Mafiascum.net

In post 4848, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4839, mcqueen wrote:because anyone that asks someone else to claim thinks they have something to hide

Why would Thanos think Gamma or I had something to hide? He was just calling for a mass claim to try to solve is all.

if you call for a mass claim, you claim first

In post 4850, mcqueen wrote:

In post 4848, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4839, mcqueen wrote:because anyone that asks someone else to claim thinks they have something to hide

Why would Thanos think Gamma or I had something to hide? He was just calling for a mass claim to try to solve is all.

if you call for a mass claim, you claim first

Also, when there's a mass claim, YOU WAIT FOR MAJORITY TO CLAIM BEFORE VOTING, ESPECIALLY IN A 3 PLAYER GAME

IME, the players that call for a mass claim rarely go first. But you're saying that I should have thought Thanos was scummy in the Boonus round b/c he didn't claim first? And even if I did that wouldn't say anything about his alignment here just like my lack of not calling him scummy has nothing to do with my alignment ITT.

We were pink in our game and I came in late. PP pushed early for a vote on us and I was going to use that as evidence that he was a pinko and trying to rush the end of our game.

You keep stating how BOONus rounds have nothing to do with alignments in this thread, when that's absolutely not true. I agree it's hard to draw conclusions about main-game alignments from the rounds, but to say they have nothing to do with each other is just dense.

Again, there is no reason why you should be quick-voting in a 3 player game.

I'm not saying that you couldn't theoretically find someone scummy for something they did. Like I bought into Cheeky's N+M case b/c I felt like the accusation made that they were asked about reads and stalled was scummy but arguing that b/c I voted in a stalled mini-game has anything to do with my alignment here is dumb at best.

In post 4843, DrewVa wrote:like if N&M is scum out of this this is like a crazy bit of theater

I think the room c round 2 peeps are all town

I'll talk with Nancy about the Thanos stuff when she gets on tomorrow hopefully -d

This is quite the flip on us from you. Are you saying that I dont have this type of play in my scum!game?

In post 4855, Nero Cain wrote:I'm not saying that you couldn't theoretically find someone scummy for something they did. Like I bought into Cheeky's N+M case b/c I felt like the accusation made that they were asked about reads and stalled was scummy but arguing that b/c I voted in a stalled mini-game has anything to do with my alignment here is dumb at best.

How about you just claim as asked and participate in discussion, rather than putting someone at L-1?

In post 4855, Nero Cain wrote:Like I bought into Cheeky's N+M case b/c I felt like the accusation made that they were asked about reads and stalled was scummy

After reading the mini do you still feel this way about us?

*Start a discussion

They asked Gamma to claim first. He didn't claim for hours so voted him. Why are you taking these mini-games so seriously?

In post 4858, Nev and Max wrote:After reading the mini do you still feel this way about us?

I haven't read it yet, I'll let you know when I do.

In post 4841, mcqueen wrote:

In post 4833, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 4829, RCEnigma wrote:

In post 4827, Gamma Emerald wrote:Tbh Thanos seemed very desperate to win the round. Wonder why that was.

I don't want to point out the obvious but it's clear why either alignment would have want the +1. The modifiers are hit or miss.

But Thanos was like this

Quoting because it's my favorite post of the game. Deserves as much attention as possible.

Glad you liked it.

In post 4860, Nero Cain wrote:They asked Gamma to claim first. He didn't claim for hours so voted him. Why are you taking these mini-games so seriously?

In post 4848, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4839, mcqueen wrote:because anyone that asks someone else to claim thinks they have something to hide

Why would Thanos think Gamma or I had something to hide? He was just calling for a mass claim to try to solve is all.

In post 4861, Nero Cain wrote:

In post 4858, Nev and Max wrote:After reading the mini do you still feel this way about us?

I haven't read it yet, I'll let you know when I do.

This could totally just be me, but if I were piggy backing on a push someone was making, and then the person being pushed showed emphatic proof that the push was constructed bullshit, I would be checking that out right away to see if I was being misled or manipulated for some reason.

I like just got on a few minutes ago. I'm looking at it now.

In post 4813, mcqueen wrote:

In post 4803, BrightEyedFish wrote:Yeah, I think TLK made up that whole fruit thing. Just like the SS thing.

Can you stop tunnelling TLK for a minute and focus on somebody else? Why would he make up the fruit thing? I want him gone, too, but very few others are worried about that right now. Even if they were, discussions are happening about N&M, CD, Elsa, and others that you rarely comment on.

So I am not allowed to have reads or suspicions that differ from yours.

If you have a specific question for me just ask.

I don't see where n+M were being grilled or stalling.

In post 4867, Nero Cain wrote:I don't see where n+M were being grilled or stalling.

Did you see where we were the ones offering up our views, being asked to provide examples and then being ignored after we provided the examples?

I liked that part a lot.

yes

In post 4870, Nero Cain wrote:yes

@BEF

In post 4817, mcqueen wrote:

In post 4800, profii wrote:Weird - I have not given any thing - modifier or fruit to TLK. Something has interfered with my role

Sorry, BEF.

I think I have an idea of what happened to the sticky fruit but it's too early to out it just yet.

In post 4568, mcqueen wrote:wait ami not allowed to quote mod posts

In post 4569, mcqueen wrote:pls dont modkill was accident promise

You can’t be modkilled for quoting anything in the main thread.