Page 81 of 425

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:09 pm
by Elsa Jay
In post 1998, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1994, Elsa Jay wrote:DrewVa laughs at all my post. Halp. I'm being pocketed. It's stuffy and warm and weird.
You want me to diss/ignore your posts, just say the word.
Image

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:15 pm
by DrewVa
In post 2000, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 1998, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1994, Elsa Jay wrote:DrewVa laughs at all my post. Halp. I'm being pocketed. It's stuffy and warm and weird.
You want me to diss/ignore your posts, just say the word.
Image


Spoiler:

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:21 pm
by Elsa Jay
That's so NSFW DrewVa. Think of the children!

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:22 pm
by Something_Smart
In post 1995, DrewVa wrote:Because it is not only the hammer that can die, it’s also anyone that tries to NK him too.
That's not the standard. That's a bomb; if you had both abilities you were a bomb supersaint.

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:29 pm
by Cheeky Dancer
Wait so who is super saint and how does that ability work?

~ C

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:31 pm
by Something_Smart
TLK claimed it. Supersaint traditionally kills whoever hammers them if lynched. I assume in a plurality game, it would instead kill the chronologically last vote on them.

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:46 pm
by RightKnight
The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.


?

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 4:51 pm
by Elsa Jay
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.
A new challenger has appeared.

Who teh fuk is this?

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:14 pm
by Cheeky Dancer
Oh that's disappointing I thought it would kill scum on the wagon.

~ C

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:43 pm
by Thanos
In post 1941, The Last Knight wrote:Something I didn't like about this is that Gamma Emerald and I have actually interacted in reference to one another, not actually any real conversation. So, Gamma finding this strange is even stranger to me. It feels like Gamma is trying to force a relationship between the two of us when there wasn't actually anything that either of us said about each other that was deeper than one of us reading the other as town. I never said anything about Gamma at all, unless you mean me asking Alonzo what his vote was. The closest we have come to speaking was me voting to kill Ramcius and him also voting Ramcius later on.

Tldr; Gamma is trying to force a relationship with me in order to make me guilty by association, an association that never existed, in order to build my wagon.

VOTE: Gamma Emerald
I don't understand this perfectly.
You're saying Gamma Emerald is trying to force an indirect association between you and GE -- your evidence for this, I presume is the following post:
Spoiler:
In post 1736, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1734, Ramcius wrote:
In post 1724, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 1703, The Last Knight wrote:
In post 1523, Ramcius wrote:
In post 1522, Thanos wrote:I think a drewva lynch would benefit town more than any other lynch btw
Any particular reason you don't want Gamma lynch? His red flip would incriminate TLK
Also, want to point out that Gamma and I haven't really addressed each other, so your flimsy guilt by association attempts are just getting bad at this point.
This is a lie, I have stated a TLK townread
Kinda doubting that because of this though
Isn't it funny how you both want me dead, refuse vote each other and TLK makes such statement?

It looks like your team is preparing to sacrifice you, DrewVa isn't backing up their gutread on you and saying there's a chance you can flip red. TLK isn't switching to you despite all resistance to my wagon, while he's still top one, but then he says he didn't addressed you yet. Tell me it's not suspicious at all
Yeah it’s suspicious. I think TLK may have freaked out about being suspected in association. Not sure why though because the last time I got that feeling, 1) the person was Town and 2) it was White Flag and this isn’t unless Boon doesn’t think that bears mentioning. So the logic is shaky to start with and the motive is not yet apparent.
As for my team preparing to sacrifice me lol no, if I was the fall guy I’d probably have more traction, and if it were normal voting mechanics I’d be lynched. For a solid example of a game where I was the designated bus go read Mini 1911. That was STRUCTURED.

To summarize this:
Ramcius claims a scum-scum association between GE and TLK;
TLK says there's no association as there's no interaction;
GE says there is an association because GE TR'd TLK;
Ramcius claims it's funny that TLK said that;
GE says it's suspect TLK freaked out about being sussed.

It seems pretty clear Ramcius was wearing a huge tinfoil hat with his allegations, and GE/you both misunderstood what the other meant by "association".
If GE was scum trying to "build an association" with you, why would he be TRing you? Do you really think "Oh Gamma TR'd him and found some part of his play suspect, therefore they're partners lulz" is the conclusion the rest of the players would come to?

I think you're tinfoiling pretty hard here as well.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:51 pm
by Thanos
@Nev and Max:

I'm assuming your vote is on us; and we are your strongest scumread.
You did seem to develop that suspicion in the course of my DrewVa interactions; can you detail what exactly pinged you as scummy?
Do you disagree with Gamma Emerald that the kind of hydra dissonance my slot exhibited is towny?
What made you "side with" Nancy so blatantly?
I still feel you were pocketing her; a lazy, opportunistic pocket considering you haven't done much else till then.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:54 pm
by Thanos
In post 1145, Karmeleon wrote:Checked Thanos' ISO. Should I be worried when only one head is posting?
In post 1147, Karmeleon wrote:Only Auro seems to be actually posting though, maybe not even Auro.
In post 1749, Karmeleon wrote:thanos
Explain your progression on your read on my slot, please.
Are you still worried that only one head is mostly posting?
Why should my slot be vigged?

