In post 32, ika wrote:In post 28, Nobody Special wrote:ika, are you town?
unfortunately, i wanted to be sk or 3rd party but no luck
Scum it is, eh?
VOTE: Aeronaut
In post 32, ika wrote:In post 28, Nobody Special wrote:ika, are you town?
unfortunately, i wanted to be sk or 3rd party but no luck
In post 50, ika wrote:In post 46, davesaz wrote:
No, but that wasn't the point. You said you'd want to be 3p and didn't get it.
p.edit: noted
it kinda does matter cus if im survivor does that mean im scum?
i mean i get your point in general but i do want your thoughs on what you consider scum and not
In post 55, Cephrir wrote:
In post 46, davesaz wrote:
No, but that wasn't the point. You said you'd want to be 3p and didn't get it.
p.edit: noted
There is a lot going on here. Why are you commenting on things that are 100% peripheral to the main action?
In post 46, davesaz wrote:
No, but that wasn't the point. You said you'd want to be 3p and didn't get it.
p.edit: noted
In post 63, Cephrir wrote:What do you mean what part of your post, it was two sentences
Are you kidding? Whether or not third parties are scum is completely irrelevant. There's been a pretty interesting exchange between other parties in the thread...
In post 129, TheWayItEnds wrote:
NY 176
Sabotage
We the Purple 2
In Smite you died before I nailed the entire scumteam.
Now you provide some counter examples and we'll compare.
In post 281, ika wrote:Davez when did you start to do meta?
In post 278, Cephrir wrote:In post 241, davesaz wrote:Lurker checking since it's quick. Aeronaut seems really disengaged compared to other games. I have not paid attention to his posting frequency vs. alignment nor have I checked other site activity, so don't have an immediate read. BipolarChemist has only posted twice. Don't think I've played with him before, no read. Anyone have an opinion on these two?
Oh boy, pointless filler questions hoping to start a lurker wagon!
VOTE: davesaz
In post 318, HerryPanther wrote:In post 241, davesaz wrote:Lurker checking since it's quick. Aeronaut seems really disengaged compared to other games. I have not paid attention to his posting frequency vs. alignment nor have I checked other site activity, so don't have an immediate read. BipolarChemist has only posted twice. Don't think I've played with him before, no read. Anyone have an opinion on these two?
I don't really see the reason for a "lurker check" that omits like half of the people with fewer than 10 posts (including this slot). Especially including BipolarChemist, who currently has a wagon on him and it's clear that people have issues with things other than his activity. It seems like dave is trying to feel out the waters here to see if there are other excuses to vote BPC.
Not a fan of 241 or 242. They feel like filler posts to me (and thus I find myself agreeing with what Cephrir has said).
In post 310, Performer wrote:@dave not liking Aero’s posts at the moment. For some reason, it makes me think of the game we played where he was Jester.
Not seeing your point about a difference between “wagon and WAGON.” A wagon is a wagon.
Not feeling the sugar on the Reas wagon.
Not liking Monk either.
In post 327, Heartless wrote:In post 326, davesaz wrote:Thanks for answering. Would be nice if other people took the question seriously.
yes, no one else has been giving opinions on bpc and aero.
no one.
In post 241, davesaz wrote:Lurker checking since it's quick. Aeronaut seems really disengaged compared to other games. I have not paid attention to his posting frequency vs. alignment nor have I checked other site activity, so don't have an immediate read. BipolarChemist has only posted twice. Don't think I've played with him before, no read. Anyone have an opinion on these two?
In post 353, Cephrir wrote:You keep reiterating that you "just woke up" like that's some sort of verifiable claim that I obviously should have already known before I went and so cruelly didn't like your posts.
In post 432, BotLane wrote:In post 350, davesaz wrote:snip
I have only seen this type of indignation from davesaz as scum. He's probably scum caught for the (in his eyes) wrong reasons.
