Post
Post #1030 (isolation #201) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 12:30 pm
Postby Menalque »
Could you elaborate specifically a bit more on this and particularly the final phrase after the comma
It'd make Menalque a weak player too unless he tends to blame mislynch victims for mislynches and as far as I know he doesn't, moreso than anyone else does.
Post
Post #1051 (isolation #206) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:50 pm
Postby Menalque »
Dats, honestly, I do think you should be TRing me incredibly hard right now bc as gross as it is to bring this up I think you as a person know me well enough to know that I as a person wouldn’t do what I did to wimpy as scum knowing I was doing it to town
Like I can accept other people wondering if I’m enough of a cunt that I would but I think you know me well enough to know that’s far beyond what I would do in bad faith
Post
Post #1055 (isolation #207) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:56 pm
Postby Menalque »
Yeah, I think that makes sense and I’d also rather not talk about that aspect of things too much because it gets into an equally horrible and gross AtE territory (of saying: wow, so by voting me you’re saying you think I’m an abominable cunt) so I won’t bring it up again
Honestly, y’all can treat it as a scumclaim if I do
Post
Post #1057 (isolation #208) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 1:58 pm
Postby Menalque »
I think I’m very town on play here though which I think makes sense for you to TR me for
Like there’s no reason for scum!me who’s feeling burned out to create a massive load of attention on me when I could definitely have coasted at least through today
Post
Post #1062 (isolation #210) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:02 pm
Postby Menalque »
I mean, don’t get me wrong, I think you’re rapidly becoming one of the best scum players on site so you could be scum who’s stepping it up to the next level
But like rather than just acknowledging that that possibility exists I would be trying to show you more that “oh no guys, datisi might be scum here because she’s really good eve tho I do tr her she still might be oh no I’m so confuse about her but I guess she’s town”
As opposed to me here being like “yeah, dats is literally just town”
I think I’m p good at scum but I get antsy about people spotting that I’m pocketing them since dr drew caught me trying to do it early on in surprise mafia so I normally try to put in some healthy fake paranoia if I’m scum
Wicked and datisi can both confirm that from my recent scum games with them
With datisi it’s what I faked around my read on her in 892 and with wicked it was my approach to pocketing skitter
Post
Post #1070 (isolation #214) » Wed Nov 13, 2019 2:10 pm
Postby Menalque »
Also I’m holding out on a pipe dream of scum believing that I’d fake my TR on dats being this strong because I believed she was scum and then flip on her in lylo if we were there together, allowing us to kill whatever scum was foolish enough to believe that and to bring us both to 3p lylo
In post 805, Menalque wrote:I’m not sure if I’m tunnelling or not that’s the problem
You, I was asking because of this
Did you read the rest of the thread? Opinion on other slots?
Yeah but it’s kind of conditional on stuff
Atm I’d say my lynchpool is (wimpy!slot, al-thingy #1, al-thingy #2, wicked) but depending on flips within that I would probably reevaluate my townreads
In post 973, Menalque wrote:Tbh I’m just really ashamed of how I treated wimpy (rightfully so, I know) and I’m struggling to get back into this game based on that
If wimpy is town then scum is in (wicked, aldu, almi) I think
But if wicked is town then that may need to be re-evaluated
' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.
You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.
You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
' line is the very essence of why I'm currently scumreading you.
You don't necessarily need concrete reasons to scumread or vote someone - that is a myth. The whole game for scum is to not do scummy things, therefore it's usually what they're not doing that you need to pick up on.
You're seeming like scum who feel they've been caught unfairly/by poor reasoning.
So you have an illogical reason to scum read me because I have literally not done anything to warrant a scum read.
I disagree.
Can you point out where Menalque lied, please?
In post 645, Luca Blight wrote:Ok, I don't really agree with the argument of either side here - they are both a little on the pedantic side, but what I think is more important it the result of these arguments.
Menalque has been relentlessly pushing his scumread in a way which he might not have had the cause to do so early on as scum, and has done so in a way which reads as genuinely frustrated and believing in his read.
Wimpy on the other hand reads like caught scum who are desperately trying to wriggle free, and then get so far entrenched that they feel they have to commit to their counter-vote. I don't believe Wimpy's confidence in his scumread/s as much as I believe Menalque's.
