976: mystyry box of sylvyr I: isis game. day 3
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
That's less funny though...
It's this reaction:
Regardless of whether or not you deem it appropriate I'm not sure there's much point to you arguing with this, it's not a factual "On no you ditten" "Oh yes she did" kind of thing. You said what you said, it has a whiff of scum to me.In post 33, DoubtingThomas wrote: Not sure if it's real thought to... scum read me for you voting me before i even posted? How did you expect me to respond?
"Oh! You are voting me before I even posted? Why are you scum reading me?"
Doesn't make sense, right?
VOTE: skye-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
In post 71, Dunnstral wrote:
OK, vote for AkarinIn post 70, NicCage wrote:Because I wanted somebody to suggest me someone to vote for
Am I not good enough for you?In post 72, NicCage wrote:Why should I?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
That's what they all say *sniffle*In post 89, NicCage wrote: Uh it's not you, it's me.
Should I be voting for this DoubtingThomas character?
And it depends on how much you like early Day 1 Dastardly Deed -1 (DD-1?)
DT is my top scumread right now, but...
It's 5 to Perform a Dastardly Deed
I think it’s currently at
DT (3): Akarin, Gypyx, Mastina
gypyx (2): DT, SKYE
SKYE (1): PlusJOYED
NicCage (1): Nona
Not Voting: (2): Dunn, NicCage
For future reference, Page 2 DT vs. SKYE peak wagons were:
DT (3): Akarin, SKYE, Gypyx
SKYE (3): PlusJOYED, Mastina, DT-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
But putting you at DD-1 isn't something Nic should do on a whim.In post 97, DoubtingThomas wrote: also but what?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I don't think it's a question of read strength so much as playstyle, strategy, and how spicy you're feeling. The game is smaller than I'm used to. I think in a 13p I probably would, but we have 1 Mistaken Dastardly Deed instead of 3 here so taking more time to look at past games and get real contributions from everyone Day 1 seems more important, and if DT is groupscum and we Mob Justice them correctly, doing it too early leaves less room to look for associations with the partner.In post 104, NicCage wrote: Well yeah if I vote it's on me. But would you vote for him? Is he a D1DD-1 for you, or just a D1DD-2?
So no, I wouldn't, but an excitable spicy corner of my heart really wants to, especially in light of the 1v1 declaration.
Both because it seems like an over-reaction to pressure, and because I think it'd generate some interesting interactions from the other players.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
What about the votecounts makes you think this?In post 95, DoubtingThomas wrote:
1 scum in akarin/gypxy/mastinaIn post 91, Akarin wrote: I think it’s currently at
DT (3): Akarin, Gypyx, Mastina
gypyx (2): DT, SKYE
SKYE (1): PlusJOYED
NicCage (1): Nona
Not Voting: (2): Dunn, NicCage
For future reference, Page 2 DT vs. SKYE peak wagons were:
DT (3): Akarin, SKYE, Gypyx
SKYE (3): PlusJOYED, Mastina, DT
and 1 in skye/plustjoyed/nona/dunn/niccage i think
Also why?In post 102, DoubtingThomas wrote:i can go with akarin/gypyx/mastina very not likely to w/w-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Um, not 1 instead of 3, it's 2 instead of 3. Points stands, just said wrong number.In post 113, Akarin wrote:we have 1 Mistaken Dastardly Deed instead of 3 here-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
So, does Nic's recent posting make you feel better or worse about him?In post 68, Nona wrote:that's interesting
considering that ari also expected to be read better by you, i guess it's likely true.
VOTE: NicCage
And what do you think of Gypyx's questions about Nic's posting, you seem like you might have a perspective closer to Gypyx's?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
There's like a 64% (?) chance for any random group of 3 to have a scum in them at this size, right?In post 129, DoubtingThomas wrote:I mean. I just find it less likely for 2/2 wolves to get on me 5 pages into the game. I am more likely to see at least 1 wolf is in the 3, although it's not an impossibility to have both wolves to not have voted me. regardless, i independently scum read xygypx
Do you actually think it's more likely than a random set of 3 players?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
She. And really when there are only 2 scum in the game, handing out townreads to everyone else but me and the 2 scumreads makes that null realistically a lean scum on TGP's part.In post 170, Gypyx wrote:Also why is akarin in null? He's pretty towny imo-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
@DT
If you take 3 random players, 18/28 possible 2-person scumteams, or 64% will have 1 scum within a set of 3 players.In post 140, Akarin wrote:
There's like a 64% (?) chance for any random group of 3 to have a scum in them at this size, right?In post 129, DoubtingThomas wrote:I mean. I just find it less likely for 2/2 wolves to get on me 5 pages into the game. I am more likely to see at least 1 wolf is in the 3, although it's not an impossibility to have both wolves to not have voted me. regardless, i independently scum read xygypx
Do you actually think it's more likely than a random set of 3 players?
