In post 3624, Ginngie wrote:LyLo, two scum and one town(hypothetical)
They lynch scum and lol guess what, scum shoots Chara....
If vengeful then chara shoots the other guy and no one wins.
That's a shit position dude
Thus why the correct play would be to no-lynch, where town would be eligible for the nightkill. (Refer to the rules on the front page.)
(Fun fact btw: after the game was revealed as all-scum, if people had called into question what, exactly, my ability was, I was going to fakeclaim that in spite of me being scum I had a vengekill, because it fit all the details I divulged about my death-immunity power while making it look like I was no longer a threat. I told people that my power in 5p would if I was lynched help decide the game's results by helping my side win, that I might be the reason the game was continuing, and that my power was death-related and lynch-related. Further bonus points: being a legit vengeful would make me feel like I was town, just like my death immunity gave me the confidence to be legitimately town. These were all true of both a vengekill and my actual role. Fortunately, nobody actually asked me what my power was, though, because I imagine this fakeclaim wouldn't have worked as well as I thought.)
I'm going to pretend that T-Bone shot me as revenge for RK and/or tunneling him in the other WWE game.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
