Vote Saudade
Vote notasexualobject
?In post 46, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 45, CheekyTeeky wrote:Yeah I noticed that too. *strokes beard*In post 38, Performer wrote:nm unvoting people....right after cheeky asked him to unvote her. That's new.In post 36, Saudade wrote:because I dont feel like itIn post 31, OkaPoka wrote:why arent u conforming to rvs like the rest of us, saudude?
I mean...if deadline is like an hour away, a townie is at L-1 with intent declared, and they have a chance to hammer someone else, Id be surprised if they didn't. But seeing self preservation when half the game still has an RVS mindset is concerning.In post 88, notasexualobject wrote:It's less of a survivalist attitude, and more of a "oshit there's going to a mislynch already without much discussion." Odd question though, "already". I don't understand this part. I've seen that typically self-preservation votes aren't accepted as town, but is there a point in time it is? Is it too early for me to be concerned about being lynched?In post 84, Kmd4390 wrote:^correction: I see you are already voting booth of them. So instead I'll ask this - why the self preservation votes already?
Yikes...notsexual wrote: That's fair. I hadn't realized I was being scummy up until I was called out for it. I found no reason to hide it because I hadn't realized that it pointed in the direction of me being scum.
Huh? I don't have a read on Saudade. I retracted my scum read. His next few posts made me realize my reason for scumreading him didn't apply. He's basically a true null. I've been meaning to look for some meta. Will probably see what he's got on Friday.In post 112, OkaPoka wrote:@kmd talk to me about saudade, you still sticking with your guns on him?
@not_mafia hi
The original vote was because her play seemed more focused on herself than others (posts 9 and 14) and because the reason for townreading you felt surface level ("scum would have" always rubs me the wrong way. Not all scum play the same). After I voted, I also didn't like her saying she was close to a "zero doubt" scum read on Saudade who hadn't really done anything yet aside from tell us he'll play for real later. It seemed more like she wanted something to latch on to in order to show she's taking stances than that she was genuinely sorting players and trying to develop reads.Okapoka wrote:pedit: oh k. Then I assume your vote on Cheeky is completely serious? Would like to hear your take on her.
I'm curious what games you looked at that have you scumreading him for his opening. His explanation seems to hold up not only in his town games, but his scum games as well. (NY215 being a slightly weird case because he wasn't really around for RVS, but even as scum he wasn't basing reads on RVS). I personally buy his answer to me. I don't necessarily town read him for it though. I do town read him though as I keep reading. His stretch of posting on Page 6 is similar to my own thoughts although maybe with a touch more emotion than I'm feeling (see post 135). You linked Micro 820. It doesn't look that different to me. Can you be more specific on what you feel he did differently in that game?Cheeky wrote:I look forward to seeing your meta dig. I meta'd him and this is very different to his opening in games where he's town.
Wait, what? I don't see a misrep, or hell, even a misinterpretation. I actually see exactly where Aero is coming from here.Cheeky wrote:Yeah because it's the same....not. way to reduce my entire push down to scumreading him for one surface level post. You're intentionally misrepping me here.
VOTE: Aeronaut
Do you still see him as confused after he posted more? Because once I got a sense for his tone, it seemed more like disbelief at Not_Mafia's actions than confusion.Aero wrote:It's you trying to make a story around what looks to me like just a confused townie.
Are you sure you are townreading her for alignment related reasons and not just for having a similar style to you? What do you think Cheeky would do differently as scum?Okapoka wrote:Going to take a step back because I feel like I so desperately want Cheeky to be town that I'm going to end up stonewalling any attempts on her without legitimately considering the other viewpoint(s).
I didn't suggest a no lynch. Uhhh, are you feeling ok actually? Looking back I see you first said Aero did this and then you realized it was me. I went back and ctrl+f'd "no lynch" and the only mentions I see of it are the rules and your posts stating that someone else brought it up. Where is this coming from? Also, can you show me where Cheeky was being proactive in sorting Saudade? She voted him for his "the fok" and then was close to "zero doubt" without saying much else. Anything after that is just tunneling in my opinion.Performer wrote:kmd - honestly have to look at him again via ISO, he hasn't stood out to me so far other the suggestion of a no lynch.
How can you possibly see Aero as the one shutting things down when Cheeky specifically said she wouldn't communicate with him? Or are you just saying he disagreed with her and I'm misreading what you mean by "shuts it down"?NotAsexual wrote:Cheeky is attempting to push for an explanation and Aeronaut shuts it down for no reason that I can think of other than that he is trying to prevent Saudede's lynch. Sure, it wasn't much to go off of, but Cheeky delivered his narrative and it seemed that Aeronaut panicked after seeing the post.
