Micro 565: The Walking Dead Ep. 1(Game Over)
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
not a big fan of this tbh-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
PagE 4
In post 85, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 68, absinthe wrote:
Sort of the opposite of what I thought about TMWSTW's entrance. He entered the game with a loose upbeat vibe. As I reread and dug a little, I really liked the 1v1 on the player whose entrance was most shaky looking.
Hmm, OK. I felt the whole 1v1 thing was overdone, especially as it doesn't seem like there was any basis for why it happened.
i assumed it was just to get us out of rvs faster. did you suspect it had ulterior motives or something?
In post 87, No Brainer wrote:
If lalala is scum I'm going to have a hard time wanting to lynch her because she's a funny duck.
:3-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
pAGe 6
well i like the visible thought process in absinthe's 135 but i disagree about bob the man being scum
In post 145, Antihero wrote:everyone's still letting wednesday lurk without repercussions
/zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
oh yeah i forgot about them. absinthe is looking better right now so
VOTE: wednesday-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
PAge 7
In post 152, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
lalayou didn't really explain what you didn't like about these.
i didn't like that he voted two different people in the span of 15 minutes/2 posts or whatever it was
just doesn't jibe well-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 165, No Brainer wrote:
You'd better not buddy me.lalala wrote:(cheet seems more townierer than mollie :s)
>:(
i'm not!-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 174, No Brainer wrote:Lalala can you hit me in the face really hard with your reasoning for the the man who sold the world read.
-Cheet.
okay i'll have breakfast and then do it
by midday-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
why do i think bob is town
well tbh it's primarily gut but
In post 21, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:
@Absinthe why the sudden change of heart on the 1 v 1? Nothing had changed in the game from you saying you'll only vote those who you think are scum to suddenly deciding to join in.
i was wondering this as well so early on it seemed we were kind of on a similar wavelength which makes someone more likely town imo
In post 53, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:In post 50, absinthe wrote:In post 48, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Anti's one of my best friends and he also happens to be obvious when scum. He's not scum here.
That's nice. My reads of those two are based on what's in this thread.
But your read of me ISN'T based on what's in the thread, you specifically said that.
good point, doesn't feel forced
In post 76, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:In post 66, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 53, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:
Also in reference to your post 49. You complained that he didn't include the reason, why you voted me is his reason for thinking your scum, but you didn't really give a reason. Based on what you say, you have some sort of unexplained meta read.
I don't know whether it's the amount of pronouns in this sentence but I'm having serious trouble following what you're saying and what your point is.
Could you re-phrase it?
Okay, sorry.
Spoiler:
These are the quotes I'm talking about. absinthe questions why Especially the Lies didn't include her explanation for voting me. Then absinthe also then says that her reasoning for thinking I'm scum is better then Especially the Lies reasons for thinking Anti is town, because they used in game evidence but Especially the Lies used meta.
So I said that, absinthe really didn't explain anything just saying she found something about my first post scummy, especially compared to my others. I then said that her reasoning was equally meta based as Especially the Lies.
then this post in particular i think displays a willingness to cooperate
In post 162, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:
I make that it's bullshit, they apparently got reads off of it but with no explanation, and actively ignoring people it's just scummy. The only real town explanation I can think of for just dropping it is if it was a gambit that failed, but even then they should at least own up to the fact it didn't go anywhere rather then just pretending it didn't happen.
this feels very newbtown to me. i think he believes what he's saying but it's just that sometimes it doesn't make sense
his wording can be confusing but i think i mostly understand where he's coming from
yeah so sorry i haven't explained very well but explaining is kinda hard as it turns out D:-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
No Brainer wrote:who is bob
In post 8, lalaladucks wrote:hi themanwhosoldtheworld! your name's much too long so can i call you bob i think i'd like to call you bob
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 226, No Brainer wrote:
are you voting ducky? I can lynch ducky especially after the stunt he and katsuki pulled in their modded game.
plus there is an absence of rainbows.
bollockstothat-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 223, Antihero wrote:In post 218, lalaladucks wrote:EVERYONE DOESN'T HATE YOU
OH PLEASE YOU THINK I'M A STUPID DRUNK
ONLY SOMETIMES-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 228, Antihero wrote:i actually have a secret scumread
does anyone want to take a crack at who it is?
guess: santa-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 220, absinthe wrote:
laladucks keeps his cards close. The reason I'm voting him is because of his L-2 vote on the missing player. The reads list concerns me. He voted me in RVS. From the reads list, the vote became serious but there was no indication in the thread prior to that. Switching off someone he's still scumreading onto a missing player doesn't look right to me.
oh yeah the vote did become serious
i thought that was implied because i didn't move it until later
you think i'm suspicious?
why yes, i am suspicious
i mean look at this moustache
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 240, No Brainer wrote:In post 239, lalaladucks wrote:yes! that's what i used :p
Ithinkweshldtalkinrainbowstheentiretime!
Iamstillsusofyoutho
~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~
sure!rainbowsarefun!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
whyareyoususofme?
~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~~(⊕⌢⊕)~
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 241, Antihero wrote:myonly one that walks beside meshadows
my
shallow
hearts
the only thing thats beating
oh this song!
the lyrics are darker than i thought-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 244, Radja wrote:Actually, I just noticed I never really sent out a message that the game had started. So I won't count Wednesday's prod, because it's possible she hasn't even noticed the game had started. Apologies for the inconvenience.
welp
UNVOTE:-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 249, Wednesday_ wrote:Intimidated that they were catching up bad move. Had the time to vote me worse move. Has the chutzpah to put me down as null instead of lurking scum scum move.
i do not understand this - please explain?
also your 'reads' are kind of ridic-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 253, Wednesday_ wrote:Also aslo also I thinknwe should character claim.
yeah not opposed to this-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 256, Wednesday_ wrote:In post 254, No Brainer wrote:
What?Wednesday wrote:The one thing I question is the unvote did cheet do that? He should let mollie take over if they're scum.
