Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2018 9:49 am
Idk yet still waiting for him to comment on my reads. I know he thinks Ramcius is town.
~ C
Idk yet still waiting for him to comment on my reads. I know he thinks Ramcius is town.
I suppose we have different playstyles. Why was my accusation awful?In post 695, mcqueen wrote:I wanted to clear you up as town despite your awful accusation of Nero
Here:In post 701, Cheeky Dancer wrote:I suppose we have different playstyles. Why was my accusation awful?In post 695, mcqueen wrote:I wanted to clear you up as town despite your awful accusation of Nero
~ C
I already addressed this. Don't understand why you couldn't answer the question the first timeIn post 443, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Next time don't bury your question in a scummy catch up wall.In post 439, Nero Cain wrote:Cheeky is ignoring my question like she normally does as scum. This game is EZ mode.
~ C
I didn't like this post. You're assuming Nero HAS TO view the same things as you, despite calling his question of such a strawman. I've done it, too, but basically saying, "No way you could have found it scum, it's so obvtown," especially when it's not, is well, bad play (for reference, I find RCE null after my first readthrough, but I mentioned above he deserves an ISO)In post 451, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Nice strawman. Tell me how you saw it as scummy then?In post 448, Nero Cain wrote:Why do I have to think the same things as you?In post 446, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Because RCE had literally done nothing scummy.
~ C
In post 506, Alonzo wrote:Why did no one sheep me on my Almost Chara vote???!
Why did you scumread those 2?In post 688, Alonzo wrote:Everyone should be voting for Gamma...
Alonzo I'm not sure what to make of you so far.
In post 441, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Exactly.In post 413, Nero Cain wrote:how is that scummy at all?
~ C
Mcqueen I answered his question before saying that in a smart ass way. Why? Well because getting emotional reactions is my way of reading people.In post 443, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Next time don't bury your question in a scummy catch up wall.In post 439, Nero Cain wrote:Cheeky is ignoring my question like she normally does as scum. This game is EZ mode.
~ C
This is likely true. However you can't read Nero based on his read of me. He's just going to scumread me if we are in a game together so it's nai.In post 706, Cheeky Dancer wrote:That interaction between Nero/RCE read like RCE could have reacted to Nero's dayvig in any way and Nero would still scumread him for it.
Hence my "awful" push on him which he responded "awfully" to.In post 708, RCEnigma wrote:This is likely true. However you can't read Nero based on his read of me. He's just going to scumread me if we are in a game together so it's nai.In post 706, Cheeky Dancer wrote:That interaction between Nero/RCE read like RCE could have reacted to Nero's dayvig in any way and Nero would still scumread him for it.
I'm sorry I missed that. It does put a little doubt in my Nero read, though... (unless I'm reading this wrong, too, he asks how it's scummy then calls RCE scummy later)In post 706, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 441, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Exactly.In post 413, Nero Cain wrote:how is that scummy at all?
~ CMcqueen I answered his question before saying that in a smart ass way. Why? Well because getting emotional reactions is my way of reading people.In post 443, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Next time don't bury your question in a scummy catch up wall.In post 439, Nero Cain wrote:Cheeky is ignoring my question like she normally does as scum. This game is EZ mode.
~ C
Second I didn't expect him to see it my way hence I said nice straw man - also at no point did I call RCE town, like you I considered him null but Nero's read on him looked opportunistic as I saw no scumminess in his reaction. That interaction between Nero/RCE read like RCE could have reacted to Nero's dayvig in any way and Nero would still scumread him for it.
Of course we have our own opinions, that's what the point of communicating is - to figure out what another is thinking and why - instead he turns it into a "I don't have to think the same as you" argument which is completely besides the point.
~ C
In post 707, mcqueen wrote:@Mod: What happens if the day ends and 2 people are tied for the most votes?
no, he's done shit all. Maybe I'll have something later to read him on.
no, I didn't. I called his reaction to my fake dayvig kinda scummy and then Drew asked why and then I explained why I felt the way I did.In post 710, mcqueen wrote:he asks how it's scummy then calls RCE scummy later
but I had already explained it and you even just reiterated that you saw "no scumminess". How is this NOT a "we don't think the same things."?In post 706, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Of course we have our own opinions, that's what the point of communicating is - to figure out what another is thinking and why - instead he turns it into a "I don't have to think the same as you" argument which is completely besides the point.
Why? What specifically are you interested in seeing?
Alonzo wrote:use the end of this page wisely....
AC for something in the early game that seemed devious. I'm at best null on them.In post 703, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Why did you scumread those 2?
Mind pointing both of these out?In post 720, Alonzo wrote:AC for something in the early game that seemed devious. I'm at best null on them.In post 703, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Why did you scumread those 2?
Gamma for what I consider a scumslip.
The fuck do you consider a scumslip that I’ve posted?In post 720, Alonzo wrote:AC for something in the early game that seemed devious. I'm at best null on them.In post 703, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Why did you scumread those 2?
Gamma for what I consider a scumslip.