Mafiascum.net

In post 49, DrewVa wrote:

@mod will the wagons of the plurality votes be revealed when resolved?

-D

Question seconded. I atleast want to know the scumbags who killed my ass later on so I can roast the townies in dead chat.

Better phrasing: at the end of the day, do we know who voted who?

In post 49, DrewVa wrote:idk if you guys know this but if there's literally no consequence to votes then there is no reason to not use them

it's just a way to indicate thought processes in this case

the one big appeal being that there's no risk of an actual quickhammer from anyone other than the four dayenders

that same post explicitly says we can still use the same vote tags

but that does raise one question actually

@mod will the wagons of the plurality votes be revealed when resolved?

-D

Ooo this started!

Toooootally not egoposting.
You see nothing! NOTHING!!!

^
lies

Alright then there's really no reason to not just do RVS as usual then. I know the mods are like, let's make it feel really different, but I don't think I've ever seen a game that *could simulate RVS* that was better off by talking about other garbage rather than just playing like it's more or less a normal game.

Our votes still matter since at the end of the day the votes are revealed. So if there's a sudden shift at the end we will know anyway

VOTE: Emperor's New Groove

I don't see why we'd do hurt tags over this when we can just do this -D

Am I the only one that hasn't read the mechanics yet?

But voting in-thread and later contradicting yourself with a different vote will end horribly.

Besides, if votes are at the end of the day, it could even be PR hints of who they're checking OR of who they checked and confirmed evil if they're dead.

I, for 1, will use my vote as a hint.

I'm sure you will Elsa. I'm sure you will -D

You question the authority of your Queen?

I'm not sure "question" is the word I'd use -D

In post 55, Nero Cain wrote:Am I the only one that hasn't read the mechanics yet?

Obviously nobody did but me.

DrewVa wrote:I'm not sure "question" is the word I'd use -D

In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:

The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.

RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.

I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.

I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.

I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.

It would be very rude to call royalty "old-fashioned" but may I introduce you to the wonderful world of AES 256-bit encryption?

reading is for wimps anyways.

ok yeah,

Who needs science encryptions when you got lightsabers, the Force, and Ice Magic?

Well this is gonna be a thing this game too I guess

Lightsabers are science-y o.o

dude, rude. (and actually kinda scummy)

You put magic crystal in holder. Use Force powers to make it glow. Have button on handle to shoot out laser beam in the form of a sword.

Lightsaber isn't complicated.

Laserbeams are science, death beams everywhere are disappointed right now.

What can I say, I'm an Evil genius.

Mr. Bigglesworth says you can live for now.

And I'm a Queen, therefore more important then you, also meaning my opinion is more valid.

It's magic.