Post #3276
(ISO)
» Sun Dec 09, 2018 7:40 pm
Time for episode 10. The first review headline I saw was that it was disappointing. Thats from a site that made the first 9 episodes sound like the best thing ever. So Im looking forward to it.
Might make notes but not as extensive today.
Think Im with Graeme on this one and the Doctor is wrong. But I've felt that a lot this series. If Tim Shaw isn't dead by the end of this I'll be sorely disappointed. Purely because it would mean we would have the shittest villain in the world having the potential to return.
I think I half invented them. Shut the fuck up Doctor, no one gives a shit.
Im bored.
Could have made the neural dampner plot point a bit more drastic...
Episode gets a 4. Scripting was better than usual, pacing was alright but the doctor was an airhead again, plot points could have been made more interesting and the episode was just.incredibly.dull. Tim Shaw is not an interesting villain, the Ux were not interesting aliens, the planet was a quarry, there was no threat. The effects were pretty poor, as was the location, which is unusual. The call-backs to previous episodes, to make it look like they were all connected was very VERY ham-fisted.
---
I wanted to talk about the whole series. I've been a little worried about how to portray my feelings of disappointment in the series. Although I've been quite verbose about it, my worries about the series came to fruition. The doctor being a woman was never ever an issue for me, honestly I didn't care. What I did care about, and I think my posts from last series express this, is that the writing on Doctor Who at the moment would be unable to handle it. I think some episodes were better than others in this regard, but I'm not sure we ever got past that fact and started learning about the doctor as a person. I think I can quite safely say I hate this incarnation of the doctor. That's not new, I realised this quite early on, but had hoped for an arc where she changes or at least grows.
I got very quickly sick of the doctor knowing everyone and having a hand in inventing or discovering every single thing. If I was a companion I'd be telling her to shut the fuck up because noone likes a know-it-all. What's the point in going on these adventures if she has seen/done everything there is to do? She's a very patronising doctor as well. Now someone brought up that most of the doctors are patronising, and that person is correct, CE definitely was, as was MS. But every single other doctor had other personality traits to combat this. If I was asked to list 5 character traits of this doctor I'm not sure I could. I think Jodie Whittaker is a great actress, I think Chibnall can be a great writer. Look at Broadchurch. But it became very obvious that this isn't the role for her (and not the show for him - but Ill get to that later). The doctor by his/her nature has to be a commanding presence. Someone in control, even when they aren't. This doctor isn't and I don't just think that's part of the writing. I think Jodie was given some nice speeches to say and was given this bold costume but felt like this mousy person playing pretend and getting lost in the narrative at times. The doctor has certain traits that transcend iterations. Keeping the companions safe is one of them, but all too frequently they were told to go off on their own in potentially dangerous situations, like it was nothing. I hoped and preyed one of them died throughout the series, because it would have shown how piss-poorly the doctor has treated her "fam". (- which minor niggle, is a shit word)
The writing/scripting/theming was piss poor as well. I'm grouping them together to avoid going on too long. Doctor Who is the BBC's flagship show. You can have your Killing Eve's and Bodyguards but they are limited series. (also fucking fantastic, I recommend them both highly) In every single episode there had to be some sort of political/moral point and actually I don't always mind that. But the show does what I think is unforgivable. It's patronising to us as the viewer. It talked down to us a lot of the time. It rammed the message down our throats and out through the other side. This is an entertainment show and I think Who forgot that this year in favour of delivering a message to people wanting to see "alien thriller fun times". It's disappointing, because Who could be a good platform for delivering a message that as long as you stay true to the ethos of the show. It also falls flat if you fail to make an entertaining story around it.
I've been trying to work out what Chibnall contributed to this series. His episodes (excluding Kerblam!) were the worst ones.
1. He decided on no recurring aliens from previous series - Fine you want to put your own mark on it. But you have to know what that mark is. You have to have a distinct plan for the series and have it build to something.
2. He decided on the humans being the bad guys for the most part, with little to no aliens at all - Remember it's Doctor Who. Aliens are in it's DNA, you take out the aliens and then you have a car ride to a new place, which is something I can do with a little bit of money and some mode of transport.
3. He decided to focus on characterisation???? of maybe the guest characters???? - I think that was his intent, but it took other writers to actually do the leg work on the main characters. Yaz had nothing to do until Demons and Klazam, and Im still not sure of her motivations or drive. Graeme got bits here and there, but beyond grieving older man (whose a bus driver...) do we know anything more? Ryan, the same, we got bits here and there, but beyond the legwork done in episode one, do we get anything new after that?
4. He decided to focus more on Earth and history - I mean it's taking yet more aliens out of the picture, but considering the three best episodes were the ones set back in time, I'll give that one a pass. Although again, not going to alien planets really takes away from the Who experience. I realise quarries are a Who staple but having both your sole alien planet storylines set in one is a bit lazy.
He decided to go full episodic - Probably BBC mandated because of Moffatt but it meant a lot of plot developments felt really unearned.
The scripting I've talked to death about. It got better but it never was any good. Plot developments were pushed forward without ever really figuring out why. Inexplicably having characters split off into groups that just perfectly align with the storyline was way too convenient and happened all the time. The doctor suddenly knowing what to do at any given moment is not confined to this season, but fucking hell, it takes all the narrative urgency out of any episode. Having character moments that are poorly scripted is astounding to me. Doesn't someone at some point go - "this doesn't feel like a natural conversation to me".
And that to me is the crux. People got caught up in what gender the Doctor was, and what platform she should stand for and people thought the TV show could write itself and what came across was really lazy writing, with little care to whether it was good or not, let alone whether it made sense. Which let's be honest, often didn't. Writing that the sonic saves the day is poor writing. Writing that "these fumes are suddenly toxic" is poor writing. Having Graeme shoot the alien in the foot and suddenly disable this great warrior is guess what, poor writing. I think if most people had my opinion on a show like this, they would stop watching and I hate being a completionist. But it's because I see glimmers of what the show could be and I think that it could be great. But I don't currently believe that can happen under Chibnall. We'll see if the Daleks can make a good episode, but considering Asylum is the only one in recent memory that I actually enjoyed, I doubt it
Scumchat - aimgochatroomname=ScumChat&Exchange=5
Semi Out of Retirement. Limited Time Only. Free Prozac for every Eggnogfas taken!