Lord of The Rings Mafia - Game End
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Why is it dodging the question not to interact with RQS when we've moved out of the randomness stage?In post 49, Spaceman Spiff wrote:Anyone else feel like dodging waynegg's question before we lynch this scum?
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
This is blatantly false. Town lynches scum day 1 at an above-expected rate if it were random.In post 110, Venrob wrote:Nights give scum a kill, which gives us INFO. Day start is a blind day, where town kills itself. Not town, but scum. Daystart and nightstart are both scum. Nightstart, we get INFO.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
What about the question is not random to you?In post 70, Spaceman Spiff wrote:I'm buddying his question because I like it very much. I do not think it was random.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Read this.In post 115, Miss Subliminal wrote:Did not know. Given scum are still a minority I'm not sure how exacty we lynch them more often RANDOMLY.
Unless more than 29% of players are scum, it means that town lynches scum more often than expected statistically on day 1, which implies that scumhunting on day 1 works. A lot of players argue that day 1 is the most important day.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
So do you think scum were pushing the wagon? If so, where?In post 129, ToastyToast wrote:I do think Venrob has said some suspicious stuff, but that is one fast wagon. I also think he's just trolling right now (I mean that town post?)
Does this mean that you investigated Venrob's meta as well? What conclusions did you draw?In post 90, Robert2424 wrote:OOOOOOOOHHHHH, RESEARCH NOTES, *Half tackles MonkeyMan out of the way and grabs the notes and reads them*.
Spiff and DeathNote feel towny.
This sounds all well and good, but it also sets up kill targets for scum who would want to take the ring out of play prematurely. I'd be more interested in letting lynches happen and see who hammers and how. More informative that way.In post 115, Miss Subliminal wrote:p.s. When the time comes for a lynch we need to organize a designated Hammer wielder to avoid letting someone come in an hammer in the hopes of getting the treasure.
-PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Robert2424 is playing in line with his scum game from what I can see.
VOTE: Robert2424
Venrob, if you're so certain Spiff is scum, why wouldn't you feel safe putting down your vote under any circumstances? Your case on him is that he's pushy (never met any pushy players on this board...!) and pursued an RQS question. Not very damning.In post 211, Venrob wrote:VOTE: Spiff
The votes came too fast on me and then Spiff, though I maintain that spiff is scum. I feel safe placing my vote again as huge wagons seem to have died down.-
-
alienBRO
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I’d like an elaboration of this. I’m going to assume that this is similar to the “liar tells” you used to catch TD in Xenoblade.In post 233, waynegg wrote:No it was those two where I talked about picking up crabs. I don't have crabs irl. And since my question is dead, I may as well let you in on that too. I structure questions that help to reveal alignment using cognitive dissonance (and a few other things that I'll keep to myself). It's a significant part of my early scumhunting. While the question itself has nothing to do with the game, the answers do.
Does the speed at which the wagon formed inform this analysis?In post 239, ToastyToast wrote:Amrun comes out as town in the Venrob-Amrun exchange. Venrob is an idiot, but I believe his claim and do think there are scum on his wagon. With the way he was acting, its a pretty easy lynch and I could definitely see scum trying to push it.
Or town is PR-light? There are a lot of ways to balance the game, and trying to figure it out before we’ve started seeing flips is probably not useful.In post 240, ToastyToast wrote:2) Giving town an advantage with the ring but scum nothing seems unlikely unless the scumteam is power heavy.
Or I’ll confirm that this was a point of interest in Xenoblade.In post 305, waynegg wrote:Andy, will you just save me some time and let Amrun know that you've been known to do that as scum? I really don't want to spend an hour digging through Xenoblade for it, but I will
Not necessarily true. Town acting irrationally is often times a good way to draw out scum.In post 360, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Town act rationally. Scum try to make things complicated and distract town.
…In post 362, MonkeyMan576 wrote:Ah but how do we know Ssauron is evil? There's the possibility the good guys are bad in this game. Shouldn't we account for every possibility?
Case for Amrun, please.In post 419, Miss Subliminal wrote:Amrun and Toasty are SUPEROBVTOWN.
penguin placed that vote while I was V/LA. Will let her answer that.In post 466, Robert2424 wrote:@AlienBro, that is your only reasoning for continuing the bandwagon on me? That is qwite poor.
