In post 8186, davesaz wrote:Are you dodging N&M's question? Or overlooked it?
I asked Nancy, I think she mostly remembered N&M pushing EJ over SS, and I believe she misremembered N&M trying to prevent the day from ending when that did not happen afaik. I don't really have an issue with retracting that part of the case on her behalf, given I don't really think that's the biggest issue we have with the N&M slot. (Claim, Boonus Round, Tone, Reactions, seem more what we've discussed irt the slot)
I'm still a bit more conflicted as I outlined 7940 but am not sure that I want BEF more today than N&M despite my misgivings on the slot.
-d
This while post is fucking bullshit. First of all Nancy is posting, but she can't respond personally to the post that you already told me you didn't want to speak for her on. I get that you spoke to her, but if it's not your read then I don't think you should be the one posting the defense.
Nancy throws shade at us in a lot of posts and when called on it she sends out her peon to make the slight retraction.
Nancy, if you think we are scum case us. Shade, feelings and tone policing isnt substative. Explain why are actions point to a scum mentality. I can't change your mind on how you read my posts. I can argue reasoning behind things info and say though.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
The part where your partner referred me to you. I call you out directly in multiple posts. Other people call you out. You prance your partner out with your hand up his ass like a puppet while offering a slight walk back from what you've said.
Nancy. This look isn't good on you, it's trite trash to be honest. Don't whine about not being listened to if one of your strategies is to ignore and diminish others.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:40 am
by PenguinPower
In post 8248, profii wrote:i thought that was some really weird reaction test that i wasn't sure what you were testing haha
Thoughts on a massclaim?
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:43 am
by Xtoxm
dw elsa i lost track and thought it was day 4 too
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 5:44 am
by BrightEyedFish
I need to start taking better notes and I keep mixing up claims.
If someone has a list handy can you please post a quick updated list of all who have claimed and what they have claimed?
I've already claimed so I'm personally not bothered - i am distinctly under the impression my loyal person didn't work so i don't think they have innos but there is a small chance as they have suggested they have a night action -if that came out it might narrow a couple of bits down idk?
Xtoxm did make a point that with only 3 scum left it is perhaps on the early side of things but like today is quite the contrast to yesterday where we pretty much knew S_S was scum - it's really interesting how 'i promise to hammer -> lie -> lynch = scum' but we don't apply the same "algorithm" to 'miller/traitor weird claim -> promise to L-1 vote -> lie? = not an instant lynch'
I guess the the point of saying that is on the S_S lynch the groups direction of travel was fairly obvious - yet, despite having EJ in a ~similar~ situation, the claim makes things really unclear and i don't see the group as a whole converging on a lynch option (EJ or otherwise - the point is, it's not obvious) so maybe a claim is a good idea.
I kinda think we have the upper hand so if someone had a good guilty indication then they'd probably trade themselves in terms of outing their info for certain death to get us down to 2 scum as we've got loads of people still so I am assuming no one really does have that via their own results
so maybe as a group putting the bits together might give us a result - i haven't been through enough 'early' massclaims to weigh up the full pros and cons but i think we aren't particularly coming together on a lynch rn so it might help ?
In post 8186, davesaz wrote:Are you dodging N&M's question? Or overlooked it?
I asked Nancy, I think she mostly remembered N&M pushing EJ over SS, and I believe she misremembered N&M trying to prevent the day from ending when that did not happen afaik. I don't really have an issue with retracting that part of the case on her behalf, given I don't really think that's the biggest issue we have with the N&M slot. (Claim, Boonus Round, Tone, Reactions, seem more what we've discussed irt the slot)
I'm still a bit more conflicted as I outlined 7940 but am not sure that I want BEF more today than N&M despite my misgivings on the slot.
-d
This while post is fucking bullshit. First of all Nancy is posting, but she can't respond personally to the post that you already told me you didn't want to speak for her on. I get that you spoke to her, but if it's not your read then I don't think you should be the one posting the defense.
Nancy throws shade at us in a lot of posts and when called on it she sends out her peon to make the slight retraction.
Nancy, if you think we are scum case us. Shade, feelings and tone policing isnt substative. Explain why are actions point to a scum mentality. I can't change your mind on how you read my posts. I can argue reasoning behind things info and say though.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
The part where your partner referred me to you. I call you out directly in multiple posts. Other people call you out. You prance your partner out with your hand up his ass like a puppet while offering a slight walk back from what you've said.
Nancy. This look isn't good on you, it's trite trash to be honest. Don't whine about not being listened to if one of your strategies is to ignore and diminish others.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
In post 8186, davesaz wrote:Are you dodging N&M's question? Or overlooked it?
I asked Nancy, I think she mostly remembered N&M pushing EJ over SS, and I believe she misremembered N&M trying to prevent the day from ending when that did not happen afaik. I don't really have an issue with retracting that part of the case on her behalf, given I don't really think that's the biggest issue we have with the N&M slot. (Claim, Boonus Round, Tone, Reactions, seem more what we've discussed irt the slot)
I'm still a bit more conflicted as I outlined 7940 but am not sure that I want BEF more today than N&M despite my misgivings on the slot.
