What do you think of him so far? Also hi everyone I'm dostin!kookiemonster wrote:I am Jacko beep boop kpop I'm correct about Johnny scum a lot
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
But if you're just taking the first one then what discussion can we have? There's only one choice they can make. Even if you are just picking "randomly" there will be human error for people to analyze because I don't think you're allowed to use a R.N.G. in this game. If you just pick from the top of a list there is no real choice involved. So if that's true, maybe Datisi is hiding something, and maybe (I'm not saying this is true) that something is that he is a mafia?In post 19, Aristophanes wrote:Nah, it's just as random a reason as any. Plus, it's not a confirmed reason, I'm merely speculating and joking about itIn post 17, dostin wrote:I thought the first couple votes on this site are supposed to be random to kick off the discussion. Doesn't choosing from a list ruin the whole point?
[dostisi]Datisi wrote:hot take????? dostin is aligned with the town.
You didn't vote for me, you voted for Aristophanes. And for the other questions I think I'm too close to the start of the game to make any decisions like that.In post 24, Datisi wrote:In post 20, dostin wrote:
Thanks Datisi. Why do you think that Kookie voted for you?
dostin.
i am surprised (?) to see someone respond to "i think you're town" with a "thanks". do you care about why i voted you? do you think i could be scum trying to gain your sympathy so you don't try to yeet me later? or do you trust me?
kookie voted for me because i never read them right.
[also, before you quote this whole wallpost to reply to this part: if you highlight something, then click the quote button, you will only quote what you highlighted.]
Why?In post 28, kookiemonster wrote:Who, Johnny? That fool town as hellIn post 15, dostin wrote:What do you think of him so far? Also hi everyone I'm dostin!kookiemonster wrote:I am Jacko beep boop kpop I'm correct about Johnny scum a lot
- monster
I don't like that you first mentioned it without explaining yourself and are now asking me this. It sounds like you wanted to make a splash of some kind with that post and were upset that nobody asked you to explain so you couldn't accomplish whatever you wanted to at first. If you're town it could be that you said I was town to try and read my reaction, but if that was your angle then I think you probably would have said something different in the first place.In post 30, Datisi wrote:what i meant to type was "do you care why i think you're town." i'm not drinking right now.
You asked me to elaborate and I already said why I think it's you, so I explained why you are a team.In post 159, Datisi wrote:i have a major problem with that read explanation, because it reads like "i need to explain why bugs/dats are a team > these interactions can be interpreted like partners"
You sounded dismissive of it like you were distancing from a weird post.In post 160, Datisi wrote:because i usually have a correct read on bugs quickly.In post 158, dostin wrote:Why do you think they asked you for help when kookiemonster was talking about them? Did you think the brainworms comment was weird?
Sorry I quoted the wrong part. I was responding to this part but I got mixed up.In post 160, Datisi wrote:and no.
Didn't bugspray know you thought they were mafia already?In post 162, dostin wrote:because i usually have a correct read on bugs quickly.
That was about posts having multiple purposes which I didn't think about before.In post 165, Datisi wrote:what was this ^^ a reply to then? because the only thing so far you've said is that you don't like that i reasked you something when nobody picked me up on it, which i explained why i did (and which you yourself offered a possible town!pov for me to do)In post 154, dostin wrote:That makes sense, I think we are on the same page about that now.
Your interaction with bugspray look dishonest, and your response to kookie's vote is overblown.In post 53, bugspray wrote:In post 48, kookiemonster wrote: AtE to no endboldof you to somehow believe that quoting the misgendering in the apology was better than the same exact post without it
Something that strikes me as funky is the time between km's posts on page 2 vs this one. I'm unsure of the slower reply afterwards is ai although for some reason I feel like a scum player would feel more in the moment stunned about not wanting to reply in a way that isnt scummy
I think then TGP or Uncrowned or maybe iconeum because right now everyone else looks like town to me.In post 184, bugspray wrote:dostin: in the event of scum!datisi and town!bugspray who do you think the other partner could be?