Re the claim: Fakeclaims exist…
Ugh, this is bad and you should feel bad. If you are seriously voting Wayne for being a hyper-aggressive player than you seriously need to find a better reason.In post 552, Miss Subliminal wrote:Townies trying to mind fuck hot hot hot hot hot people is not a good thing, last I checked.
UNVOTE: for now. Going to calibrate reads with penguin now that I’m caught up.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Robert2424, I've seen your scum game. I got to replace into your scum slot in a Newbie not too long ago, so I have reason to be familiar with it. (Spoiler alert: it didn't end well for scum) I checked out the Micro you completed as scum. Your posting here pre-wagon fit in with your style in both those games of dancing around getting immersed in the game play and being somewhat frivolous. Not sure I buy your claim, especially with your overenthusiastic amusement at the idea of someone eating a shoe. That rang really false to me, like scum buddying in an attempt to be fun and engaged in the thread without commenting on anything important.
waynegg and Amrun going all cage match on each other isn't helping my read of either. Could be scum posturing with scum, really, given the level of debate they've reached.
Venrob, you really think he should claim at L-3? Why? Fishing?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Associative tells are always helpful, even before flips. I really don't get why more people don't use associative tells early to try to piece together the narrative of the game.In post 622, Venrob wrote:also good point alien; could be 2 scum, distancing- hmm... That's associative tells though, which need to wait for Day 2
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUIn post 631, BROseidon wrote:
Would you like to discuss anything from Xenoblade with this head?In post 626, waynegg wrote:PA~have you maybe read my exchange with Andy in Xenogears the day before LyLo?
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I haven't picked up on that specifically, but I am keeping an eye on him. penguin and I are trying not to subject everyone to hydra dissonance, so we are focusing on going after targets that we mutually agree are scummy.In post 633, waynegg wrote:You already know what all happened in Xenogears. I'll argue with the wall if I think I think it'll cause someone to mess up, and its very common for people who haven't played with me to read me wrongly.
I'd like to hit scum today. Many of Andy's posts here have had a distinctly different feel here than in that game. They're hedged. They're less jovial. They feel contrived many times in sentence structure. His designated hammer post was the last of his posts that came off similar to Xeno. Right after I called their hand on the hammer thing, they went silent and said they were now going to have less posts and post with one thought. While their posting has slowed, they're definitely speaking with two heads.
Then there's the latest round of red flags which I've already enumerated. I really think they're scum and would like to discuss that with someone, but so far it's fallen on deaf ears. What are your thoughts BRO?
I have, however, picked up on differences in your play. Specifically, you are being a lot more personal and abrasive here than you were in Xenoblade. Any reason for that?
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Wayne, do you see something here?In post 714, Who wrote:He later claimed poison doctor. The fact that this fit with the flavor led me to believe he was innocent, but after reading the "safeclaim" section of various modding guides on the wiki, I am beginning to rethink that opinion.
I think we need to bring liar tells into this.
Ugh still catching up...
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Missed you reaching out to me.In post 756, waynegg wrote:I would like to talk about TwinFlames and their general lack of activity here and in particular RachMarie's almost carbon copy of her Xeno playstyle. I've reached out to both Subliminal and Bro to discuss this slot (though I don't think either of them knew my intentions) and to beat a dead horse that isn't Subliminal now I'm comfortable with them for reasons and have been rebuffed. So I try again. If anyone else would like to take me up that'll be fine as well.
Rach's play is anti-town regardless of alignment. If anything, her scum play I saw in Xenoblade was more pro-town than her town play in HP mafia. I only have experience with NS's scum meta, although I think penguin has mentioned having more experience with him.
I have no clue how to read that slot.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
You posted it in a place that I technically shouldn't mention >.>In post 874, waynegg wrote:Coulda sworn I'd just posted the link to liespotting... Oh well, here it is
http://liespotting.com/liespotting-basics/words/
I'm seeing a lack of contraction usage in the post I linked, although it's only a few instances. Once I have time and am not catching up before bed I am going to look through the rest of his posts.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I'd point out that BRO's experience with town-RachMarie was when she was hindered by being half of a siblings pair who'd claimed masons to try to avoid the double hit, which hindered her active towniness IMHO. Having played with her as town, I'd expect her to be quite useful as such.