Why is contributing a town tell?NotAsexual wrote:Currently, Performer and Oka seem to be the most Town for me, and if they aren't, I still view no reason to push them. They seem to be keeping the conversation going and contributing moreso than I have (which I apologize for).
I didn't personally see anything to suggest the conversation was going that way though. They disagreed on a few things. Aero pointed some of those things out and asked good questions. And it looked like he was being respectful. I don't see why that conversation needed to be shut down at that point and I can't help but notice Aero's questions weren't answered as a result.Katyusha wrote:i’ve literally done that as town before and would still stand by those decisions when I made them
sometimes it’s just better for the health of the gamestate to not get into a conversation that leads to a pissing match or both sides relentlessly nitpicking eachother rather than doing anything productive
like on policy not engaging your scumreads is bad but I understand why that happens and I don’t think it’s fair to say she’s not gamesolving just because she thinks she sees where the conversation is going
Can you show specifically where she did that if Performer doesn't answer me first?Katyusha wrote:on a different note aero I don’t really see what you’re getting out of cheeky - the way she’s playing makes a lot of sense to me. starting out early game by making strong accusations gets people to take sides and move the game along, and cheeky’s been consistently transparent with what impacts her thought process. Like I can’t look at it and not see genuine scumhunting from it,?
Are you at zero doubt yet or still just close?Cheeky wrote:This is a trademark of mine. NM is familiar with it. When I say x is scum, doubt = zero it means I'm 100% confident you're scum. It doesn't happen every game but it has a 100% success rate D1 and a 100% fail rate thereafter for no obvious reason. Saying I was close was based on my gut pings which I expanded on in my minicase of you.
I usually use associative tells or process of elimination with Not_Mafia.Okapoka wrote:The only way I can really gauge N_M alignment atm is his vioting pattern.
If someone wants to lend me a hand on how else you can draw blood out of stone then please do.
Cheeky wrote:I feel like you holding back from giving reads or making pushes is coming from a frozen wolf because you're at L-1 and don't want to give any info if you flip.
lmaoSaudade wrote:Im at l1 and i didnt know?
Again, this is a playstyle thing. I personally don't enjoy games where everyone sits on their ass so even as scum I don't like to encourage it. Also, this site gives free town reads to anyone who can stay active and talk somewhat smoothly so what scum wouldn't try to come out of the gate strong if they are capable of it?Okapoka wrote: If you dropped the same case now or at the time you commented on it, sure it could be weak and extremely nitpicky. But getting the ball rolling is extremely townie and I don't really see scum wanting to get the ball rolling and have discourse be engaged. Scum probably wants everyone to sit on their asses so we can drown in apathy.
Town on top, scum on bottom:Aero wrote:Could everyone provide a brief readslist / status on where you feel the game is?
Why is a lynch on Saudade driving the game forward where lynching Cheeky is derailing us? Is this just a fancy way to say you agree with Cheeky's top scum read more than Aero's? If Cheeky were to flip scum, would Aero have been driving the game forward all along? If Saudade were to flip town, would Cheeky be derailing us? Better question: If Aero and Cheeky are both town, who has done more to progress the game?NotAsexual wrote:"Driving the game forward", imo, isn't what Aero's doing. He's defending Saud with nothing and going directly against Cheeky, which seems to have actually halted the conversation and now we're being derailed into trying to lynch Cheeky.
Can you elaborate on the bolded?NotAsexual wrote:Performer - Town,relatively unbiased
I didn't bother asking earlier in my post because I figured it would be answered by now but I don't see anything. Who is this super secret paranoia read?Performer wrote:a certain someone seems to be widely tr, and I'm getting a little paranoid here about that person...
he knows who he is...…
Ok I'll just keep my vote here then.In post 222, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'd answer them if I considered them important. I'd rather you sort me from my actions. I'm not a fan of explaining myself when anything I say can be construed as scummy - like how it has been so far. I'm pretty sure you've already decided I'm scum based on your terrible readslist so answering questions seems kinda pointless in helping you sort me.In post 220, Kmd4390 wrote:Cheeky I had a few questions for you in that post.