Why don't you want to ask me anything? I don't think the reason you gave when you first voted me at first was very fair. You said I didn't question why Datisi said I'm town but I did question Datisi about other things and I have thought he was scum this whole time. So I don't think it's a good reason because why do I only have to ask certain questions when I think that somebody is mafia? If the game worked like that then it would be really boring and really easy for the mafia to know how to answer.In post 240, Uncrowned wrote:Hey Dats talk to me about the Dostin wagon when you can
Why are you talking about this hypothetically? In this game, coming from Datisi, is it NAI? Do you agree that it was an overblown reaction? Why or why not?In post 175, Uncrowned wrote:Oh and by the way the "overblown reaction" to being voted or scumread thing is super overrated as a scumtell imo and for most players I'd argue is NAI. I wouldn't put too much stake in it outside of newbie games tbh
I don't understand this. You look like you are only using meta on Datisi to read him this whole time, because you're saying he was scummy because his play looked like how he plays scum. Now you are saying he is scummy because his play looks nothing like how he plays scum? If you still honestly believe he is scum can't you find other reasons that make sense? There has to be another reason or else this doesn't make sense or else you are scum.In post 209, kookiemonster wrote:Getting this angry over a vote is interesting. You're purposefully changing your meta to throw me offIn post 150, Datisi wrote:ok, and???? do you maybe wanna talk about the second game we played, where town!you was townreading scum!me after i left you out to die and get ripped apart by the town??? like your read on me so far is *at best* 50% so don't even fucking startIn post 125, kookiemonster wrote:He says I have no experience with him and shades me for it but my very first game with him, I wanted to shoot scum!him day 1.![]()
Last time you did this to me, you had ~cool~ vibes which angered me big time. You see its not working anymore so you decide to try to throw me off by showing off some "townie anger"
No. You ARE scum.
Why are you asking me what kind of questions you should ask? Aren't you the one voting me? I can't tell you what reasons you have for voting me and I can't tell you what parts of it don't quite add up to you but I don't know why you hadn't talked to me at that point to try and make sure your vote was right.In post 257, Uncrowned wrote:...what would I ask you, exactly?
My SR on you is on your scummy P1 tone and your reach on Bugs/Datisi.
"Why don't you want to ask me anything" is such a weird thing to say.
You didn't even acknowledge my vote until now that your wagon has picked up? When it was just me voting you you ignored it entirely?
Dostin is scum.
You're still not talking to me here? Who are you talking to? You're just telling a made up story without even doing anything to try and make sure you can prove it. You're also not even giving me a chance to allow other to read me. By asking me questions you can make sure you're right and you can make other people see for themself that you are right or wrong. This angle doesn't make any sense if you are town and actually think I might be a mafia. You're twisting what actually happened by saying the "Feeling comfortable" part because I was answering a direct question I didn't randomly decide to theorize about Datisi/bugs on my own.In post 258, Uncrowned wrote:So FMPOV, scum!dostin sees towncrowned vote him early, for an admittedly minor reason. He feels no pressure. TGP and Datisi townlean him so he's feeling good and doesn't feel the need to respond.
Feeling comfortable, he makes that bad read on Datisi/Bugs.
He gets called out for it. Gets to E-1. NOW all of a sudden it's "unfair" that I'm voting you? Now you feel the need to reply, because you're on the chopping block?
Yeah. This is scum. We can wait for Ico/Ari to get back from. V/LA for more info/perspective but this is the flip we're making today.
I didn't really remember that username was in this game but I do remember liking their first post it sounded like smart thinking.In post 260, Datisi wrote:why are username and ari town to you?In post 254, dostin wrote:I think then TGP or Uncrowned or maybe iconeum because right now everyone else looks like town to me.In post 184, bugspray wrote:dostin: in the event of scum!datisi and town!bugspray who do you think the other partner could be?
Can you explain this? How does it look like one town and one scum if you don't even know who is who? This is just like Uncrowned talking about hypothetical situations while we are in a game with real things happening. What about my history with Uncrowned looks like I am scum and he is town? What about it looks like he is scum and I am town?In post 261, Datisi wrote:uncrowned and dostin give off a very strong t/s vibe to me. which is very scary if dostin flips town. i won't think about that for now.
bugs, do you have reads? why are you even voting dostin?
