[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 13142343 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 1035: Commandless Chain of Command [game over!] - Mafiascum.net
In post 149, skitter30 wrote:Yeah that's about where i'm at too. I dont really have a lot of reads yet, which is weird
Hm.
there's a kind of mindset peculiarity here now that i'm thinking about it more.
darby is in a hurry to push out of rvs (which is like, great) but i feel like dwlee is probably the most vocally solve-ey person itt atm. i think there's reasons to press against dwlee so far but they're also reasonably well townread so pushing back against this seems like it's against the grain.
despite all of this darby doesn't:
- actually seem interested in playing a post-rvs game; just in having an early serious vote;
- appear to present any urgency in pushing dwlee against others' townreads on them.
pedit:
but either way: i don't believe that's something you actually think is scummy!!!1!
aha but this sentence implies that you think i'm looking for things to find scummy which means you think i'm actually scumhutning which means you know i'm town! but you're still voting me!!! perspective slip!!!!! VOTE: skitter
Post
Post #182 (isolation #11) » Sun Nov 28, 2021 4:19 pm
Postby DArby »
In post 181, skitter30 wrote:i mean:
- i thought the exact same thing and i know i'm town
- does me doing that have any implications for my alignment for you ?
In post 175, skitter30 wrote:i mean there might be a process but i'm not trusting you
Well okay so:
Dwlee is too complex a player to make the initial push in 26 in a literal way and I don’t think town them would do that.
even if they don't know iv?
@tw: eh a little bit. like i think they're townie, and i like they have the same thoughts as me, but i don't think they're townie *because* they have the same thoughts if that makes sense
It just seems disingenuous. Even if it was ambiguous, it’s LHF and I don’t think the push itself was in good faith.
In post 121, the worst wrote:I shall be your bucket of water, bicycle pal
lmk if I should know who you are
i think you'll figure it out :^)
I stayed up all night sorting every account who's ever signed up for mafiascum.net into two categories:
- users who would use the :^) emoticon.
- users who wouldn't use the :^) emoticon.
I then sorted the users who would by probability of them using it within 5 posts of entering a game with a meme and I have a shortlist of only 1362 people
I'm closing in on you Cycle. I will catch you.
btw evidence suggests only 2.6 people in this game would ever use the :^) emoticon. this post doesn't count because I'm using it for science, not joy.
To expand on this: I think I pushed Noraa until death in squid game on the fact that they asked a question about something that was in the town role pm. I've pushed people on "Idk I think you're scum" or "I looked at this ISO and got a vibe" or even more simple things. And that's later in the game. I think you're either horribly misinformed about how I play (which goes to show metabad :^)) or you're making up reasons to push me
In post 193, skitter30 wrote:I kinda dont know why, but i think darby is town for this
What?
To expand on this: I’m dumb regardless of alignment. I just have a knack for punctuation and texting dry unless intentionally trying to be “comical”. Don’t read that deep into it.
In post 193, skitter30 wrote:I kinda dont know why, but i think darby is town for this
What?
To expand on this: I’m dumb regardless of alignment. I just have a knack for punctuation and texting dry unless intentionally trying to be “comical”. Don’t read that deep into it.
To expand even further T3 holds a 100% read rate on me because I will say something stupid or passive and he’ll read it as town. I just have yet to naturally role as scum in a traditional game. I’m sure I’m equally as dumb as scum.
In post 193, skitter30 wrote:I kinda dont know why, but i think darby is town for this
What?
To expand on this: I’m dumb regardless of alignment. I just have a knack for punctuation and texting dry unless intentionally trying to be “comical”. Don’t read that deep into it.
To expand even further T3 holds a 100% read rate on me because I will say something stupid or passive and he’ll read it as town. I just have yet to naturally role as scum in a traditional game. I’m sure I’m equally as dumb as scum.
Ok. Not sure what exactly you're protesting but your vibe on the prior page feels somewhat townie
If anything you protesting me reafing it this way is even townier
I felt I got town points for saying something wrong. I don’t want to eventually get scum read for actually playing smart.
In post 242, DArby wrote:I felt I got town points for saying something wrong. I don’t want to eventually get scum read for actually playing smart.
I mean i'm not sure which part you think is wrong, but i think your approach is genuine. You dont have to be right to be town
And i'm not sure you arent playing smart now either? Or at least i'm not sure what bit that's referring to
But idk u feel relatively genuine to me rn
It’s a reference to T3 town reading me for my ignorance in my intro and Dwlee bringing up a good point that I later retracted. I suppose I’m not fully sure what you townread me for at that point but I assumed it was for my assumption.
In post 253, DArby wrote:It’s a reference to T3 town reading me for my ignorance in my intro and Dwlee bringing up a good point that I later retracted. I suppose I’m not fully sure what you townread me for at that point but I assumed it was for my assumption.
- t3 is in the game?
- honestly i'm not sure exactly why i found that exchange to be townie for you, ig it just feels like this is a real thought process you're having + the way you're working through your suspicions/questions of this townread feels real and townie to me
No I mention T3 because [redacted] and he townread me in two games that just ended today where I’m town.