For the no Lynch thing or the secret paranoia read?In post 249, Performer wrote: @kmd & aero I was speaking of Oka earlier
Sorry, fell asleep reading this last night. I'm on page 13.In post 412, CheekyTeeky wrote:You lurkers suck.
If someone notices they are getting voted for being scummy, saying oh sorry like they are going to stop can make them think the votes will go away. Obviously, we know that's not how mafia works. If you appear scummy, it happened. It can't be apologized away. But if NotAsxual doesn't understand that, it explains those posts. Is there a reason town would be more likely to do that than scum? Because I believe that was the thought process regardless of NotAsexual's alignment.In post 319, CheekyTeeky wrote:I just can't see scum saying "oh sorry I didn't realise that was scummy" like what scum player is going to bring attention to scummy shit and apologise hoping it's going to work?
Or hasn't learned how to look town as scum yet which makes NotAsexual very transparent. We see scummy posts because we see scum. You and oka were talking about "too scummy to be scum". You realize that's been considered a fallacy for a long time, right? I also don't at all see how you are getting that NotAsexual has to be confident in order to be scum. There's no way this play has been intentional.cheeky wrote: I mean either this dude is very confidently open wolfing or completely clueless to how scummy his behaviour is. I'd say the latter because I feel a player newish to MS wouldn't have this kind of confidence as a wolf.
Yeah it's hard for a lot of us to keep up with a few of you.Saudade wrote: gotta love it when an entire game becomes basically a game of 4 people + random afks/replacements in and out at odd intervals
Actually my reason for not being vocal during their argument is that I was out celebrating my anniversary with my wife that night and rushing home to get the kids from the babysitter that morning, not because I was already scumreading cheeky. I actually made a point not to be on my phone that day so she could have my full attention. I'd have done that regardless of my alignment in this game. Some things are just more important. I also comented when I came back. It should be obvious from looking at my posts which side I took.oka wrote: if cheeky and aero is tvt
scum probs content in letting it build up
people who were least vocal about cheeky v aero were kmd and katy
i think one scum is in there, but they also have pretty good reasons not to have been commenting
kmd is already scumreading cheeky
draynth replaced out in the middle of the interaction so katy couldnt even have the chance to comment
but its either TvT and scum in <katy,kmd> or its not TvT
Kat, you asked about my early gut read on you. I think I was just looking at your posts, disagreeing with everything, and didn't like it. Some of your later posting has me leaning town on you. This game like your question to performer about how he scum hunts feel like a genuine effort to get reads. I'm at a point where I think at least one scum is either playing really well or is not_mafia because I'm starting to doubt myself a bit on cheeky too which leaves NotAsexual as my only confident scum read.In post 372, Saudade wrote:In post 365, Katyusha wrote:saudade who's your pick for naso's partner? playing devil's advocate with myself rn
He's not voting cheeky.Saudade wrote: arent you voting like
everyone
Seems he had a lot more to say about people in that game than he has in this one. I didnt realize he'd unvoted oka though until I ISO'd him just now.In post 450, Katyusha wrote:viewtopic.php?f=84&t=76150
this dumpsterfire of a game was the last iteration of the setup
Here he asked for a hammer twice. In that game, he said multiple times In The first five pages that he wanted pine lynched. He was more interactive there. I get that he didn't say much, but he responded to people. He specifically said he wants pine dead. Here, it's just a grand total of two unprompted hammer requests. That's the entirety of his posts about Saudade.In post 462, Katyusha wrote:Feel like egging ppl to hammer Saudade is in line with his egging people to hammer pine
Also had a similar infrequent posting schedule early game iirc
^ might be biased in how infrequently people did anything d1p1 that made me feel like screaming at a wal
Saudade and NotAsexual are probably today's lynches. Not that I buy into the idea of Lynch bait, but can you tell me why Saudade doesn't fit that description?In post 474, CheekyTeeky wrote:...from one lynchbait lynch to another eh?
Consistency in style hasn't been the reason for any of my reads. I don't think that would change for many people based on alignment. I also don't support Day 1 info lynches. Performer is a low content town read for me so there isn't much to say.In post 479, CheekyTeeky wrote:I've already established my reasons on saudade. You saying "can't think of a reason not to" is pretty bs considering you townreas saudade for being consistent in his style yet you scumread NM for being consistent in his. NM needs to be PoEd and is the worst lynch for info.In post 477, Kmd4390 wrote:Saudade and NotAsexual are probably today's lynches. Not that I buy into the idea of Lynch bait, but can you tell me why Saudade doesn't fit that description?