TGP made some weird posts at the start about me and Datisi. They looked like they knew too much for town player on the first page of the game. When they disagreed with Uncrowned's vote for me, they made it sound like there was a big secret reason for it but the reason doesn't make sense to me and it doesn't seem as important as when they first hinted about it.In post 269, Uncrowned wrote:Actually Dostin, here's a question.
Explain why TGP or Ico could be scum? Interesting how you go after two of the less active players and provide absolutely no reasoning whatsoever.
Why?In post 297, Iconeum wrote:uncrowned probably townIn post 269, Uncrowned wrote:Actually Dostin, here's a question.
Explain why TGP or Ico could be scum? Interesting how you go after two of the less active players and provide absolutely no reasoning whatsoever.
Ok I guess I can understand your reasons why you might say we are not mafia together even though you still didn't explain anything. But you have to be able to explain why we are definitely not both town right? That's the part of this that is not making sense to me.In post 353, Datisi wrote:dunno if i can, honestly. it's like, your actions don't look s/s. but, while i can see what uncrowned means when he says he thinks you're scum, and i don't necessarily *disagree*... something about his posts is still making me uneasy. i don't think i can explain it on a conscious level.In post 351, dostin wrote:Can you explain this?
Why do you say this is a useless question? Do you mean it's a useless question for me to ask you because it won't tell me anything about you? Or do you think it's useless because it won't tell me about Datisi? Are you giving me advice on playing the game well? Defending yourself? I am very curious about that part of your post.In post 360, Uncrowned wrote:If I make a comment like that generally and then don't elaborate further with my opinion, safe to say I agree with the general statement. That is to say, no, I don't think the reaction is NAI. This is a bit of a useless question imo.In post 344, dostin wrote:Why are you talking about this hypothetically? In this game, coming from Datisi, is it NAI? Do you agree that it was an overblown reaction? Why or why not?
If you really want to know the "why" it's because I try not to value emotion too much in my reads on people. Town frustration can definitely be a thing and I will use it here and there, but I think Datisi is good enough to use it as scum IF he wants to. However, because the initial push by Kookie was quite bad (something I've already stated) it's also not a huge surprise to me that Datisi reacted in that manner.
In terms of probability FMPOV, neither is much more likely than the other, hence it being NAI.
1. Would you think I looked like town if I questioned every single time somebody said something about me? Why did you deserve a response from me if you weren't even willing to engage me directly yourself? And why am I the only one at fault for that according to you?In post 361, Uncrowned wrote:I've already given you my reasons, and you're just saying they're "made-up" and "don't make any sense" without actually telling me why town!you would:In post 349, dostin wrote:Why are you asking me what kind of questions you should ask? Aren't you the one voting me? I can't tell you what reasons you have for voting me and I can't tell you what parts of it don't quite add up to you but I don't know why you hadn't talked to me at that point to try and make sure your vote was right.
You're still not talking to me here? Who are you talking to? You're just telling a made up story without even doing anything to try and make sure you can prove it. You're also not even giving me a chance to allow other to read me. By asking me questions you can make sure you're right and you can make other people see for themself that you are right or wrong. This angle doesn't make any sense if you are town and actually think I might be a mafia. You're twisting what actually happened by saying the "Feeling comfortable" part because I was answering a direct question I didn't randomly decide to theorize about Datisi/bugs on my own.
1: Ignoring my vote on you.
2: Making a stretch case on Dats/Bugs while Kookie was being pressured - which FTR I believe is +Equity between you two.
3: Only deciding to interact with me once your wagon reached high pressure.
What exactly do you mean by "prove it" ??? This is Mafia. I can't "prove" anything until I see you flip. Unless I'm an investigative role with results on you, or there's conf!town with a result on you, there will never be a 100% chance that you are or aren't Mafia. This applies to any game on this site. I am going off of probabilities, and I can't imagine your behavior coming from a town who is actually trying to solve the game. You look like a scum who tried to avoid pressure and then shat themselves horribly when they realized that their wagon was picking up.
What was there to talk about with you when I first voted, would you say? I voted you for your awkward P1 entrance and posting style. I then followed that up with pushing on you later on in the game for specific reasons which... you still haven't really answered outside of "this is unfair" and "it doesn't make sense" which isn't much of anything at all.
