getting any kind of suspicion, but gives pretty much no reasoning and overall looks disinterested in it.
Eventually leaves the wagon momentarily, rejoins stating a strong scum read, quickly leaves soon after, then gives flip floppy opinions on him the rest of the day. That does not read town to me.
VOTE: Kthxbye
PEDIT: @Kise I barely looked at your ISO when I made my second reads post, which should be pretty obvious just by reading it. I remember reading only a small part of it, but it was long enough ago that I can't remember which.
Also, explain what adaic means as well as what you mean in #1885.
Good stuff.In post 1899, Kise wrote:Cleared was the wrong word, I agree. Nice, but before that
->
The bolded parts show that you were fine with Zephyr's reactionIn post 1585, esuriospiritus wrote:Cool, was waiting on that zephereaction. (although... that is a bad vote on d3x and you should feel bad)
VOTE: Ankamius
I knew there was gonna be at least one scum who couldn't resist a sweet and juicy Brandi mislynch.
In post 1554, Ankamius wrote:I'm not reading Brandi's recent posts as scum.
PEdit: Seriously? 4 posts in 3 minutes?
I'm really not sure what Ank is referring to with OMG CAN'T BELIEVE I MISSED THAT; probably Voided's post that was in between these two posts, but that's really not the point. Point being... either he read Brandi's posts (as he implies in the first post) or he didn't (as implied in the second one). Can't have it both ways. At the very least he's certainly caught in a lie, but I think there's more to it than that. The way he suddenly switched stances here reads incredibly disingenuous.In post 1565, Ankamius wrote:Oh my god. I can't believe I missed that the first time.There's so much damn spam going on that I'm just skimming everything.
UNVOTE: Kthxbye
VOTE: Brandi
PEdit: Both Kthx and Brandi need rope. Bitmap's slot is a strong third choice.
Andy's reaction is also weird to me, just with the way he hopped on and off and on and off again. But he's right about Ank and I think we got the same vibes around when he hopped off the Brandi wagon the first time so /shrug for now. I'm mostly just noting that he let me pressure him into getting back on Brandi before thinking for himself again... I'm not really sure what to think of that as far as reading it as scummy or towny yet, but I trust Pie (or if he's dead, I guess maybe Kise) to take care of him for me in the event I'm flipped and Andy lives on and on like the energizer bunny. <3
AD is still scum and I haven't forgotten about him, it's just that I got tired of the wagon not going anywhere and I wanted to shake things up a little. I hope everyone has noted his falling back into lurkmode once the initial pressure on him wavered and he realized he wasn't in immediate danger, though.
I'm kinda bleh on zepher too after the general fence-sitty feeling of a few of his reads in that last big post (although at least he didn't take the brandi bait) but I'll be damned if I'm voting on a wagon started by popp, sooooo... :/; you imply he's a-okay in your book for not taking the Brandi bait. You also throw in that you don't want to vote with popp as a reason for not wagoning Mr. Z.
Hedging and voting the obvtown.........In post 1907, Elscouta wrote:Oh come on. That's the third game in a row where i see scum be lynched, and the next day, there's a wagon forming on one the people that led the previous day lynch. I will not let this happen one more.
Vote: esuriospiritius
(To be honest, i see xRECK/PeregrineV more scummy, but replacement solidarity ftw)
There is no logical reason for me to hate this post as much as I do. Ick.In post 1922, Kise wrote:Yeah Brandi what gives
I don't like the way your suspicion of Bella developed. Started out with annoyingly asking the same question repeatedly as a form of active lurking, and now you're telling me you have no real reason for suspecting her and, surprise, you're still useless. No thanks.In post 1945, Venmar wrote:If it's worth any consideration, I still think Bella could be scum via gut alone.
Other than that I am at a complete loss in this game... I need to actually catch up or something.
Please regale me with your refreshing perspective and town-oriented, thoughtful gameplay. Or whatever my exact snark was last time I said that. In other news, 'regale' is rapidly becoming one of my favoriteIn post 1946, Knight of Cydonia wrote:This is the most impenetrable game I've replaced into in a long time.ways to be condescendingwords.
Okay. I suppose there's no point in considering you as a lynch target yet then. You probably shouldn't have claimed so fully though (E, specifically, in the event scum tried to off you alone)In post 1960, Ankamius wrote:You know what, I'm going to claim too. There's very little point not to since the chances of me living to tomorrow is basically 0%.
I am Sivir, the Battle Mistress.
I towerhugged N1 and ended up taking FOUR damage. (I'm betting anything this was a scum hit.)
I auto-attacked ActionDan N2, and ended up taking two damage.
I only started with 7 HP, so I'm dead if anything with damage hits me.
My autoattacks deal two damage, but successfully hitting anyone with it means I attack twice instead (due to my passive). So my auto-attacks effectively do four damage.
As for abilities, I only have my E and Ultimate. My E negates the damage from the highest damage auto-attack targetting me during the night, and my Ultimate increases my auto-attack damage to three (effectively six) for that night and the night after. It can be used with an auto-attack on the same night.
Right now, P5 and I have a really strong combo going on. We can practically instagib anyone in the game tonight.
@Kise: Was that in response to me? If so, then is that your entire basis on Andrius-scum?
In post 1973, pieceofpecanpie wrote:The claiming, stahp, I don't like it one bit. Whatever strength lies in town coordinating seems mitigated by the free information you're giving scum. I am taking any of these claims with vast grains of salt, until a flip proves otherwise.
I feel uncomfortable sharing the note-taking I've been doing, since it's just too messy. Too many ifs and butts and I don't feel that's useful right now when the mood seems to already be directionless. So instead I'll just put some things out there that I can state with reasonable confidence.
- - Wagon analysis by Kthx in #1950 is not completely without merit, although he takes it a bit far considering his own wagon a counter-wagon, since it already existed at the start of that Day and the previous one.