waynegg, do you have a tow read on Spiff? If so, why?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I'd say your initial use of the phrase 'pointing that out' was wrong because your mother wasn't making a statement designed to call your attention to something you could have immediately observed; it was a fact that you had to take significant action to verify beyond observation from your immediate vantage point.In post 1398, Miss Subliminal wrote:uh the green orange thing was just an example
What happened was my mom said we were out of ice cream
and I was like "thanks for pointing that out" before checking the freezer
but then I found ice cream
so I was like "oh no you didn't point it out you were wrong"
and my aunt was like "no she still pointed it out"
according to you, my mom was pointing it out because she didn't know she was wrong
however, if she had known we had ice cream, and lied to me, then that would not be pointing it out
Y/N? just to make sure-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
^ Sorry, that was PA. In response to this question,
No, because pointing something out requires that whomever you're pointing the thing out to will know immediately that you are right. You're showing them a self-evident truth.In post 1396, Miss Subliminal wrote:But is it still pointing out if you KNOW you are wrong?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
The effffffffffff????????? The third-party wincon looks like a survivor to me, so either you're being dumb or know something I don't.In post 1501, Gollum wrote:2 mafia and an sk left.
PA and I are calibrating reads now, will get back to y'all soon.-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I feel dumb now >:CIn post 1507, Gollum wrote:
This seems obtuse. Maybe Wayne is right about Miss hrmmm...In post 1502, Miss Subliminal wrote:How do you know the RingScum is an SK?
Lets see....we have a psn doc who has claimed that he was psned last night + it seems like it would be super bastardly not to give ring scum a power and a kill would help him greatly + in the other LOTR game I was a third party ring hunting SK + this question is fucking dumb 'cause your own hydra thinks there's an sk. lol
-Bro-
-
alienBRO
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
In post 1683, DeathNote wrote:
Lol you just won't give up on that.
I can't get a good read on Subliminal.Well, this is godawful.
Sorry, we haven't had time to touch base in our QT since DeathNote picked up. We were still looking at where scum was likely to have been on MonkeyMan576.
DeathNote, care to comment on the aboutface?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Nope, it's like saying you can't get a good fix on something. It doesn't tell you anything about its location except that it's indeterminate. And people don't usually use 'good' and 'bad' to describe their scum/town reads.In post 1687, waynegg wrote:
"I can't get a good read on Subliminal"
Wouldn't the opposite of that be...
"I'm getting a "bad" read on Subliminal"? That's how I took it.
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
BRO and I concur on Who and Twin Flames, actually. Their votes on the MonkeyMan576 wagon:In post 1692, Amrun wrote:Toast, funny you should ask that... I unvoted DN but didn't want him to know I decided he was town until he answered, but I let the cat out of the bag anyway. Pretty clearly explained what about DN's interaction with the monkey wagon I found town, following "specifically." Amazing how that works, isn't it?
Finally got a chance to re-read Monkey wagon.
Scummiest votes on the wagon: Who, Twin Flames, Gollum
Scummiest person off the wagon: Toast
Today, I am inclined to go for Gollum or Toast.
But then if they thought the lynch might not go, why not lurk it out? It's a nice place for town cred, if they thought losing MonkeyMan576 was inevitable, but time is also scum's friend. I think both hydra heads are savvy enough to get on the bus though.In post 1386, Twin Flames wrote:VOTE: monkey dude
Thats L-1 can we get a hammer in the next couple of hours?
This is looking very much like a NL situation which is bad juju on D 1 especially...
---Rach
This is a generic 'he's terrible' reason where he still wants to hold onto his other supposed scum reads. If scum managed to get on the MonkeyMan576 wagon, he's my first choice.In post 1268, Who wrote:Really?is enough to convince you that he had reasons and a reason to hide them?
Plus, you seemed to be saying that you already thought that he had reasons and wanted him to reveal them.
But, as scummy as you are
VOTE: Monkeyman
Monkeyman has been just terrible recently and is more deserving of my vote.
Then here:
He volunteers to hammer someone who he thinks might be a VI. Sure, we have nailed one scum and aren't in dire straits, but if Venrob is telling the truth, he's going to die tonight, and with a poisoner then on the loose, we could be looking at two deaths/night from here one out. Which would give us 10 people at the start of Day Three and 7 at the start of Day Four. That worst-case scenario gives us three more lynches to nail a scum. Not a lot of wiggle room for lynching VIs.In post 1566, Who wrote:I think that based on the refusing to give a reason, DeathNote is more likely a VI than scum (Though he could be a scum VI). There is no reason for scum to play like that, so it's probably just bad play in general which is not indicative of alignment. At least, that covers the refusing to give a reason for his own attacks part. Him thinking he gets immunity from suspicion because he left on the other hand, is scummy.