I don't NEED to ask you anything. If I'm going to make a push because I have a read on you, I'm going to force the issue. If we sat around here asking 21 questions every time we had a read on someone, we'd get talked out of it 99 times out of 100 because then you get into paranoia and a game of "ahh shit they're posting really well now under pressure but I thought they started scummy" or things of that nature.
Even now your posting is shallow. You're trying to shade and discredit without actually pointing out what is wrong with the case.
Ok? I asked a question about why he said that, not about what t/s means or why interactions are important. Why are you defending Datisi so much?In post 362, Uncrowned wrote:Interactions are arguably the biggest part of this game. They're what can solidify (or weaken) reads and are crucial to later in the game when you need to figure out who the scum-team is.In post 351, dostin wrote:Can you explain this? How does it look like one town and one scum if you don't even know who is who? This is just like Uncrowned talking about hypothetical situations while we are in a game with real things happening. What about my history with Uncrowned looks like I am scum and he is town? What about it looks like he is scum and I am town?
I don't like this whole "hypothetical" thing you've got going on because when you're playing a game where you don't have any information, EVERYTHING is going to be a hypothetical until it is proven one way or the other.
It's such a weird way to discredit people. It's like me saying to you right now "B-But Dostin... you're making a guess that I'm twisting the story right now! How do you know it's 100% true?" and trying to shut you down by saying that, because it can't be proven right away, it's false? What kind of thinking is that? How is that going to work in a game where there are no certainties outside of investigative results?
How come it's fine for you to discredit Datisi or me by saying stuff is hypothetical, but it's unfair when we say that your casing of Bugs/Dats didn't seem quite right?
You say interactions are the biggest part of the game, but you don't see why I would ask a question besides wanting to know the answer?In post 415, Uncrowned wrote:I meant useless question because the answer was already there for you to see.In post 412, dostin wrote:Why do you say this is a useless question? Do you mean it's a useless question for me to ask you because it won't tell me anything about you? Or do you think it's useless because it won't tell me about Datisi? Are you giving me advice on playing the game well? Defending yourself? I am very curious about that part of your post.
And uhh... no? I don't think I was trying to do either of those things? I just explained why the interaction came off as NAI to me.
I don't like some parts of this post but I have to go for now so I will explain later. I will also finish reading the game later. I got up to this post so far.In post 389, Datisi wrote:so, during the weekend, three people were practically not posting: ico and ari, who were VLA, and username, who usually doesn't post a lot.In post 385, Uncrowned wrote:@Datisi
I don't really get your point about active posting? Maybe I'm just misunderstanding it? You're saying scum are fine without posting but are part of the active posters?
during that weekend, with the vast vast majority of posts coming from the other 6 players, the game was:
(1) a shitshow, most of the people playing had scumreads on others that were playing, and there was a decent amount of infights and mudflinging
(2) decently active at times, *but* it also easily went 12+ hours without a single post
this makes me think that both scum are in the 6 player who were active during that period, because:
(1) it seemed like there is no cohesion inbetween the players, most were fighting/argung/scumreading with the most of others, which makes me think there's a higher ratio of scum purposefully sowing chaos
(2) the activity levels varying that strongly also make me think that, because i guess i think town is more ~consistent~ in their posting, while scum will post a lot if necessary but doesn't mind just ~dropping the posting~ if they are able to / can get away with it
obviously, this "case" relies on assumptions that (1) town, if by themselves, will be able to find each other and (2) town is more consistent in posting and won't as easily drop the game, *and* scum *will* drop the game if given the opportunity.
i'll admit i'm not... extremely confident in this theory, but eh. felt it would be of use to at least get it out there.