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:54 pm
by Thanos
In post 2010, Thanos wrote:a lazy, opportunistic pocket considering you haven't done much else
since
then.
Corrected.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 5:57 pm
by Elsa Jay
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.


?
Seriously though, who the heck are ya?

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:01 pm
by Thanos
In post 1916, BrightEyedFish wrote:
Spoiler:
In post 1913, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1912, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1910, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1908, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1905, DrewVa wrote: Why are you still so tunnelled on us, when we aren’t even voting you anymore?
So people are only allowed to OMGUS vote you? If you TR them must they also TR you? Did I understand this correctly?
No, you didn’t. I’m saying he’s not thinking logically. Why wouldn’t scum!me be voting him now?
Scum!you would know if he was scum or not.
That isn’t what I said. I said as scum, fhpov, I should definitely be voting him.


Well, I would consider that possibly as WiFOM. I'm not implying that you are scum based on that post but it is irrelevant if you two are voting for each other or not.
@DrewVa: Why is it a bad assumption to make that scum!you
wouldn't
vote for Ramcius (or whoever SR'd you)? I don't follow the logic there. If town!you wouldn't vote for him, and scum!you wanted to emulate what town!you would've done, you wouldn't vote him, yeah?

I agree with BEF in that it doesn't matter whether you vote each other or not, but I don't see the vote on you being illogical from this angle.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:03 pm
by Thanos
In post 1618, davesaz wrote:Checking in for catchup, bottom of 59.
Davesaz, I'd love to hear your thoughts on the current gamestate.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:04 pm
by Nev and Max
In post 2007, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.
A new challenger has appeared.

Who teh fuk is this?
fake forced feels forced.

you should know from the A50 game that the slot is a hydra of nancy and mathblade.
In post 2010, Thanos wrote:@Nev and Max:

I'm assuming your vote is on us; and we are your strongest scumread.
You did seem to develop that suspicion in the course of my DrewVa interactions; can you detail what exactly pinged you as scummy?
Do you disagree with Gamma Emerald that the kind of hydra dissonance my slot exhibited is towny?
What made you "side with" Nancy so blatantly?
I still feel you were pocketing her; a lazy, opportunistic pocket considering you haven't done much else till then.

~A
our vote isn't on you. nev hasnt been back since i posted in order to talk it over with him.
my read has nothing really to do with drewva. i just really dont like your slot and things that both you and your partner have said. im going to leave it at that.

~max

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:05 pm
by Nev and Max
in fact will not lie

when i originally signed up i misread one of the slots for the nancy and mathblade hydra and then got unexcited because i realized it wasnt that slot itself

so take that at face value lmafo

@elsa

~max

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:05 pm
by Thanos
In post 2016, Nev and Max wrote:i just really dont like your slot and things that both you and your partner have said.
Mind telling us what exactly you dislike; so we can talk about it?

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:17 pm
by Elsa Jay
In post 2016, Nev and Max wrote:
In post 2007, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.
A new challenger has appeared.

Who teh fuk is this?
fake forced feels forced.

you should know from the A50 game that the slot is a hydra of nancy and mathblade.
I know that after I remembered, but I was wondering why they said what they said that way on an even weirder account not even listed or being used for this game.

Just because I know the account doesn't make it a forced reaction.

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:21 pm
by Thanos
In post 1770, Cheeky Dancer wrote:@Thanos why do you think drewva is scum , yet you're not voting?
Who else is scum and who is town?
I'm scumleaning there, but as I've mentioned, it's a sub-optimal lynch as the slot would sort itself as the game progresses.
It's my first large game and the list is too big, it's hard to have any strong and reliable reads. I'm happy with my vote on UL.
I've had townleans on a bunch of slots, I think TLK's post on GE is too silly to have come from scum, so my townlean there strengthens.

I'm getting some weird vibes from RCEnigma, I'll detail my problems with that slot later.
Also beginning to lean scum on Nev&Max -- refusal to engage with a scumread beyond "I don't like your slot" is anti-town.

~A

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:34 pm
by Nev and Max
In post 2018, Thanos wrote:
In post 2016, Nev and Max wrote:i just really dont like your slot and things that both you and your partner have said.
Mind telling us what exactly you dislike; so we can talk about it?

~A
not at the moment no, but the minute i can trust me i will have words on it

~m

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:49 pm
by Nev and Max
so i'm not really "refusing" to engage. i just can not at the moment, but i will when i can.

-m

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 8:29 pm
by RightKnight
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.


?
In post 2007, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 2006, RightKnight wrote:The Last Knight has been barred from Camelot.

Effective immediately.
A new challenger has appeared.

Who teh fuk is this?

Spoiler:

Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 8:38 pm
by BrightEyedFish
If RightKnight is TLK then switching accounts after a hard claim is a very poor last ditch effort to convince us you are not scum.