- So taking AD's wagon as a scum counter-wagon into consideration, I'm uncomfortable with Andrius' voting pattern, having switch off AD to Zepher at the end. However, his posts have read null, so do actions speak louder than words?
- Similarly I'm uncomfortable with esurio's vote-sheeping and AD counter-wagon, especially when juxtaposed with her opinionated persona. Reasons for staying off Zepher wagon seem to revolve around a strange affection she's developed for me.
- Counter-wagons or no aside, other people who gave me tingles at the end of Day 2 are - in no particular order - Bella, Brandi and ActionDan
- Some of these names conflict with each other, so before it starts getting messy I'll keep it at that. If anyone wants more details, ask.
Ick. Entire scumlist is fence-sitty, and scumlist sucks. Bella, Brandi, esurio (all of whom I have as town to varying degrees), Andrius (high content, though I've found a few of his posts scummy he's not nearly a top pick), and ActionDan (who you don't list a read of)....ick.In post 1990, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Bub Bidderskins - scummishIn post 1975, Ankamius wrote:@popp: What are your overall reads looking like so far?
Bella - scummish/person of interest
PeregrineV - nullish/weak scum from Reckoner
Venmar - ?
TehBrawlGuy - townish
CF Riot - townish
InflatablePie - weak scum
Knight of Cydonia - weak scum from kdowns
d3x - townish
Andrius - weak scum/person of interest
Brandi - scummish/person of interest
Elscouta - nullish/weak scum from Bitmap
esuriospiritus - clownfuck/person of interest
Action Dan - ?/person of interest
Kise - ?
Kthxbye - weak town
Ankamius - ?
So as you can see, with about half of the list looking scummy I have some conflicts between players to iron out (ie. if A is going to be scum then B will have to become town). This is creating a lot of ISO'ing for me, along with the "?" players who I really haven't read enough of recently to read with any confidence.
I'd like to start concentrating on the people of interest, particularly Bella, Brandi and Andrius, as potential lynch targets. I'll elaborate on this as soon as I get time, and depending on where the game goes in the meantime. I leave the other two people of interest off this list because Action Dan feels scummy but a WIFOMy subject due to his wagon looking like a Zepher counter-wagon, and esurio being more disruptive clownfuck rather than a high value scummy lynch prospect.
Still quite a switch based on very little... you were apparently only suspicious because esu was suspicious of you? I know you like OMGUS, but having no other reason for a vote at this stage is pretty lame.In post 1994, Brandi wrote:That's all well and good but having under 30 posts by day 3 in an 80 page game is pretty pathetic. Just because quantity doesn't equal quality DOESN'T mean that their posts have been quality ones. Nice misrep, though.
And on Esu: Because I was wrong about her. I'm not going to go back and repost our interactions for you. It's very clear that when she told me she was baiting, and explained it, I understood her point and believed her.
He claimed to be absurdly low on health (did he specifically say 1HP or am I imagining that?). If he lives a whole lot longer you have a right to be suspicious but as it stands this is pretty much just shitposting.In post 1997, Elscouta wrote:
Alt FailIn post 1996, Docteur Gudsight wrote:Notes regarding the claims:
- I call bullshit on sivir AA dealing 4 dmg per hit. That doesn't look anywhere near the powerlevel of the other champions we have seen.
- I claim my part of responsability for the damage PeregrineV received that night.
Updated suspect list: Elscouta and kthx are the only ones I presently want to lynch. Leaning scum reads include Andrius, Peregrine, AD, Venmar, popp."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
In case it wasn't clear, Ank's claim pretty much jumps him straight to prob town for me. He neither passed Go nor collected $200.
I would apologize for triple posting but quite frankly you're probably going to have to get used to it."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Page 81-present! Yay I'm real now!
Eh. I originally quoted this to agree with it but now that I look again I don't think Bella's posts are actually contradictory.In post 2027, Kise wrote:In post 910, Bella wrote:I dislike this vote, though I'm not entirely sure why. Panzer's alternating between defeatism and half-hearted trying doesn't strike me as enough to tip someone onto his wagon.
In post 904, MrZepher wrote:It really shouldn't be that surprising. I decided I wanted Panzer's flip over Kthnx.
These two posts made me even less comfortable with the vote - the fact that he tried to slip the vote in without reasoning and then responding with this when chellenged seems really odd. Unlike the alleged scumslips earlier in the game, this one might actually be a scumslip.In post 908, MrZepher wrote:You know, aside from the fact that I've been debating switching to your wagon since I first voted KTB.
I took the opportunity to read through his ISO again and I found some things that made me think he could possibly be town.
The logical conclusion for me was to avoid that wagon until I have more information.
nice OMGUS though.In post 1330, Bella wrote:- The cases against AD and Zepher are interesting, but not enough to pull me off Bitmap. Definitely worthy of further scrutiny, though.
..In post 1824, Bella wrote:Goddammit, I thought the deadline had passed...
unvote, VOTE: MrZepher
I'd rather have a lynch over no lynch and I feel more strongly that the kthx spot is town.I remain unconvinced that Zepher is scum.
Andy?
I don't know why I'm bothering to quote esurio every time she makes another town post anymore, I think my standpoint is pretty clear.In post 2037, esuriospiritus wrote:
hahahah noI don't have to answer your questions if I think you're scum. That's a thing, right?
I had (emphasis "had") a slight town read on you. With your reactions to my questions though, I'm not so sure anymore.Also, why did you say, "I expect better from you"?
You'reIn post 2029, CF Riot wrote:Pretty sure you've been part of the crowd telling me all my votes sucked.votingme! and you don't even know what I've said and what I haven't...?