How did you come to this conclusion without first assuming/knowing that iconeum, ari, and username are town?In post 389, Datisi wrote:so, during the weekend, three people were practically not posting: ico and ari, who were VLA, and username, who usually doesn't post a lot.In post 385, Uncrowned wrote:@Datisi
I don't really get your point about active posting? Maybe I'm just misunderstanding it? You're saying scum are fine without posting but are part of the active posters?
during that weekend, with the vast vast majority of posts coming from the other 6 players, the game was:
(1) a shitshow, most of the people playing had scumreads on others that were playing, and there was a decent amount of infights and mudflinging
(2) decently active at times, *but* it also easily went 12+ hours without a single post
this makes me think that both scum are in the 6 player who were active during that period, because:
(1) it seemed like there is no cohesion inbetween the players, most were fighting/argung/scumreading with the most of others, which makes me think there's a higher ratio of scum purposefully sowing chaos
(2) the activity levels varying that strongly also make me think that, because i guess i think town is more ~consistent~ in their posting, while scum will post a lot if necessary but doesn't mind just ~dropping the posting~ if they are able to / can get away with it
obviously, this "case" relies on assumptions that (1) town, if by themselves, will be able to find each other and (2) town is more consistent in posting and won't as easily drop the game, *and* scum *will* drop the game if given the opportunity.
i'll admit i'm not... extremely confident in this theory, but eh. felt it would be of use to at least get it out there.
Why is it provided that I am town? I thought you thought I was scum? This whole post is about me being town and you don't even know what you'd do if I'm scum. So why do you, the person who started voting me first, have a plan for when I flip town but not for if I was scum?In post 390, Uncrowned wrote:That's reasonable, Ico.
I'm coming around to the idea of Scum!Bugs based on their interaction with the Dostin wagon. Provided the latter is town, I think there has to be one scum in the following 3 people who all voted on the same page to put him to E-1. Those people were User, Datisi and Bugs, in that order. Out of them, Bugs currently looks the worst.
Follow this with the whole post with the qualifier "If Dostin is town, then this could be scum!datisi being opportunistic" and it just looks like a scummy way to set up a "trajectory" on Datisi on a flip they know will be green.
This leads me to believe that there is only one scum between Dostin and Bugs.
What makes me hesitant on Bugs is that they are currently being SRed by almost everyone. This is LHF... but I don't want to fall into that trap of not eliminating there just because of that.
If Bugs flips scum, I think that the next scum is within Datisi/Kookie since both of them are trying to implicate the other as the partner. That might be bad logic. I don't know. It feels right to me though. I'm pretty sure a Bugs red flip also clears Dostin.
If Dostin flips scum, I'll have to look back at who that implicates, but I'm pretty sure it's TGP? Not 100% on that. A red flip on Dostin also most likely clears User.
Why did you have all the energy and willpower to make that long post for everyone to see but you won't do the easy part of making your words have actual meaning by applying it to the game.In post 394, Datisi wrote:re uncrowned: /shrug, at the moment, i'd say "everyone"? the game went 12 hours without posts (259-260), meaning nobody posted. i remember seeing that and thinking it was weird. gut is telling me that's more likely to happen if scum's in the more active slots driving the game.
if i had more faith in this, maybe i'd start checking to see who usually posts at that time window, but eh...
I never claimed townreads like that, I said I thought TGP and Uncrowned and maybe iconeum looked scummy and datisi asked about people I didn't mention like you and ari. You should click back in the topic and read stuff before making accusations because this looks like you are not really paying attention and are calling me scum just because lots of other people are.In post 396, iamausername wrote:In post 350, dostin wrote:
I didn't really remember that username was in this game but I do remember liking their first post it sounded like smart thinking.
Ari looks like town because of his joking around before going away for the weekend without doing anything serious. If I did that as mafia I would be way too paranoid that people thought I was scum while I'm gone.
yeah, this sounds like dostin got caught out claiming townreads on players he has no business townreading and is scrambling to make up reasons after the fact. i guess i can see the reasoning on Ari being a thing that someone might think, but his read on me really does not make sense.
my first post was an accusation directed at kookiemonster, who dostin has stated as a townread for... some reason, that he will apparently explain later (when?). if he thought my first post was smart thinking, it obviously wasn't smart enough to influence his reads any. but since that's the only post i've made that isn't calling him scum, it kind of had to be his go to for explaining why he would townread me. i do not buy it.
