Mafiascum.net

In post 24, Accountant wrote:What if the democracy resulted in a law being passed which prevented people from leaving?

Then you break the democratic law.

Do you think that anti-leaving law harms people physically and mentally? If so, hasn't democracy failed in its job of doing the least harm?

In post 26, Accountant wrote:Do you think that anti-leaving law harms people physically and mentally? If so, hasn't democracy failed in its job of doing the least harm?

Yes. Democracy, has, indeed, failed in its job. That is because democracy is not a perfect system.
However, I do not see any superior option to democracy.

What if I told you that a benevolent dictatorship would lead to less harm because it doesn't have the same flaws democracy does?

In post 28, Accountant wrote:What if I told you that a benevolent dictatorship would lead to less harm because it doesn't have the same flaws democracy does?

What if I told you that a benevolent dictatorship system is even more flawed and is also unsustainable?

Can you explain how it's flawed and unsustainable?

I thought this was the Annadog40 philosophy thread.

Same here. There is more to life then who rules the peeps u know.

The response to you will be in your thread, Accountant.

In post 32, Annadog40 wrote:Same here. There is more to life then who rules the peeps u know.

Why is free will important?

Cause if everyone marched to one drum of whatever. Then boring.

What is your personal moral belief on murder, do you think it's okay to kill a person who murdered a person to prevent future murders?

There are worse things than murder. In self-defence it is ok like if it is do or die.

In post 1, Annadog40 wrote:Time to kick out the gunz.


First off, you all can have your free will.

But do humans have free will in the first place? And if they do, to what degree? I mean many of our decisions are influenced by education (formal and informal), opportunities, past experiences, personal beliefs, etc. So while theoretically a person has a multitude of choices when facing a decision, taking everything into consideration, he/she is way more limited in his/her choices.
This is if you don't believe in the idea that given the exact same circumstances (including internal ones) a person will always make the same decision- which would mean there is no "free will".

They do have choices, they just choose a certain option. Just cause an action is predictable doesn't make it not free.

Best flavour of ice cream?

I don't like ice cream

what do you like

Television. Though is this really philosophy related?

This has somehow shifted to a GTKAS thread.

sorry that was a bad question then!

Well, one non-extinct life form isn't better than another. Like rats or tree aren't less than Humans.

Would you eat television flavoured ice cream?

No.

Do governments of wealthier/more developed nations have a responsibility to give foreign aid to poorer/less developed countries when the money could be spent to improve people's lives domestically? Do periods of economic downturn affect this?