Intent to hammer if DN doesn't claim.
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
WALLLLL POSTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT.
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll. First wording post that hasn’t made me, as a linguistic, want to verbally eviscerate the person saying it.In post 1531, Miss Subliminal wrote:According to DN, you can only point something out if it is true or you believe it to be true. If you know that it is false, then it is lying, not pointing out. He said that Toasty could point him out as scum. Not accuse. Not say. Point him out. DN made a subconscious word-choice slip.
This one is less good. One can admit something to someone who is not already aware of that thing.In post 1540, waynegg wrote:Admitted gives the connotation that DN already knew Venrob was poisoned before Vennie said anything about it. An uninformed word choice would be more along the lines of "told us he was poisoned".
Can we lynch this? “Look at me magically vanish and then come in and intent to hammer the obvious VI.”In post 1566, Who wrote:I think that based on the refusing to give a reason, DeathNote is more likely a VI than scum (Though he could be a scum VI). There is no reason for scum to play like that, so it's probably just bad play in general which is not indicative of alignment. At least, that covers the refusing to give a reason for his own attacks part. Him thinking he gets immunity from suspicion because he left on the other hand, is scummy.
Intent to hammer if DN doesn't claim.
Look at how incredibly town this is.In post 1572, DeathNote wrote:Scum posting here.
You guys... are silly. I am town and a rider or rohan (VT). Same reason why Monkey's claim was crap because it didn't make sense to have two people be vanilla townie and one with a name claim.
Not scum. I'm never scum. Hate you all.
Carry me pls.In post 1605, waynegg wrote:So, there must be a resistance to hammer on DeathNote. That leads me to believe both of the remaining real scum are already on the wagon.
VOTE: Subliminal
Fucking Balrog!
yup. hydra slipping all over the place...
I was V/LA and other games were easier or more urgent to post in.In post 1667, Gollum wrote:Which head of BroAlien would like to explain why each head is posting it up around the site but not here?
We are still working out the kinks of our hydra.In post 1670, waynegg wrote:That is odd. They've been pretty devoid of activity here even before V/LA
This post is eerily similar to how I felt when I read through day 1 during the night phase.In post 1692, Amrun wrote:Scummiest votes on the wagon: Who, Twin Flames, Gollum
Scummiest person off the wagon: Toast
Hydra kinks. We move votes slowly together as a unit because we want to be in consensus about things.In post 1721, Gollum wrote:So.....why are you not voting either?
This is far from the worst I’ve seen. Hell, my townplay in C&H was worse than this >.>In post 1742, Gollum wrote:If this is DN town, its about the worst play we've seen outside of a non-newbie. Thus we're having a hard time buying DN town.
Ugh I don’t like this DN wagon Who is scum as fuck.
VOTE: Who
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Here. "I don't like lynching VIs. I'm going to vote this VI now."In post 1787, Miss Subliminal wrote:
Can you give an example of you "scumslipping" as town?In post 1785, alienBRO wrote:I scumslip more as town than as scum.
I don't put much weight on scumslips/scumtells. Nacho beat it out of me when he was my IC.
-Bro
It got me dayvigged >.>
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I'd agree that I make scum slips way more blatantly as town; my worst one was here where I typed 'kills' instead of 'investigations' and it kept me as ever being seen as town by influential townies for the rest of the game.In post 1803, alienBRO wrote:
Here. "I don't like lynching VIs. I'm going to vote this VI now."In post 1787, Miss Subliminal wrote:
Can you give an example of you "scumslipping" as town?In post 1785, alienBRO wrote:I scumslip more as town than as scum.
I don't put much weight on scumslips/scumtells. Nacho beat it out of me when he was my IC.
-Bro
It got me dayvigged >.>
-Bro
I find DeathNote scummy for other things, like his vote on null-read Subliminal and his stance that he only seems to want to vote people who others have voted in #1693. But the pointed out thing, not so much.
Who, my suspicions of you are here. Comments?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Okay, caught up.
1) Either GM has the ring or he actually destroyed it. I don't see mafia motivation in what he did yesterday, but he still could still be a third party lying about it hoping to coast to a victory.