I'll tell ya what. You find an example of me telling you your votes sucked, I'll self-vote. You don't, I'm voting you for having a clearly fabricated read on me.
You have until the next time you post, so none of this pussyfooting around "nananana I'm being obstinate and making you wait" bullshit. Got enough of that in this game from popp.
Bolded are my favorite points (and the ones that I think stand up against Ank's defense, which I won't bother quoting). But, again, there isn't much point in focusing on Ank right now.In post 2049, d3x wrote:MrZ's early read of him, their huge lack of interaction pretty much all game, Ank leaving MrZ off of his original reads' list and then calling the case weak {while calling my points credible while I mostly was just building on the initial case}, reinforcing that he's antiMrZ Lynch due to the Wagoners, calling both AD and MrZ's Wagons Scum driven while having both leaning Scum {pretty damn fence-sitty, imo},MrZ flat calling him Town and browbeating others for suspecting him, sitting on a nonWagon while the Day runs out, then pushing a CounterWagon while deadline gets much closer {still not giving any reasons why he doesn't liek the MrZWagon, yet repeating that he just doesn't}, ...and again, showing last minute support for the tertiary ADWagon, his bland jump to the MrZ Lynch, "I'm beyond shocked that I'm even alive", clearing me super early Today for my interactions with MrZ while damning Kthx for theirs', and gut.
...damn, that's a lot more annoying to read than I intended. That's what I get for multitasking while building a case. I can go back and source anything upon request.
Sorry for party rocking, guys...
Seriously girl. You were just accused of snapping at anyone who questions esurio, to which your response was initially "you can't even read" followed by you lterally admitting to have done exactly that.... I don't understand you. Here's a better defense: "Yes, and how does that make me scum?" See that took me 5 seconds to think up.In post 2069, Brandi wrote:and god forbid I comment my thoughts on things relevant to the game?
Esu's town votes on her are bad so I will say such
I agree with Esu that Popp is a good vote and will say such
I am playing this game
you want me to not say anything to or related to a certain player
you are literally insane
Bella's late vote doesn't look very bussy to me but I can at least see where you're coming from on that. Your point on esurio, on the other hand, is just atrocious. What would ever be wrong with being scum about lynching scum, and I also don't see how it's remotely smug. I also want to note that AD did hammer without giving any fucks, I somehow missed this fact. I assume it was probably really close to deadline though.In post 2083, Kise wrote:I shouldn't have to do your work for you, Ank.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p4839603
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 9#p4840169
Note esu's feelings for you and Andy.
You had/have one strong suspect in Bitmap and I can't tell who else you may have viewed just as strongly, but Zephyr looks like one of your next best choices based on what I quoted. You had to have at least considered Zeph could be scum after pointing out what you thought was a slip. The way D2 turned out, you ignored his wagon for a large part of it, only saying the cases were interesting. Due to replacements and a new deadline, you finally came around to putting on a vote when Zeph was L-3, and around these parts, late votes on scum look bussy.In post 2080, Bella wrote:So, in summary, I stated a couple of times that Zepher might be possibly scum, then voted because a deadline was coming up whilst stating I was unconvinced he was scum. This, apparently, is contradictory?
lol.
While I had a mild suspicion of him, it never progressed beyond a mild lean-scum. It's pretty much the definition of "unconvinced he's scum". It's the kind of read I wouldn't throw a vote on if I didn't have to, because it wasn't solid enough to justify it. I am mildly confused as to why you think this is an issue.
ALSO I remembered more of why I'm skeptical of esu
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 2#p4858092
With no claim from Zeph and AD's nofucksgiven-hammer AND with 40 mins til deadline [breath] this vote made me think of someone who was sure of Zeph not being a mislynch. I've never seen anybody make a 'just in case' vote on someone who's flipped town - And it wasn't as if Zeph was a suspect of yours either. For me, the biggest thing is that Zeph didn't get a claim in and the L+1 vote would have been really smug if not for him flipping scum..it may still be smug, actually. You didn't suspect him, as I pointed out.
WutIn post 2086, Kise wrote:Back to this:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p4880511
And looking at these quotes->In post 1639, MrZepher wrote:
I have no real established opinion on you or your play. You seem town enough that I'm not going to go out of my way, but it's not a solid enough read that I'll work to defend it.In post 1600, Kise wrote:Zeph why would you vote me? All I want to know. DYING to know.
I was also pointing that out to see if anyone tried to convince me. Nobody did. It's really a non-issue.They're working on something..Something BIG. No way they just let me off the hook like that. I said nothing at all when I voted Zeph and here he shrugs me off again for the null player I am. How do you not even give an opinion on someone voting you for no reason? I'm left wondering what the plans for me are.
I have the biggest suspicion that the scum are plotting my demise.
hmmmmmmmmmmmm so confused on how to interpretIn post 1754, MrZepher wrote:Actually now that I think about it Esurio has been doing a good job of derailing town whenever she's involved... will read into this.
This post sucks... bolded seems like you're setting up pre-emptively to have an excuse for OMGUSing the first few people who vote you? And the last sentence doesn't do it for me despite the fact that I've probably said something similar at some point.
Town logic.In post 2116, Andrius wrote:Man I just realized how ironic this is.
I wanted to kill Ankamius last night...
...and saved him.
Funny how these things work out.
I'll elaborate if you want me to but suffice to say I read Zepher's stuff after the flip and was like K GONNA SHOOT KISE OR ANKAMIUS based solely on Zepher. And so I sent my action in and didn't give myself the chance to secondguess the decision the rest of N2.
Are you going to say literally anything that you didn't say Day 2 today? Are you even reading the thread?In post 2123, Kthxbye wrote:Anyone willing to lynch scum KoC or scum bub yet?
