Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:17 am
what exactly makes a vigilante a bad scum fakeclaim?In post 2440, DarkInnocence wrote:"Let's go after a slot that could be useful to town and would prob have a better fake claim as scum instead of confirmed scum!"
VOTE: Dagger
~Maria
Rude.In post 2448, Klingoncelt wrote:There's something about you that makes me not care.In post 2444, Leonshade wrote:Klingon... out of towncred, sorry.
How certain are you of this?In post 2449, Not Chara wrote:mal's fakeclaim matching his abilities means nothing. i'm saying to lynch this.
Hey i can understand himIn post 2447, KainTepes wrote:WTF? you basically SHOT me on the basis that if i had a knightmare you think i won't use it properly? what the hell, man.
My apologies. It didn't come out the way I meant.In post 2452, Leonshade wrote:Rude.In post 2448, Klingoncelt wrote:There's something about you that makes me not care.In post 2444, Leonshade wrote:Klingon... out of towncred, sorry.
I came to respond to a prod. Iso me if you want to know who I am. Then kindly pull your head out of your ass.In post 2419, Vecna wrote:Notice how my lover indicated that he has some dirt on malpascp and that davesaz comes in here to scurry about and try to poke at what that might be.
60% certain by the claim alone.In post 2452, Leonshade wrote:How certain are you of this?
mal's claim is not unlikely, Dagger's isn't either. both are entirely expected for either alignment in a bastard game by Frozen Angel. mal's is scummy for a different reason, whereas Dagger's is not because of how the claim came out, in my opinion.In post 2467, BTD6_maker wrote:Crystalline Dagger is not outright confscum. His claim seems unlikely (although I am not hugely familiar with flavour) but he could definitely be telling the truth given the ssbm_Kyouko lynch.
Malpascp's claim seems more unlikely, though again I will need knowledge of flavour to assess it.
I would say all players are likely to be PRs and have complex abilities.
Still no list of Nobles.
do you have anything to say today that isn't about your claim or questions to other players about whether they're VTs or not?In post 2469, malpascp wrote:why is my claim scummy?
Juicy! Will read and hope you explain!In post 2400, culted wrote:Also I was gonna wait for this slot to post some content today before outing this but since they're prodded it works just as well.
I believe that I've found us a scum.
VOTE: Malpascp
Fullclaim in your next post pls. : )
Fakeclaims are always a thing tho.In post 2432, Vecna wrote:Hmmm the flavourclaim does match the claimed abilities flawlessly. Guess the question remains whether these black knights are sided with freedom (which the flavour does seem to indicate)
I have grown to despise this reasoning, and any variations thereupon. Yes, on odd occasion it is correct, but for the grand majority of times it should probably just be lynched.In post 2454, Drone wrote:too scum to be scum.