2) Nothing TF has done has made me think the slot is particularly town, but I also want to run up Toasty or Gollum.
Yeah, I think GM might be a third part, and the last mafioso is in {Gollum, Toasty, TF}
Gonna sync reads with PA, and then we'll place down a vote.-
-
alienBRO
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Here's the thing: if we lynch the last wraith-scum and there's a ring-scum with the ring out there, we lose. When you had the ring, you knew we were lynching the wraith scum you'd found. Your reads were good enough to find said scum. Come night, by your theory, there'd be only one wraith scum left. You could pick who gets the ring next, and I don't buy that you didn't have a decent town read somewhere to pass it off safely. Instead you say you destroyed it? It doesn't add up. Maybe if scum killed the new ringbearer, that's bad, but we went into night with 12 people. Subtract yourself, and that's eleven possible bearers. An 18% chance scum gets the ring versus an investigation. And the 18% includes you making a random handoff, so ignoring your scum reads.
I agree and have agreed on TF for a while, although given that Who had a fakeclaim identical to an actual VT, I don't have a town read on NSin-Robert.
Does that make my position clearer?
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
1) What does AtF mean?In post 2409, goodmorning wrote:
1. How is this in any way a good answer to the question "why assume there is another third party" instead of an AtF?In post 2408, alienBRO wrote:Here's the thing: if we lynch the last wraith-scum and there's a ring-scum with the ring out there, we lose.1 When you had the ring, you knew we were lynching the wraith scum you'd found. Your reads were good enough to find said scum.2 Come night, by your theory, there'd be only one wraith scum left. You could pick who gets the ring next, and I don't buy that you didn't have a decent town read somewhere to pass it off safely. Instead you say you destroyed it?3 It doesn't add up. Maybe if scum killed the new ringbearer, that's bad, but we went into night with 12 people. Subtract yourself, and that's eleven possible bearers. An 18% chance scum gets the ring versus an investigation. And the 18% includes you making a random handoff, so ignoring your scum reads.
I agree and have agreed on TF for a while, although given that Who had a fakeclaim identical to an actual VT, I don't have a town read on NSin-Robert.
Does that make my position clearer?3a
--PA
2. No, they weren't. I chose Subliminal to investigate as they would have been a valuable clear but had enough suspicion from others on them that it was possible they were Scum. I thought they would investigate Town.
For the record, if they had been Town I would have outed them as Town and passed the ring elsewhere.
3. Yes.
3a. But I don't think it's intellectually honest.
Speaking of NSin, my meta of him, knowing whose alt he is, makes it much more likely to me that he's Town.
2) That's valid.
3) What do you mean by not intellectually honest?
The problem that we are having is that there major discrepancies in the movement of the ring. Who claims to have had it, nobody counterclaims. NSin hammers. Somehow YOU end up with it during night-phase, and you claim to destroy it despite us having just lynched the person whose wincon was to have it AND having the main mafia faction be down to one member. Basically, that the ring got to you is suspect as fuck, and the fact that we don't actually know if it's gone just compounds this problem.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
I've bolded the operative word here.In post 2420, goodmorning wrote:Nevertheless,Iknow the facts of my involvement to be true and therefore do not know why you no longer seem interested in finding Scum but in chasing some impossible dream of a third party instead.
YOU know them to be true, but if you are some sort of ring-scum you're going to say that. The fact that nobody has supplied ANY information to support that, from my perspective, I should suspect nothing fishy is going on makes me incredibly nervous.
Here's what I think we should do: Everyone should claim whether they had the ring day 1 or two, and who they passed it to.
Muffin: I do think that Who lying would be a possibility, but there still had to have been a townie who passed it to GM, and nobody has claimed that. Unless it was Venrob, we should have had a claim from the townie who passed it.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
That's what I'm trying to figure out right now. I'm generally a risk-averse person, so having this not cleared up bothers me.In post 2425, goodmorning wrote:Also: can Who's claim of having the ring be trusted? What reason could he have to lie? If he did have it, why pass it to me?
The answer to all of these, from anyone's pov except his, is IDK.
I'm fairly sure that he last Sauron-scum is Gollum or TF, and I'm favoring TF right now. PA agrees with me that TF is the best candidate.
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Mod confirmed it was the 3rd party wincon. The BFF part is concerning, though.