Also what?
-Cheet.
Hi also hi. Your turn.
troll?-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
so how'd absinthe go from 'meh' to a scumread-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 314, absinthe wrote:
Would your impression of that post change if you thought he wasn't a newb to mafia? I have no idea if he is or not. I wanted to look at old games but he doesn't have any completed ones.
u took pi post :((-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 305, Antihero wrote:
In post 146, Raskolnikov wrote:But you don't like ETL's push even though you understand why he's doing it and even agree with one of his points, because he's pushing your townread?
that sounds familiar...
oh yeah:
In post 103, No Brainer wrote:Also you dislike ETL's push on her but you agreed with one of her points?
Heh?
Isn't it a little dissonant for you to be saying now that you think her entire push was bad when a page or two ago you were essentially appeasing her?
-Cheet
omg
i did not even notice this wao-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
thursday never answered this and sadface-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 358, absinthe wrote:
My read isn't likely to move much on this basis. Whatever you think of my questions and observations they are made in the hope that I can better understand why players do and say what they do. It's the only way I know to figure out alignment on day 1.
:[ i think you are town and i wanna work with you
but everybody says i'm scum all the time and wah wah wah-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
absinthe's case on me is misguided but appears to be coming from a town perspective i think
she's doing her best to contribute to the game, move things along, figure things out
i rvs voted her, she didn't take notice of it, that is null
then in the beginning of the game i had her pegged as scummy because the entrance was awkward and the bob vote was silly
around 79 i started seeing her as not so scummy and i don't mind her next two posts either. yes one is just a smiley but it's a non-scummy smiley alright
she voted me because i put the L-2 vote on wednesday before they showed up. meh. not a great reason but not the worst i've seen for voting
being suspicious of me because i'm not explaining every single thing i think about the game at this point is a bit ridic though
yes she called me out on saying things that didn't make sense, yes she was correct. sometimes i say nonsensical things intentionally sometimes unintentionally but i've decided to make a not remotely trollish post here and this is this hope you enjoy goodbye for now and have a nice evening or morning-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 375, absinthe wrote:In post 369, lalaladucks wrote:well nobody cares about my reads because apparently i'm a scum
My first post to you asked about your thoughts regarding the game. You blew me off.
sorry i was in a weird mood :S-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 383, No Brainer wrote:In post 363, lalaladucks wrote:In post 358, absinthe wrote:
My read isn't likely to move much on this basis. Whatever you think of my questions and observations they are made in the hope that I can better understand why players do and say what they do. It's the only way I know to figure out alignment on day 1.
:[ i think you are town and i wanna work with you
but everybody says i'm scum all the time and wah wah wah
I have never been in a game with you where some1 called you scum. so where is this "all the time" coming from?
what???
wellyouwereinthegamewhereiwasanskandmostpeoplewereterriblyinactivesoitwasprettycoastyforthescums
youwereinnumbersmafiatoowhereiwasanicandsodidwhateveriwantedb/cicouldrevealifpplwantedtolynchmebutthatgametheydidn'tseemtofindmescummy
butmostofmygamespeopleseemtobeincessantlycallingmescummy.i'vebeenmislynchedinlikesixoutofthethirteengamesi'vecompletedwhichlookingatitnowisn'tasbadasithoughtbutdudeitatleastseemslikepeoplealwayssayi'mascum;-;-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
@mod vc plz?
In post 397, Raskolnikov wrote:Oh and please stop the rainbow texting it's godawful.
not this post is godawful!
and whaddya mean i'm weird
In post 399, Raskolnikov wrote:Anything substantial to say?
this is a bad response to absinthe's point..
403 is better-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 409, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
Many of them are distinctly difficult to follow, both in content and language. It takes a lot of time to even understand what statement they are making.
so you think they're being deliberately obscure?
i think that may be the case
In post 409, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
It seems to me, and this is primarily the reason for voting, is their reaction to suspicion being thrown at them. It's not "no you're wrong and I can prove it, and I know you're wrong because I'm town and here's all the ways you are wrong", it's "you're a pussy". That is so not a town reaction. That's scum being mad people are catching on and having nothing substantial to defend themselves with.
^-^ okay i like dis etl is prob town
pedit:ty moddd :)-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
well no that's why i asked about it
but fine i did a not lazy thing and searched wiki and okay "look at me, i'm so town" i've seen that phrased used before but not the acronym...
In post 411, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:In post 328, lalaladucks wrote:mollie was telling anti to stop talking in the scum pt so i assume there is
This is a horrible post. Why would you assume something someone said to be true whose alignment is supposed to be unknown to you?
because mollie? D:
but yeah that was a bad post by me i agree with you there-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 418, Antihero wrote:im kind of ready to lynch wednesday just to make this game playable
but do you think they're scum?-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
i'd prefer wednesday dead first-
-
lalaladucks a study in thread
- a study in thread
- a study in thread
- Posts: 4082
- Joined: February 25, 2015
In post 433, TheManWhoSoldTheWorld wrote:
Well the logic from both Ducks and ETL is that they were posting else where, and not this game. At the time it seemed fair enough to me. My only issue is that Ducks didn't unvote when the reason the player absence was revealed.
In post 244, Radja wrote:Actually, I just noticed I never really sent out a message that the game had started. So I won't count Wednesday's prod, because it's possible she hasn't even noticed the game had started. Apologies for the inconvenience.
i'm in australian est so this was posted at 1:57am for me and i was asleeping
in the morn i started from where i left off reading through posts and responded to points directed at me/interesting things and unvoted when i saw the mod announcement about it