Have you ever drunk-posted?In post 44, Ms Columbo wrote:Hi, all.
VOTE: malpascp For participating in the wrong brand...bring that sarcasm over here.
Also I think McMenno using his abilities like that is too random and attention-drawing to be scum
Have you ever drunk-posted?In post 44, Ms Columbo wrote:Hi, all.
VOTE: malpascp For participating in the wrong brand...bring that sarcasm over here.
Same here, hence the mistake. And the shitposting.In post 62, Ms Columbo wrote:Lol, is that what happened? It's been a long time since that's been a thing for me.In post 54, malpascp wrote:Have you ever drunk-posted?In post 44, Ms Columbo wrote:Hi, all.
VOTE: malpascp For participating in the wrong brand...bring that sarcasm over here.
What's your fucking problem? Because you don't seem to be joking here. If at #88 you're already complaining about lack of contribution, you should make your own damn RVS-less Mafia forum. Also my name's not THAT hard to spell.In post 88, All Alone wrote:christ almighty you people are pissing me off
Lita DDT: banana mint
Rear Naked Choke: banana mint
the two of you combined have contributed a grand total ofabsolutely nothing. disgraceful. you get to fucking die
VOTE: malpaspc
you also get to fucking die
chara, penguin, and thinkbig are on thin fucking ice
EVERYONE TAKE NOTICE: IF YOU WANT TO KEEP FUCKING AROUND, YOU CAN GO DO IT IN THE DEAD THREAD
Racist mofoIn post 274, Kmd4390 wrote:Mal, yesIn post 267, Narna wrote:Who is willing to voteblock semi active people with me finishing a low content poster like penguin, Mal, or light?
a) I want to break the game by townblocking up and lynching who only we want to lynch.
b) I want to force some of the nobodies into defending their townreads or scumbiddies.
c) This is fucking RAW. We need some tag team action.
Penguin, maybe
Light, no
Because of my last sentence. He could admit it was poor reasoning. Or someone could point a flaw in my reasoning. Either way I'm always cautious when putting people at L-1 as I've met my fair share of lolhammers, and also the wagoning was strong with this one (not that I disagree with it happening).In post 357, Ms Columbo wrote:Why didn't you vote? It's a strong statement to make and then not vote.In post 280, malpascp wrote:Maybe I'm just rusty or something but AC's post just blew my mind. It makes no sense to hide anything at all if you're town. The only reason to be afraid of your other head saying "hey dude you shouldn't have said this" is if you're scum. Or poor reasoning.
Two people who were being read as scumbuddies claimed mason, then used a tag-teag combination move that was apparently a day-vig on one of the top townread players without asking for a claim or providing reason.In post 555, Pepchoninga wrote:Could you basically sum up all the big event of SD. I don't really know from where to start reading and I don't really know when will I be able to read up 60+ pages. Knowing some of the players there alot is probably filler.In post 552, Vifam wrote:I miss them
I didn't find in this thread any other justification by anyone on why they TR McMenno, besides his RVS ability usage. I understand why you think that is a tell, and I disagree.In post 596, Kmd4390 wrote:Malpa's 524 is bad in so many ways. I don't like the discrediting of the town reads on mcmenno by saying we all assume scum would never use abilities. I don't like things being shrugged off as WIFOM. I don't like the way he says anyone who says mcmenno is obvtown didn't read that post, rather than just disagreed with it. It feels like malpa is just intimidated by a large group of widely townread players which maybe makes me think we are on the right track with that and POE might be enough here (note that if malpa is town that's not necessarily true. Also note that, ironically enough, this would make mcmenno even more obvtown if malpa is scum).
The posts you quoted have zero content about this brand. Why'd you quote something about the masons, say it's AC pushing for a mislynch, then correct it to "a mislynch on THIS brand". Sounds like your initial read was not legitimate at all. Just a made up read on AC with some generic wording.In post 963, Pepchoninga wrote:A misslynch on this brand.In post 961, Almost Chara wrote:A mislynch on WHOM? I clearly said time and time again that I'm TOWN READING MARIA. How does that lead to a mislynch on her or Pepto??In post 952, Pepchoninga wrote:I don't like this post. Seems to me, like it's just a way to manipulate the other players into an ultimate misslynch/bad decisions.In post 880, Almost Chara wrote:Also, reading this again I see you see it my way. Doesn't that give you a pose or an urge for second thoughts?In post 858, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:I believe the claim so I see no reason to break up the masons.