Who is the scum driving your wagon? Don't be like Uncrowned and Datisi just saying things about the game without looking at who is actually doing what and why.In post 400, bugspray wrote:alright i'm p sure dostin is scum and that mine is a scum driven counterwagon just judging by development speeds and whatnot
No I don't.
Again with this? All you are saying is "Either Bugs is town or scum and either Dostin is town or scum" and you never explain yourself. So you're saying nothing, and saying nothing else to explain that nothing. Why is one of us scum? How can you be so sure of that but have no clue who it is? You are still refusing to explain this.In post 401, Uncrowned wrote:I am convinced there is scum between Dostin and Bugs and the above post is pretty much confirming that idea for me.
Are you saying nothing else happened between when you first voted me and when I said your reasons were bad? When I started seeing you as suspicious it's because you were asking other people about me and had never asked me a single thing before and it was really really weird like you were trying to just get other players to vote me instead of actually trying to figure out if I'm town or give other people a chance to figure it out.In post 418, Uncrowned wrote:It's not that you did or didn't respond to it, it's the TIMING of when you chose to respond. You completely ignored the vote and then decided to call it "unfair" only after you had been pressured. How come it became unfair to you after you had been pressured? Why wasn't it unfair to you as soon as I did it?In post 414, dostin wrote:1. Would you think I looked like town if I questioned every single time somebody said something about me? Why did you deserve a response from me if you weren't even willing to engage me directly yourself? And why am I the only one at fault for that according to you?
2. Datisi (and you I think) asked me to elaborate so I explained. I would not have brought up those points if nobody asks. I'm sure everyone gets gut reads for stupid reasons sometimes that are hard to explain why it makes you so sure. Not saying that I was sure at all because that was one of my very first posts I'm pretty sure and not a lot happened in the game yet but I didn't think it's really that much of stretch, I don't really remember though.
3. What is the reason a mafia would have to go back to the first vote against them way later when other people give them pressure? That doesn't make sense it would just draw more attention to you. How does that make me scum?
You are attacking my word choice which is a pretty scummy thing to go on for a whole paragraph about. You can't "prove" anything but you can support it or at least make an attempt to prove the best you can, like in a court with lawyers.
And yeah, Datisi asked you to elaborate on it BECAUSE you had said it in the first place. So you did actually bring it up.
Mafia would most definitely try to shade someone's vote against them if they're worried they're getting lynched. How they go about defending themselves is player specific and I have zero meta on you. What, are they just going to sit there and let it happen? I was the beginning of your wagon and the main reason it was happening, it makes sense that you'd go to the root of the problem.
And yeah, I went in on your word choice because it makes zero sense. I gave my reasoning and you don't like it. That's whatever. You're not going to agree with me because it's my read on you. You can't sit there and talk about "proof" when I've already given my point of view on why I think you're scum. There is no proof until you flip. That's that.
Even now your case is still just defending yourself with questions and wine ("what is the reason a mafia would have to go back to the first vote" and "Would you think I looked like town if I questioned every single time someone said something about me?") that's giving me no confidence in your slot at all.
I understand that was Datisi's take on our interactions and I'm saying it's a bad take and Datisi is unable to actually explain or even just point to what things make him think that way and I think it's really weird that you keep defending him about it when it's perfectly reasonable for me to ask for explanation when somebody says something without explaining that.In post 421, Uncrowned wrote:Oh boy.In post 416, dostin wrote:Ok? I asked a question about why he said that, not about what t/s means or why interactions are important. Why are you defending Datisi so much?
I don't know why you are both just throwing game theory labels on every interaction and then getting upset when I say that's not an explanation. I don't care if you are hypothesizing I know that's a big part of the game but I don't like how you are both sometimes avoiding giving real opinions instead of applying theories to things without having to use your own words.
That last question doesn't make any sense those are two different things.
You do realize to Datisi that... from his perspective... you and me being a TvS WAS a "real thing" that was happening, right? I'm not throwing game theory, I'm literally trying to explain that that WAS Datisi's take on our interactions. You discredited the notion entirely by saying "if you don't even know who is who?" which is why I explained that people are going to have takes on stuff like that, because it is important.
And yes, the last question does actually make sense because you're putting us in a lose-lose situation where you can shade us no matter what we do.
