In post 974, NicoRobin wrote:I clearly said '/in to replace' in the sign-up thread.......
In post 87, NicoRobin wrote:/in to replace
UNVOTE:
In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:Yes. You can take that vote as serious in that I haven't seen any other wagon was compelling enough for me to shift my vote. I don't buy how he's approaching the game state as genuine.
In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:In post 936, Taly wrote:In post 772, Mewtaph wrote:I like u r a person 2 for town quite a bit actually, and I would be willing to do my first active sort to them, Taly or Varsoon.
I think NicoRobin is a decent point to poke with a stick before deadline rears too close, but is a bad wagon to get going near deadline in case they are really just apathetic!town.
I don't know why pinturrichio keeps pushing their content back repeatedly but it's not a great look.
I didn't like the initial voting on UP2 when I first skimmed through it, the reasons for a scumread there lacked substance (Prompting Michael Scott to explain why he thought UP2's posts were manufactured, that's the vote that most got my attention when it happened.)
I agree a bit on Nico. A lurker lynch won't get anywhere, and I don't trust the fact that everyone is like "where's the scum at"?
:/ I get my vote on Kokichi contradicts the above statement, but I'm working to change this.
Pint pushing content back... not a great look? Or scum-indicative?
I thought ignoring u r a person 2's self-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
In post 976, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: STW
In post 974, NicoRobin wrote:I clearly said '/in to replace' in the sign-up thread.......
In post 952, Taly wrote:Alchemist is someone I want to sort more.
I can see scum take the positions he's had (namely the vote/rationality on STW 128 133, 153 and the vote/unvote onto UP2 734 and 736), but, alongside my other iffy/scumlean reads, a lot of people don't agree.
ProFlavor, Michael Scott, and Pint need an individual ISO for me to get thoughts rolling on them.
Mephisto reread / UP2 Wagon Evaluation / ProFlavor/Michael Scott/Pint are the areas of sorting I'm looking to absolve in the next 2 days.
In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:
Yes. You can take that vote as serious in that I haven't seen any other wagon was compelling enough for me to shift my vote. I don't buy how he's approaching the game state as genuine.
It was an open ended question, so I wasn't expecting any answer in particular.In post 936, Taly wrote:In post 772, Mewtaph wrote:I like u r a person 2 for town quite a bit actually, and I would be willing to do my first active sort to them, Taly or Varsoon.
I think NicoRobin is a decent point to poke with a stick before deadline rears too close, but is a bad wagon to get going near deadline in case they are really just apathetic!town.
I don't know why pinturrichio keeps pushing their content back repeatedly but it's not a great look.
I didn't like the initial voting on UP2 when I first skimmed through it, the reasons for a scumread there lacked substance (Prompting Michael Scott to explain why he thought UP2's posts were manufactured, that's the vote that most got my attention when it happened.)
I agree a bit on Nico. A lurker lynch won't get anywhere, and I don't trust the fact that everyone is like "where's the scum at"?
:/ I get my vote on Kokichi contradicts the above statement, but I'm working to change this.
Pint pushing content back... not a great look? Or scum-indicative?
I thought ignoring u r a person 2's self-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
Mmm, yes. This is how I feel too.
I'm not taking Pint having to push his content back as scum indicative but I'm saying it would've been bad if posts along those lines continued, which I guess is pointless now.
In post 978, Taly wrote:In post 976, Varsoon wrote:VOTE: STW
Please make a case, involving post links.
I can't bring myself to read all the pages in this thread because of the back-and-forths and filtering out a mountain of words for a few content-advancing statements hasn't done me well for comprehension.
In post 965, Mewtaph wrote:I thought ignoring u r a person 2's self-referential call for a wagon on himself by means of a vote over interaction was scummy. There is a part of me that thinks that scum would be looking for something to do outside of STW's wagon after it dissolved.
In post 980, Tibor and Lumia wrote:If someone can explain to me why Meatloaf is stuck in my head, I'd appreciate it
In post 977, Taly wrote:I think scum was on STW's wagon regardless of STW's alignment. He was L-1'd, and this is a large. Granted, I do have a townread on STW, but it's faded the past few pages, I still stick to them-town.
In post 986, Almost Chara wrote:it's cold
In post 543, Varsoon wrote:Just gonna bring this into overdrive, actually, and go for the dunk.
Day Vig: Shoshin the Worst
In post 43, Taly wrote::D so much opportunity to get pocketed!!
._. im gonna have to reread that playerlist movement night action stuff arent i?
not feeling the kokichi IC claim but i slight townvibe it anyway
VOTE: Almost Chara
RVS is bullshit but square up w me, both heads now
~ Taly
In post 995, Tibor and Lumia wrote:In post 543, Varsoon wrote:Just gonna bring this into overdrive, actually, and go for the dunk.
Day Vig: Shoshin the Worst
Oh nice
brass mentioned this but I wanted to see for myself what the deal was.
First impression would be this is a reaction test, but I think I saw V For Vendetta saying he meant this.
Since stw is still alive I'll ask: how did you survive, stw?
-Gamma "the hipfire king" Emerald
In post 989, Shoshin the worst wrote:Posts like ProFlavor's last one SHOULD come >rand from scum because of how conspicuously weighted they are