Update: they aren't and the pats are at-worst a mediocre team.In post 568, BROseidon wrote:What if the before-times are coming back???In post 546, BROseidon wrote:I would make fun of you for being young and not remembering the beforetimes when NE was the joke team of the league, but I too am too young to remember.In post 545, D3f3nd3r wrote:New England is the new Jacksonville?
You're probably right. If there's one thing I've noticed is that other QB's seem to get a lot more time to set up plays, but the Steelers just can't seem to give Ben any. It's like they just crumble. It's always a struggle. And it doesn't help that he's getting old and gets injured easy. If he could risk getting hit, I bet he'd be great and that wouldn't matter as much; but this just isn't going to work for the team.In post 581, PokerFace wrote:I usually don't give advice to Steelers, but I really think Pit needs to adopt an offensive strategy similar to the saints offense. Kamara and Ingram were quite the duo last year. They give Brees time to think and a rushing threat. Brees is well equipped to play at his age. Steelers should have done the same and gotten a partner for Bell. There are more teams that do RB by committee than having one man do it all. Bell has been injuried a lot and had quite the ego. Getting him a partner, would have kept him healthier and given him less ground to stand on. As it stands, Pitt is either gonna need to pay or trade him since their locker room is getting pretty toxic over the dilemma.
Yeah, that certainly isn't helping either. They always seem to have a defense that crumbles. Especially towards the end of a game and it seems like the offense always has to make up for it. Even when they supposedly have one of the "best" defenses in the league (whatever the announcers mean when they say that).In post 583, PJ. wrote:Right, the issue is they've allowed more passing touchdowns in the first 4 games then any team ever, and only some of that has to do with the NFl being flag football nowadays.
lets wait until the 2nd portion of the seasonIn post 589, BROseidon wrote:Jags 2nd half has been better but yeah seems like Chiefs > Jags (w/o Fournette at least but Yeldon was very not the problem this game)
I mean, they're almost certainly #2 right now. Although if Brady and Gordon get a good thing going, then the top of the AFC is suddenly pretty spicy.In post 588, PJ. wrote:But the Bengals tho.
