Nomic II - Moratorium Wins!!!

Empking · Post Post #66 (isolation #1) » Tue Apr 28, 2009 4:07 am

Yay to 1-8
Nay to 9-14
Yay to 15
Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #108 (isolation #2) » Wed Apr 29, 2009 3:53 am

Yay to 19

Nay to those I'm not voting on.

Empking · Post Post #141 (isolation #3) » Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:43 am

Yay to 37-39

Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #182 (isolation #4) » Fri May 01, 2009 4:41 am

Yay to those I am currently voting on.
Nay to those I am not currently voting on.

Empking · Post Post #193 (isolation #5) » Fri May 01, 2009 8:37 am

I think it might be better if we all say what commodities we want to produce and what they do and then after we agree on that we can get somebody to propose all of them in the same proposal.

Empking · Post Post #206 (isolation #6) » Fri May 01, 2009 11:15 pm

dizardin wrote:P50, P51: Um, what do those commodities do? Thought any ability of it had to be included in the proposal.
P52: I'm curious to know what Empking plans to do with that 8x8 grid - play Checkers? No rules given for method to change it.
P53: I'm surprised there's a following for this rule, given the propensity of some to have no cash inflow...
P54: Not sure what this one means -- care to elaborate, farside?

Nay to P50, P51, P52
Yay to P53

P54 I'll abstain on, until we get more info.

I'm pretty sure the mod dsaid to put what they do in a different proposal.

Re 52: The point of 52 is to have a limited amount of something due to the fact that everything else is limitless. I was thinking of using it as a property type board but I cared more about proposing the thing with the limit.

Nay to 54-59

Empking · Post Post #209 (isolation #7) » Sat May 02, 2009 1:17 am

Yay to 58

I don't like 59 and I don't like the thought of you having three commodities when I have 0.

Empking · Post Post #223 (isolation #8) » Sat May 02, 2009 5:33 am

Yay to 61
Nay to 60

Empking · Post Post #225 (isolation #9) » Sat May 02, 2009 5:43 am

I don't know.

Empking · Post Post #233 (isolation #10) » Sat May 02, 2009 6:36 am

Nay to those I'm not voting on.

Empking · Post Post #279 (isolation #11) » Sat May 02, 2009 9:34 pm

Yay to 71

Nay to 70

Empking · Post Post #281 (isolation #12) » Sun May 03, 2009 12:48 am

Yay to 70

Nay to 71

Empking · Post Post #304 (isolation #13) » Sun May 03, 2009 9:38 pm

Nay to all till we vote in a win con or expand the role numbers.

Empking · Post Post #312 (isolation #14) » Mon May 04, 2009 7:32 am

I want explainations from those voting nay on 62.

Empking · Post Post #314 (isolation #15) » Mon May 04, 2009 7:43 am

yabbaguy wrote:Are you saying that you have a second account you wish to enter the game with P62?

If so, you deserve no explanation.

No, I don't want to accidently vote with the wrong account and it not count.

Empking · Post Post #342 (isolation #16) » Tue May 05, 2009 4:15 am

I tell ya, a Grade 3 Offense is a serious kick in the teeth. Dang. Now I gotta sit on my hands for two weeks. Expect a lot of 'Nay' votes here. =)

Want to force them to give me back my money by voting nay to everything?

Nay to everything

Empking · Post Post #375 (isolation #17) » Wed May 06, 2009 5:03 am

Nay to all

Empking · Post Post #381 (isolation #18) » Wed May 06, 2009 7:13 am

Rhinox wrote:Its clear lots of people like the concept of betting... I'd be for starting over, getting rid of corporations, and turn the game into a Nomic casino. We already have the one dice game, although I admit I didn't read the rules closely enough to know exactly how it works.

We can use the 8 by 8 grid in betting too. Players can buy squares (lets say up to a max of 5, increasing if there are open squares), and then roll 2 8-sided dies. Who ever owns the square corresponding to the dice roll wins all the money in the pot for that round. Square 1,1 would be the lower left corner.

