Marathon 4 (Semi-Open 2: Oopsy Daisy!)

Jack · Post Post #4 (isolation #0) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 6:08 pm

hmm why not

/in

Jack · Post Post #64 (isolation #1) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:16 pm

Vote:VitaminR

Why did you switch?

Jack · Post Post #104 (isolation #2) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:26 pm

hmm well if you say so

Vote:PJ

Jack · Post Post #113 (isolation #3) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:29 pm

I don't think scum would try and push that.

Jack · Post Post #117 (isolation #4) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:31 pm

petroleumjelly wrote:Not too enthralled with claiming, but I will if I have to.

Vote: Jack
, do you have any comments to make on the game?

Yes. I would comment that I'm sleepy and my wireless keeps dropping out and I'm assuming Vitamin has a guilty result even if he says he doesn't.

Jack · Post Post #130 (isolation #5) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:34 pm

Thread needs more MrBuddyLee.

Jack · Post Post #139 (isolation #6) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:36 pm

actually I wasn't at all convinced about the PJ thing but now he keeps going after myself and scum love to go after people who say incorrect things so I'm happy with my vote.

Jack · Post Post #143 (isolation #7) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:37 pm

Atticus wrote:
Jack wrote:
petroleumjelly wrote:Not too enthralled with claiming, but I will if I have to.

Vote: Jack
, do you have any comments to make on the game?
Yes. I would comment that I'm sleepy and my wireless keeps dropping out and I'm assuming Vitamin has a guilty result even if he says he doesn't.
He lies, he claimed this in semi-open 1. He was scum. He claimed to miss a deadline, but he was lying scum!

Well I said it when i was town in the other as well. It's true, although I didn't miss any deadlines.

Jack · Post Post #151 (isolation #8) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:39 pm

myself wrote:oh crud im dead

You have 2 votes what are you talking about.

Interesting.

What was the "incorrect thing" you said that I went after?

I was asking if you had any thoughts. I was not impressed with your vote on me which came with no reasoning at all, which put me at Lynch -1.

No, "myself" said it. The alko inventor thing.

I don't worry about lynch -1.

Jack · Post Post #167 (isolation #9) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:44 pm

Unvote,Vote:VitamenR

He is trying the "scum wouldn't act this way" ploy.

Jack · Post Post #172 (isolation #10) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:46 pm

VitaminR wrote:I still much prefer a PJ lynch here.

You said pj was suspicious for voting m-self and now you are voting m-self.

Jack · Post Post #174 (isolation #11) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:46 pm

VitaminR wrote:
Jack wrote:
Unvote,Vote:VitamenR

He is trying the "scum wouldn't act this way" ploy.
I wish. I can never pull this off convincingly when I'm scum.

Precisely

Jack · Post Post #178 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:47 pm

al_kohaulec wrote:
Atticus wrote:If he's town scum coulda been on the wagon at beginning...
This is true.

Was there anybody who never voted for myself at any given time?

moi

Jack · Post Post #180 (isolation #13) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:47 pm

myself wrote:
unvote, vote: vitamin

i prefer a vitamin lynch over a PJ lynch right now

although that may change, why is this exactly m-self?

Jack · Post Post #186 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:49 pm

unvote,Vote:myself

He is quite scummy on reread.

Jack · Post Post #193 (isolation #15) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:52 pm

myself wrote:@MBL: i never voted for myself

i dont think that i voted for PJ
though he is acting scummy

What did this mean:

unvote, vote: vitamin
i prefer a vitamin lynch over a PJ lynch right now

Jack · Post Post #198 (isolation #16) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:54 pm

pj and vitamenR might be distancing.

myself is very weird. Could you just try and explain yourself?

unvote

Jack · Post Post #207 (isolation #17) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:57 pm

I did respond. It was m-self who said the incorrect thing (alko lied).

I will

Vote:PJ

again, I quite like my distancing theory. It's a good strategy for quick games like these.

Jack · Post Post #213 (isolation #18) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 7:59 pm

hmm, is that so MBL?

Well PJ is still arguing over nothing with him, I don't mind my vote.

Jack · Post Post #218 (isolation #19) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:01 pm

unvote, Vote:Atticus

Yah, you've done nothing but pursue myself.

Jack · Post Post #246 (isolation #20) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:10 pm

Atticus wrote:Indeed I have. I think he's scum.

Well I can certainly see how you arrived at that conclusion from your posts:

Die Scum?

Myself is scum.

But last game I though klebian was scum for going after jalyn all day and he wasn't so

unvote

Jack · Post Post #260 (isolation #21) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:14 pm

I am still not liking VitaminR. Although I did remember to spell his name correctly. Humm.

Jack · Post Post #272 (isolation #22) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:18 pm

What's up Alko?

I think myself is an easy target.

I'm still inclined to think VR and PJ are scum together.

I would be suspicious of Atticus but I'm not.

MBL seems like a decent chap.

Jack · Post Post #277 (isolation #23) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:20 pm

Vote:VitaminR

Jack · Post Post #360 (isolation #24) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:54 pm

I told you guys atticus was innocent.

I believe I also said pj was scum.

go me.