Condescending snark that implies you're useless goes here.In post 2130, Kthxbye wrote:
junkIn post 2126, esuriospiritus wrote:hey kthx
Can you tell me (or remind me if you've already said) what you think about these 4 wagons? I can appreciate your frustration for having scumreads that no one seems to want to vote with you on, but it would help if you'd comment more on the other stuff that's going on, too.esuriospiritus (2): CF Riot, Elscouta
CF Riot (2): InflatablePie, esuriospiritus
Bella (2): Kise, Brandi
Kise (2): Andrius, Ankamius
also disclaimer: I am drinking tonight. I probably have better things to do than post here, but just in case I don't I officially blame any lack of clarity on alcohol.
junk
meh
meh
A solid exploration of the anomaly I noticed. Thank you for not dismissing it as too weird the way I did and actually taking some time to lay that out, I am somewhat convinced.In post 2133, PeregrineV wrote:Pg24
This stands out:
Why?In post 577, MrZepher wrote:Where is d3x?
Zephyr’s last d3x mention is a scumread on him in 399.
D3x next content posts are 407 and 408, neither of which talks to or about Zephyr, and Zephyr neither responds to or about d3x until 577.
I see nothing between there that mentions or references d3x except kthxbye (412, 430) TBG (469), Bella (513).
If Zephyr has a scumread on d3x yet doesn’t interact with him or reference his posts, but wants to hear from him 7 pages later?
Vote: d3x
Listen. I hate you.In post 2138, Knight of Cydonia wrote:
Nope.In post 2128, Ankamius wrote:@Knight of Cydonia: Do you have anything for us?
This is disturbingly fair.In post 2140, esuriospiritus wrote:VOTE: KoC
it would be one thing if only one person in this slot was acting like this, but that's two people lurking in the same slot now and expecting to get a free ride because "townslip."
I'm not so sure anymore.
Too much of a free pass for the active players. Even if we are going to lynch a lurker or two please don't ignore everyone else in the meantime.In post 2141, Ankamius wrote:
UNVOTE: KiseIn post 2138, Knight of Cydonia wrote:
Nope.In post 2128, Ankamius wrote:@Knight of Cydonia: Do you have anything for us?
VOTE: Bella
I'm not going to vote for anyone active until the general activity level picks up to passable levels again. There's so many lurkers that killing active people isn't going to solve anything (even if we hit more scum). Half of the playerlist is barely contributing.
LaaaaaaaaaaaaaaazyyyyyyyyyyyyyIn post 2172, Andrius wrote:I love all of you. <3
I picked Bella because she's #1 on the list.
At least pick a scummy lurker ffs
Also awfully convenient that she already has a couple votes on her =/
I appreciate that Elscouta isn't going for Bella (who's targeting him) even though he has an easy chance to do so. But at the same time, doing so would be kind of overtly scummy, especially if Bella were to flip town.In post 2203, Elscouta wrote:
Actually this post is so bad it deserves aIn post 2187, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
This plays some part towards my reasoning for preferring Bella lynch over KoC lynch.In post 2185, Ankamius wrote:If we lose because we lynch lurkers, then town didn't deserve to win this anyway.Vote: pieceofpecanpie.
Really? The "let's lynch a lurker choice" among Bella/KoC is Bella? Can anyone that has looked at their posting history pretend such an absurdity?
Eeeeeeh. While Elscouta is at least making an effort finally, I don't think those posts are particularly town.In post 2220, Bella wrote:
Pretty sure Elscouta meant compared to the other lurker types. When I've posted, I've done more than just post a single sentence fragment plus "will catch up later".In post 2209, Ankamius wrote:
Bella was one of the least active people for half of the game.In post 2201, Elscouta wrote:I find extremely surprising that Bella is getting wagonned by the "anti-lurker" crusade. Among all the people there, she is the one with probably one of the best signal-to-noise ratio, and a decent posting rate. I suspect there is quite a few scum involved in this wagon looking for an easy ride.
In fact, if you check my ISO, you will see that there are a number of fairly long posts that in the hands of some other people in the game would be broken down into 2 or 3 or more posts. I advice checking the content of the posts made by players in this game instead of measuring by quantity, because I bet that you'll find more game related content in my infrequent posts than some more spammy members of the game.
As much as I'm loathe to move away from the strongest scumread I had, ElScouta's picked it upover the last couple of days.In post 2217, Brandi wrote:Alright, I've changed my mind about Els. Those are some pretty town posts.
Honestly, I kinda prefer Action Dan as a lynch right now. Look at his recent post history. Short, relatively content-free and always promising more later and not delivering. Among the lurker types people want to get rid of, he's the most lurkerish and the one who seems to be putting the least effort into the game. It's fair to describe his contribution as coasting, which is the scummy kinda inactivity.
Not entirely sure I'm convinced by the attempted PoPP wagon push from Brandi. I mean, I understand and kinda agree with Esu's stance on him, but Brandi just kinda sheeped onto it kinda suddenly and hasn't really tried to develop it. It'd certainly be a better alternative than choosing between KoC and me, though.
The frustration reads as genuine, just like it did wrt Panzer.In post 2222, Andrius wrote:You're like, playing jungle warwick. You spentD1 and D2the first fifteen minutes in the jungle autoattacking all the creeps to death because you can't be bothered tovoteuse any other abilities. That's too much work. And you want someone toGIVE YOU someone to voteleash the big camps because its just easier that way. So after fifteen minutes you finally get your ult and despite your lanes calling foryou to actually vote and/or play the damn mafia gameganks you just sit in the jungle and autoattack more creeps because hell, the lanes are failing so there's no need to go in there and die too.
predit: OH HEY LOOK YOU SUSPECT ACTIONDAN.