Here's another idea I got from another forum - some sort of game based on a real weekly lottery drawing, like powerball or something. Create lotto balls 1-65, or whatever the max number is. Players can buy lotto balls (only 1 of each number available), and when the real lottery drawing occurs, whoever bought the ball that matches the powerball wins the lotto pot for the week.

Just some ideas for those who are interested, because I can't propose anything.

I'd be for starting again.

Empking · Post Post #407 (isolation #19) » Thu May 07, 2009 5:24 am

Vote Reset

Empking · Post Post #431 (isolation #20) » Fri May 08, 2009 5:53 am

Yes to 82

Empking · Post Post #436 (isolation #21) » Sat May 09, 2009 8:01 am

C'mon we need one more vote.

Empking · Post Post #449 (isolation #22) » Mon May 11, 2009 6:51 am

Yes

You better be a yes 82 voter.

Empking · Post Post #474 (isolation #23) » Wed May 13, 2009 6:39 am

Yay to 83 to 87
Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #495 (isolation #24) » Thu May 14, 2009 4:49 am

Nay to 93-98
Yay to rest

Empking · Post Post #516 (isolation #25) » Fri May 15, 2009 11:20 pm

Yay to all I'm not voting on.

Empking · Post Post #524 (isolation #26) » Sat May 16, 2009 6:10 am

yay on 113-114

Empking · Post Post #534 (isolation #27) » Sun May 17, 2009 5:37 am

Yay to 115-117

Empking · Post Post #537 (isolation #28) » Sun May 17, 2009 7:28 am

Yay to 118 & 119

Empking · Post Post #549 (isolation #29) » Mon May 18, 2009 4:25 am

Propose it.

Yay 20 - 22

Nay to 23

Empking · Post Post #565 (isolation #30) » Tue May 19, 2009 4:51 am

Yay to 124, 128
Nay on 125-127

Empking · Post Post #567 (isolation #31) » Tue May 19, 2009 5:06 am

The mod would presumbly make the new rules after counting.

Empking · Post Post #577 (isolation #32) » Tue May 19, 2009 10:15 pm

Yay to 129

Empking · Post Post #602 (isolation #33) » Wed May 20, 2009 10:36 pm

Nay to all those I'm not voting on.

Empking · Post Post #617 (isolation #34) » Sat May 23, 2009 5:10 am

Nay to 135

Empking · Post Post #632 (isolation #35) » Mon May 25, 2009 7:33 am

Moratorium wrote:Again, I think we should just set an arbitrary win condition, something simple, and then if someone comes up with something more interesting later, or if the game condition forced people to consider revising it to ensure someone didn't win, make the proposal then.

Just saying something like "First to reach 25,000 $$$ wins" is a perfect example of that. If one individual raced out way ahead and started getting close, everyone else would have an incentive to change the win condition. If the game remained competitive, no one would have any incentive to change it.

All these no votes on various win conditions for "I don't really like that idea" reasons, I feel, are misunderstanding the concept of Nomic.

Says Mr. "I'm not voting yay for 136"

Empking · Post Post #644 (isolation #36) » Tue May 26, 2009 9:07 pm

Yay to 138, 139

Empking · Post Post #661 (isolation #37) » Thu May 28, 2009 9:39 pm

Yay 140

Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #662 (isolation #38) » Thu May 28, 2009 9:44 pm

Yay 140

Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #663 (isolation #39) » Thu May 28, 2009 9:45 pm

Yay 140

Nay to rest

Empking · Post Post #681 (isolation #40) » Fri May 29, 2009 11:38 pm

Yay 144

Empking · Post Post #701 (isolation #41) » Sun May 31, 2009 6:26 am

Yay to 145
Buy 1 Sapphire

Empking · Post Post #704 (isolation #42) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:05 am

Anyone want to trade 100s?

Empking · Post Post #706 (isolation #43) » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:31 am

Yay to all those I'm not voting on

Empking · Post Post #734 (isolation #44) » Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:50 pm

Nay to all those I'm not votingn on

Empking · Post Post #758 (isolation #45) » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:16 am

Yay 159
Nay 160

Empking · Post Post #779 (isolation #46) » Sun Jun 07, 2009 6:42 am

Good bye foul wold.