Post
Post #370 (isolation #32) » Mon Nov 29, 2021 6:17 pm
Postby DArby »
In post 368, Something_Smart wrote:That is a good point, I suppose. It seems pretty weird to suggest that scum are lurking right off the bat, especially over a holiday weekend.
No but what I find interesting is that both of these are logical thought processes. Both you and skitter. I want to look at something tho.
Post
Post #376 (isolation #34) » Mon Nov 29, 2021 6:31 pm
Postby DArby »
In post 348, Mindhack Diva wrote:I'm really not sure how to parse this game, it feels a lot more one-dimensional over the last few pages than it really should with the events of the game so far.
-A
Here.
Thank you SS, you gave me context.
I’m not sure how to feel about this post, but the thought process is interesting that “scum is probably lurking” but “the game is one dimensional now”.
I don’t think they’re really correlated. But it’s framed as if it should be(?)
I’m really tired so I can’t word what I’m feeling too well but this is what I’m getting from the logic:
<Scum is lurking>
<The game isn’t as lively as I’d want it to be>
<This is odd and implies that EITHER scum has yet to sow seeds of deception OR scum is conspiring to make it look as if scum is lurking>
I don’t think they’re as linked as Diva thinks it is.
Post
Post #452 (isolation #36) » Wed Dec 01, 2021 1:12 am
Postby DArby »
In post 382, skitter30 wrote:I think alyssa is saying that she feels like the game is relatively, but is surprised that once she pointed that out, pressure didnt relly turn to the inactive people. Is that right?
In post 382, skitter30 wrote:I think alyssa is saying that she feels like the game is relatively, but is surprised that once she pointed that out, pressure didnt relly turn to the inactive people. Is that right?
No, the game just sort of gravitated towards that frame of mind once I pointed it out, and when I indicated that I thought the way the game was going was oddly one-track, the general response was agreement despite the first causing the second.
In post 970, DArby wrote:I disagree if it was a normal day that I was hoping it would be because then I’d be able to push more of Skitter.
I still don’t see how a fast day helps town.
It forces scum to narrow down the field without any info. Obviously if they had known skitter was the vig they would have killed her instead, so getting A50 killed was actually pretty good.
In post 990, Dwlee99 wrote:I didn't put a much thought into who the vig was because I wanted to check IV again and I figured vig would claim the next day anyway
why did you want to check me twice again?
so the consensus here is dwlee can only be town here if scum roleblocked me correct? there’s no other way he can be town? Just want to make sure I am understanding this
^
I’d like to once again say that I’m good on a Dwlee lim.
In post 996, DArby wrote:FMPoV Skitter isn’t scum since there’s no counter claim and I’ve investigated her.
the fact that you've investigated me is irrelevant, i had a proveable action that nobody has counterclaimed
You pointing this out is also irrelevant unless you’re shading me, which I think you are.
If d2 didn’t end as quickly as it did, I would be cleared as well. The start of d3 and you claiming happened before I posted. I’m only in doubt because I haven’t posted quickly enough.
Post
Post #1024 (isolation #54) » Sat Dec 11, 2021 6:28 pm
Postby DArby »
In post 1023, skitter30 wrote:i mean that could be true, sure, but you could also be scum making up a claim that isn't verifiable, how am i to tell the difference?
1040 wants to flip me when I'm saying I'm a null read at best. I'm a bad choice to flip today.
Post
Post #1027 (isolation #55) » Sat Dec 11, 2021 6:36 pm
Postby DArby »
In post 1026, Something_Smart wrote:If your fakeclaim is doctor... it's not a gimme, necessarily. He may have wanted to verify it with Dwlee, or even just see if his wagon would go away without needing to claim.
If it's possible can y'all use fewer pronouns? I can't fully follow this argument.
In post 1023, skitter30 wrote:i mean that could be true, sure, but you could also be scum making up a claim that isn't verifiable, how am i to tell the difference?
1040 wants to flip me when I'm saying I'm a null read at best. I'm a bad choice to flip today.
- that post doesnt exist yet
- why are you a bad choice to flip today?
Oops 1014. I’d love to say I was a bit out of it last night but I think that’s my current state of being now. :S
I’m a bad flip today because of the nature that Im a null read that only looks sus based off 2/3 poe. We’re at ELo. I don’t think you should be basing a potential lim off of that with no scum flips.
In post 1026, Something_Smart wrote:If your fakeclaim is doctor... it's not a gimme, necessarily. IV may have wanted to verify the doctor claim with Dwlee, or even just see if IV's wagon would go away without needing to claim.
That make more sense?
I don’t think I’m following the logic but I understand who you’re talking about now.
I had to look up the rule set again, but from what I understand, it should be given that scum doesn’t need to verify the role they know doesn’t exist and can safely use it. I don’t think I get the need to verify.
Post
Post #1039 (isolation #59) » Sun Dec 12, 2021 4:15 am
Postby DArby »
Will answer question soon but I need to write this down first so I can reference it later.
(In no particular order)
IV claims doc 946 (action same post)
SS claims tracker 933 (action same post)
Skitter claims vig 923 (action same post)
DArby claims Neapolitan 928 (action same post)
Dwlee claims tracker 930 (action 930, 943)