In post 860, Titus wrote:VC please
Quick game position would be nice. I see something about a princess.
You had some serious votes on you.
In post 860, Titus wrote:VC please
Quick game position would be nice. I see something about a princess.
In post 886, Sinsun1 wrote:In post 778, MonkeyMan576 wrote:
zabing12[9] - MaxwellPuckett, Little Gumball, LicketyQuickity, HostileIntent, Jamierus, Nero Cain, Saint, RIP, PeaceBringer[L-3]
Just want to start off, there are DEFINITELY scum on Zabing's wagon here. I'll do a current read of everybody at the bottom of this post.
Did everybody miss this???
In post 787, ChannelDelibird wrote:Best practice is to kill him now and reduce scum's knowledge of our roles because it's early game so that the extra night does less damage to us if he's actually town
I am beginning to like CDB, he is along the lines of my thinking. If LQ dies today, mafia have to take two BLIND shots. Tomorrow they have more of a chance to read who is PRs or going to be vital for town to be in game. Then again if LQ flips mafia like I am beginning to think he will, we will be one step closer to saying bye bye mafia.
In post 834, Senator wrote:CDB, you are trying to push this too hard. Its not like we only have 3 days to figure him or the game out. Killing him now is more detrimental to the town PRs than killing him day 2 or 3.
Read what I've said above. Your logic sucks.
Anyway, time for my list of current reads. (BTW the thing about the STDS9 thing about LQ's character not having to have anything to do with the season and flavour, thanks for pointing that out CDB, I am not a die-hard ST fan so I would have never known that).
Leaning Town
MaxwellPuckett
HostileIntent
zabing12
ChannelDelibird
Neutral
Jamierus
PeaceBringer
Jeanne11/(Titus or whoever replaced him/her)
Millar13
PeregrineV
davesaz
RIP
Saint
Narninian
Marcrell
Leaning Scum
The Archmage Ludicrous
Senator
Nero Cain
LicketyQuickity
Little Gumball
KlingonCelt
With my belief of about 4-6 mafia, I'd be laughing if all mafia is in my leaning scum list, but I know I am never that lucky Day 1.
Anyway, LQ's lynch has been proven now that it is beneficial to town whether he's BP or mafia.
FP'd a lot. LQ, you stand at the noose very soon.
In post 899, Saint wrote:mine is more of a fact that i feel like he is a new player who will end up being a scumandeer and fake townleader but he's not good enough to do so yet so he comes across as a VI which makes us largely forgive him for being daft because dumbscum is a legit playstyle that i will go through with when all else is failing .... which is what he's accidentally looking like... active and dumb
Senator I disagree
it is better to get it out of the way statistically, and informationally
Not liking LQ response in my P-Editx3
In post 902, ChannelDelibird wrote:It's not a lie to say that your claimed flavour is not a character from season 1 of DS9, LQ.
In post 905, MaxwellPuckett wrote:PEDIT: LQ, CDB is not lying, and that is just a fact. Even if he's scum, he is not lying about that claim being bad.
How the hell is CDB supposed to know what your alignment is? If you're saying he's lying, that means you're also saying he knows you're actually Gene.
In post 911, ChannelDelibird wrote:OK this is me not even bothering to argue with Titus. She's going to be wrong this game. Not worth my engaging, at least not while at a meet.
Those who can see sense should vote LQ. It's the only reasonable decision.
In post 914, Narninian wrote:In post 909, Titus wrote:In post 902, ChannelDelibird wrote:It's not a lie to say that your claimed flavour is not a character from season 1 of DS9, LQ.
Gene Roddenbury is the creator I believe. That makes sense for a BP claim because without the creator, none would exist.
Second, why would he claim that as scum? Surely the mod would provide a fakeclaim right?
Why besides the claim, is LQ scum?
I don't really buy into the shouldn't claim that as scum argument as
He shouldn't claim that as town either, especially considering that killing him at night triggers the day skip.
