1. End of day vote-counts
2. The way Jingle votes/interacts
3. Anything else I found particularly interesting.
Spoiler: End of day vote-counts
D1 Lynch:
Your push on him reads as : "stop reading too in-depth".
How is that a good reason to lynch someone, esp on d1?
~~~~~~~~
Pint read p strong town to me. He seemed to be trying p hard, and there were people who were doing a lot less. => I didn't like this lynch => I don't particularly like people who are on it.
I do like that FA/PP isn't here, though.
========================================================
D2 Vote Count:
Why do you need a lynch? You don't seem certain of your Gamma read and you can always wait a day. Picking No-lynch for 8-ball seems dumb. :/
~~~~~~~
Overall the lynch was super fast and I didn't particularly like the little reasoning I saw for it, but I don't like NSG as town more than I don't like any of the others, so I guess I'm leaving that alone for now.
========================================================
D3 Votecount:
We got scum this day so I only really wanna look at two votes:
To put my shoes in the situation of NSG for a moment, she has two options: No lynch due to day end w/ no player reaching majority (if I understand the rules correctly), and lynch Jingle.
As town, a No lynch seems pretty viable especially since NSG thinks 8-ball is on Suka for some reason
As scum, knowing Jingle is scumbuddy and, based on GE lynch, town seems to be p eager to get a lynch in every day, Suka will likely skip to Jingle wagon and then it looks weird pushing a no -lynch if Jingle dies the next day, and also sorta weird if someone were to bring up the reluctant NSG hammer where the only reason Jingle isn't town is PoE (speaking of which, why did she not vote him then?)
I'll admit the case against NSG seems a bit stretch here, but based on her play this game in general, I don't like this vote.
In post 308, the worst wrote:pinturicchio(5) : northsidegal, ceejayvinoya, Jingle, Irrelephant11, Gamma Emerald
what is this reasoningIn post 170, northsidegal wrote:i don't like how frozen angel hasn't put down a vote yet but given her specific acknowledgement and plan regarding that, that probably nullifies and scum value that might have otherwise been thereIn post 152, Frozen Angel wrote:Alright gonna play some overwatchnext time I catch up I'll make a vote. I'm just waiting to see people react to my posts and to have a little more to analyze first cause I have heavy doubts about my reads on few people
anyways, on another unrelated note, it occurs to me the anti-town nature of going too in-depth as to my reads.
VOTE: pintu
Following NSG, are we?In post 189, Jingle wrote:VOTE: pint
I like this wagon marginally more. Want to hear Relly's reasoning on the Gemerald vote tho.
Provides reads and you still don't back off. :/In post 193, northsidegal wrote:why are you town? what about your play this game is your towngame as opposed to your scumgame? if you're going to say that you expect better from me, i can't just be wrong, i have to be going off of poor reasoning. after all, just like i said to JJH in 728, if someone played to what seemed like a theoretical scumgame even if they were town, it would still be reasonable to vote that person.In post 183, pinturicchio wrote:I expect more from you, NSG. You usually have good early reads, and you should know better. It's too early to vote you because of BoP, but continue pushing me and I'm telling my parents about you. Believe me, you don't want that. Spooky.
are you serious about voting me because of burden of proof? you seem to already be taking it that i'm town, so that seems kind of a hollow threat. why do you townread me already? you said earlier that you don't really have experience with reading me and questioned irrelephant's read on me, but later said that "[nsg] felt town from the beginning". when did you start townreading me?
why do you think frozen angel would be at terrible vote?
you're still voting w/ her.In post 196, Jingle wrote:I think this is wrong. Or at least, incomplete.In post 170, northsidegal wrote:anyways, on another unrelated note, it occurs to me the anti-town nature of going too in-depth as to my reads.
I don't think we can scumhunt without making it obvious who we find suspicious, so trying to hide our suspects is counterproductive. I would agree that outing preflip associatives is antitown, and I'd agree that outright saying "X is my second strongest scumread" is probably bad, but just whether people fall on the town or scum side of null should be relatively safe without crippling our ability to hunt. Trying too hard to stop the nightkill and preventing our own ability to share reads and build trust isn't going to help anything, though.
he's done more for town than a lot of other people at this point in time.In post 204, northsidegal wrote:-shrug-
if you're town then it's not like my votes on you are stopping you from doing other things.
most people read me through activity and through my depth of thought.
Your push on him reads as : "stop reading too in-depth".
How is that a good reason to lynch someone, esp on d1?
Don't like this vote, but...In post 267, Irrelephant11 wrote:you certainly implied itIn post 260, pinturicchio wrote:if you still think I'm the scummiest player after all I have done at this point, you're as wrong as it gets, since there are at least 4 players who are active lurking.
