[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 11014309 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 877: Liars and Millers - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #154 (isolation #1) » Tue Jun 11, 2019 3:25 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
Is there a town coalition forming already? I'd like to be admitted to that if at all possible. I'll spend some time analyzing the first couple of posts but I don't think they mean much generally.
Post
Post #219 (isolation #5) » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:29 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 198, the worst wrote:I feel like Saudade would put on a confident tone as either alignment just to advance the game and keep the thread spicy like regardless of the benefit of it so I'd rather we don't focus on his tonality too much ):
You know, I'm not going to back down from my read. I appreciate you providing a different perspective on it, however. I have marked you leaning town for that.
Post
Post #232 (isolation #7) » Tue Jun 11, 2019 4:39 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 46, northsidegal wrote:hardclaim miller. on phone and haven't actually read very closely but i'm pretty sure this confs one scum in miller claims
Asking not to be lynched without any pressure feels scummy to me. Whereas northsidegal is just null so far, they haven't really given enough content for me to figure anything out yet.
In post 463, AzoriusSenate wrote:I really dislike CheekyTeeky at the moment for doing that, seems like a role fishing attempt on d1...
What's the problem with it?
The main issue I have is I generally avoid talking about town power roles until we are hardclaiming. I find it hard to believe someone would hardclaim cop on d1 without any protection roles.
Post
Post #475 (isolation #14) » Wed Jun 12, 2019 10:10 am
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 474, Ircher wrote: but OkaPoka has >rand chance of scum and cop claimed anyway, so does it matter?
I like to think of my vote as a powerful weapon and only use it when I want something. Right now my vote on OkaPoka wouldn't get me what I want, which is more reads from northsidegal.
In post 474, Ircher wrote: but OkaPoka has >rand chance of scum and cop claimed anyway, so does it matter?
I like to think of my vote as a powerful weapon and only use it when I want something. Right now my vote on OkaPoka wouldn't get me what I want, which is more reads from northsidegal.
that's interesting to me. why me in particular? what about pine?
on the subject of lynching millers vs vts given cheeky's claim, given the chance that she's doing the MU thing where you fakeclaim cop as cover i think it still makes sense to lynch in the millers.
In post 489, the worst wrote:not explaining my nsg read is intentional and tactful tho
(just so you know, if you're trying something where you wait to see if i question you for giving me an easy townread, mathdino tried that one and it didn't work. i guess i'm interested in your reasoning but i usually don't think townreads on me are unwarranted because i usually feel like i've towntold.)
I'm not really interested in Pine because they are in the non-miller list.
To answer your question Cheeky, you've shifted out of the miller pool as well so I'm not really interested in analyzing you posts. You have leaned scum for me so far but I wanted to shift to pressuring a miller claim.
After getting caught up on Skygazer's posts I'd be fine lynching them. NSG is still difficult for me to read as she hasn't taken a super hard stance on the game like the rest of the miller list, still have NSG marked null.
Post
Post #879 (isolation #17) » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:34 am
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 744, Skygazer wrote:its 1am; im sorry im trying not to spend every waking moment as a reminder that im being universally scumread lol
In post 808, Skygazer wrote:if tw is scum i have no idea what his angle is here :c
Idk just kind of feels like Skygazer is rolling over here. If NSG wants to try and defend Skygazer and suggest a lynch in the two power players so far in the miller list (tw and saud) I would be willing to read the posts but to restate I feel alright lynching Skygazer now.
In post 46, northsidegal wrote:hardclaim miller. on phone and haven't actually read very closely but i'm pretty sure this confs one scum in miller claims
Asking not to be lynched without any pressure feels scummy to me. Whereas northsidegal is just null so far, they haven't really given enough content for me to figure anything out yet.
Post
Post #881 (isolation #19) » Fri Jun 14, 2019 8:42 am
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 858, CheekyTeeky wrote:We lynch in group 1 (millers) until we hit scum. Sky > NSG > TW. Then we find scum in group two which should be easier after a scumflip. Pretty much autowin if after I eat N1 NK you all VCA once you've nailed one.
In post 463, AzoriusSenate wrote:I really dislike CheekyTeeky at the moment for doing that, seems like a role fishing attempt on d1...
weird flex but i kind of get town pings for pushing a claimed cop lol
In post 877, AzoriusSenate wrote:I'm not really interested in Pine because they are in the non-miller list.
To answer your question Cheeky, you've shifted out of the miller pool as well so I'm not really interested in analyzing you posts. You have leaned scum for me so far but I wanted to shift to pressuring a miller claim.
After getting caught up on Skygazer's posts I'd be fine lynching them. NSG is still difficult for me to read as she hasn't taken a super hard stance on the game like the rest of the miller list, still have NSG marked null.
UNVOTE: NSG
VOTE: Skygazer
bad push, unexplained vote, feels like an easy hop-on
I'd suggest pushing on Saudade or the worst. Also self voting here is a bit much, like is that supposed to make me feel bad for voting you?
Post
Post #904 (isolation #21) » Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:42 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
They are the others in the miller list..... and no one has thrown really any meaningful pressure their way. You're not really adding anything new to the thread by saying "lynch me and NSG" because that's essentially what we've already concluded. If I were you I would be fighting saudade directly as he seems to be the one who suspects you the most.
Post
Post #905 (isolation #22) » Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:45 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
Then again no one wants to challenge Saudade or TW today, including myself, so it's really just a catch 22 for you. You've gotta do something other than concede your lynch though, you're just not helping us gamesolve enough.
