2016 NFL Football

hasdgfas · Post Post #173 (isolation #0) » Thu Sep 01, 2016 3:05 am

In post 169, Bella wrote:
In post 167, Wraith wrote:Fuck, I really like Teddy B and the Vikings too.

Though this now raises the potential of a Bears dark horse run which I'd be interested to see as well.
Based on their preseason performances, this is about as likely as the Browns winning their division. The Lions are far more likely to be the team that benefits most from Bridgewater going down. Also the NFC South.

The Lions went 4-0 in the preseason in their 0-16 season. I don't trust preseason performances.

hasdgfas · Post Post #261 (isolation #1) » Mon Sep 12, 2016 5:13 pm

The Rams look completely out of sorts.

hasdgfas · Post Post #459 (isolation #2) » Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:15 pm

Nobody deserved to win that game, so nobody did.

hasdgfas · Post Post #599 (isolation #3) » Sat Dec 24, 2016 6:24 am

In post 596, shaft.ed wrote:why doesnt Pederson kick field goals when it is ridiculously obvious he should be doing so?

Which instance do you mean here? I've found Pedersen to be a breath of fresh air compared to most absurdly-conservative NFL coaches.

hasdgfas · Post Post #604 (isolation #4) » Sat Dec 24, 2016 2:13 pm

In post 601, shaft.ed wrote:
In post 598, PokerFace wrote:Cowboys have everything clinched now and play detroit this week. Romo should absolutely play week 17, but as far as this week goes, you can make arguments for either QB. You could want Dak to have exp against Detroit as there is possibility cowboys vs detroit at some point in playoffs. Or you could want Romo to play to see what he has in tank to get trade value. As romo has not played a game in over a year, he needs a warm up more than Dak does
Detroit will learn more about Dak than visa versa, but sitting him and letting him cool off and think instead of play is stupid either way you slice it

After the two broken legs today, I would not be surprised to see Dak out.