I was never super townreading pintu (I was ~50% avoiding the wagon just so he'd talk more) and I have a really hard time picturing this as floundering town. VOTE: pintu
pedit: same
pedit2: I don't feel like you've done that much? You've made wild guesses as to how Gamma might play this as scum, townread me because..? and said that scum have to be among the active lurkers (occasionally it happens but I've also seen floundering scum say exactly this). Oh and you've made wild guesses as to the 8-ball, which tbf I speculated on, too, but it seems to be both central to your scumhunting process and completely inconsistent
In post 271, Irrelephant11 wrote:alright alright, I'll let you AtE me for a bit
UNVOTE:
is cj still your scummiest read?
Irrelephant kinda reads as confused/frustrated town, I guess.In post 278, Irrelephant11 wrote:eh it probably wouldn't be successful anyway, my gambits never are
VOTE: pintu
mostly just wanted to give time and space for scum to try to bus, but I don't know that I can manage it without being distracting
~~~~~~~~
Pint read p strong town to me. He seemed to be trying p hard, and there were people who were doing a lot less. => I didn't like this lynch => I don't particularly like people who are on it.
I do like that FA/PP isn't here, though.
========================================================
D2 Vote Count:
GE and Pint read p town to me from the beginning, so this lynch also makes me feel crummy inside.
This feels weird considering this:In post 514, Irrelephant11 wrote:Eh I could maybe see Gamma’s hammer as a reluctant “I’d rather not be on the wagon but we need the mislynch” hammer
VOTE: Gamma
He hasn’t done much else that’s towny tbh
ISOIng him to find the posts I townread showed me how much he’s posted without advancing things much
Idk this might be a bad way to read Gamma
Ahhh but I want a lynch I think??
I have to go afk
I’m not that bothered by a no lynch and also okay with a Gamma lynch
In post 485, Irrelephant11 wrote:Spoiler: gamma quotes I townreadIn post 145, Gamma Emerald wrote:Ok so this was the only post connecting the unskipped night to talking with buddiesIn post 131, Saudade wrote:so I could discuss my extensive scum strategies with my partner in crime =]
I feel like this joke could be made even with daychat and as such isn’t clearing
I would have cleared someone if they used serious spec based on that idea to accuse someone or make theories
Obv not doing that anymore as the thought process is out thereIn post 158, Gamma Emerald wrote:144: given Relly created he setup idea I’d believe any questions to be genuine. So they’re not playing dumb, making playing dumb not his plan. That was poorly written out earlier as I wrote it on the fly without fully sequencing the logic behind it.In post 156, Jingle wrote:Busy as hell today, probably no real contribution til tomorrow.
Would like GE to elaborate on 144 and 145 if possible.
145: Mafia has daychat, but some might not realize. I wanted to see if anyone tried to connect the long night to no daychat so I could give them townpoints. The only person to do it was Saudade, in a joke post which I feel scum could still make.In post 313, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hm I think a good strategy to start each day is actually a soft read reset at the very least, since the mafia are likely to try to play into pre-existing prejudicesIn post 335, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why so tilted?In post 333, northsidegal wrote:just frustrated about my mistakeIn post 332, Irrelephant11 wrote:Nsg where you at
Why do you need a lynch? You don't seem certain of your Gamma read and you can always wait a day. Picking No-lynch for 8-ball seems dumb. :/
Hm.In post 515, Suka wrote:I'll switch to Gamma if we can make that happen over me or Jingle.
Your scumread is Saud, but your last minute push is on Gamma?
I don't like how quickly this lynch happened. I don't know what to make of it past that, we know one scum was on it, but past that I'm not sure.
In post 522, northsidegal wrote:and by lovely i mean "i really don't think gamma is scum"
Or convenient timing, considering the possibilities of her alignment.In post 524, PenguinPower wrote:Wow...trash.In post 519, Jingle wrote:Fingers crossed.
Unfortunate timing, nsg.
~~~~~~~
Overall the lynch was super fast and I didn't particularly like the little reasoning I saw for it, but I don't like NSG as town more than I don't like any of the others, so I guess I'm leaving that alone for now.
========================================================
D3 Votecount:
We got scum this day so I only really wanna look at two votes:
There were two wagons at this point: Jingle, and Saud, w/ Saud being the only person not voting. Jingle and Saude were both at L-2. Saud isn't going to vote themselves, making Jingle the only viable lynch.
To put my shoes in the situation of NSG for a moment, she has two options: No lynch due to day end w/ no player reaching majority (if I understand the rules correctly), and lynch Jingle.
As town, a No lynch seems pretty viable especially since NSG thinks 8-ball is on Suka for some reason
As scum, knowing Jingle is scumbuddy and, based on GE lynch, town seems to be p eager to get a lynch in every day, Suka will likely skip to Jingle wagon and then it looks weird pushing a no -lynch if Jingle dies the next day, and also sorta weird if someone were to bring up the reluctant NSG hammer where the only reason Jingle isn't town is PoE (speaking of which, why did she not vote him then?)