Post
Post #906 (isolation #23) » Fri Jun 14, 2019 1:49 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 896, Skygazer wrote:I don't really see any scum motivation in Ircher's posts other than the fact that if Oka is town then he's a pretty easy vote to get away with here. I don't think anything really else sticks out to me, he seems like he's genuinely trying to gamesolve even if his solve is incorrect :c plus the people I'm townreading know him better and are townreading him and nsg is pushing him in a way that doesn't rlly feel like a bus ?? like it'd probs be suboptimal to bus when ircher is being TR'd pretty heavily by other folks
Maybe you could explain your nonmiller list a bit more and why ircher is at the top.
In post 474, Ircher wrote: but OkaPoka has >rand chance of scum and cop claimed anyway, so does it matter?
I like to think of my vote as a powerful weapon and only use it when I want something. Right now my vote on OkaPoka wouldn't get me what I want, which is more reads from northsidegal.
that's interesting to me. why me in particular? what about pine?
on the subject of lynching millers vs vts given cheeky's claim, given the chance that she's doing the MU thing where you fakeclaim cop as cover i think it still makes sense to lynch in the millers.
In post 489, the worst wrote:not explaining my nsg read is intentional and tactful tho
(just so you know, if you're trying something where you wait to see if i question you for giving me an easy townread, mathdino tried that one and it didn't work. i guess i'm interested in your reasoning but i usually don't think townreads on me are unwarranted because i usually feel like i've towntold.)
as far as i can see this is like the only interaction nsg has had with azor and i don't see any reads on him from her
I think looking for partner interactions today is a pretty weak read. I'd prefer if you attacked the way I'm playing the game, not who I am talking to.
azor's vote/unvote feels super scummy bc they're around but were probs hoping for saudade to lolhammer and they conveniently didn't unvote until that possibility had passed
I'm reconsidering your alignment because of the events that just happened
Post
Post #1189 (isolation #35) » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:28 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 1186, Skygazer wrote:like they were clearly around and posted after the VC but didn't unvote until after cheeky unvoted and i wasnt in danger of being immediately mislynched
thats rlly scummy
pedit: oka has equity too there just the timing of the azor vote stuck out to me
I can see how that looks scummy from your perspective.
IDK what's going on with you? I'm soul reading this game at the moment, I think if I get too caught up in finding a logical fallacy in a drunk person's logic then I'm completely failing my job as town.
Good question. Best answer I can give you is that I have been so caught up in the sorting of players into different categories I forgot which one I was in, in relation to NSG.
IDK what's going on with you? I'm soul reading this game at the moment, I think if I get too caught up in finding a logical fallacy in a drunk person's logic then I'm completely failing my job as town.
I don't even know what this means.
Any way I could clarify for you? I thought that Skygazer's reaction to being *hammered* seemed genuine and unforced, but there's no real logic that I'm applying to that read.
Good question. Best answer I can give you is that I have been so caught up in the sorting of players into different categories I forgot which one I was in, in relation to NSG.
It's easier to think you're the godfather who forgot what category they should go into.
You should know that mafia is never an easy game...
Post
Post #1216 (isolation #42) » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:45 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
You could also say I care so little about which category I fit into because I'm TOWN. Town shouldn't really care about which category they are in, whereas scum would be HYPER interested in appearing town.
Post
Post #1224 (isolation #45) » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:50 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 1220, Saudade wrote:so you dont scumread the person who didnt hammer your scumread who you now townread?
I don't scumread you right now, no. I'm considering/have considered/will continue to consider why you would choose to back off of the wagon you had formed and were pushing so aggressively. Is it because you're scum and you want to pretend to analyze someone else's alignment? Is it because you're town and reconsidering your own reads? Probably the second one.
Post
Post #1233 (isolation #46) » Sat Jun 15, 2019 5:53 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 1223, Saudade wrote:I wish skitter30 was here to carry me so I wouldnt have to post this much
I will say this: if we DO lynch Skygazer today, I think it's immense towncredit for Saudade if they flip town, regardless of Saudade's actual alignment.
did no one laugh at this
i swear i made myself laugh
I don't find claiming mafia very funny in general, this is a very srs game.
You idiot. Simpleton. Low-IQ cockroach. How dare you not get my joke? I have spent years, decades, studying comedic theory to master the craft of making people laugh. You have insulted me and brought dishonor to my bloodline. My career is now in shambles because of you. You have ruined me. My days of being an internet funny man are no more. I can no longer sustain my family. This calls for a punishment of the highest degree. Since you have shamed me in front of the masses, I shall do the same to you. And all I need to do is utter three simple syllables. R. Slash. Woosh. Good luck recovering from that.
IDK what's going on with you? I'm soul reading this game at the moment, I think if I get too caught up in finding a logical fallacy in a drunk person's logic then I'm completely failing my job as town.
I don't even know what this means.
Any way I could clarify for you? I thought that Skygazer's reaction to being *hammered* seemed genuine and unforced, but there's no real logic that I'm applying to that read.
In post 1236, the worst wrote:Article 350,000 which I didn't realise was lost on everyone but me: skygazer and okapoka can't talk about each other
In post 1267, the worst wrote:Oka's vote on her makes equal sense as mislynch/distancing but his read trajectory on her and refusal to actually push for her lynch is kinda ???
I've also asked them both explicitly to talk about each other. Oka's posting about Skyg was hilariously frozen and Skyg ignored that part of my request altogether to focus on other stuff then never circled back to it
bruuh its hidden away in some spoiler somewhere i think cause it was long
Post
Post #1303 (isolation #58) » Sat Jun 15, 2019 6:19 pm
Postby AzoriusSenate »
In post 1302, Saudade wrote:trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king trust in the king