For completed/abandoned Mish Mash Games.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #10 (isolation #0 ) » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:37 am
Post
by Lowell » Fri Apr 24, 2009 9:37 am
/in because i'm fundamentally a masochist
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #19 (isolation #1 ) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:58 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat Apr 25, 2009 1:58 am
Man I'm going to posit soooo many mandatory lurking rules...
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #21 (isolation #2 ) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:47 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:47 am
How about this one then. No one under the age of 30 is allowed to post rules.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #22 (isolation #3 ) » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:48 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat Apr 25, 2009 2:48 am
See? I'm full of good ideas.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #73 (isolation #4 ) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:40 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:40 am
nay on all
I need to get my bearings first. The corporation idea is an interesting one, but I'm lazy and don't really understand it yet. Feel free to try again, possibly intertwined with some sort of win condition.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #74 (isolation #5 ) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:40 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:40 am
I have a rule coming that will help the lurkers out there...
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #76 (isolation #6 ) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:42 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue Apr 28, 2009 9:42 am
no this is a safe one, don't worry. The insane ones come later when you're all in love with me.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #86 (isolation #7 ) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Post
by Lowell » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:31 pm
Moratorium is all business. I'm a little scared.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #89 (isolation #8 ) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:39 pm
Post
by Lowell » Tue Apr 28, 2009 12:39 pm
vote YAY on 24
. Hilarious.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #114 (isolation #9 ) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:18 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:18 am
Let's get more YAYs on 28, please, it'll make things simpler.
NO on 23, 24, 25, 26, 27
YES on 29
NO on 30-32
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #115 (isolation #10 ) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:23 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:23 am
transfer- k'scope- 10$$$
transfer- farside- 10$$$
transfer- xelada- 10$$$
transfer- popsofctown- 10$$$
I'm going to use my money to help kill these corporation rules. How's that for ironic socialism?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #117 (isolation #11 ) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:45 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:45 am
wouldn't you like to know... mwhawhawhawhwah
No.
It'll be easier to get the dead and dying ideas off the list if folks can leave for a few days and have someone else vote on their behalf.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #118 (isolation #12 ) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:48 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:48 am
NO on 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #122 (isolation #13 ) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:24 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Apr 29, 2009 10:24 am
Moratorium wrote: Proposals self-destruct after a week regardless.
I still voted yes.
Ah didn't realize this. Nevermind then.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #152 (isolation #14 ) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:28 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:28 am
I can't believe those rules passed. Democracy is retarded.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #153 (isolation #15 ) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:32 am
Yay on 38 and 40
Let's get yay votes on 39 and 41, please.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #170 (isolation #16 ) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:19 pm
Post
by Lowell » Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:19 pm
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #188 (isolation #17 ) » Fri May 01, 2009 7:38 am
Post
by Lowell » Fri May 01, 2009 7:38 am
God this game has gotten insane. At least the mechanism for shutting people up passed.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #190 (isolation #18 ) » Fri May 01, 2009 7:42 am
Post
by Lowell » Fri May 01, 2009 7:42 am
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #212 (isolation #19 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 4:13 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 4:13 am
I'll vote
yes on 42
. Huzzah it passed... hilariously, I STILL don't think it helps yabba, as it only refers to NEW players. mod, a ruling?
Also I have no idea what the commodities do or mean. I'm not voting on any of them until I understand the point.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #215 (isolation #20 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 4:23 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 4:23 am
yabba I'd support a one-time correction for YOU personally. propose it as an amendment or something, it'll pass.
If not I'll give you 10 $$$ instead. How's that sound???
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #227 (isolation #21 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 5:48 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 5:48 am
Oh god, unlimited rules? Pass.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #230 (isolation #22 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 6:22 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 6:22 am
popsofctown wrote: Moratorium wrote:
P61: Anyone who isn't in the lead in money right now shouldn't be voting yes to give everyone money if they are truly playing to win.
psh, if everyone was playing to win i wouldn't be playing.
Or, I could be forming an alliance of players to change the rule at the last minute to whoever has the LEAST amount of money wins.
... think about
that
!
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #234 (isolation #23 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 6:38 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 6:38 am
No on 48-59
YES on 60-62
No on 63-69
Still not getting what commodities do.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #235 (isolation #24 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 6:40 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 6:40 am
no on 33
MOTION TO CENSURE dizardin
. Too many rules!