I'll admit the case against NSG seems a bit stretch here, but based on her play this game in general, I don't like this vote.
Weird hammer after trying to deflect off Jingle all game.
========================================================
Spoiler: The way Jingle votes/interacts
========================================================
NSG: "Hey Jingle, let's see if we can push the 8-ball!" *Votes FA
Jingle: "Sounds good, what's our reasoning?"
NSG: "Idk, prolly that FA seems least likely to be 8-ball."
Jingle: "Seems fine. I'm giving you responsibility tho." *Votes FA
NSG: "Not publicly!"
Jingle: "My b." *Unvotes
NSG: "Wow you're jumpy. Guess this isn't happening now." *Unvotes
In post 416, Jingle wrote:Why?
In post 417, northsidegal wrote:process of elimination combined with thinking that, if i were to be wrong on any given scumread, FA would be the least likely to be the 8-ball
In post 418, northsidegal wrote:i don't think you, irrelephant or saudade are likely to be scum. (though, if i'm wrong i'm wrong on you or irrelephant first, and being wrong on one of you is likely a game losing read)
that leaves gamma, ceejay and FA. of the three, i feel like FA is the best vote
In post 432, Jingle wrote:VOTE: Frozen Angel
I kind of think this is town, but I kind of agree that it's also the least likely slot to have been 8 balled. And I kind of think everyone is town at this point. Fuck. I don't even know. NSG, I'm trusting you.
No kidding.In post 445, PenguinPower wrote:Well...that was quick.
In post 449, PenguinPower wrote:Quick town reads on nsg and the elephant.
could lynch Gamma or Saudade.
This is a short game, so I'll read up in the morning.
Lol.In post 451, northsidegal wrote:UNVOTE:
penguin if you're town i would appreciate you showing it as soon as possible
NSG: "Hey Jingle, let's see if we can push the 8-ball!" *Votes FA
Jingle: "Sounds good, what's our reasoning?"
NSG: "Idk, prolly that FA seems least likely to be 8-ball."
Jingle: "Seems fine. I'm giving you responsibility tho." *Votes FA
NSG: "Not publicly!"
Jingle: "My b." *Unvotes
NSG: "Wow you're jumpy. Guess this isn't happening now." *Unvotes
========================================================
Spoiler: Anything else I found particularly Interesting
In post 466, Suka wrote:I agree that Saudade/Gamma makes more sense than Saudade/Penguin, though.
In post 490, Suka wrote:Why won't you vote Penguin?In post 487, Irrelephant11 wrote:I’ll vote {Suka, gamma, maybe Saudade}
Suka's Explanation:
The penguin push seems super weird if you think saud is the guy that did it. I don't like any of this from you.In post 500, Suka wrote:I never "refused" to come to these conclusions. "Refused" is the wrong word to describe what I've done.In post 499, Irrelephant11 wrote:Some conclusions you refuse to come to that i think you should
A) Saudade/penguin is never a team
B) the only reason to vote off wagon is if you’re afraid of 8-ball - most players seem to think that you’d be the on-wagon 8-ball, though, so you least of all should be afraid of it
A) I agreed with you when you brought the wagon dynamics to my attention. I wasn't thinking about them prior to that. But I clearly agreed with you that it's less likely that it's Saudade/Penguin than Saudade/Gamma.
B) I specifically asked for your explanation because I didn't understand it. I never refused the reasoning, though I am questioning you about it because I don't understand why you came to that conclusion. I also don't see why you're scumreading me for that conclusion when your other townreads voted off wagon (e.g. NSG voting FA). This isn't a fair basis to scumread me when your strongest townread seems to be doing it.
This should be looked at again after what jingle flipped.In post 515, Suka wrote:I'll switch to Gamma if we can make that happen over me or Jingle.
TLDR:
NSG
votes by PoE
says reads on her are based on activity and depth of thought... both of which seem to be lacking in her posts
votes are weird as explained
Jingle follows NSG twice. at least.
looks scummy
Suka doesn't look great w/
what penguin just pointed out
jingle hammer given circumstances (reasons above)
deflecting votes off jingle
PP is town
votes are p contrary to jingle
lead a p hard push on jingle
other gut things, I guess
Irrelephant
hard time committing to things they're thinking
vote changes from what reads seem to say
confused town?
----
anyways i replaced into the game and I always feel most comfortable reading people based on interaction rather than what's happened (esp cuz I wasn't there and hindsight is better than present-sight)
also I doubt 8-ball is no-lynch, seems kinda dumb to me, so I'm down to no-lynch if people are willing to interact so I can narrow down between NSG and Suka.
i don't want to discuss theory about 8-ball unless we're asking who everyone thinks 8-ball is, because that feels like a waste of time