-Ank
In post 405, TheWayItEnds wrote:
In post 242, davesaz wrote:TheWayItEnds has made 5 of 7 posts on the same tangential issue, and not even a whiff of scum hunting. That's good enough for a weak scum read.
Oh you sweet summer child.
In post 780, TheWayItEnds wrote:In post 725, LicketyQuickety wrote:I am wondering why people have a read on PV one way or another here. Can someone explain their read on them please?
Oh hey I can help with this.
I'm town reading PV because hes very probably town.
In post 714, LicketyQuickety wrote:
Like I said, my observational capabilities are pretty lacking and I usually use my admittedly weird reasoning for my reads which I'm sure will come out sometime in this thread unless they already have with the way people are questioning my reads. But yes, if anyone has Mod Meta on Coug's games I'd like to know if anyone can tell me what roles he's likely to use.
In post 783, TheWayItEnds wrote:In post 781, davesaz wrote:In post 780, TheWayItEnds wrote:In post 725, LicketyQuickety wrote:I am wondering why people have a read on PV one way or another here. Can someone explain their read on them please?
Oh hey I can help with this.
I'm town reading PVhes very probably town.because
That is not very helpful, it is missing a because clause.
A better response to 725 is to ask LQ why the townreads on PV are an issue. (LQ, you can consider this post to be that question btw)
let me help you out.
In post 787, LicketyQuickety wrote:
I don't know what lamp shading is. If it means you think I am just saying that as cover in some way for me to say I'm town you're free to look through my games on my wiki.
In post 1038, BotLane wrote:Read this entire page. That's basically how I've been reading the past five or so pages.
-Ank
In post 1408, LicketyQuickety wrote:Does anyone else thing Botlane is being avoidant or is it just me?
In post 1402, LicketyQuickety wrote:In post 1401, Heartless wrote:In post 1399, Antihero wrote:In post 1388, LicketyQuickety wrote:That's an odd vote Heartless. What for?
wild air up my ass and reasons i'm too lazy to talk about right now
ah fuck
Its whatevs. Your a town read, so I gots no problems with the vote. I was just curious.
In post 1756, PeregrineV wrote:
But even leaving that aside, why on God's green earth does a Mafia Goon claim Back-up BP instead of BP? BP is neither town nor scum, since it can effectively be either.
To me, that claim makes more sense if Performer knows that a BP exists. And it being day1,he only knows that one exists if there is a scum BP.
In post 1989, Reasonably Rational wrote:As drixx said before though just lynch us before/at lylo, we're a safety lynch, and let us find some fucking scum for you before we have to die.
In post 2031, PeregrineV wrote:In post 1982, davesaz wrote:I have seen the vengeful mechanic done that way on a different site. IMO claiming it when it works that way is the worst way to play it for town. As claimed it sets up people who stay on the wagon to be townread and people who leave the wagon to be scumread. And it sets up town to not want to lynch the player. Put all that together and it makes a dandy claim for scum.
I'm not sure on RR. A SK might want to claim their BP to call off both attempted vig and scum kills, and furthermore might not even be BP but claim it anyway. Many people get mixed or townish reads from SK's which could explain the strong division of opinion on the slot.
Neither claim makes the claimant town by itself. We need to filter the claim through the lens of regular reads.
They have 132 posts. What is your regular read on them, and what posts inform that read?
In post 2278, pisskop wrote:Dave is a good vig
In post 2385, MattP wrote:Calling people morons isn't likely to get them to see your side of things
Just sayin
In post 2417, Ankamius wrote:In post 2387, davesaz wrote:In post 2385, MattP wrote:Calling people morons isn't likely to get them to see your side of things
Just sayin
Feel free to make a case.
You're funny.
Read 2371 please.
In post 2427, Spiffeh wrote:I still think RR could be scum idk why people dropped that.
In post 2437, Reasonably Rational wrote:
davesaz: Would you mind giving out a larger reads list with reasons? I asked you for this yesterday but you never got back to me.