THEN MAYBE YOU SHOULD VOTE HIM?
idk that might help form a wagon or actually convey your scumspects to other people but hey that's work and i dont want to push you to actually play the game like the rest of us
maybe you're Win Later and I'm Win Nao and I have to waittill fucking lylohalf an hour for you to be ready to help but goddamnit if you don't expect me to try in the meantime
Would you care to expand on the bolded?In post 2234, Nachomamma8 wrote:I want this Venmar lynch, though. All of the votes he's made have been opportunistic as fuck (tunneled the shit out of Panzer in an obviously unfair way), defends Brandi and esurio in half-hearted, white-knighty ways, plays the "I can't large game card" to excuse no content... He's a beautiful, beautiful lynch with the bonus that town Venmar is easy as all hell to pick up on.
ehiuwrehvgoibqgopqwkoefmnIn post 2244, Venmar wrote:Well.... okay.
I've been lurkish and bored with this game cause i've started to have a problem keeping up like I said, so no wonder my actions are half-hearted, doesn't change the fact I think Brandi and Esurio were and are town.
I can't defend against your case though, so i'm at your mercy master.
Even though these lists are kind of stupid I'm doing one anyway quickly just to organize my thoughts.
Bella: Leaning town. Actually contributes occasionally. If we're lynching someone just for lurking, seems like a poor choice.
Venmar: Leaning scum. Only a few issues with him until post 2244 which is in the top 3 worst posts I've read in this game outside of Bitmap.
Brandi: Town. Talked this to death already.
Knight of Cydonia/kdowns: Neutral, I guess. KoC's deliberate? uselessness might be scummy, I'm not sure.
PeregrineV/xRECKONERx: Neutral. Didn't like Reck, Peregrine is doing okay.
Ankamius: Scummy, but dat claim. If he's somehow alive in 2 days I'll start worrying about him again.
d3x: Neutral. Would have said leaning town before Peregrine's solid points.
kthxbye: Scum. Talked this to death already.
CF Riot: Leaning town. Mostly held over from early stuff as nothing has stood out from him lately.
Nexus/Esuriospiritus: Town. Not even close.
InflatablePie: Leaning town. Useless early, spurt of usefulness that I liked quite a bit, back to useless.
NachoMamma8/TehBrawlGuy: Leaning town. Neither player has given me cause to think otherwise.
Elscouta/Bitmap: Scum. Bitmap was insane and insanely scummy, and Elscouta is only a bit better.
Kise: Leaning scum. Has rubbed me the wrong way too many times.
Andrius: Neutral. Only the convenient Bella vote really bothered me recently.
ActionDan: Neutral, but wins the other useless award. If we're lynching for sheer suckage, it's this guy or KoC.
pieceofpecanpie: Leaning scum. Haven't liked him at all outside of the Zepher case.
I'm gonna vote under the assumption deadline will be extended and worry about compromising later.
Vote: Elscouta"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I know. I had him among my top suspects before that, and he climbed back up after I gave him a million points for the Zeph case. Basically I feel like he's been really scummy all the time, except for one shining moment of win. It's not sufficient to exempt him- he could easily have expected that not to culminate in a lynch and been shooting for town cred down the line. It's definitely something I'm struggling with."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Sounds like you want a list. Fine, that just seems like such a noob thing to do. Yes, I did decide to move d3x up just now.
Towniest to scummiest:
Nexus/Esuriospiritus
Brandi
InflatablePie
NachoMamma8/TehBrawlGuy
CF Riot
Bella
d3x
Andrius
PeregrineV/xRECKONERx
ActionDan
Knight of Cydonia/kdowns
pieceofpecanpie
Ankamius
Venmar
Kise
kthxbye
Elscouta/Bitmap"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
"Look how town I am" is not a convincing argument. Especially when you argue it by pointing out something I have demonstrated I'm fully aware of. Bolded: Well no shit, why on earth would you do that if you were scum and basically ensure your lynch right afterwards? It should be clear at this point that I don't think esurio's points are bullshit and in fact take her opinion very seriously.In post 2314, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
That does not make sense.In post 2299, Cephrir wrote:I know. I had him among my top suspects before that, and he climbed back up after I gave him a million points for the Zeph case. Basically I feel like he's been really scummy all the time, except for one shining moment of win. It's not sufficient to exempt him- he could easily have expected that not to culminate in a lynch and been shooting for town cred down the line. It's definitely something I'm struggling with.
I made the opening vote on Zepher and when the wagon was stalled I made my #1630, which not only restated my desire to see Zepher lynched, but added to my case. You quoted that post yourself and agreed with it, so I don't get how you can still seemingly be saying that I accidentally set up a lynch on my scumbuddy?I wanted him lynched the whole time! At no point did I slink away with egg on my face, figuratively saying. I found him scummy, he got lynched and flipped scum, that's a mighty good thing in my books."oh god what have I done?"
If you'd re-read the bullshit esurio's been spinning about me and compare it to what I'veactuallybeen doing, then perhaps you can reconcile more easily with the fact that I made a case on a now confirmed scum before anyone else considered suspecting him. From there it shouldn't be too hard for you to conclude what alignment I most likely am.
."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
So I'm scum because I'm too townie (which is a deliberate technique because I'm replacing someone sooooooooooo scummy, an opinion that was held by literally no one but you) and because my read on you progressed as I read the thread? And you also expect me to believe that the one slot you have been calling one hundred percent scum all game might be town because of KoC not caring even though kdowns plainly didn't care either? Lol, okay."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Not to mention that what you said about my read on you progressing literally isn't even true... I've been calling you scum since Day 1, I just mentioned that you get 'a few town points' for the Zepher thing... are you high?In post 2330, Kthxbye wrote:At first, I'm town and even more town due to Z being scum. By the end of his catch-up posting, I'm 1 of 2 top scum reads."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
For the short version of my list-reasons. If you want the full version, well, you'll have to read my catch up posts =PIn post 2297, Cephrir wrote: Bella: Leaning town. Actually contributes occasionally. If we're lynching someone just for lurking, seems like a poor choice.