Given this, do you think your "at least 1 in 3" ismorelikely than that random 64% chance?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I mean, obviously we're talking about reading the game, I just mean that if I said "Slots 1, 2, and 3 likely contain at least 1 scum" on post 1, I'd be more likely to be right than not, so the kind of logic you were doing in that post is unhelpful and kind of bad, which is what a few people have been trying to say to you I think.
Do you think any push on a town player is >rand wolf agenda?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
The point is me trying to figure out your thought process, you were wanting me to engage with you earlier when I didn't have much to actually ask you, why the resistance to it now?In post 182, DoubtingThomas wrote:yes. >rand wolf agenda if 3 ppl (2 votes away from maj) stack up less than 3 pages into the game?
that's what i've been saying. what is the point of this question?
So do you think a wagon getting to DD-2 on page 3 is unusual?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Because it literally says that in the setup.In post 209, Gypyx wrote:Akarin / nic might be the team
Akarin, while you're here, why did you assume 2 scum vs 7 town?
5 3rd parties of which 2 of them share a wincon and a PT is a 2-player scumteam. But we know which it is as soon as we get a non-town flip.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
In post 216, Gypyx wrote:Yeah, akarin's reaction doesn't feel genuine, like, he's making kinda convoluted explainations and trying to deflect the pressureShe
And what don't you understand?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
@DoubtingThomas, PlusJOYED, & NicCage
Do you 3 agree with this logic?
Gypyx quoted himself saying I was towny in the post where he voted me, then doubled down on the argument after the setup was quoted by someone other than me, defending me basically immediately after he voted.In post 214, Akarin wrote:Okay, the only way I see this move making sense for teamscum!Gypyx is if he's partners with Dunn and panicked about how little resistance there might be to a Dunn Dastardly Deed. Otherwise it just seems too weird to be scum.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
My deepest apologies, Your Majesty.
I just wanted specific yes/no responses from the people on the Gypyx wagon in particular but of course I'm happy to hear what everyone else thinks too.
— Akarin-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
What's convoluted? I thought I explained everything pretty clearly and I'd like to clear up any confusion.In post 245, Gypyx wrote:
Sorry, and wdym by "not understeand"?In post 217, Akarin wrote:In post 216, Gypyx wrote:Yeah, akarin's reaction doesn't feel genuine, like, he's making kinda convoluted explainations and trying to deflect the pressureShe
And what don't you understand?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I want to ask what's an example of a better question but that feels like a waste of time since I can't imagine you giving an answer I'd find helpful. At least give it some thought though? If you were in my shoes, what would you ask you about the larger portion of your posts?In post 227, DoubtingThomas wrote:
I think there are like better questions to have asked me if you really wanted to sort my thought process out. I mean that's like a very very small portion out of a lot of posts I madeIn post 183, Akarin wrote:
The point is me trying to figure out your thought process, you were wanting me to engage with you earlier when I didn't have much to actually ask you, why the resistance to it now?In post 182, DoubtingThomas wrote:yes. >rand wolf agenda if 3 ppl (2 votes away from maj) stack up less than 3 pages into the game?
that's what i've been saying. what is the point of this question?
So do you think a wagon getting to DD-2 on page 3 is unusual?
The point, for me, is to look at things you've said that don't make sense to me and try to figure out if you got to that point by a town thought process or a scum thought process. And honestly if it's a town thought process leading to a bad conclusion I'd like to at least make you rethink it, but that's secondary because most people can't really be talked into reconsidering things if they don't decide to do it themselves.
So could you answer whether or not you think a wagon getting to DD-2 on page 3 is unusual?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Ahem
@PlusJOYED
Do you agree with
Asking about the logic, not if you'll vote Dunn right now.In post 219, Akarin wrote:
Gypyx quoted himself saying I was towny in the post where he voted me, then doubled down on the argument after the setup was quoted by someone other than me, defending me basically immediately after he voted.In post 214, Akarin wrote:Okay, the only way I see this move making sense for teamscum!Gypyx is if he's partners with Dunn and panicked about how little resistance there might be to a Dunn Dastardly Deed. Otherwise it just seems too weird to be scum.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Okay, so everyone but Mastina has posted since I voted Dunn, and Mastina had him as like her #2 scumread I believe.