-d
This while post is fucking bullshit. First of all Nancy is posting, but she can't respond personally to the post that you already told me you didn't want to speak for her on. I get that you spoke to her, but if it's not your read then I don't think you should be the one posting the defense.
Nancy throws shade at us in a lot of posts and when called on it she sends out her peon to make the slight retraction.
Nancy, if you think we are scum case us. Shade, feelings and tone policing isnt substative. Explain why are actions point to a scum mentality. I can't change your mind on how you read my posts. I can argue reasoning behind things info and say though.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
The part where your partner referred me to you. I call you out directly in multiple posts. Other people call you out. You prance your partner out with your hand up his ass like a puppet while offering a slight walk back from what you've said.
Nancy. This look isn't good on you, it's trite trash to be honest. Don't whine about not being listened to if one of your strategies is to ignore and diminish others.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
~DrewVa
Oh and FF, if you seriously think I’m being in anyway sketchy here, have your lovely hydra partner address me instead. I’m more than willing to talk to Max. See, two can play this stupid game.
In post 8186, davesaz wrote:Are you dodging N&M's question? Or overlooked it?
I asked Nancy, I think she mostly remembered N&M pushing EJ over SS, and I believe she misremembered N&M trying to prevent the day from ending when that did not happen afaik. I don't really have an issue with retracting that part of the case on her behalf, given I don't really think that's the biggest issue we have with the N&M slot. (Claim, Boonus Round, Tone, Reactions, seem more what we've discussed irt the slot)
I'm still a bit more conflicted as I outlined 7940 but am not sure that I want BEF more today than N&M despite my misgivings on the slot.
-d
This while post is fucking bullshit. First of all Nancy is posting, but she can't respond personally to the post that you already told me you didn't want to speak for her on. I get that you spoke to her, but if it's not your read then I don't think you should be the one posting the defense.
Nancy throws shade at us in a lot of posts and when called on it she sends out her peon to make the slight retraction.
Nancy, if you think we are scum case us. Shade, feelings and tone policing isnt substative. Explain why are actions point to a scum mentality. I can't change your mind on how you read my posts. I can argue reasoning behind things info and say though.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
The part where your partner referred me to you. I call you out directly in multiple posts. Other people call you out. You prance your partner out with your hand up his ass like a puppet while offering a slight walk back from what you've said.
Nancy. This look isn't good on you, it's trite trash to be honest. Don't whine about not being listened to if one of your strategies is to ignore and diminish others.
What part of we’re a hydra aren’t you comprehending?
~DrewVa
Oh and FF, if you seriously think I’m being in anyway sketchy here, have your lovely hydra partner address me instead. I’m more than willing to talk to Max. See, two can play this stupid game.
Im confused by this. Like I never said I wouldnt talk to you or your partner, so I dont know why you feel it necessary to say youll only speak to Max. Ive wanted to talk to you. You are the one dancing around the issue and not addressing it headon.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:44 am
by DrewVa
We can massclaim or not but at this point I am pretty okay just lynching N&M.
-d
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:50 am
by PenguinPower
I mean...me too, but it doesn't seem like there's a lot of support for that. There doesn't seem to be a lot of support for any lynch as far as I can tell.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:54 am
by RCEnigma
I'm with drewva to be honest. Rereading Cheekys iso is making me kind of paranoid but I think N&M comes away from cheekys iso as a scummier slot than the ones I'm paranoid of.
One of Alonzo/McQueen was on track and are worth digging through. I want to say Alonzo to take the lazy way out but cheeky didn't die over their JK joke.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:55 am
by Thanos
I too dislike Una's pushes on the DayRep theory. Seems pretty useless for scum especially after Boon announced it.
I think a full massclaim should help, as Jingle said, lock down more scum.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:13 am
by Creature
In post 8198, Thanos wrote:Stupid question: what would a disloyal action on an Ascetic return?
In post 8233, UnaBombaH wrote:Meaning that IF there was someone bussing D1, it was DrewVa.
That's a...good theory.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:22 am
by Creature
In post 8260, DrewVa wrote:We can massclaim or not but at this point I am pretty okay just lynching N&M.
-d
Me too, probably.
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:43 am
by Xtoxm
In post 8262, RCEnigma wrote:I'm with drewva to be honest. Rereading Cheekys iso is making me kind of paranoid but I think N&M comes away from cheekys iso as a scummier slot than the ones I'm paranoid of.
One of Alonzo/McQueen was on track and are worth digging through. I want to say Alonzo to take the lazy way out but cheeky didn't die over their JK joke.
had a quick look out of interest
mcqueens reads => EJ, PP
alonzos reads => NM, Una, Jingle
is what i interpret
something to add to the web
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:09 am
by DrewVa
In post 8262, RCEnigma wrote:I'm with drewva to be honest. Rereading Cheekys iso is making me kind of paranoid but I think N&M comes away from cheekys iso as a scummier slot than the ones I'm paranoid of.
One of Alonzo/McQueen was on track and are worth digging through. I want to say Alonzo to take the lazy way out but cheeky didn't die over their JK joke.