If we give you a "hypothetical" you say that it's just that - a hypothetical, meaning that to you, it's not worth anything.
But when we give an actual take on your case, that too is apparently unfair. So what are we supposed to do, exactly?
You look like you're still trying to defend yourself here and you didn't pay attention to what I just said. I wasn't going to tell you but you leave me no choice than to just say it. I was asking to see what your answer was (which I already heavily implied in the post where I voted you) but instead of giving an answer which according to you should have been easy for you to do since the question was apparently already answered, you are getting defensive and angry and ignoring what I'm actually accusing you of.In post 422, Uncrowned wrote:You need to stop reaching.In post 417, dostin wrote:You say interactions are the biggest part of the game, but you don't see why I would ask a question besides wanting to know the answer?
The phrasing "useless question" was because there was already an implied answer that you just chose to ignore. Like I said, if I say something like "Hm, "overblown reactions" are something that I think can come from both town and scum, so to me it's NAI" and then I don't follow up with anything like "However, in this situation I think that it COULD be scum-indicative for ... " then that already lets you know that I didn't find it AI.
You're falling apart here.
VOTE: Dostin
When was I handing out townreads? I said not a lot of people looked scummy to me. You and Datisi who I think are both scum forced me to give reasons for that when I didn't have any reasons in the first place. This all feels like one big trap.In post 425, Uncrowned wrote:For someone who is adamant about needing "evidence" your reads are manufactured and have no backing behind them. You hand out TRs to people and then give minimal reasoning as to why they're town. The other time you were asked for reads, your SRs were Me (who has been directly pushing against you) and then on two slots that were inactive at the time and couldn't engage with you at all. Again, with nothing behind the reads.
You can't even keep your style consistent. For someone all about the evidence, you're severely lacking it when giving your "totally not BS 100% legitimate townreads"
I'm happy to flip this once Ari has completed catching up.
I thought you had a whole plan for when I die and reveal to be town, but now you would just give up?In post 426, Uncrowned wrote:I'm typically not one to deathtunnel but I just can't see this coming from a town player who is actively trying to solve the game. Nothing adds up here. I'll take the blame if this is wrong but I just don't see a townie engaging me in this manner at all.
I said sometimes I never ever said that was all you are doing this game. You are being a hypocrite by telling me to stop twisting your words. Most of the times you did that you were defending Datisi or trying to get people to vote for me.In post 427, Uncrowned wrote:Also the fact you come at me for this is comical considering that at most, maybe 5 of my posts have been about game theory? The rest has been questions, reads, pushes or comments on other interactions. All heavily game-related issues. Naturally you'd try and twist it though to make it seem as though my content has been meaningless, right?In post 416, dostin wrote:but I don't like how you are both sometimes avoiding giving real opinions instead of applying theories to things without having to use your own words.
Refusing to explain something in your own words can definitely be a scumtell because mafia don't have real reasons when they are pushing a lie. It is harder to make an in-depth wordy explanation look genuine than it is to vaguely compare it to a scenario that happens sometimes in the game. You can't even point to anything that is a part of the process to coming to that conclusion. I think you are just saying things that you think you can get away with saying without an explanation because you don't want to look fake.In post 430, Datisi wrote:like, my issue is, how do you call "i think dostin/uncrowned are likely to be t/s" a "game theory label"? how is solely using mafia lingo "game theory label"? like, i'm not avoiding giving a real opinion. my opinion *is* that you two are likely t/s. is the problem that i used the word "t/s" as opposed to "using my own words"? what even counts as a "real opinion" to you?In post 416, dostin wrote:I don't know why you are both just throwing game theory labels on every interaction and then getting upset when I say that's not an explanation. I don't care if you are hypothesizing I know that's a big part of the game but I don't like how you are both sometimes avoiding giving real opinions instead of applying theories to things without having to use your own words.
I don't remember if I did, but I don't remember the last thing kookiemonster has done in this game.In post 441, iamausername wrote:dostin, did you ever do this?In post 157, dostin wrote:For my kookiemonster town read I will elaborate on later.