Gypyx:Immediately votes me, pushes the scumslip thing even after The Empress defends me, and asks again if no one's interested in voting me today. Also
NicCage: Votes Dunn, mentions that he expected Dunn to behave differently after Dunn's initial suspicion of Nic rather than mostly responding when he's the target of someone else's reads. Asks Mastina about Dunn's usual play and what towniness she expected but didn't see. Nic obviously took time to look at Dunn's posts, activity elsewhere on the site, etc and make a big post on it before placing this vote.In post 246, Gypyx wrote:And btw, i've played a game with dunnstral recently, he was about as inactive as here and town, so i'm not sure this is AI
Then Nic moves vote to TGP after TGP's further push on Nic.
DoubtingThomas: Votes Dunn for hardly trying.
TheGoldenParadox: Is fine to compromise on Dunn later but says Nic is the better vote today.
PlusJOYED:
That's it, despite me specifically asking for his opinion.In post 239, PlusJOYED wrote:i'll go nic
SKYEscrapers--tris: Not voting Dunn because she remembers him as being someone who isn't a very active player.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I'd also like to say that I'm not voting Dunn because of lack of activity despite people being quick to characterize it that way.
I have more reason to think every single other player in the game is town than I do Dunn, and Dunn works in any possible scumteam IMO compared to every other player having a few people I wouldn't pair them with. That's a related but different issue than inactivity = scum.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Ignoring deadline compromises and assuming Dunn never gets replaced, at what point in the game is having no interactions enough to get you on a Dunn wagon?In post 259, TheGoldenParadox wrote: dunn's interactions are not great but at the same time i don't have enough posting from them to really be on board a dunn wagon
akarin what do you think about nic
Nic is actually one of my top townreads right now and I won't vote for him.
My hot take is that I could actually see TGP vs. Nic as Town v. Town.
TGP, I think your reasoning against Nic looks very much based on that very early game stuff and pretty confbiased for the more recent posts. "Unproductive and inflammatory shitposting" isn't at all how I'd describe his more recent play, and your interaction here:In post 198, mastina wrote:Because the you-Nic interactions scream scum-scum and your play is highly lackluster; I'd like to think I know you as a player well enough to reliably get a read on when you're town and this game I'm not seeing the town at all.[Dunn]
I usually can see you as town from your first three or so posts at latest, generally speaking.
You've more than that and those townvibes are nonexistent.
mis-represents Mastina, to my reading.In post 240, TheGoldenParadox wrote: so, let me get this straight. mastina is explaining a scumread on dunnstral based, largely, on her reading of the interactions between you two as S/S, and yet you completely ignore thepost you quotedand simply vote dunnstral with mediocre reasons at best, and ask mastina to explain dunn further
like this screams "bussing your scumpartner for towncred" and it's terrible
I can see where Nic is coming from in voting for you over this, but I can also imagine it coming from confbias. Mastina did mention the SvS thing elsewhere, I can see how it could stand out in memory, but that didn't look to be the entirety of her reasoning.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
If you're looking for a group of 2, it doesn't matter if they're Mafia or a 3rd party. You can still look for associations.In post 275, Gypyx wrote: The reasoning you expressed about the 3rd parties not counting as scum, that's kinda weird imo, like, because the size of a scumteam is 1, you don't include it?
We know 2 of the 3rd parties would share a chat, the others can't be hunted for by associations anyway and there's not going to be 5 anti-town win conditions even in the lots-of-3rd-parties scenario.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I would have taken Mastina for a setup reader, are you actually not?In post 398, mastina wrote:Well this changes things.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Yeah, I'm still absolutely not voting Nic, this play doesn't make any sense at all from a Scum NicCage perspective.
And I'm a bit suspicious that TGP is leaning into that confbias narrative I suggested when I said TGP-Nic might be TvT. Recent posts are pretty over the top, but I'm not sure that isn't just wanting to push for the kill excited town.
I'm actually gonna
VOTE: PlusJOYED
Feel like that slot has the highest chance of flipping scum right now. You can see him checking out of the game and only responding to the most recent posts to avoid a prod on the last couple posts, but supports a wagon (without voting it) on the last pseudo-prod-dodge. I know that's not much of a "case" but about to lurk-out town I feel like would be less likely to support a wagon when they have no idea what's going on, while scum would be telling themselves they'd come back later and justify it. And really I don't see any reason to think Plus so towny, don't really get where that read comes from.
I'd also be willing to consider TGP or Mastina but I'm conflicted on both, whole worldview was kind of shaken up here.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
Basically I mean you're being so scummy as to practically be claiming Mafia. And yet I think you are most likely Town.In post 450, Gypyx wrote:Idk, i understood the deadline thingy as : if someone replaces plus, we get more time, so not guaranteed
And what's openwolfing btw?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
NicIn post 441, NicCage wrote:There is no good reason to go Mastina without the Dunn=Scum
???In post 419, NicCage wrote:In post 398, mastina wrote:
Well this changes things.In post 279, NicCage wrote:Cause it’s mentioned in the setup, either 2 scum and 7 town, or 4 town and 5 non-town, 2 of which share a wincon
If the game's two scum and seven town, then obviously there's a maximum of one nontown in Nic/Dunn since schadd_ wouldn't make a scum-scum neighborhood and I doubt they're lying about the existence of one.