He wasn't in any immediate danger of lynch (So should't have claimed it as town) , but there were people wanting to vote for him for behavior. As soon as the claim came people started advocating not lynching him ever, so I could see a benefit for scum fakeclaiming this.
Roddenberry was not the creator of deep space nine, Berman was and Roddenberry was dead during the first season production/airing. A quick google for star trek would give you his name to use for a fake claim though
In post 915, Sinsun1 wrote:In post 887, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 886, Sinsun1 wrote:...
All of it: its a load of garbage. Why are you being like this? Are you trying to pull a reverse or something?
Dude, you quoted that entire post to post 1 line consisting of garbage... You've been called out now by multiple people, your play is atrocious, I am thankful I will not have to put up with you tomorrow.
In post 893, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Sinsun, do you have zabing town because you think that with all those bad votes, a good few of them had to be from scum going for the mislynch?
Yeah, a lot of the reasons I feel were just fluff to vote just to mislynch someone.
I am hoping more people see why lynching LQ is beneficial for town, I'll point it out in BOLD and COLOURED this time just because those are the only times people see what I say fully.
If LQ is town. It gets rid of a headache for everyone in the game and it makes scum take blind guesses tonight, more blind than they would N2 or N3.
If LQ is scum.. Need I say more? (Aside from the fact this is likely because his character is not actually in the first season which this game is suppose to be based on).
FP'd 4 times. Give us a reason to not lynch you LQ. YOUR OWN REASON why keeping you alive has any benefit for town. Can you think of one possible benefit looking at this from a town perspective of keeping you around gives us?
In post 918, Titus wrote:VOTE: LQ
If shit hits the fan Narninian/CDB, you are helping me look into TAL and Saint. K?
In post 921, Senator wrote:In post 909, Titus wrote:In post 902, ChannelDelibird wrote:It's not a lie to say that your claimed flavour is not a character from season 1 of DS9, LQ.
Gene Roddenbury is the creator I believe. That makes sense for a BP claim because without the creator, none would exist.
Second, why would he claim that as scum? Surely the mod would provide a fakeclaim right?
Why besides the claim, is LQ scum?
Saint claimed Miller
In post 923, Titus wrote:In post 920, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 918, Titus wrote:VOTE: LQ
If shit hits the fan Narninian/CDB, you are helping me look into TAL and Saint. K?
Why are you not taking Sinsuns1 reads with a grain of salt?
They are so backwards its not even funny.
Who said I wasn't or was? His reads are not a factor to me now.
In post 936, Saint wrote:In post 901, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 899, Saint wrote:mine is more of a fact that i feel like he is a new player who will end up being a scumandeer and fake townleader but he's not good enough to do so yet so he comes across as a VI which makes us largely forgive him for being daft because dumbscum is a legit playstyle that i will go through with when all else is failing .... which is what he's accidentally looking like... active and dumb
Senator I disagree
it is better to get it out of the way statistically, and informationally
Not liking LQ response in my P-Editx3
I'm not VI, I'm closer to Vi. Yeah, it means what it means.
how so?
i doubt you've been closer to than i have on this account because this was originally a hydra between us
In post 940, MaxwellPuckett wrote:That's what was going through my head. Please answer, Senator, the fact that Saint defended you there has me confused. Would love the opinions of someone else on this because I feel like I'm going crazy???
In post 174, Senator wrote:It is going too fast, and the reasons are bad. But its the reactions to it that make it good.
In post 413, Senator wrote:Lickety. How many games have you played recently?
In post 681, Senator wrote:In post 652, Senator wrote:Just relax and let others post so that you can see what they do. You're hogging up all the spotlight.
And 'win con' is one of the most misused terms in this game.
In post 879, Senator wrote:A lot of people on Zabing are kind of weak.
In post 963, Senator wrote:So why didn't you say that instead of trying to misconstrue my words? Did you not understand before? It sounds like you did.
In post 965, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Double PEdit: Senator wasn't speaking to you, LQ.
In post 971, Senator wrote:I believed you when you said 6 before. 'Coaching'? As in online? Or in person?
Okay. Why is it pro-town?