Also, I agree with NSin's plan, but we have to remember that scum could choose not to NK the person for reasons of WIFOM (although I doubt they would do this unless they thought GM destroyed the ring, because leaving an investigation in play is probably not worth it).
Mod, what happens to the ring if the person who had it self-hammers-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
Yeah...care to explain why you didn't dangle from a noose yesterday? Or shall we assume the answer to that is "fuck you guys" again? And where does Saki come into it?
And how is it that you can't see any reason for zMuffin to lie about his investigation? Because here's a good one: what if he's scum trying to score the last mislynch at MyLo on Twin Flames, a popular scum read?
UNVOTE: GM
If the ring did transfer back to GM, I'm not giving up the option of hammering to conduct our own investigation tonight, thank you very much. (BRO, we'll discuss in-hydra, but this is my gut take.)
--PA-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
If zMuffin is wraith-scum and you're ring-scum, the latter of which seems quite likely to me, we're actually at MyLo today. He's voting you today. I can't imagine that a hand-wavey explanation of 'it was the ring' is going to suffice for why your lynch didn't stick. Which means we're lynching you again today. That leaves one wraith-scum and three townies after a wraith-scum kill: MyLo.
Saki. Isn't. In. This. Game. See: the player list you just quoted.-
-
alienBRO
-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
This seems decent. Will consult with PA about it. We're hashing a few other things out right now.In post 2471, zMuffinMan wrote:actually.
@alienbro,
there is one scenario that could possibly solve this. let me hammer goodmorning today. if he is ring scum and i get the ring after his lynch, there are two scenarios here:
(1) twin flames kills me, he's confirmed scum, you lynch him tomorrow, gg town win
(2) i get the ring after goodmorning lynch. twin flames kills someone that isn't me. i then pass the ring to one of the two players that isn't twin flames still alive tomorrow. they can pass the ring amongst themselves as much as they want so that neither i nor twin flames would reasonably know who has the ring. after this, we no lynch, and there's a 50% chance of confirming i'm not lying
this works if i'm right in my suspicion that goodmorning is currently in possession of the ring
thoughts?
-Bro-
-
alienBRO Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 540
- Joined: July 15, 2013
(1) That's true. If you flip town, we know Twin Flames is scum.In post 2471, zMuffinMan wrote:actually.
@alienbro,
there is one scenario that could possibly solve this. let me hammer goodmorning today. if he is ring scum and i get the ring after his lynch, there are two scenarios here:
(1) twin flames kills me, he's confirmed scum, you lynch him tomorrow, gg town win
(2) i get the ring after goodmorning lynch. twin flames kills someone that isn't me. i then pass the ring to one of the two players that isn't twin flames still alive tomorrow. they can pass the ring amongst themselves as much as they want so that neither i nor twin flames would reasonably know who has the ring. after this, we no lynch, and there's a 50% chance of confirming i'm not lying
this works if i'm right in my suspicion that goodmorning is currently in possession of the ring
thoughts?
(2) We're left with {Twin Flames, zMuffinMan, alienBRO, DeathNote, NSin} minus whomever scum-TF doesn't kill from your POV. We no-lynch in the hopes that whichever of {alienBRO, DeathNote, NSin} you passed the ring to during the day survives the night to investigate. It's a 50% chance we go into the next day with the non-ring-holding survivor having to choose between you and Twin Flames with no further information.
Versus someone else hammering, that person is the NK and the ring goes away anyways. And the survivors still have to pick between zMuffinMan and TF.
I'm kicking around whether a massclaim is a good idea. I end up thinking not, but I do think Twin Flames and zMuffinMan should claim. It's been set up to be 1v1 there, except town has to decide tomorrow who's right. I'd rather not have a surprise role claim thrown in the mix at the end.
BRO, DeathNote, NSin, what's your take on having TF and zMuffinMan role claim?
BRO said he wanted DN to hammer, but I'm leaning toward following zMuffinMan's plan. DN, I get being paranoid and only trusting yourself at this point, but I think it's pretty clearly either zMuffinMan or TF who's wraith-scum. Do you disagree that GM is likely ring-scum? If you're on board there, can you agree that it's unlikely we had 6/15 anti-town parties?
Even if zMuffinMan is somehow a ring-scum (making this a 40% scum game) we just refuse to lynch until he hands off the ring to a townie who can destroy it.
--PA
-
-
-
-
-