Thought all of this was town in how he was approaching wimpy!slot and in his reasons for SRing the wimpy defence
I didn’t lie and I liked him trying to get wimpy to clarify that too
Finally although there’s mild equity with scum!wimpy and it very mildly pings me that he said more than once that wimpy he thought had good chances of being scum, he didn’t vote him, I think scum is somewhat more likely to get on there if it’s a buddy
If wimpy is town I think it’s much more likely that scum was avoiding things and letting town eat itself which brings things back to some combination of (wicked, aldu, almi)
In post 990, Menalque wrote:I think pops will probably make it relatively clear if wimpy!slot is town after all and honestly I’m starting to feel that way even if I don’t have good reasons to
I need to reread it but again I’m not really ready to do that yet
to end the day and avoid having to post reads and hope everyone forgets come D2
or
play the game and work with us before you hammer going gently into D2
This all feels rly contradictory to me apart from in the case where icon genuinely doesn’t believe I’m gonna hammer in advance
But like, your top SR is about to get hammered fypov. You should be happy about this, and when your posts are directed at said SR you’re egging a hammer on. But then on me instead of considering my hammer pro-town (by lynching what icon believes is scum or for pressuring him into claiming) he chooses to shade my play instead as having a terrible ISO or for trying to weasel out of ending day
I don’t think that’s a reaction that makes sense when you’re encouraging a hammer on your top SR and it looks like it will happen
I think that’s setting up for after a mislynch push
Post
Post #1359 (isolation #235) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 4:37 am
Postby Menalque »
I don’t think it is, because while you played scum very lurkily in AvP, people talking about 1942 reminded me that you can also play as hyperposting scum
In post 845, Datisi wrote:@Emps, I like that you're doing catchups "real-time", but is there ever any "conclusion"? What are your reads atm?
I'm gonna
piggyback
this question.
Wicked didn't do catchups real time and he had more content than you.
~ahem~
lol oof
town
{ico} - strong tl
{datisi, luca} - tl
{wicked, alduskel(or however you say it), mena} - null
{alimidia} - nullscum
{wimpy slot} - scumlean (might need to reconsider, ill look into it tmrw)
scum
yay fuck me like 10 pages to catch up on
but first time for reasonings
ico - i think his posts abt the whole mena datisi vs wimpy situation were towny
datisi - talked to me before about basically having a stroke in the scum pt every other post, and theres no daytalk but she seems relaxed/natural
luca - kind of gut tbh but i also like his reasonings
wicked - not much to go off of. i really dont see why people have been scumreading this tbh
aludskel or whatever - not much to go off of either
mena - i really just keep going back and forth on him tbh im really not sure
alimidia - tone feels a off and voting me for posting a ton and doing real time catchups is ???
wimpy - tone is off and he felt overly defensive, and kept emphasizing that hes done nothing scummy at all
pedit : oh hello there
i still have 10 pages to catch up on so ill let you know once im done
emps my man
i like your tonal datisi read, but would it change if there would be scum daychatter?
weak luca read
your wicked read is low effort? have you actually read the game? I brought up a few critical points on wicked that i'm about to respond to in my next post. Are you scum with Wicked here?
alud has posted enough to have an opinion on...
Ali... Hmm. That seems like an OMGUS read to me, and feels like how town!emps would read it.
Wimpy read is meh as well :s Everyone would be overly defensive with the crap Menal pulled there.
Which brings me to your menal read that you are hedging.
How can you not have an opinion on him? Like it or hate it, his ISO is FILLED with AI stuff.
This is probably town!Emps that is just not into this game. His reads are very feely right now, especially wrt Ali. He isn't pushing a scum!agenda and reminds me of myself when I'm town just stuck in a game.
I don’t think that makes sense as an explanation for icon pushing me to provide more content before end of day given that he’d already made claims like this
Post
Post #1387 (isolation #244) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:36 am
Postby Menalque »
In post 1385, popsofctown wrote:Sorry, it's necessary to be rank about how I characterize the meta of a player and how that contextualizes my reads. He also was sloppy with the fruit mechanic in AvP instead of working to leash it, which made it more difficult to understand his alignment. If I go into games treating him as a sloppy player and not a booksie one, I'm going to read him more accurately.
Sorry not sorry to be clear
I felt sure it was going to be a movie that ended with a lolhammer and when the movie didn't end that way and Alduskkel pointed out how that's a dangerous movie for scum!Menalque I am worried
Post
Post #1388 (isolation #245) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 11:38 am
Postby Menalque »
In post 1351, Luca Blight wrote:Alim is starting to ping me again with the way he just floats through the game whenever the spotlight isn’t on him.
In post 1352, Luca Blight wrote:I generally don’t like Aldu’s reaction, but there are one or two things I’ve seen that have given me pause for thought. I’ll try and put them into words Tomorrow when I’m on the computer.
In post 1351, Luca Blight wrote:Alim is starting to ping me again with the way he just floats through the game whenever the spotlight isn’t on him.
In post 1352, Luca Blight wrote:I generally don’t like Aldu’s reaction, but there are one or two things I’ve seen that have given me pause for thought. I’ll try and put them into words Tomorrow when I’m on the computer.
