[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 7295266 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Trouble in The Cougar's Den (Game over!) - Mafiascum.net
In post 130, BipolarChemist wrote:my immediate thought is that it seems like some throwing under the bus. haven't really read into their other posts yet, but from skimming, I've found long in the past (like 2 years i think?) that Drixx tends to talk himself in circles no matter the alignment and it seems like that trend is continuing. I'd probs vote them but IDK where the vote count is at right now
I'm translating this as
"My immediate though it that it seems like scum BotLane is throwing ReasonablyRational under the bus, but from skimming Reasonably Rational's posts, his style is not alignment indicative. I would probably vote ReasonablyRationale, except it may be the hammer vote, I don't want to be responsible for his lynch."
I'm I reading it wrong?
Vote: BiPolarChemist
In post 193, HerryPanther wrote:If anyone has specific questions for me about the first 8 pages, fire away. Otherwise, I think the BPC wagon is something I can get on board with. I agree with the heart of Pere's 190 -- I thought BPC's 130 felt scummy, his main point was ambiguous and it looks like he's trying to draw associative tells without a whole lot to go on. A whole lot of noise, not a lot of substance.
UNVOTE: VOTE: BiPolarChemist
-Herr
In post 194, Heartless wrote:we're wagoning bpc b/c of the non-opinion presented as an opinion in Post 130 and waiting on a vote count to vote this early. these are textbook "fly under the radar" maneuvers scum use to navigate early game situations. if you think that's "weak," push someone who you think is clearly scummier. and use words.
In post 326, davesaz wrote:Thanks for answering. Would be nice if other people took the question seriously.
yes, no one else has been giving opinions on bpc and aero.
no one.
Ooh, you noticed me. I'm impressed.
Have you posted anything meaningful on Aero
after
my post?
Have you posted anything meaningful on BpC at all? (yes, I know you have posted *stuff*)
If you weren't such an arrogant prick, you'd have a conversation with me instead of trying to belittle my posting. Pull your head out please.
The fact that you're either not keeping up with the game or are purposefully forcing people to repeat themselves isn't on Anti at all. And perhaps the arrogance doesn't lie with the person not trying to impose his own time table on everyone else.
Why do you care
when
something was posted? If this is a good-faith attempt to discuss reads on your part, you're being awfully rigid and inflexible about it.
