search the area between bathrooms for piping, or switches, cameras, or ceiling tiles that I can scurry up into
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
For no apparent reason, as fast as the pipe started leaking and gushing, it stopped. The bathroom is utterly flooded, and some of it has leaked into the womens as well. Your shoes and pants are soaking wet, and the toilet paper in the cabinets is ruined.
Some might call them misadventures. But if I survived it was an adventure through and through.
check out drains to verify whether they are sized so someone less... rotund... could fit
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
THe pipe is no longer dripping. THe camera would have recorded that incident. You hope that never ends up on social media somewhere. It might effect any re-election dreams you might still harbour.
ponders whether there is anything more to find in the public bathrooms
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
tap tiles on the wall with my kickin’ rad pipe, looking fit loose tiles or hidden switches or anything interesting
sing “Singing in the Rain” to the video camera
assess what the main area between the two bathrooms are like
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
take all tank lids off the backs of the toilets, look inside for goodies
remove drain pipes if possible; stick hands/arms down into to find goodies
inspect area where pipe was leaking and gushing water
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
There is water in the toilets, no goodies. Not even so much as a brick.
Remember what happened last time you removed piping - are you totally sure you want to do that again. ANyway, you shove your arm in the pipes and out again. You look in the mirrors, and realise that you are now quite a frightful mess.
The pipe that was leaking looks like an old pipe, with a piece missing (in your inventory). It doesnt seem to mind being more broken. But then again, it isnt running a torrent any more.
Last edited by ambic on Sun Aug 16, 2020 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
break more pipeage off for more weapons, also help ensure the second flood
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
try to do whatever it was that caused the flood the first time
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
grab spray paint, and write on walls where video that's recording can see:
Let's Talk
F
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
(because in all my travels, I know how to get crazy)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).