Menalque wrote:It is kinda funny that the two unvotes came from the two people I thought would definitely not unvote here tho, and I’m not sure if it’s AI or not
So, this is me declaring intent when I had zero intent of actually hammering (which again, not what happened here) and catching scum with it
In post 1535, Datisi wrote:Because at the time he was in PoE? And Mena even said before he's fine with lynching there? And there was a case that lit you sheeped?
Like why is it so unbelievable to think that the reaction to intent made him reconsider
so you think that:
'Scumalque: yo bro ur ima PoE you have 30 minutes before I hamma you'
'Alidus: ehh i'm good not claiming suck it lovecake'
'DragonBoi: ehhhh menal is gonna look preeeeeety bad if he lynches this and it flips town'
Post
Post #1575 (isolation #250) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:27 pm
Postby Menalque »
Aldu refusing to claim — not orthodox. I’m not talking about whether it’s pro-town, or anti-town or whatever, but it’s out of what is expected. I can see possible scum motivation there in deciding to intentionally look out of the ordinary in the hopes of people following the logic I’m using now, but I don’t think that’s likely.
I think that being that calm and declaring that you don’t think the hammer is coming is much more likely to come from town precisely because lynching scum D1 in a micro is ++town!EV, and tbh I think scum is much more likely to go along with the orthodoxy and at least make a fake claim that may keep them alive.
Post
Post #1577 (isolation #252) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:33 pm
Postby Menalque »
In a situation where I’m scum:
I could have lolhammered.
I could have declared intent then lolhammered at any point later so long as the wagon was there.
I 100% could have lolhammered when my timer deadline ran out.
And there’s absolutely no reason for me to expect to be lynched in any of those cases. To expect pressure, yes, but not to expect being lynched. I’m always going to end up coming under pressure in this game because scum has the impression I’m a viable mislynch. They’re not wrong, as there are four people on me and a maximum of two of them can be scum.
I’ve been kind of disengaged since wimpy, so I haven’t been producing as much content as I would sometimes, and those are all things scum are going to see and think that I’m viable as the mislynch. Maybe I am, even, especially if one scum is still off and can get a quickhammer.
Post
Post #1578 (isolation #253) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:36 pm
Postby Menalque »
Now, my dad’s visiting me, so I’m not going to be around like I would be/how I’d like to be, but I also haven’t even mislynched in D1 before as town and I’m not intending to start today especially when the grounds for my wagon are something as weak as me posting intent and then not hammering.
I’m gonna VOTE: icon because while I’ve been going back and forth on this, I don’t believe that he believed that me not hammering is enough of a reason to call me scum
973 puts aldu in scumpool (along with me and wicked) using POE basically
977 aldu NAI
982 same as 973
997 1st direct interaction with aldu
1025 asking pops about aldu
1033 .. non relevant stuff
1286 ... links old posts of 973 and 982 as reasonings for him wanting to hammer Aldu
I’m gonna need you to be explaining how this is in any way “damning”.
None of this explains why I wouldn’t want to hammer aldu, not why my not doing so is scummy.
Post
Post #1588 (isolation #257) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:50 pm
Postby Menalque »
In post 1584, Iconeum wrote:i think ur scum for posting intent, threatening with a deadline, having no interest in sorting aldus, not hammering after your deadline despite not coming away with additional information for your PoE, and for not engaging with me when I asked about your reads. Not to mention you pushed Wimpy without the intention of sorting there.
Define how what I’ve been doing with aldus has not been sorting him, when I’ve very clearly explained how his reaction to my intent influenced my read on him, and i did get additional information from the very fact that he refused to claim
I pushed winpy while sorting there and am still unsure as to how good that was vs whether it was tunnelling
Post
Post #1598 (isolation #259) » Thu Nov 14, 2019 10:59 pm
Postby Menalque »
In post 1548, Iconeum wrote:there was a little more to it, and aldu also pointed out that menal hammering puts him in a bad spot at the time (part of his argument that he didn't believe the intent)
In post 1535, Datisi wrote:Because at the time he was in PoE? And Mena even said before he's fine with lynching there? And there was a case that lit you sheeped?
Like why is it so unbelievable to think that the reaction to intent made him reconsider
so you think that:
'Scumalque: yo bro ur ima PoE you have 30 minutes before I hamma you'
'Alidus: ehh i'm good not claiming suck it lovecake'
'DragonBoi: ehhhh menal is gonna look preeeeeety bad if he lynches this and it flips town'
In post 1528, Datisi wrote:hammering/intent isn't about "getting things", it's about "lynch scum or don't lynch a PR"and if he felt that Aldu isn't scum then there's automatically no point in hammering?
only it actually is about getting things?
you say it yourself
lynch scum or don't lynch a PR
if he thinks aldu isn't scum why post intent in the first place?