In post 419, Farren wrote:385 is interesting. I want to come back to this later. There may be something Town here, depending on what happens later.
what does this mean lol
I think 385 may be a sign that I'm misreading you, but I need more information. It's not the sort of information where I can just ask a question, get an answer, and go from there, so I have to wait and see what happens.
In post 426, Farren wrote:If you are scum, I don't want to just blurt things out and give you a chance to try to manufacture anything.
Wow, I think you're just saying that to make less content, wolfy
(Disclaimer: Joke)
Hm... mildly tempted to vote North, though
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
Some of the things they are focusing on are... strange
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
nsg are you specifically trying anything different this game from how you normally play? if you consider yourself to have a "normal" style or method of playing to begin with
In post 336, Dannflor wrote:I'm wary of the secondary tier T3 scum reads because I feel like if town - he's going to be a slot scum are always going to want to have in their back pocket as a miselim
like the way people are sort of dancing around his slot is feeling... performative? at the very least it makes me think Enchant/T3 are less likely to be aligned - the "meta I can't talk about" is a non-case but also taken seriously enough that it reads genuine. could easily be scum picking a random push on an easy townie but i lean towards that not being an lolrandom bus
ive been nursing a paranoia nsg read since basically her entrance but i think that paranoia was bound to come up at some point this game so im not really giving it any credence until nsg gets a chance to play more
what exactly pinged you about either of our posts?
to be honest, i'm not sure why i would be a "paranoia" read at all. really, i think that i've been townread far too easily and quickly this game – if anything, i would expect to either be basically null. of course, i don't think that my being townread quickly is necessarily the product of scum, but for you specifically i feel like i have memory of you by default being more hesitant to townread me in the most recent games we've played together. i feel like i'm not really seeing any of that attitude here, or i suppose i'm seeing less of it.
This feels like 5 sentences basically saying the same thing.
I don't have a read on you but I think Ich is town -> that implies you are scum.
I started to write this post with placing a vote on you and explaining something. But you know what? Let's see what you have to say - Why do you think this?
In post 431, Dannflor wrote:nsg are you specifically trying anything different this game from how you normally play? if you consider yourself to have a "normal" style or method of playing to begin with
nope, not really.
In post 435, T3 wrote:This feels like 5 sentences basically saying the same thing.
i like to explain myself when i feel i actually have a point to make. sometimes it's hard to translate what you're intuitively feeling into words.
In post 393, Esooa wrote:@koba apparently you're the one who said shit about flow meta
wanna explain your read on them
ya they were traitor in a game I was in with them and I wrecked them, but only after d1 when their partner flipped and I saw the associative. basically if a scum flips, we can figure out if flow is scum but also the fact that flow was gathering attention was pretty +town for flow given that meta.
In post 431, Dannflor wrote:nsg are you specifically trying anything different this game from how you normally play? if you consider yourself to have a "normal" style or method of playing to begin with
nope, not really.
In post 435, T3 wrote:This feels like 5 sentences basically saying the same thing.
i like to explain myself when i feel i actually have a point to make. sometimes it's hard to translate what you're intuitively feeling into words.
despite me throwing a pretty large amount of shade your way, you have not commented on it at all to the best of my memory, why is that?
"I'm not coming to your house with a paper shredder" - Flow
"I honestly had no idea how to converse with (Flow). (Flow) brought up architecture to start with and I was like "oh do you like architecture" and then he was like "uhm no I know nothing about it." And then he threw something out a window??"
In post 441, Ich Troje wrote:despite me throwing a pretty large amount of shade your way, you have not commented on it at all to the best of my memory, why is that?
i don't really recall seeing anything from you that seemed to really warrant a response. was there some question i missed? apart from that, all i remember is just a general suspicion you had of me, and the thought that i discredit people as scum, or something. (that's not an attempt to downplay what you said, i'm really just speaking off memory here)
In post 431, Dannflor wrote:nsg are you specifically trying anything different this game from how you normally play? if you consider yourself to have a "normal" style or method of playing to begin with
by the way dann, i'm curious. i'm decently confident that you're relatively similar to me when it comes to following a flow of making a prediction, asking a question, and updating based on the response. so what was your prediction for this question, and how would you have updated either way i would have answered it?
In post 448, northsidegal wrote:troje, i'm also curious to hear your thoughts as to seemingly thinking that both me and esooa are scum. thoughts there?
thoughts are this question made me laugh because of how vague it is like are you afraid of details