I'm not twisting your points. The point of the post wasn't that I'm town but the scenario presented in the post assumes that I am town even though your entire game has been focusing on me being scum but you still didn't have any "next steps" for that probably because you know that I am town.In post 460, Uncrowned wrote:And my whole post wasn't about you being town. It was actions that made Bugs look scum. Hence why you're both in my elimpool. And that post explains why I don't believe you two could both be on the scumteam. Please stop trying to twist my posts.
What are you talking about? Are you confused about post 463? I'm not talking about your ISO, the part in quotemarks is what I am saying "t/s" means to me. It is a very weak point and I seriously do not understand why you and Datisi are acting like it is not.In post 464, Uncrowned wrote:...I actually don't even want to engage anymore with you. You're ignoring everything I've said.
I've already made my cases on both of you in previous posts. What aren't you getting about this?
Anyone else but you in this game would agree that I've made my case on both your slots. It's clear as day. Do I need to go through my ISO and quote every single post on you two?
If you're not going to read properly then don't bother interacting with me at all. Thanks.
You can't accuse me of ignoring you when you say things like this while I am replying to almost all of your posts.In post 488, dostin wrote:...I actually don't even want to engage anymore with you. You're ignoring everything I've said.
I don't care. None of that is what I'm talking about at all. You are being such a hypocrite. You complain that I am ignoring you and twisting words but that is all you have been doing to me (ignoring my points and questions and twisting my meaning over and over and over again) since I started fighting back against your push against me. It is so obvious that you are scum and you didn't expect me to fight back when you started trying from the very first page of the game to get me voted out today.In post 467, Uncrowned wrote:Spoiler:
This is just picking SOME of the stuff out of my ISO that has been almost 100% game-related, and has aimed at solving either you, Bugs, or another slot in this game.
You are absolutely delusional if you think that this is all hypothetical, or that I haven't explained my reasoning.
I've developed reads through questions, interactions, wagons and reactions to my pushes.
Trying to boil down all of my posting in this game as "nothing" or "filler" or "theoretical" is complete bullshit and you know it.
I'm actually going to be disappointed if you're town because it's clear you have no intentions of engaging with me in good faith or actually paying attention to what I've been saying this entire game.
I don't think it's going to matter though because you're only furthering my suspicions that you're scum at this point.
I feel like you keep pretending to be dense to avoid answering to my findings and accusations. You can't tell me what I'm allowed to ask when I am scumhunting. It is a fundamental of this game to ask people questions and figure out what alignment they are. That is not what you have been doing against me at all this whole game. At first you avoided talking to me at all and just tried to convince everyone to follow you, and now all you are doing is defending yourself and trying to imply that I'm an idiot and scum.In post 471, Uncrowned wrote:...holy shit dude. Are you being serious right now?
Me: Hey! I don't someone reacted in an "overblown" way is alignment indicative!
You: What does it mean for Datisi's alignment?
Do you see how that is a ridiculous question? If I THOUGHT it was AI for Datisi, I would've said something about it in the same post. I would have said:
Me: Hey! Normally, I don't think someone reacting in that way is alignment indicative. HOWEVER, I think in this case it could show that Datisi is [insert alignment here] because of this this & this
What aren't you getting about this?
You are still putting so many words in my mouth and being such a hypocrite by doing that. Maybe you are even projecting with this post here I don't know. I never complained about being asked those questions, I answered them. When you said my answers were weak, I explained why they were weak. This post makes it out to be like I was the one getting defensive about being asked to explain myself but it is justIn post 472, Uncrowned wrote:HOLD UP
"Forced" you to give reasons?
No no no.
That's not how this works.
If you don't have reasons, just say that. We didn't force anything out of you. We just asked you. You know, like how you said earlier? Asking questions helps you sort things? Oh, but it's fine when you do it, yeah?
This is so hypocritical lmao
You keep getting angry at the smallest semantics because I'm right and you have nothing to say against my actual points.In post 474, Uncrowned wrote:This misrepping is ridiculous. WHERE did I say I would give up? You're literally pulling shit from thin air and trying to act as if it's what I'm saying. You may as well go and start typing in the sections where you're quoting me and passing it off as something I wrote. That's how far you're stretching this BS.