Micro 894: Marked for Death!! [game over]

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #13 (isolation #0) » Fri Oct 11, 2019 2:49 pm

It wasn't me I swear

*hides knife*

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #21 (isolation #1) » Fri Oct 11, 2019 11:22 pm

I'm around and not American. You can rant to me.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #64 (isolation #2) » Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:03 am

@George why did you vote DrDolittle here? What's wrong with his vote exactly?

Kinda agreeing with GuiltyLion for now. I'm not sure why you would vote someone and then not discuss it.

VOTE: George

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #78 (isolation #3) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:10 am

In post 68, Caesar Wills It wrote:
Very well, Senators, that will do. Mighty Caesar bids you remain on topic, for Our time is precious, and we despise having it ill-spent.

We thank Senator Bailey for his kind words. Your fealty is accepted, and you may beg of Us a favor in the future. We also recognize that you are engaged in earnest attempts to solve our mutual problem, and grant you leave to continue.

Senator Lion is cautioned that continued frivolous hectoring of Senator Bailey will see the good Senator cast into the Colosseum wearing naught but a breechclout to face his namesake. It is Senator Ceejay, however, who earns Our Ire at this time, as We judge his motives in maligning Senator Bailey to be opportunistic and false, while Senator Lion’s are more likely merely unwise.

Caesar has spoken.

VOTE: Senator Ceejay

As mighty Caesar has mentioned, we should remain on topic, and it is exactly for that reason on why we have placed suspicion on Senator Bailey.

If you could kindly explain further as to how my actions have been opportunistic and untrue, I would greatly appreciate it.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #79 (isolation #4) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 1:12 am

In post 72, Osetr wrote:
In post 64, ceejayvinoya wrote:@George why did you vote DrDolittle here? What's wrong with his vote exactly?

Kinda agreeing with GuiltyLion for now. I'm not sure why you would vote someone and then not discuss it.

VOTE: George
lion didnt openly say that was the reason for scumreading george, potential svs

I meant I agree with his vote but I am voting him for different reasons.

I can't english well am sorry

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #104 (isolation #5) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:50 pm

In post 80, Osetr wrote:
In post 79, ceejayvinoya wrote:
In post 72, Osetr wrote:
In post 64, ceejayvinoya wrote:@George why did you vote DrDolittle here? What's wrong with his vote exactly?

Kinda agreeing with GuiltyLion for now. I'm not sure why you would vote someone and then not discuss it.

VOTE: George
lion didnt openly say that was the reason for scumreading george, potential svs
I meant I agree with his vote but I am voting him for different reasons.

I can't english well am sorry
but he never gave a reason

His reasons. Dont. Matter. To me.

I am voting him independently.

It just so happens he voted him first.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #105 (isolation #6) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 2:59 pm

In post 90, GeorgeBailey wrote:Well now i'm at
L-2
I believe.

To further read into this shit storm:
CeeJay's vote feels very opportunistic since no real reason was stated.

I literally stated that I voted you because you did not discuss your vote towards DrDolittle further.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #106 (isolation #7) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:09 pm

In post 91, GeorgeBailey wrote:
In post 78, ceejayvinoya wrote: If you could kindly explain further as to how my actions have been opportunistic and untrue, I would greatly appreciate it.
Well, for me atleast, it felt like you were really quick to follow Lion's lead. It's the first couple of days, and you're voting someone based off an RVS and a little introduction.

Our problem right now is that we are on the stage of the game where we have little information about everything.

I did not know the real purpose behind your rvs vote, but it struck me as a more serious vote than just rvs. It was like you asked him "what are you doing?" and then voted him.

In post 48, GeorgeBailey wrote:
In post 45, DrDolittle wrote:VOTE: Caeser

Et Tu Dolittle?

VOTE: DrDoLittle

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #107 (isolation #8) » Mon Oct 14, 2019 3:21 pm

Which struck me as weird because I did not see anything wrong with DrDolittle's vote, and you didn't elaborate on that. Then you started discussing flavor.

At this point I decided that you were playing inconsistently and I wanted to vote you. And I did.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #138 (isolation #9) » Tue Oct 15, 2019 6:43 pm

In post 108, Chemist1422 wrote:CJ can be a little towny

Not a lot but a little

This looks like something you can easily back out of

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #139 (isolation #10) » Tue Oct 15, 2019 6:53 pm

In post 129, GeorgeBailey wrote:
In post 106, ceejayvinoya wrote: I did not know the real purpose behind your rvs vote, but it struck me as a more serious vote than just rvs. It was like you asked him "what are you doing?" and then voted him.
I don't really understand how you thought it was serious. I thought the "
Et tu
" joke made it clear. I didn't put much reasoning behind it because I didn't think it really needed much. And to have your reasoning *conveniently* happen after Lion's seems scummy.

I'm glad my RVS got so much attention though, got the thread sparking. And got me 2 reads at least. If I do end up getting lynched for it, I assure it's a scum duo at work.

I didn't get the joke, but that's not important.

To me, you voted him for a reason, and that's it.

So what am I supposed to do with my suspicions after GL made clear of his? Not say it?

"oooh as the good townie that I am I should not say that I find what he did there to be scummy because it is conveniently after Lion's read"

As much as I agree that your rvs got us a lot of attention from everyone and started discussions, I believe you are being dramatic and it is annoying to read your "scum is out to get me" posts.

ceejayvinoya · Post Post #153 (isolation #11) » Thu Oct 17, 2019 10:10 am

Ugh nothing is happening.

VOTE: Caesar

Let's go here. He's doing worse than George.