Page 39 of 42

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:19 pm
by Nero Cain
how bad does Dee Ford feel?

Posted: Sun Jan 20, 2019 4:19 pm
by shaft.ed
he should feel all the bad

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 12:29 am
by PokerFace
I initially thought edelman touched the punt. After watching the video I was not sure. The karma of the next play being an interception off edelman's hands was good

There were 2 passes that looked to be incomplete to me with how the ball moved in hogans hands. Looked like the ball touched the ground or bounced off it as he went to the ground with it. If it appears to bounce or be moved by the ground, then I don't believe the player has control, so its incomplete in my opinion. Ford should feel bad for his offsides. The roughing the passer calls where a players arm touched the qb in the chest as he threw looked bad, but not as bad as the PI in Saints vs Rams. Zebras did not do well today. I wanted Drew vs Tom, but at least my final pick here could be true

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 7:03 am
by YellowSnow
Should be a pretty high rated super bowl based on the markets, the X-Factor is the "Pats are in it every year".

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:17 am
by Bella
Aside from the video replay, which was pretty conclusive for me, the really convincing think is how Edelman reacted to it. If he had even the slightest suspicion he touched it, he'd have turned and gone for the ball rather than leaving it. It's like a textbook play that should be reviewed - it looks one way in real time, 'cause everyone thought he'd touched it, but the replays show he didn't. You can't call it karma if they got the call right.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:21 am
by shaft.ed
its more fate than karma
I still dont know why KC didn't try a little harder for endzone when they had the chance in regulation
the way the two defenses were playing, OT was pretty likely to come down to the coin toss

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 9:25 am
by PokerFace
In post 952, PokerFace wrote:I initially thought edelman touched the punt. After watching the video I was not sure. The karma of the next play being an interception off edelman's hands was good
I don't feel the video gave conclusive proof one way or the other. When any video does that, I lean to keeping what was called. Since next play literally had something go off edelman's hands and into a chiefs, it felt like the world righting that.

Posted: Mon Jan 21, 2019 2:33 pm
by Nero Cain
I thought the Hogans first replay was a catch but the second was not.

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 1:02 pm
by SleepyKrew
I like how jim nantz says big boi

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 5:49 pm
by Nero Cain
I skipped the halftime show.

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:02 pm
by PJ.
Probably should of just skipped the game

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 7:04 pm
by BBmolla
Did they play sweet victory?

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:12 pm
by YellowSnow
Edelman should not have been mvp. It should have gone to a defensive player, or the defensive coordinator or the kicker. My choice would have been Stephon Gilmore.

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 8:42 pm
by PJ.
Should of went to Tony Romo.

Posted: Sun Feb 03, 2019 9:11 pm
by PokerFace
Panzerjager wrote:Probably should of just skipped the game
Yay, this is the most boring superbowl I can remember. I would have preferred a blow out over this like the SEA vs DEN Superbowl a while back was better.

Best game this season to watch was the KC vs LAR game

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:08 am
by T-Bone
I wanted to vote for Ryan Allen for MVP but stupid NFL didn't make him an option despite pinning the Rams inside the 20 on half his punts.

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 3:54 am
by shaft.ed
so...why didn't the Rams run the ball?

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 4:40 am
by PokerFace
Great Question^

I think Gurley's health must have continued to be an issue, though that doesn't explain why only 7 carries for CJ

The bad call was bad in the saints vs rams game. Rams out performed saints in that game and got the ball second in OT, so I was completely fine with Rams being in super bowl before the super bowl happened. But given how boring last nights game was, I wish Saints had gotten in now.

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:36 am
by shaft.ed
curious how that super bowl played out in the alternate universe where Nick Foles stayed with the Rams and Jared Goff got injured in Week 14

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:38 am
by BBmolla
What a joke of a super bowl in every way possible

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 9:39 am
by shaft.ed
it must have been pretty bad
i haven't heard anyone complaining about Maroon 5 yet


Which unusual, because as much as its annoying that the Pats are always in the SuperBowl, their games are usually pretty entertaining and close

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:46 pm
by Nero Cain
there was a whole thing on yahoo yesterday about how their performance was bad and it should have been all rap given that they were in Atlanta.

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 12:51 pm
by shaft.ed
I mean yeah, having the SB in ATL and not involving any of the myriad of amazing black artists that come from that area instead of the Maroon 5 of all things was pretty insulting
but since the SB has basically killed off a bunch of horrible acts, I was hoping M5 might be next in line

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:15 pm
by YellowSnow
I wonder what the demographics are on the percentage of football fans that like rap vs. pop?

Posted: Mon Feb 04, 2019 1:20 pm
by Nero Cain
I figure that they had Maroon 5 play b/c they are like in house talent. Not everyone that watches football likes rap. The biggest two rock bands from Atlanta are Sevendust and Collective Soul, which I think are both great but not exactly household names.