Venmar: Leaning scum. Only a few issues with him until post 2244 which is in the top 3 worst posts I've read in this game outside of Bitmap.
Brandi: Town. Talked this to death already.
Knight of Cydonia/kdowns: Neutral, I guess. KoC's deliberate? uselessness might be scummy, I'm not sure.
PeregrineV/xRECKONERx: Neutral. Didn't like Reck, Peregrine is doing okay.
Ankamius: Scummy, but dat claim. If he's somehow alive in 2 days I'll start worrying about him again.
d3x: Neutral. Would have said leaning town before Peregrine's solid points.
kthxbye: Scum. Talked this to death already.
CF Riot: Leaning town. Mostly held over from early stuff as nothing has stood out from him lately.
Nexus/Esuriospiritus: Town. Not even close.
InflatablePie: Leaning town. Useless early, spurt of usefulness that I liked quite a bit, back to useless.
NachoMamma8/TehBrawlGuy: Leaning town. Neither player has given me cause to think otherwise.
Elscouta/Bitmap: Scum. Bitmap was insane and insanely scummy, and Elscouta is only a bit better.
Kise: Leaning scum. Has rubbed me the wrong way too many times.
Andrius: Neutral. Only the convenient Bella vote really bothered me recently.
ActionDan: Neutral, but wins the other useless award. If we're lynching for sheer suckage, it's this guy or KoC.
pieceofpecanpie: Leaning scum. Haven't liked him at all outside of the Zepher case.
I'm gonna vote under the assumption deadline will be extended and worry about compromising later.
Vote: Elscouta
Though some of Sajin's questions are a little weird, so far so good.
Not sure how Els could have possibly forgotten the most important thing popp has done in the entire game. Not saying I think he pretended to forget but rather that not paying attention is scummy. Likewise I find it townie when people pay enough attention to notice contradictions (see: Sajin), especially distantly spaced ones, though I personally am not usually observant enough to pick up on these."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I'd like to hear a fullclaim and also a claim from Bella. Feast obviously does something interesting or you wouldn't have pushed the lane N1 (unblockable damage?). ActionDan's logic is indeed bad. Welcome to mafia, it turns out Vanilla Townie is less powerful than Cop. This game is admittedly atypical but I don't think we can expect all roles to be on the same power level, I mean look at Ank's claim, that shit be cray.
Though I can't actually deny the all tanks/ADCs theory (except to point out the dead supports), I think it's a silly assumption.
As far as the number of roleblockers go. On the one hand, that is a lot of roleblockers. On the other, there are a lot of CC abilities in League of Legends that couldn't be much else, not to mention I think Kthx is scum anyhow.
I'd air a little on the side of the claim being truthful, though again, I'd like to hear the rest of it. That just doesn't necessarily mean Venmar is town."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
This is a good point. VM seems like a really random target who can't confirm or deny whether he was actually roleblocked. Convenient as fuck.In post 2418, Brandi wrote:So just got back from my friends I've been MIA for a few days. I'm willing to move my vote over before the end of the day to be more useful but right now I'm not 100% how I feel about the Venmar vs AD interaction.
On the one hand I do think part of AD's logic is bad- but I also get a bad gut feeling about Ven mentioning his targeting of VoidedMafia with his abilities since that's a townie that is dead. He also never pursued Voided at all or voted him. Though I do admit he replied to one of VM's posts negatively D1.
I don't know why you're getting so defensive about how you so "clearly" prefer a Bella lynch to Venmar after this post in which that doesn't sound like the case at all.In post 2422, pieceofpecanpie wrote:Oh yeah, that bear thing was Venmar's doing.
This changes everything.
I dont get why people are saying this is a townie reaction. What he says about the softclaim, though, is true I think. Obviously I never saw this alleged avatar but his next post refers to it in a way that seems to imply that's what he was talking about. I saw both the 'eat' softclaim and the bear one as I was reading and was confused (because I thought bear was a softclaim), and I remembered that Volibear's W bites an enemy so I figured that's what it meant but I guess I can believe this... basically what I'm saying is we shouldn't lynch over this, I still prefer the Venmar lynch but this reason isn't very good.In post 2430, Venmar wrote:This is utter HORSESHIT. I never soft claimed any fucking volibear claim. That joke I made was when I still had a bear for an avatar, that was the joke, punning my own avatar, not volibear you opportunistic shitheads.
Go ahead and put my head on a pike, but when I flip as a blue team Cho'Gath, you'll be sorry. My wagon is bad, and Bella should be lynched, NOT ME.
I blocked VM cause I thought she was scummy. My block+AA damage didn't kill her, or else there would've been two deaths...
I don't really think it is. AtE flipping out and giving up is certainly something I've seen from town and scum alike, though I can see why Brandi would like it and that opinion sees consistent with her play.
"i'll give you the benefit of the doubt because I haven't seen you fuck up before"... what. If Venmar flips scum this post seems bad.In post 2436, pieceofpecanpie wrote:@ VenmarAtE, anger, indignant rage, call it what you will, but considering your involvement in this game it's pretty unjustified.
If anything you should be kicking your own arse for contributing so little, beyond actually a post that can be alluded to Volibear and then a post claiming Cho. It hasn't really taken a Sherlock or Poirot to create a speculative link out of that, and no one can really counter it with a"nu-uh Venmar has totally been doing town stuff here, here and here". So what have we got to go on, your good standing within this game?
Having said all that, I'd be willing to give you the benefit of the doubt in that I haven't seen you derp something like that in the past, so find it unlikely that you'd accidentally do so here. And I'd much rather lynch Bella over you and I believe others should feel the same, especially after the way the last few posts have unfolded, but I'm not against switching over to you to ensure a lynch does go through.
