Accountant's Utopia Philosophy

Raskolnikov · Post Post #2 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:30 am

Ok it's fun and all seeing peeps get BAITED but sorry I have to reveal ur secret now

Accountant is a troll [ACCOUNT](ant). Just look at the name bro. It has account in it as a dead giveaway, but you also know because nobody actually names themselves something like that. An internet alias like that, it sounds like how people name their hydras or something, you can tell.

Now a lot of people do know all this but play along anyways cuz it's kind of fun and you get to bait more people like this but sometimes it does go a little too far yknow what i mean

Raskolnikov · Post Post #4 (isolation #1) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 8:55 am

3/10 I was expecting a zoolander reference when I wrote that instead

Raskolnikov · Post Post #20 (isolation #2) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 1:27 pm

You know what I don't get is, why so complicated? You can just simplify it to the no-self-doubt every-decision-is-right axiom right?

Raskolnikov · Post Post #27 (isolation #3) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:16 pm

#UnbanGreyIce

Raskolnikov · Post Post #32 (isolation #4) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:02 pm

i'm sorry please don't re-educate me glorious leader please PLEASE NO STOP AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Raskolnikov · Post Post #38 (isolation #5) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:28 pm

I would like to apologize for any disparaging comments I have made in this public forum thread. I am still being rehabilitated, but I urge you others who display these errors in thought and judgement to seek assistance and have them corrected for your own happiness.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #45 (isolation #6) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 3:54 pm

Hey don't sell yourself short, it's actually amazing you were the first one to discover what the true ideal of the perfect human is.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #47 (isolation #7) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:04 pm

I can see why people struggle so much to believe it. I mean really, what are the realistic chances you out of all people happened to meet someone who knows what the true human ideals are? And you discover this not from a book, not on the news, but on a small internet forum where you're part of an exclusive few who are probably ever going to hear about this truth.

It's mindblowing when you realize it, but you have to break down your conditioning and approach with an open mind to get there. It's understandable why it's so difficult but I urge anyone reading to examine the axioms themselves and just give it a chance. You have to un-learn years, in some cases decades of training from all the various institutions of society to see that but it truly is worth it.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #51 (isolation #8) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:16 pm

In post 48, Accountant wrote:Again, I did not discover anything. Anyone could have done that since the answer was obvious and self evident.

But they didn't. No one did. So you are the first to realise these truths for what they truly are, or at least the first person to share the insight with others. Now whether you call this groundbreaking realization a "discovery" or something else I'm not sure, but surely you must admit how amazing it truly is.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #54 (isolation #9) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:19 pm

No, that is accountant.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #57 (isolation #10) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:26 pm

Now, although I am a most zealous disciple I have so much still to learn. There is a question I cannot answer as of yet, which I look to guidance on.

One of the axioms is obedience, to follow the law whenever possible. But what would happen if you are in a society where as a law they've explicitly denounced this philosophy in its totality?
In this way is it not impossible to act as the ideal perfect human? You violate the axioms with either choice. What am failing to see here?

Raskolnikov · Post Post #65 (isolation #11) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:36 pm

What if I rephrase the above, to: what would one do if you are in a society where as a law you cannot believe the philosophy (and resistance entails re-education).

Raskolnikov · Post Post #72 (isolation #12) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 4:42 pm

If you took all that effort doubting and put it into productive self-reflection and acceptance you could have found yourself already making correct decisions by now.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #76 (isolation #13) » Mon Dec 05, 2016 5:14 pm

@Acc: Re: 51

Raskolnikov · Post Post #175 (isolation #14) » Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:54 am

In post 168, Davsto wrote:The BONUS square you get if certain conditions within other squares are met (or "self-evident" is used because hey why not)

You need one square about correct decisions, one about the ideal perfect human, and one about foe lists.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #203 (isolation #15) » Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:42 pm

Accountant is starting to convince me on one point- it may actually be worth re-educating people with certain beliefs for their own good :^)

Raskolnikov · Post Post #205 (isolation #16) » Tue Dec 06, 2016 1:58 pm

Now you see, saying "one" point doesn't necessarily mean I don't fully believe all of the points. Maybe it would seem to imply that, but technically the two statements are not by definition contradictory.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #238 (isolation #17) » Tue Dec 06, 2016 3:34 pm

Accountant what would you do if there was someone very similar to you but they just had different axioms they claimed as perfect? How would you convince them they were wrong?

Raskolnikov · Post Post #369 (isolation #18) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:23 pm

Hey accountant your system is wrong. It's just self-evident why that is.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #371 (isolation #19) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:26 pm

You don't have to, because it's self evident.

Raskolnikov · Post Post #372 (isolation #20) » Thu Dec 08, 2016 4:27 pm

Do I need to amend "self-evident" to "self-evident to any sane person"?