garchomp and salamence have both been banned to Ubers before
dragonite may be my favorite, but "best" is an
In post 37, Bins wrote:In post 36, InflatablePie wrote:too easy to be a scumslip
odd
phrasing
but
ok
In post 39, Bins wrote:am i genuinely curious as to "why"
In post 42, Not_Mafia wrote:Where's the "slip" pie?
In post 43, Bins wrote:i don't see how you could have a reason, actually
parama wrote:anyways pie, my reasoning for chamber is arguably bad, apparently, so argue with me why it's bad.
anon wrote:However, a lot of his issues with ploti-cat are play-style: trust me, this is her 'tryharding' as town.
In post 191, Parama wrote:i have coasted in so many games as scum because i'm almost always capable of putting in effort and people write me off as town for that, it's hilarious
...
by the way pie's my strongest townread atm
plotcat wrote:I've heard this before and I think it might just be something about the way I use language becauseI feel like I'm taking stances in every sentences I type. I think most of what I write can be boiled down to "this person just wrote a town post" or "that person just wrote a scum post" or "what's the message you're conveying i still don't know what you're saying".
Pie wrote:one of you two gets to answer 181 btw. I said PlotCat's catchup was IIoA and my eyes glazed over (that was a bitch to do that dissection above btw) but then launched into multiple reasons why their early post gave me a scumread on them (despite pushing Bins instead for ~reactions~). and then I got misrepped by BellaCat, "most of my issues are with Plot's playstyle". Despite BellaCat making the post I went into detail on.
In post 163, InflatablePie wrote:yeah so PlotCat's catchup just looks like a lot of IIoA which makes my eyes glaze over every single time
reads explained:
- Cat's first post (19 pinged me as scum. lack of vote, instead an FoS @ Bins, commenting on a few things in a generic 'scum faking involvement' fashion, and mainly the comment about NM being 'fluffy' ~14 posts into the game. 'sides, to NM's credit, he did comment that TIP's entrance was bad, so I don't even think that's particularly fluffy.
PlotCat wrote:I told her to use hurt tags instead of vote because we didn't understand the setup or whether it was safe to vote yet.
Both heads of this hydra have trouble telling when things are literal and when things are joking and we both find jokes confusing. Like we can get as far as "someone's using sarcasm here maybe" and then we get stuck. Why are they saying something that isn't true? If someone is claiming scum in RVS is that haha just serious or haha just kidding? We can't tell. I always scumread someone who says they're conftown unless there is modconfirmation.
We both find the first few pages of games to be overwhelming incomprehensible noise. We both tend to scumread people for overly jokey entrances into games but we know that's not alignment indicative for not_mafia.
This is the last micro I sign up for. Micro games seem to condense all of the parts of the game that I don't understand into one piece and then the game is over before we get to the part where I know how to play.
In post 163, InflatablePie wrote:yeah so PlotCat's catchup just looks like a lot of IIoA which makes my eyes glaze over every single time
reads explained:
- Cat's first post (19 pinged me as scum. lack of vote, instead an FoS @ Bins, commenting on a few things in a generic 'scum faking involvement' fashion, and mainly the comment about NM being 'fluffy' ~14 posts into the game. 'sides, to NM's credit, he did comment that TIP's entrance was bad, so I don't even think that's particularly fluffy.
In post 171, Rainbow Unicat wrote:Ugh, even though Pie is voting for us, his recent posting looks really town-y. Especially the unvoting. However, a lot of his issues with ploti-cat are play-style: trust me, this is her 'tryharding' as town.
bins wrote:i find pie really "searchy" and awkward and like he gets a step ahead of himself only to find he doesn't have any proof to justify his actions