I missed a bit my connection was out. Still favoring a vitaminR lynch here.

myself
jack
vitaminR
mbl

Jack · Post Post #366 (isolation #25) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 8:59 pm

Ok it took a few minutes to get that posted.

But I'm prepared to vote vR. Don't know if I'll be able to do a reread but I'll try.

It's lylo, shouldn't we be claiming or something?

Jack · Post Post #369 (isolation #26) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:01 pm

Well I'm just a townie.

I'm worried that no vig has claimed.

Jack · Post Post #371 (isolation #27) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:04 pm

I think it's unlikely that vR just happened to bring a bunch of pressure on PJ day one, right from the get go.

If there's an SK it's probably MBL. Should we no lynch and hope for crosskill?

I think a vig would claim.

Jack · Post Post #378 (isolation #28) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:09 pm

mbl, claim please. Let's all claim.

Jack · Post Post #385 (isolation #29) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:13 pm

I think vitR is scum and mbl is scum.

If we don't lynch they have to go for eachother yes? but they would both have to die. However there is no way to win by lynching. Unless someone has a usefull role.

someone

must have a pro-town role.

Jack · Post Post #391 (isolation #30) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:16 pm

well, let's do no lynch and you kill vitR mbl. I still think you're scum but this is a good plan either way yeah?

Vote:No-Lynch

Jack · Post Post #392 (isolation #31) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:18 pm

VitR lynching a townie makes no sense when we can do no lynch. And I think you're scum anyway.

Jack · Post Post #403 (isolation #32) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:23 pm

myself what's your role?

Jack · Post Post #408 (isolation #33) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:28 pm

I think everyone knows vR and mbl are the two scum. Now, if we lynch a townie and only one scum dies, then the remaining scum wins. If we don't lynch a townie and one scum lives then town wins.

Jack · Post Post #411 (isolation #34) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:31 pm

look mbl, if there are two scum and one is lynched the other wins. So you can see why I don't want to lynch scum this round. If instead of lynching we have you vig, it's the same thing.

I think you can figure out who the other scum is (VitaminR). I'm sticking with no lynch.

Jack · Post Post #416 (isolation #35) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:34 pm

It's only dumb numerically. But in this game we can figure out who the scum are.

Jack · Post Post #420 (isolation #36) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:36 pm

deadline plz

Jack · Post Post #424 (isolation #37) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:37 pm

VitaminR wrote:Jack, I've explained why No-Lynch is dumb.

I see you've abandoned your "lynch VitaminR" plan though lol.

Jack · Post Post #432 (isolation #38) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:41 pm

VitaminR wrote:
petroleumjelly wrote:Okay. I think it's Jack + myself. The guy pushing the inventor agenda goes first.

Unvote: Jack, Vote: myself
, and
FoS: Jack
.
Typical scum move. Voting townie and FOSing partner.

Look man, if you think mbl is scum than lynching me as scum would lose the town the game.

If you are sure I'm scum then voting no lynch and having mbl vig me would win the game. Simple.

Jack · Post Post #444 (isolation #39) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:48 pm

Lookie, we either have 2 scum or 1 scum and 1 vig. Worst case is 2 scum. If there are 2 scum, if we lynch 1 scum then we lose. Therefore we don't lynch anyone so there is no risk of lynching scum. We go to night and let the scum kill eachother. The scum really don't want this.

Jack · Post Post #448 (isolation #40) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:49 pm

MrBuddyLee wrote:Jack, are you scum?

no

Jack · Post Post #459 (isolation #41) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:54 pm

well I don't get it, if mbl was sk he could just lynch VitR and win. Unless he really believes I'm the scum instead of vitR.

mbl you think there is one scum left right? and you think it's me right? So why not just go to no lynch and kill me? town win right?

Jack · Post Post #468 (isolation #42) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 9:59 pm

ughh this is confusing. Why isn't mbl lynching vitr?

Jack · Post Post #469 (isolation #43) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:01 pm

I don't know why vitR is voting himself. I just want the game to be over damnit.

Jack · Post Post #477 (isolation #44) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:04 pm

confirm vote:no lynch

Either I vastly miscalculated somewhere or you people are weird, so I'll just stick to my guns here.

Jack · Post Post #480 (isolation #45) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:06 pm

mbl if you kill me you lose, just remember that.

Jack · Post Post #483 (isolation #46) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:07 pm

Are we really going to wait out the 10 minutes or are you two going to confirm your votes?

Jack · Post Post #497 (isolation #47) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:12 pm

MrBuddyLee wrote:lol Jack did you just claim scum? that's awesome. not sure what you're hinting at there, you might want to be clearer.

no dude... you kill me (townie) vitR (scum) kills you (scum), vitR kills myself endgame.

Jack · Post Post #514 (isolation #48) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:24 pm

hahaha oops

Jack · Post Post #517 (isolation #49) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:25 pm

I always have been terrible at ID'ing newbie scum. But I guess you really thought it was me huh MBL?

Jack · Post Post #521 (isolation #50) » Tue Mar 27, 2007 10:30 pm

myself got jumped on so hard day 1 though. Ah what the christ.

My plan was still correct at least.