What the fuck is this? I would say it seems like you're trying to distract us from the wagons at hand, except this vote is so obviously silly that no one could possibly be distracted by it. Just... what?
I can admit the way this wagon is developing makes me a little uneasy. It has both my top scumreads on it, for one thing, but I feel like they could be bussing in the hopes that Bella will be lynched anyway.In post 2461, Ankamius wrote:Partially because Venmar's been looking more town in the past couple pages and Bella has been looking scummier since the beginning of D3.
Buuuut, I feel there's more information to be had in a Bella lynch. Bella-scum means Venmar is most likely town (and scum was part of that jump), while Bella-town means that the primary people promoting the Venmar wagon (Nacho/d3x iirc offhand) are likely town, as well as reinforcing my early town read on Sajin (kdowns slot) for #2441. No real change on Venmar in that instance.
Venmar scumflip lessens my scumread on the people suddenly attacking him, but the entire thing was weird enough (and he had been a primary focus of attention while attention on Bella had been waning) that I could see scum bussing pretty easily as well. Venmar townflip just means I still have a scumread on Bella and the people who suddenly switched to Venmar for the lol-volibear-softclaim.
"For the information" is kind of a dumb reason at this point. Especially because I feel like we get a lot of info from either flip at this point.
These last few pages make me a little less excited about the Venmar wagon, not that I loved it to begin with, but I still think Bella is town. I really wish we had time to run up my top suspects and/or ActionDan."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I could prolong Ank's life by one night (and only one night, because my predecessor made bad choices), but I think there are better uses for me tonight.
I think having everyone just AA their scum reads is okay. What's the argument for only having a particular set? So we know anything outside that group was done by scum? I could see townies disobeying the plan because everyone becomes a lunatic when they get vig powers etc etc.
@Kise- I think one person might have but that didn't account for everything?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
No we're not, it's 7-8, my VC was wrong and your counting is wrong even if you took my VC as correct.
Bella 7 (Venmar, Ankamius, Andrius, pieceofpecanpie, InflatablePie, CF Riot, PeregrineV)
Venmar 8 (Nachomamma8, Elscouta, Cephrir, ActionDan, kthxbye, d3x, Bella, Brandi)
Useless votes 3 (Sajin, Nexus, Kise)"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Hm. I think we probably need everyone to check in before we potentially go lynching d3x, even if he's scum we want to know if someone claims to have saved him somehow. I'm a little surprised Venmar is gaining steam already today seeing as he was something of a compromise lynch yesterday, though to be fair I could see the move onto AD being scum-driven (not much point speculating about this until we know Venmar's alignment). For now I'm going to do the thing I can definitely do regardless of all this night shenanigans, and I'll possibly move later once the night shenanigans are cleared up.
Vote: Elscouta"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Obviously he wants me to claim two different roles, one in each wave. Duh.
The order seems good and unbiased.
On d3x vs. Venmar: Venmar's story doesn't make a ton of sense to fake unless he thinks he's definitely getting lynched today and wants to take someone down with him. But he is scummier than d3x independently, so given a binary choice I'd pick Venmar."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
CF, you do make a decent point but I think part of it is the way the wagons formed yesterday. The Bella wagon stuck for quite a while and it took forever to switch to Venmar, but the Venmar wagon collapsed in zero seconds flat. This did have a lot to do with the deadline, I suppose. I felt like Bella was always a compromise wagon anyway, and though there is some legitimate suspicion of her with the new day everyone can go back to what they actually wanted to do.
And as we've discussed the claim is confirmable, whereas Venmar has the night shenanigans which seem to present us with a dichotomy (that means binary choice right? I'm not actually sure)."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Also, Brandi...
What changed?
"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
It seems like you had a change of heart sometime yesterday but you never really commented on Venmar between that post and this one.In post 2661, Brandi wrote:In post 2649, ActionDan wrote:it's ok brandi.
Just never let them lynch you.
I must say that I'm amused andrius has the audacity to suggest a AA list of the all the town-reads that Ank has.
WOW. Andrius.
WOW.
YOU ARE LITERALLY COUNTER CLAIMING VENMAR.
At this point I just want Ven/Andy dead. :/
All of this orchestrating of derailing the ven wagon tastes horrible to me.
unvote
vote: Venmar
Im not lynching AD -_-"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Reasonable explanation but I wish you'd mentioned it yesterday.In post 2906, Brandi wrote:As in, if you are scum about to be lynched, you want to give the town as little information as possible. As such with Ven.
Ank vote is pointless and stupid. I've also been reading him as more town since my entry.
You were plainly not getting lynched yesterday. Not a fan of "FoS Brandi for lazy reasons oh and I should probably read your posts".pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Secondly, I'm not too impressed by Ank's empty-headed vote in #2847, but what caught my attention the most is that Brandi immediately followed that post without an eyebrow raised and put a vote on Venmar. This is the same Brandi that kept crowing for either Bella or myself yesterday and made her sheeping intentions perfectly clear through both actions and words. So here's a perfect opportunity to sheep someone voting me and... nope, doesn't take it. Why? This kind of inconsistent play does not read town.
Now since she's posted a lot since then I need to read - rather then skim - the rest of it and see where this is going. But a renewedFos @ Brandinonetheless.
Hi Nexus! Good of you to drop in! What is your opinion on literally anything at all ever?"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I've touched on the popp point before. He got a lot of town points for being the driving force behind the Zepher lynch, but I have found pretty much every other thing he's done to be scummy. If it weren't for this I would probably be voting for him right now.In post 2910, d3x wrote:^^I'm pretty sure that was said Yesterday.
-----------------------------------------------
Anyway, I've been going over the MrZ Wagon progression and I'm not finished, but I'm convinced that Bella and popp are solid Town. I'll have the whole thing put together hopefully later tonight.
