In post 485, RH9 wrote:By the way, what does everybody think of a Pooky-marci-Dwlee team?
I'm leaning there right now.
Why was Pooky in here?
In post 691, RH9 wrote:Meuh, who do you want eliminated the most from SGB?
In post 690, Faker wrote:Dragons really did not enjoy a previous 3 way with me, and there's a good chance he never wants to touch any minigame with me.
In post 699, Dwlee99 wrote:In post 685, RH9 wrote:I think that since Pooky flipped, it's likely that scum!Pooky with his expertise and experience, made a plan and convinced marci and Dwlee to follow along.
It's likely that Dwlee had intentionally joined marci so that Town, not expecting two scum to engage in such a risky behaviour, would view this as unaligned. I also think that Pooky engineered his interactions with both so that when Sillyposting flipped (as is the norm), whoever the Town are in SGB would be convinced that Dwlee was Town.
I think that swapping marci was always the plan but when it came out that they needed to swap marci into MD, the scum decided to leave you with her, because I had already suggested my belief that marci and Dwlee was aligned and "possibly even scum together".
Only someone who hasn't played with scum Pooky would think he tells his teammates what to do or makes overarching plans
In post 680, Faker wrote:My point here with the above two posts isn't that marcistar needs to or should listen to me. From her point of view I'm scum and obviously shouldn't.
She was willing to go toe-to-toe with me when it was tonal blitzing, but when it comes to substantive holes or inconsistencies, she's nervous. What I just pointed out isn't a big deal at all and honestly isn't even that scum indicative. I think her discomfort in the engagements show a lot more.
I gave this time to let it become apparent: The nail in the coffin imo is the complete lack of care about being on the verge of defeat. Town has lost one minigame, and there's neither indignant fire or flailing despair. She's frozen but knows the game isn't over if she gets voted out, and that there exists a safety net of another partner in a scumsided game to pull the win out if she fails.
In post 707, Save The Dragons wrote:if faker is scum her engagement of pooky had to have been theatre as well. which is a hard pill to swallow. so maybe it is marci.
No. It's relevant and not even remotely insulting to you as either a person or a player. This point is not even asserting something about your skill or mine. I think you have reason to make this swap, if you didn't then OK.
It was extremely performative almost by definition. I have not even remotely been trying to hide it; the entire sequence of my interaction with marcistar has openly been in bad faith.
Not really clear on this; you saw the lengths me/IV went to in ours.In post 707, Save The Dragons wrote:if faker is scum her engagement of pooky had to have been theatre as well. which is a hard pill to swallow. so maybe it is marci.
My preference at the immediate moment is Dragons->RH9->Dwlee99. I am a very long way from deciding.In post 691, RH9 wrote:Meuh, who do you want eliminated the most from SGB?
Same goes for Faker and marci.
I want to see your reads because it could potentially impact my decision if we are to resolve SGB after MD.
In post 709, Faker wrote:No. It's relevant and not even remotely insulting to you as either a person or a player. This point is not even asserting something about your skill or mine. I think you have reason to make this swap, if you didn't then OK.
In post 709, Faker wrote:What do you think of the substantive point inside the post?
In post 709, Faker wrote:Not really clear on this; you saw the lengths me/IV went to in ours.
In post 698, Dwlee99 wrote:If I was scum why would I swap you out of my game?
In post 719, marcistar wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
this game is so boring with faker being so obviously scum
i honestly dont get what rh9 is going on about rn, whats the use on commenting on dead ppl when u can instead use that energy and focus it into reading the people in ur minigame?
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Firstly, Faker isn't exactly obvscum because the rest of us lack the extra insight that you have. We only know that between you and her, there's one moderator and one hacker.
In post 720, RH9 wrote:Secondly, my comments were in response to Faker's posts. Not only that, these rereads are good help for my reads on my minigame. It helps me develop my reads.
In post 722, Dwlee99 wrote:@Marci except if I'm tunneled on you it would be a way easier game for me as scum and I don't think you'd be able to convince the third to vote me out, so it still doesn't make sense if I'm scum to swap you out