But if the game's four town and 5 nontown, then I'd expect both of them to be nontown here, presumably with players like DoubtingThomas and SKYEscrapers filling in the gaps (because 5 nontown allows for scum to legitimately scumhunt).
I don't like how Mastina's read on me changes here.In post 402, mastina wrote:When it comes to Nic btw: in the neighborhood if Dunnstral is scum (and all signs point to this), Nic cannot be scum with Dunn. In a 7-2 world, this clears Nic as Nic would by necessity be town (due to no scum-scum neighborhoods).
But in a 4-5 world, Nic's probably not town because his claim seems very much like a 3p claim, actually. The sorts of things he's doing don't seem to make sense as town, but fit as some form of 3p.
We know from the setup that daytalk is enabled everywhere, and scum always share a PT anyway. So why can't Dunn and I just be lying about the neighborhood, and actually just be buddies? We don't know for sure yet what Dunn's role will say. Maybe the word neighbor won't even appear in it.
And of course, the stated motive for the partial read change is based on a revelation of the new setup, not on reads. It's a great excuse to not have to explain yourself in any substantial way.
Sure is funny, since Mastina has put forward Dunn and I and S/S this entire game, with no change. Until now, until I've made it much less profitable. Because if Dunn flips scum, she knows that if she's still suspicious of me it's going to turn into a slugfest between the two of us. And if I lose and am eliminated, everything I said before will be justified, and it'll become very difficult for her to win. Much better to start backing off on it now.
You really think this stuff is only true if Dunn is scum with Mastina?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
TGP wasn't going on Dunn either.
You moved your vote off Plus with this post
While saying you didn't want Dunn, you were the one who was making Dunn seem inevitable. Your vote was the only vote of difference between the wagons.In post 418, Gypyx wrote:VOTE: dunnstraal
Not a fan of this vote, but we need an exe, and i'm not taking risks about the deadline extension
And TGP wasn't voting Dunn either. Their vote stayed on Nic the whole time.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
In the words of Noir Spiderman himself:In post 462, NicCage wrote: What is the Mastina argument without Dunn?
How is this any less true if Dunn were to flip Town? You think people wouldn't go after you after a Dunn Town flip?In post 419, NicCage wrote: I don't like how Mastina's read on me changes here.
And of course, the stated motive for the partial read change is based on a revelation of the new setup, not on reads. It's a great excuse to not have to explain yourself in any substantial way.
Sure is funny, since Mastina has put forward Dunn and I and S/S this entire game, with no change. Until now, until I've made it much less profitable. Because if Dunn flips scum, she knows that if she's still suspicious of me it's going to turn into a slugfest between the two of us. And if I lose and am eliminated, everything I said before will be justified, and it'll become very difficult for her to win. Much better to start backing off on it now.-
-
Akarin
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
I think for a disturbingly large number of players:
Dunn flips scum -> Nic is scumbuddies with Dunn and threw him under the bus.
Dunn flips town -> Nic forced it through and is getting away with too much, obvscum.
I'm not saying you should back off out of fear, I'm saying your logic doesn't particularly point to Mastina + Dunn as the only scum team where that has a scum narrative.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
You're not weird.In post 509, MathBlade wrote:I may be weird but I think Nic + Dunn is TvT.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
The earlier clarification:
Where does Nic assume 3rd Party game before this recent exchange after Math joins the game? I can't find it.In post 417, NicCage wrote:@Akarin
My role says 90% town and 10% mafia. I have assumed that mafia could mean any non-town, given the possible setups, but the wording of the role pm gives no further clarification.
Anyway, Nic reads like he's kind of been on tilt about the Dunn wagon collapsing today, and the Mastina-Dunn thing was originally a scum assumption on Nic's part I believe.
Also, Nic, did you figure out which Isis-sentence your role is linked to?-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
@Math
Is this what you mean?In post 551, MathBlade wrote:He says there could be 4 town and 5 third party-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
IMO you're being crazy here, MathBlade.
That idea is in the setup post of the game, I was thinking about it a lot in early game too. Yes Nic should have clarified with schadd, but that's not an assumption that it's a 3rd party setup, it's him bringing it up as a possibility.
You're treating something very very thin like it's an open-and-shut case and it's just not.-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
Akarin Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1870
- Joined: August 20, 2015
-
-
-