MOTION TO CENSURE moratorium
. For shits and giggles, and until I understand the corporations.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #243 (isolation #25 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 7:13 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 7:13 am
You guys are so little fun.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #246 (isolation #26 ) » Sat May 02, 2009 7:18 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 02, 2009 7:18 am
I assumed that MY vote counted, but yes, I agree it's not necessary for people to specifically decline censure.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #345 (isolation #27 ) » Tue May 05, 2009 5:34 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 05, 2009 5:34 am
It's clear that if I dont' do anything I'll win.
New Title: The Majestic One
As in:
I agree with what Lowell, The Majestic One, said about this. My, how he is truly majestic.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #346 (isolation #28 ) » Tue May 05, 2009 5:41 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 05, 2009 5:41 am
There's a suffrage I would bid on, but I refuse to use the job title, so that person cost himself some mad bling.
- The Majestic One out
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #349 (isolation #29 ) » Tue May 05, 2009 9:06 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 05, 2009 9:06 am
^^^ who is the first part of 347 referring to?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #351 (isolation #30 ) » Tue May 05, 2009 9:09 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 05, 2009 9:09 am
Dammit!
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #382 (isolation #31 ) » Wed May 06, 2009 9:32 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 06, 2009 9:32 am
I too think the corporations are clumsy and too all-consuming. If anyone wants to propose a way to either (a) kill them completely, or (b) tone them down, I'd gladly vote for it.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #406 (isolation #32 ) » Thu May 07, 2009 4:32 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 07, 2009 4:32 am
I'm here.
vote to reset
No offense to the people who have made all these rules so far, and I'm glad you're all so eager. But I do think a lot of the proposals slipped through when some people absconded and made the majority lower. I'd prefer to start over.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #415 (isolation #33 ) » Thu May 07, 2009 11:02 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 07, 2009 11:02 am
MOD, can I propose a rule to get rid of rules I don't like? Are there special procedures for that?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #418 (isolation #34 ) » Thu May 07, 2009 12:15 pm
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 07, 2009 12:15 pm
Okay I've posited a rule repealing all the rules. Let's start this again on an even playing field.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #420 (isolation #35 ) » Thu May 07, 2009 12:41 pm
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 07, 2009 12:41 pm
vote yes on rule 82!
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #444 (isolation #36 ) » Mon May 11, 2009 5:30 am
Post
by Lowell » Mon May 11, 2009 5:30 am
More yays on 82, please.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #459 (isolation #37 ) » Tue May 12, 2009 3:54 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 12, 2009 3:54 am
yes to LT playing
MORE YESs on 82...
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #467 (isolation #38 ) » Tue May 12, 2009 1:11 pm
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 12, 2009 1:11 pm
Yay we successfully achieved anarchy! Do I win?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #473 (isolation #39 ) » Wed May 13, 2009 5:53 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 13, 2009 5:53 am
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #477 (isolation #40 ) » Wed May 13, 2009 9:39 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 13, 2009 9:39 am
I'm turned off by the monetary rules at the moment. When I see some good rules I'll vote on them.
I like the idea of a penalty for not voting on the rules, though obviously a non-monetary penalty would be preferable.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #493 (isolation #41 ) » Thu May 14, 2009 3:29 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 14, 2009 3:29 am
I think the money issue ties our hands, and we all become CEOs again, which I don't want.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #519 (isolation #42 ) » Sat May 16, 2009 2:34 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 16, 2009 2:34 am
no on 94-96
. I'm anti-everything. Plus this gives the wrong incentive to pass rules.
yes on 97
, why not.
no on 98
this is how the financial crisis started...
no on 99
, though I would support an amended version that (a) doesn't have such a short time limit, and (b) isn't all for all. (As is, there's no reason to try to earn money, because someone will just take it from you). Change it so a player can challenge another for a set number of $$$, so that there is balance.
yes on 100, 101
, though if
mod
could change "by" to "buy" it would be appreciated.
no on 102
. I prefer the incentive not to be set in stone, but flexible.
no on 103
. Don't care about this.
yes on 104-109
, I'll see what yabba has in mind.
