The game of the year: town won!

[izakthegoomba]

I don't see how random and policy gives us anything useful except hope the numbers are favorable when people actually start playing. And scum voting block will likely make sure numbrs are not favorable. for town anyways.

Are you suggesting we try to scumhunt as normal with 50 players alive?

[Rhinox]

I don't see how random and policy gives us anything useful except hope the numbers are favorable when people actually start playing. And scum voting block will likely make sure numbrs are not favorable. for town anyways.

Are you suggesting we try to scumhunt as normal with 50 players alive?

Yes, by breaking it up into manageable groups to focus our efforts constructively. Its like you're not even reading what I'm saying.

1 week for group 1.
1 week for group 2.
etc.

not 5 weeks to scumhunt 50 people.

[Rhinox]

Even Policy lynch from group 1 -> use flip to focus efforts in group 2 -> use both flips to focus effort in group 3 -> etc leasds to better results than random and policy for 5-10 deaths.

[AGar]

No. We're not doing that.

Then provide a good reason why not and why random and policy is better.

Because you're suggesting that 50 people analyze only 10 people at once, but what you're neglecting is that some scum are caught because they're scumhunting is absolute bullshit, and that there's opportunity to be called out on that. If someone outside of that group of 10 acts like shit, then you're expecting us until we get done with 1-4 other groups before that gets called on? With 50 people posting?

C'mon. You're a better player than this Rhinox.

[The Mini-Librarian]

Why is chesskid a good policy lynch?

Agree with agar about rhinox's idea.

[IceGuy]

Idea: split into 5 random groups of 10, focus on 1group per week, lynch the scummiest from each group for 5 lynches in 5 weeks for the first day.

Pros: makes scumhunting more focused and natural
Scum unable to lurk through early days

Cons: some groups might not have scum

I wouldcontinue doing this for every day there are multiple lynches, so until19 players remain. Every new day reshuffle groups amd split into n groups where n= number of lynches. Always choose 1 lynch from each group.

Thoughtts?

tl;dr

VOTE: chesskid

[AGar]

Because he's chesskid?

Because he has a notorious habit of devolving into a troll-happy liability to the town who lets outside grudges impair his judgment on the actual events of the game if certain players are present in the game's playerlist.

[Rhinox]

Because you're suggesting that 50 people analyze only 10 people at once, but what you're neglecting is that some scum are caught because they're scumhunting is absolute bullshit, and that there's opportunity to be called out on that. If someone outside of that group of 10 acts like shit, then you're expecting us until we get done with 1-4 other groups before that gets called on? With 50 people posting?

C'mon. You're a better player than this Rhinox.

So provide a strategy better than lol policy lynch chesskid which does jack shit.

I don't see why you can't make notes of scummy things ppl from outside the group of 10 do and then lynch them for it when their group comes up.

I'm looking for a strategy to do something useful while treating this like a 50 player game not "reduce the number to something manageable and then start and hope we're not screwed by the numbers at that point"

[Fritzler]

Alright, lets use the first two lynches to policy lynch. I'll switch to chesskid if we get redFF afterwards.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: chesskid

DEAL!

Vote: Chesskid

That is 8 of 10 needed.

[The Mini-Librarian]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

chesskid

p-edit: L-1

Please someone hammer before he gets in.

[Fritzler]

FunkmasterFritz's Unofficial Vote Count

9 - Chesskid (Captain Corporal, Agar, Johhog, theamatuer, Hoopla, izakthegoomba, IceGuy, Frizler, the mini-librarian)
1 - izakthegoomba (Rhinox (

LIKELY SCUM, FYI

)

10 to lynch
Not voting: 40

[izakthegoomba]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

chesskid

p-edit: L-1

Please someone hammer before he gets in.

Beep. Beep. Fake vote alert.

[Fritzler]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

chesskid

p-edit: L-1

Please someone hammer before he gets in.

You might want to reformat your vote, to make sure it gets counted. I counted it, but I am not the mod.

Like this:

Vote: chesskid

The vote part is pretty important.

[syndromeofadown]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

VOTE: The Mini Librarian

Wait, so you don't know why people dislike him, in fact you never had any trouble with him, yet you want to quicklynch him before he gets a chance to post? Sounds pretty opportunistic to me.

[The Mini-Librarian]

VOTE: chesskid

fuck.

[AGar]

Because you're suggesting that 50 people analyze only 10 people at once, but what you're neglecting is that some scum are caught because they're scumhunting is absolute bullshit, and that there's opportunity to be called out on that. If someone outside of that group of 10 acts like shit, then you're expecting us until we get done with 1-4 other groups before that gets called on? With 50 people posting?

C'mon. You're a better player than this Rhinox.

So provide a strategy better than lol policy lynch chesskid which does jack shit.

I don't see why you can't make notes of scummy things ppl from outside the group of 10 do and then lynch them for it when their group comes up.

I'm looking for a strategy to do something useful while treating this like a 50 player game not "reduce the number to something manageable and then start and hope we're not screwed by the numbers at that point"

We have

5

day 1 lynches. If you think one policy lynch will render zero information, I really feel like you're trolling.

Also, because their shit will be buried by plenty of inane shit (remember... 50 players. POSTING.) and they'll have plenty of time to fabricate a cover for it when in a natural environment they would be called immediately. This is the problem with segmented scumhunting.

That you can't see the flaws in this idea is pretty saddening to me.

[YYR]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

VOTE: The Mini Librarian

Wait, so you don't know why people dislike him, in fact you never had any trouble with him, yet you want to quicklynch him before he gets a chance to post? Sounds pretty opportunistic to me.

Ninja'd me.

VOTE: The Mini Librarian

[Fritzler]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

VOTE: The Mini Librarian

Wait, so you don't know why people dislike him, in fact you never had any trouble with him, yet you want to quicklynch him before he gets a chance to post? Sounds pretty opportunistic to me.

FOS: syndromeofadown

Also, is his username making fun of people with Down's Syndrome? That is pretty messed up. Modkill requested please.

[Milk]

Vote Chesskid

Hammer :p

[Rhinox]

k. I've just played a few mm games with him and haven't had any trouble so I just wanted to know why people didn't like him.

Anyway let's keep this going.

chesskid

p-edit: L-1

Please someone hammer before he gets in.

scum #2 ^^^

[The Mini-Librarian]

@soad: yep. If people as a whole don't like him I will bow down to the judgment of the masses.

Especially

in this game. Taking my one vote off isn't going to stop chess from getting lynched.

[Fritzler]

FunkmasterFritz's Unofficial Vote Count

10 - Chesskid (Captain Corporal, Agar, Johhog, theamatuer, Hoopla, izakthegoomba, IceGuy, Frizler, the mini-librarian, milk)
1 - izakthegoomba (Rhinox (

LIKELY SCUM, FYI

)
2 - the mini-librarian (syndromeofadown, YYR)

10 to lynch
Not voting: 37

HAMMER!

[IceGuy]

HAMMER!

On to the next mislynch!

VOTE: petapan

[The Mini-Librarian]

So, I'm scummy for:

1. Asking why there's a policy lynch on someone.

2. Getting an answer on that question.

3. Voting based off that answer.

How does this make sense?

[Fritzler]

I already made a deal with Hoopla.

Vote: redFF