The part where your partner referred me to you. I call you out directly in multiple posts. Other people call you out. You prance your partner out with your hand up his ass like a puppet while offering a slight walk back from what you've said.In post 8241, DrewVa wrote:What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?In post 8240, Nev and Max wrote:This while post is fucking bullshit. First of all Nancy is posting, but she can't respond personally to the post that you already told me you didn't want to speak for her on. I get that you spoke to her, but if it's not your read then I don't think you should be the one posting the defense.In post 8188, DrewVa wrote:I asked Nancy, I think she mostly remembered N&M pushing EJ over SS, and I believe she misremembered N&M trying to prevent the day from ending when that did not happen afaik. I don't really have an issue with retracting that part of the case on her behalf, given I don't really think that's the biggest issue we have with the N&M slot. (Claim, Boonus Round, Tone, Reactions, seem more what we've discussed irt the slot)In post 8186, davesaz wrote:Are you dodging N&M's question? Or overlooked it?
I'm still a bit more conflicted as I outlined 7940 but am not sure that I want BEF more today than N&M despite my misgivings on the slot.
-d
Nancy throws shade at us in a lot of posts and when called on it she sends out her peon to make the slight retraction.
Nancy, if you think we are scum case us. Shade, feelings and tone policing isnt substative. Explain why are actions point to a scum mentality. I can't change your mind on how you read my posts. I can argue reasoning behind things info and say though.
Nancy. This look isn't good on you, it's trite trash to be honest. Don't whine about not being listened to if one of your strategies is to ignore and diminish others.