Why is everyone ignoring Performer?
Weak...In post 494, Performer wrote:Nm's ISO looks scummy since it's so bare, upon another ISO. But I can't think of a reason why he would go out of his way to engage with her. Can't see scum nm going out of his way to do something like that.In post 43, Not_Mafia wrote:*ahem*In post 42, notasexualobject wrote:VOTE: Performer for having an animated profile picture that I stared at for like 3 minutes
UNVOTE: not_mafia aka my ex-Mason partner! Fun times!
That along with what I said earlier on this page, is making me rethink NASO read again.
You could hammer NotAsexual instead.In post 518, Katyusha wrote:anyway so like in an hour i said i would hammer saud but like
i thought naso would actually post by then
That's assuming this is an inactivity Lynch and... That's not why the wagon is there.In post 549, OkaPoka wrote:there is two sides to hammering now
either hammer now to send a message that doing nothing wont be tolerated
or dont because we are rational people who dont want to mislynch because we get pissed off
In post 530, Saudade wrote:Кароче не тени резину давай хаммертайм
Not_Mafia or Saudade probably would make the most sense.In post 797, OkaPoka wrote:is it time to revisit the aero vs cheeky theory?
if cheeky=town and katy = town then kmd or aero should be scum, and i don't really know associatives possible for kmd so then aero?
aero partner is ??? discuz
maybe im wrong somewhere but
we need more talking and poeing guys
I've hardbussed before. Depends on how scummy of a partner I get.In post 827, Katyusha wrote:i'm terrible at it but i know how the pieces move and like the mechanics
also this is not an ordinary setup lmfao - in this and the newbie setup bussing D1 is a really bad idea you need to be extremely confident in. in this you need to be confident you're not POE'd (easy to do if you're a charismatic player reaping towncred off of a bus, and I think only you fit that description in the PL. Maybe KMD can pull it off in a vacuum but I don't think it's his personality unless he felt it was the only play), in the newbie setup the PRs can usually curbstomp solo scum into autoloss
otherwise i dont think D1 bussing is that bad? it's just here im thinking of it differently
pedit: saud unvoted performer
It's Day 1. If that happens I'm sure we can rally and turn things around.In post 856, CheekyTeeky wrote:No he can't that's the point. I'm not defending him like I usually would at this point, all I'm saying is that if he flips town scum win.
Nah. We all seem to have reads if I'm not mistaken. Even if we didn't, it's possible to hit scum randomly. Day 1 mislynched aren't auto losses unless the setup really sucks.cheeky wrote:lynching in the dark
I'd agree to this and self vote tomorrow on a green not_mafia flip if everyone were to agree to let me choose who is lynched after my own green flip. So effectively give me a vengekill and I'll do it.In post 933, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok will you guys compromise with me? I will hammer NM if you guys promise to lynch KMD if nm flips green.
UghIn post 969, CheekyTeeky wrote:Can I like tinfoilhat and say if oka and/or kat are scum they deserve the win and I wouldn't be mad at all lol.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just somehow missed how i said it's too early to tell who I'd pick, but you should have reached that conclusion anyway using your own logic about how far ahead it is. We would have two flips and everyone's reaction to those flips. It's impossible to tell what I'd do at this time.In post 985, Performer wrote:What the.In post 948, Kmd4390 wrote:I'd agree to this and self vote tomorrow on a green not_mafia flip if everyone were to agree to let me choose who is lynched after my own green flip. So effectively give me a vengekill and I'll do it.In post 933, CheekyTeeky wrote:Ok will you guys compromise with me? I will hammer NM if you guys promise to lynch KMD if nm flips green.
So you're saying if nm is green, and if you flip green, you want to choose who to lynch - which I'm going to guess you'd want to choose me lynched, since you're only voting nm & I.
Stringing together deaths this far ahead just doesn't sound right.
Multiple people are making that assumption although most of that rhetoric is coming from the trio themselves.In post 1044, Performer wrote:what? how are people all assuming they're confirmed town? that's hardly the case this day. You are clearly keeping keeping up with the thread, so this assumption doesn't sound like it's from town.In post 1042, Kmd4390 wrote:Kat why can't it be not_mafia or Saudade with oka? Are we just all assuming cheeky/Kat/oka are like confirmed town or something?
In post 969, CheekyTeeky wrote:Can I like tinfoilhat and say if oka and/or kat are scum they deserve the win and I wouldn't be mad at all lol.