In post 984, Hostile Intent wrote:Gene wasn't *in* the fucking show though, dude.
That's why that claim is complete and utter bullshit.
In post 838, Hostile Intent wrote:Oh.
Well then.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: LicketyQuickety
#RIPinPeaceGeneRoddenberry
In post 148, Hostile Intent wrote:Ah, I misintepreted that last bit. Duh me.
PL is short for policy lynch.
LAMIST is short for Look At Me I'm So Town.
You said you're scum-reading me for scum-reading you. You said that. That's OMGUS without the vote.
In post 227, Hostile Intent wrote:Elaborate.
In post 999, Hostile Intent wrote:Quote of the fucking year, Bird.
In post 1054, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1052, LicketyQuickety wrote:
P-Edit: Please respond to more stuff surrounding the players who are lurkish Kling.
Shit, that's two-thirds of the playerbase!
In post 1058, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1056, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1054, Klingoncelt wrote:In post 1052, LicketyQuickety wrote:
P-Edit: Please respond to more stuff surrounding the players who are lurkish Kling.
Shit, that's two-thirds of the playerbase!
Pick the 2-4 that are the lurkiest then.
I'll do better than that. I like to ISO players, not in the game, but on their profile page. It gives me a much better look at them. It's time-consuming, I'll do it tomorrow (Friday.) (The hubs is babbling at me right now & I can't concentrate.)
In post 1065, Hostile Intent wrote:In post 1063, LicketyQuickety wrote:No you guys, we should lynch HI. She has done nothing but disrupt the ongoing conversation.
I--
In post 1073, Senator wrote:LQ shut up and let other people post. :V
In post 309, Saint wrote:I'm miller lq so my point is you have to get neg town shit out of the way
In post 1077, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 309, Saint wrote:I'm miller lq so my point is you have to get neg town shit out of the way
This is why I claimed everyone.
In post 863, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 860, Titus wrote:VC please
Quick game position would be nice. I see something about a princess.
You had some serious votes on you.
In post 1081, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Monkey can't tell you what roles are in the setup, if that's what you're asking.
In post 1084, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Huh... the same thing happened to me, but I definitely unvoted so I'm pretty sure it was just an error.
I know that the rules, as they usually do, bring up the possibility of there being people with multiple votes in-game, but do not confirm anything as that would be giving away if there are double-voters or not. That's why I don't think Monkey is able to confirm this for you.
In post 1151, Hostile Intent wrote:The fantastic part of Per5 being so against it is that he's only one player and we're fucking doing this anyway. So, yeah. Let's just get other folks on board so we can get the fuck on with the game already.
In post 1153, Sinsun1 wrote:Here's another thing about the town PRs which LQ did not think of if he is scum fake claiming BP.
Here's a question. WHO PLANS TO OUT THEIR N1 RESULTS TOMORROW? If not, then you should be happy with 2 nights before maybe outing the information you could gather.
It'd be more serious if you had 3 cop reads and then LQ died before you outed, found a scum for the 4th read but died by your 5th one because scum found you before you outed.
This way we have max usage of PRs out of this scenario without that risk. So unless you plan to out your role and action tomorrow, then you should not even consider letting him live another day.
In post 1156, Narninian wrote:no, I'm not advocating lynching town.
I think we should lynch scum --- I just happen to believe LQ is scum.
People are commenting on his role, and what if we're wrong. Well my point is if we're wrong its still better he dies earlier than later.
2 people die in the first example, and 3 in the second example is because we lynched town, not because of an extra night kill. We could easily mislynch if we targetted someone other than LQ. He is my biggest scum suspect.
For LicketyQuickety: The reason I want you dead is nothing personal. I don't believe your claim, and in most cases if someone is lying they are scum.
I also think if you are not lying lynching you now is not the worse case scenario. The longer you live as town, the more powerful your kill will be, as the later in the game it is, the more likely they'll hit important Power roles (fewer choices). As sinsun pointed it, later also means its more likely that town will have diminished benefits as well from a double night, and scum will have much better information to use for targetting their kills.