With popp, it's not just about the initial case {although that should be compelling enough}. He makes the case, everything dies down for quite a while, then popp comes back and makes another hard push at MrZ while people are losing focus. He puts the Wagon together multiple times.
With Bella, the deadline was approaching and the KthxWagon was almost neck and neck. She would've tied the Voting, but instead Voted MrZ, putting him out front and pretty much securing the last minute Votes would go there for the Lynch. The Vote itself is rather noncommittal and a bit fence-sitty, but the impact is pretty legit. After she moves over, the rest of the Votes fall into place quickly. It's not as solid as popp, but barring some horrendous turn of events, she's Town in my book.
I am also of the opinion that Brandi is Town {although nowhere near as strong of a read as the other two mentioned above}. Her Vote comes at a similar juncture as Bella's, only earlier. It also pushes the MrZWagon ahead fo the competing Kthx and AD Wagons.
I fell like Bella's not the only one we could potentially apply your logic to, but your point is okay. I mean I didn't really think she was scum in the first place so it's not like I need to be convinced otherwise."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
It's worth considering, I suppose. It looks like a lot of players ignored the shortlist last night though and I wouldn't be surprised if they continue to do so. If you don't look at it as a scheme and rather as an isolated action. ("I am town. I suspect X. Autoattack: X"). If we actually stick to the shortlist it's essentially equivalent to what you're suggesting. Ultimately the effect is that we get two lynches per day which seems pretty okay? I'm not sure how I feel about these plans slash giving away information on the whole, and I don't know that there's necessarily something wrong with everyone doing their own thing.
Yeah, I'm not entirely sure why it's somehow okay to attack people you haven't expressed suspicion of. Unfortunately Nexus replaced obvtown and apparently thinks this means it's okay to skate by and not help.Sajin wrote:Additionally, why is nexus being allowed to provide zero insight and why has bella's wagon which was rapidly dropped for the AD wagon been completely forgotten? Many people have been allowed to damage people without providing much of any reasoning in the thread. The mechanics of this game have been played completely wrong imo."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
Vigging one target versus a pool of several are functionally the same except that people get some choice, so there is less chance they will ignore the plan. I don't particularly care for the ORGANIZE EVERYTHING plan, but I'll go along with it if that's what we're doing.
I can't remember why I ever didn't think Andrius was town, but I no longer feel that way. And if anyone is getting a town leader hat, it's gonna be the guy who is already leading the town.
Brandi, please stop being emo. It makes people waste their votes on you and distracts us from lynching scum. Your emoness has generated all the tells from others that it is ever going to generate.
It looks like my third choice is getting votes. I am okay with this.
Vote: popp"I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
I mean, if you ignore the fact that I opened the day voting Elscouta. I think my progression on you as I read the thread was pretty clear, so I'm gonna go ahead and say that your claim that I'm just ignoring that piece of evidence is a misrep.In post 2992, pieceofpecanpie wrote:
Oh stop, you flatter me so. OfIn post 2981, Cephrir wrote:It looks like my third choice is getting votes. I am okay with this.allthe people lucky lil 'ol me isthirdon your list? What did I ever do to deserve such an honour? Oh yeah, that's right, I made an opening case of my scumbuddy Zepher and continued to promote his lynch, which you fully acknowledged and understood and then miraculously resolved into your continued misgivings about my scumminess with a magical wave of your "I-still-believe-this-to-be-so" wand.
So why aren't you up there promoting and championing the first and second on your list? Ah lazy wagon vote, I see.
There is a way to correct me without being incredibly condescending for no reason.
Why, good sir, that comment about Brandi was something she did this very day, not yesterday. So me "plainly not getting lynched yesterday" is a completely irrelevant comment. Thus I'm not a fan of "make lazy assessment of PoPP's post with premeditated ideas in my head".In post 2927, Cephrir wrote:You were plainly not getting lynched yesterday. Not a fan of "FoS Brandi for lazy reasons oh and I should probably read your posts".
I didn't turn around on Bella, I still think she's town, but I was irritated by you (and Sajin iirc) ignoring the issue and decided my blanket statement should apply to her as well. You're stretching my words pretty hard here.In post 2935, Cephrir wrote:I fell like Bella's not the only one we could potentially apply your logic to, but your point is okay. I mean I didn't really think she was scum in the first place so it's not like I need to be convinced otherwise.
Side point: WTF @ short-spaced turn around on Bella?In post 2939, Cephrir wrote:If I see a post from Bella, Sajin or popp that does not contain either a claim or a specific objection to claiming I will vote them. Don't ignore the issue.
Main point: Has Safin made a claim or specific objection? Well, yes several posts follow continuing discussion on the merits of claiming.
Has PoPP made a claim or specific objection? Yes, #2953.
Has Bella made a claim or specific objection? No.
Conclusion:"Oh golly that pro-town Bella, 10 pages without a peep, I'll threaten her with votes and she'll respond. And yet, she hasn't responded. Oh well, better vote PoPP"
So I'm not allowed to give my own opinion of things? Not to mention unjustified slants on others' posts is exactly what you just finished doing...So after all that careful analysis and commenting by yourself lucky lil 'ol third-in-line me gets the vote. Well I must say, stellar stuff old boy. Top job. I'm reminded of someone who said something along the lines of that most of your big analysis posts read like you just quoting something and throwing a mostly unjustified slant of your own below it. I'll have to go digging, perhaps it was Kthx, nevertheless I agreed with that sentiment at the time and I'll publicly state so right now for the record."I would prefer not to." --Herman Melville,Bartleby the Scrivener-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish
-
-
Cephrir he/himSurvivorhe/him
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 25436
- Joined: October 11, 2006
- Pronoun: he/him
- Location: Seattle-ish