Also:
In post 206, the worst wrote:someone check Punreader's current scumreads pls iirc their reads have been semi pants-on-head so we might be ok there
Believe it or not, this was my strategy from the onset.
I banked on my own incompetency as a punhunter, at least as a third party. (Where I have a long record of incorrectly reading the pun but winning anyway because I didn't need to read the pun correctly to win as a 3p.)
I
knew
my reads weren't going to be good. They were all sincere, until the time I contacted you. None of what I said was in any way faked. However, in spite of having those reads sincerely, I also knew that those reads were, quite likely, to be mostly wrong. But this "reads mostly wrong, stumbling into maybe one or two right ones" state was the one I figured was my best chance at fulfilling my wincon.
I'd not lynch the entire punteam with my reads, so the game would continue on, but I'd manage to get at least one or two, so I wouldn't be endgamed. Keep in mind that with my wincon as it was, I wanted the game to stretch on for as long as humanly possible, as that would give me the most chances to kill/infect players.
So my strategy was to, genuinely, punhunt. To try, fully, to townside...but know that
in spite of trying to townside
, I'd still not win the game for them.
At least, that was the original plan.
About around D4, it began to become significantly less feasible.