I mean, Scum!Me would certainly want to execute the Masons, and we have even been provided with "an out" to do it. I we're Scum them it's likely the Masons aren't really Masons. so, why do you choose to believe they are indeed Masons while simultaneously being suspicious of our slot?
~A50
~A50
He just dayvigged ffsIn post 1059, Kmd4390 wrote:When did math get confirmed?In post 1047, malpascp wrote:Math is conf!town.
Pep reeks of newbscum.
I don't understand the reasoning behind lynching Vifam.
Regarding the masons, I think they might be lying about having another shot, that was probably the only one.
McMenno is still useless.
@Math: you're the math guy/person(s)/whatever, if both GMs were scum wouldn't this setup be extremely scum-sided? Having one of each alignment would make no sense balance-wise imo
I never said I thought there were 3 scum? Everyone's pretty sure there's 2 scum left.In post 1216, Pepchoninga wrote:You think there are 3 scum? Cmooon. And yes, I'm cought up. Please don't discredit my stuff. That ain't nice...In post 1186, malpascp wrote:Can we keep the politic talk to a minimum, especially when it's mind-boggling stupid?
Also you should catch up then give us your insight, if you don't have the time for it just take notes, because at this point what you're talking about is pointless because, in case you didn't notice, SD is over. And that brought pertinent info we're currently discussing.
I still think having a scum day-vig is weird, given that there was a town day-vig already flipped (in terms of setup these masons are pretty much the same as a lone vig, except if one of them dies early).
Gladiator is usually not very pro-town, but it's being hard to see a scumteam where none of those two is included.
Can't get a read on Pep because he makes no sense, can't get a read on Ms. Columbo because there's nothing to analyze.
Still think AC is town since massive flipped, and Math should be town as well since I don't think a scum day-vig is a thing.
Vifam is conftown.
My gut tells me the scumteam is in LUV/Kmd/and that other guy that is still breathing somehow. I'm not sure if my willingness to lynch Pep comes from suspicion of because he's so annoying.
Just the tone of your posts seem totally anti-town tho. Also you still trying some strange stuff and just try and get Blade under the radar.
According to massive's role PM it's a "Modified Gladiator".In post 1258, McMenno wrote:gladiator that doesn't include yourself though? will have to think about it
Because killing confirmed town actually makes sense as scum.In post 1264, Kmd4390 wrote:Let's try a different approach then
Hey malpa, why wouldn't math have killed vifam?
NKing confirmed town is usually the way to go. I've yet to see Math do something that can be considered "normal" or "orthodox". Hence I feel (gut mainly) that Math wouldn't have killed Vifam. I also think he would go for someone who had a strong read on him (being it scum or town) to further try to mindfuck us on the WIFOMy ways of said NK.In post 1275, Kmd4390 wrote:I still don't get the "why" of it all, but that's probably the best answer I'm getting, isn't it?In post 1273, malpascp wrote:Math wouldn't go for the obvious kill in his situation, that's what I feel. He would go for someone who had a stronger read on him than Vifam did, be it a town or a scum read.
@Math: don't take it as an insult, your playstyle might come handy sometimes but i think you think a bit *too much* outside-the-box.
Shhh Math is always right ok? Ok? Don't question Math's logic unless you want to be scumread tooIn post 1313, Ms Columbo wrote:How is Massive as town-gladiator on SD and masons with 2 (conditional) day-vigs, any less powerful or possible than what you just described?? The SD roles are 100% FACT. The assertion that there is a 0% chance of something comparable on this brand defies common sense.In post 1310, MathBlade wrote:I am scumreading people making dumb arguments.
There is 0% chance Town has a gladiator and a vig and <redacted>.
...MathBlade wrote:Reasons. Of which are derived from planetary bodies which are true but no one understands.In post 1313, Ms Columbo wrote:How is Massive as town-gladiator on SD and masons with 2 (conditional) day-vigs, any less powerful or possible than what you just described?? The SD roles are 100% FACT. The assertion that there is a 0% chance of something comparable on this brand defies common sense.In post 1310, MathBlade wrote:I am scumreading people making dumb arguments.
There is 0% chance Town has a gladiator and a vig and <redacted>.
...In post 1310, MathBlade wrote:I am scumreading people making dumb arguments.
And now Pep's last post was 10 days ago, and McMenno still failed to give any sort of actual content. What are the odds of none of them being scum?In post 1263, malpascp wrote:
I can't decide whether to lynch Pep or McMenno. Pep reeks of newbscum while McMenno managed to lurk his way into Day 4. Though I'm pretty sure they're not scumpartners.
I think at this point everyone should be stating who they intend to vote? Even though I'm pretty damn sure this isn't LyLo.