Mafiascum.net

In post 297, Xtoxm wrote:Literally doing our own vcs and wagoning in the normal way though, isn't something I'm interested in here.

how do you see the game panning out and town getting their hands on precious info? I take the point on spirit of the game but any info is good info i think

In post 292, Karmeleon wrote:

In post 290, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 241, Almost Chara wrote:7- There's too many men, too many people making too many problems.

I love this

How do you feel about the game so far?

I think I should be allowed to take things my own speed.
You should know when I’m ready to get serious FYI

In post 297, Xtoxm wrote:

In post 285, Karmeleon wrote:

In post 284, Xtoxm wrote:

In post 279, Karmeleon wrote:We should vote as normal and do a votecount every like two pages.

I need to know who's the spotlight.

This is rather against the spirit of the game don't you think.

So you mean the correct play is not explicitly saying who you want to lynch the most and let plurality luck do everything?

I actually don't think that would be as bad as you appear to think. Scum can't really pool votes without looking super obvious about it. But, come end of day people will be declaring who their vote is on, no doubt.

Literally doing our own vcs and wagoning in the normal way though, isn't something I'm interested in here.

But if scum have day talk, they can bunch their votes without posting here and we’d never know

To make sure scum won't just coordinate a wagon as if it was their factional daykill or end lynching someone unaware.

In post 301, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 292, Karmeleon wrote:

In post 290, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 241, Almost Chara wrote:7- There's too many men, too many people making too many problems.

I love this

How do you feel about the game so far?

I think I should be allowed to take things my own speed.
You should know when I’m ready to get serious FYI

I trust you.

This is my time to get serious though.

In post 256, Boonskiies wrote:Day Rep votes are public and should be made in this thread.

We vote on who the next 4 reps are or is that just saying that the 4 days reps vote to end day ITT?

I skimmed and nothing seemed real important, was there?

I also hop knight eviscerates RCE with his saber.

In post 300, profii wrote:

In post 297, Xtoxm wrote:Literally doing our own vcs and wagoning in the normal way though, isn't something I'm interested in here.

how do you see the game panning out and town getting their hands on precious info? I take the point on spirit of the game but any info is good info i think

I haven't really thought about it. D1 in large games is always a mess anyway.

In post 305, Nero Cain wrote:We vote on who the next 4 reps are or is that just saying that the 4 days reps vote to end day ITT?

In post 150, the worst wrote:Emperor flippyNips
Alonzo
Mcqueen
Xtoxm

If there is a bullet point,
that means they have voted

I should go back to my regressive postcount ISOing

In post 298, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 278, Nev and Max wrote:

In post 276, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 230, Nev and Max wrote:

In post 229, Karmeleon wrote:My other townreads are Gamma Emerald, RCEnigma, Ramcius and BrightEyedFish

Adding Nero into this list for you since you had his down as town in a separate post.

Can you explain these reads? I isoed them and dont see anything that tilts the scales towards a town read for any of them, and I see at least 1 scum in your list.

You missed the word “other”.

Are you implying that we should see karm as scum, or that you believe we are scum?

Neither. I’m saying you didn’t need to mention Nero because it was already clear it was an incomplete list.

Ok, but I was adding Nero because Karm had already stated a tr on him without ever saying why. I wanted karm to go over why those 5 mentioned were trs because I wasnt seeing it.

Karmeleon: Is handsome

Nev and Max: I don't feel like quoting particular posts, but their questions are worded in some 'sharp' way I feel unlikely to come from scum. If you need special quotes, I can do no problem.

If there's not a good reason to scumread me then I'm town.

In post 288, Karmeleon wrote:If I'm ISOing everybody and commenting on them, then the answer should be pretty obvious.

I get impatient, especially if I feel like im being ignored. I will wait with less snark.

In post 303, Karmeleon wrote:To make sure scum won't just coordinate a wagon as if it was their factional daykill or end lynching someone unaware.

But that's the thing about the final vote count: it literally puts all of them in the same basket. If 3/4 people voted the same person for no connected reason - well, they have a decent chance of being aligned.

That means if all the scum vote in the same place, it'll be too obvious. Even if they have 5 people, that limitation of having to spread their votes makes it easier on town.

In post 311, Nero Cain wrote:If there's not a good reason to scumread me then I'm town.

I feel like thats not how that works. Scum would be sure to avoid looking like scum at this point and would be acting as stereotypically town as possible. If there isn't a reason to scum read you it just means you are null and have yet to do anything real.

In post 313, Elsa Jay wrote:

In post 303, Karmeleon wrote:To make sure scum won't just coordinate a wagon as if it was their factional daykill or end lynching someone unaware.

But that's the thing about the final vote count: it literally puts all of them in the same basket. If 3/4 people voted the same person for no connected reason - well, they have a decent chance of being aligned.

That means if all the scum vote in the same place, it'll be too obvious. Even if they have 5 people, that limitation of having to spread their votes makes it easier on town.

And if the count gets revealed eventually we would be able to look at inconsistencies between what people talked about in thread vs. what they voted in confession.

In post 304, Karmeleon wrote:

In post 301, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 292, Karmeleon wrote:

In post 290, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 241, Almost Chara wrote:7- There's too many men, too many people making too many problems.

I love this

How do you feel about the game so far?

I think I should be allowed to take things my own speed.
You should know when I’m ready to get serious FYI

I trust you.

This is my time to get serious though.

Ok. I guess I find Nev and Max a little questionable.

In post 309, Nev and Max wrote:

In post 298, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 278, Nev and Max wrote:

In post 276, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 230, Nev and Max wrote:

In post 229, Karmeleon wrote:My other townreads are Gamma Emerald, RCEnigma, Ramcius and BrightEyedFish

Adding Nero into this list for you since you had his down as town in a separate post.

Can you explain these reads? I isoed them and dont see anything that tilts the scales towards a town read for any of them, and I see at least 1 scum in your list.

You missed the word “other”.

Are you implying that we should see karm as scum, or that you believe we are scum?

Neither. I’m saying you didn’t need to mention Nero because it was already clear it was an incomplete list.

Ok, but I was adding Nero because Karm had already stated a tr on him without ever saying why. I wanted karm to go over why those 5 mentioned were trs because I wasnt seeing it.

I interpreted it wrong then. Still wondering why you thought I suspected one of you.

I didnt understand what you meant by missing the "other" until just now. I did miss that in his post, but I wasnt saying that it was a negative, I was simply adding nero to my list of reads I was questioning instead of quoting the other post.

Why I thought you suspected one of us, I was trying to figure out where you thought i missed the word "other" because I thought you were saying i omitted it and not that I missed it from karms post.

I think this was all a bit of a misunderstanding on both our parts.

Ok
I guess you’re not questionable anymore

What do you think about BEF?

In post 305, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 256, Boonskiies wrote:Day Rep votes are public and should be made in this thread.

We vote on who the next 4 reps are or is that just saying that the 4 days reps vote to end day ITT?

I skimmed and nothing seemed real important, was there?

I also hop knight eviscerates RCE with his saber.

That I'm gonna hang and eat that fish. It's in the scavenger hunt I got to get a BOONus prize.

In post 323, Elsa Jay wrote:That I'm gonna hang and eat that fish. It's in the scavenger hunt I got to get a BOONus prize.

I like the enthusiasm, but that question was for GE, we can get to your opinion after if youd like.