Favorite Scummer Join-Year Poll (14-1)

SleepyKrew · Post Post #1 (isolation #0) » Sat May 16, 2015 2:56 pm

Anyone that votes something past 2012 is a fool.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Sat May 16, 2015 5:29 pm

I'm calling 2009 and 2010 first and second place (in either order).

SleepyKrew · Post Post #23 (isolation #2) » Sun May 17, 2015 9:18 am

How are any of you dedicated enough to go through and make a list

SleepyKrew · Post Post #103 (isolation #3) » Mon May 18, 2015 10:14 am

Oh shit, 07 is stacked.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #115 (isolation #4) » Mon May 18, 2015 11:37 am

In post 0, Chevre wrote:the examples can only be from other years to count.

lmaoooooo

SleepyKrew · Post Post #121 (isolation #5) » Mon May 18, 2015 12:48 pm

oh okay
2011 foreva

SleepyKrew · Post Post #123 (isolation #6) » Mon May 18, 2015 12:54 pm

Oh zmuffinman is from 2011 too

SleepyKrew · Post Post #136 (isolation #7) » Mon May 18, 2015 5:27 pm

How can you quote Jaden Smith if you get the quote wrong

SleepyKrew · Post Post #165 (isolation #8) » Tue May 19, 2015 9:46 am

Oh hey 2011 has the actual best people on the site: DeasVail and MattP. I've been told that Grimmjow (also 2011!) is on that tier as well.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #172 (isolation #9) » Tue May 19, 2015 11:07 am

Remember kids
A vote for 2009 is a vote for mastin's ego

SleepyKrew · Post Post #198 (isolation #10) » Sun May 24, 2015 7:11 pm

This is very difficult

SleepyKrew · Post Post #247 (isolation #11) » Fri May 29, 2015 5:17 pm

In post 246, LlamaFluff wrote:recency bias exists heavily

well duh

SleepyKrew · Post Post #277 (isolation #12) » Sun May 31, 2015 3:14 pm

2011 is the most excited

SleepyKrew · Post Post #317 (isolation #13) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:16 am

You and Reck are related?

SleepyKrew · Post Post #321 (isolation #14) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 8:46 am

laxaviv
The Living Laxative

SleepyKrew · Post Post #330 (isolation #15) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 1:56 pm

SleepyKrew · Post Post #340 (isolation #16) » Tue Jun 02, 2015 4:45 pm

oh wow

SleepyKrew · Post Post #369 (isolation #17) » Wed Jun 03, 2015 10:19 am

In post 366, PokerFace wrote:2002, 2003 deserved better since they were the first 2 years

Makes perfect sense.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #380 (isolation #18) » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:04 pm

why would you only read parts 4-6 in a 7 part series

SleepyKrew · Post Post #381 (isolation #19) » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:05 pm

this'd be understandable if we were talking about watching Star Wars but we're not

SleepyKrew · Post Post #385 (isolation #20) » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:18 pm

In post 382, Majiffy wrote:I think you need to re-read my post.

In post 383, Majiffy wrote:Basically I only read 3-6 because my girlfriend was a fan.

All I got from this exchange is that you can't count.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #387 (isolation #21) » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:23 pm

No, I still don't understand why you wouldn't start with the first book.

SleepyKrew · Post Post #399 (isolation #22) » Fri Jun 05, 2015 6:22 pm

chevvvvvvvvvv

SleepyKrew · Post Post #404 (isolation #23) » Fri Jun 05, 2015 6:42 pm

idr my votes

SleepyKrew · Post Post #413 (isolation #24) » Wed Feb 14, 2018 1:26 pm