no on 110-112
we have enough of this.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #523 (isolation #43 ) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:08 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 16, 2009 6:08 am
yes on 113
. Very much yes.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #543 (isolation #44 ) » Mon May 18, 2009 2:09 am
Post
by Lowell » Mon May 18, 2009 2:09 am
^^^ ugh 85 is really dumb
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #569 (isolation #45 ) » Tue May 19, 2009 10:16 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 19, 2009 10:16 am
no on 114-118
. I think I see where this is going, but make the rules make more sense and explain the game better. Better yet, make them all one rule, so we arent' stuck with the possibility of passing half the rules and not others.
yes on 120-122
no on 123
yes on 124
no on 125
no on 126
good rule, but change it to 0$$$ or less, not just less.
yes on 127-128
both good.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #588 (isolation #46 ) » Wed May 20, 2009 9:30 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 20, 2009 9:30 am
no on 129
. Unnecessary.
Though I like the rule about penalizing people for not voting on rules, we do realize that it will by necessity eventually clip everyone down to zero, right? Unless every vote is a tie broken by the last player to vote, there will ALWAYS be some people who haven't voted on any given rule.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #592 (isolation #47 ) » Wed May 20, 2009 9:44 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 20, 2009 9:44 am
can someone explain to me what the rule 8 grid does, exactly?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #594 (isolation #48 ) » Wed May 20, 2009 9:54 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 20, 2009 9:54 am
so you're saying there's still time to pass a rule that says anyone who buys a square owes everyone else 100$$$. sweet.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #604 (isolation #49 ) » Thu May 21, 2009 2:26 am
Post
by Lowell » Thu May 21, 2009 2:26 am
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #639 (isolation #50 ) » Tue May 26, 2009 2:32 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue May 26, 2009 2:32 am
yes on 135
no on 136
yes on 137
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #650 (isolation #51 ) » Wed May 27, 2009 6:57 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed May 27, 2009 6:57 am
yes on 138
yes on 139
hey look I'm co-winning! I'm great at this as-yet-non-game!
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #670 (isolation #52 ) » Fri May 29, 2009 7:59 am
Post
by Lowell » Fri May 29, 2009 7:59 am
yes on 140, 141
no on 142, 143
Anyone willing to go 100$$$ for 100$$$ for as long as this nonsensical rule exists with me?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #672 (isolation #53 ) » Fri May 29, 2009 8:57 am
Post
by Lowell » Fri May 29, 2009 8:57 am
okay, thanks.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #683 (isolation #54 ) » Sat May 30, 2009 3:40 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 30, 2009 3:40 am
Lunar_Tick wrote: Skitzer, Lowell, it would be interesting to know where you see this game going. Would you like to propose a rule or something?
Yeah I dont' know. I'm just hanging on for now. I would have preferred not to have money at all, really. I think having money makes people too lazy in creating rules, and I feel like an f-ing banker the whole game.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #684 (isolation #55 ) » Sat May 30, 2009 3:43 am
Post
by Lowell » Sat May 30, 2009 3:43 am
I think the mod has been waiting all game to propose this rule, watching as we trod through vague win conditions and monetary rules.
yes on 144
. I'll indulge.
Incidentally, I'm close to proposing a repeal all rules rule again... any support for that? Things are cluttered. And as well, thanks to whoever else gave me 100$$$.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #713 (isolation #56 ) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:10 am
Post
by Lowell » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:10 am
Rhinox wrote: 100$$$ sent to Lowell.
Right back at you. I'll continue this as long as you will.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #714 (isolation #57 ) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:11 am
Post
by Lowell » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:11 am
yes on 145
thanks pops
no on 146-149
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #728 (isolation #58 ) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:29 am
Post
by Lowell » Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:29 am
no on 150, 151
. I really need to figure out what's going on in this game.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #739 (isolation #59 ) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:46 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:46 am
Can somone explain how the items work again? Is a certain item needed to stop a certain attack? I have no idea how this works and can't tell from the first post.
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006
Post
Post #740 (isolation #60 ) » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:58 am
Post
by Lowell » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:58 am
Here's what I dont' understand. Do I need two items to fend off a 40% chance of death? Or 5 to 100% fend it off?
Lowell
Lowell
Jack of All Trades
Lowell
Jack of All Trades Jack of All Trades
Posts: 6318 Joined: July 25, 2006