In post 2198, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:BTW, what's up with the modding rules on this site? I have to mod an open game and a mini-theme game before I am worthy of moderating a theme park game? It isn't like I haven't modded before.
In post 2199, Persivul wrote:In post 2191, farside22 wrote:In post 2169, Persivul wrote:But however it worked out I'm leaving on a win so that's cool.
You can't leave.
You are trapped here forever.
*hug*
It's not my thing on a regular basis. For every fun game like this, it seems I get one nasty one, and one boring one, and you really don't know which will be which beforehand. Considering the amount of time it takes to play properly, it's just not worth it. I'll probably pop in for one game every three months or so. IC in a newbie might be good, as I enjoy teaching. Unfortunately in my one SE game I drew scum and the IC and other SE barely played at all, so all the newbies learned was how to lose.Actually they were on to me early but couldn't pull together a wagon.
In post 2196, Persivul wrote:In post 2188, Titus wrote:In post 2168, Persivul wrote:Reading titus' d2 i was having second thoughts but i couldn't get past the appeal to wifom yesterday.
Don't listen to whether you agreed with me but rather if there is town motivation in my play. A lot of people get caught up in town reading those they agree with and scumreading those they don't.
I certainly didn't see town motivation in lynching MS after I made the connections from cop to doc to protects/no kills. If you had simply argued that you're risk averse, maybe, but wifom arguments just ping the hell out of me. I see wifom as newbie or scummy, and you're not new.
If we had saved MS, today presumably would have been 1 conftown, me, ZZZX, and boo/frogger. No clue how that would have gone down. I'm always suspicious of Z just due to his lurkiness.
In post 2202, Titus wrote: did. I said I am risk averse and didn't want to bet the game. Read my ISO again.
In post 2178, Titus wrote:Metal knows this and was still freaking, that did not look good.
but <3 In post 2163, farside22 wrote:Bachelor 2 loves to gives candy to the kids and take pictures too. A man who loves kids, if you get my drift.
xD In post 2207, Titus wrote:So basically being open and transparent and explaining what I feared was it? You mentioned there was nothing to fear. Being bp, I couldn't be 100% Metal was shot.
In post 2208, Persivul wrote:In post 2207, Titus wrote:So basically being open and transparent and explaining what I feared was it? You mentioned there was nothing to fear. Being bp, I couldn't be 100% Metal was shot.
You weren't open and transparent about being BP.
I've never rolled BP. Do you know when you've been shot and it's gone?
In post 2208, Persivul wrote:In post 2207, Titus wrote:So basically being open and transparent and explaining what I feared was it? You mentioned there was nothing to fear. Being bp, I couldn't be 100% Metal was shot.
You weren't open and transparent about being BP.
I've never rolled BP. Do you know when you've been shot and it's gone?
In post 2214, Titus wrote:In post 2208, Persivul wrote:In post 2207, Titus wrote:So basically being open and transparent and explaining what I feared was it? You mentioned there was nothing to fear. Being bp, I couldn't be 100% Metal was shot.
You weren't open and transparent about being BP.
I've never rolled BP. Do you know when you've been shot and it's gone?
Not on this site.
In post 2214, Titus wrote:In post 2208, Persivul wrote:In post 2207, Titus wrote:So basically being open and transparent and explaining what I feared was it? You mentioned there was nothing to fear. Being bp, I couldn't be 100% Metal was shot.
You weren't open and transparent about being BP.
I've never rolled BP. Do you know when you've been shot and it's gone?
Not on this site.
In post 2218, TheReverend wrote:The zzzx kill was, in my opinion, a mistake, but a perfectly reasonabel mistake for a late sub with IRL problems to make.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}