[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8002814 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 619: House M.D. Mafia - Game Over! - Mafiascum.net
Micro Games (9 players or fewer). Archived during the 2023 queue overhaul.
141 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Shadow Dancer
Shadow Dancer
Mafia Scum
Shadow Dancer
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4869
Joined: March 15, 2010
Post
Post #12 (isolation #0) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:09 pm
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Okay...
vote Heartless
Because waggon.
also, not quite sure how long turns are, so before I forget.
Search patient's home, look for sources of toxins, any signs of drug abuse and check the kitchen for her died.
Ask her, how exactly she broke her arm.
Also ask her, what she thinks about her husband making fun of her and how long that's been going on (both the making fun and the clumsiness).
I guess the ER have taken care of the broken arm just fine. If not, some one should maybe issue a complaint!
Okay, that's it for now, more tomorrow night, I am going to bed right now, good night every one.
Post
Post #13 (isolation #1) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 12:12 pm
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Also, assume that I don't ask her straight out how long "she's been clumsy". I'd like to be a bit more subtle than that, just ask her how long thins like the thing that broke her arm have been happening to her, something along those lines.
Post
Post #98 (isolation #3) » Wed Jun 15, 2016 11:43 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
(also, some one should probably leak that tape to the police and get the arsehole arrested for battery, but that's probably of no concern to us any more...)
Damn, there is little to go on so far. I am gonna go ahead and VOTE: Mala
for giving the most extensive "let's just avoid the mafia part of this game" expression so far...
In post 97, Shadow Dancer wrote:Okay. Nice job heartless.
Even better that you seem to be the only one at least attempting something resembling scum hunting so far.
unvote
VOTE: Shadowdancer
siriously that was an attempt to buddying the one who voted you.
your not doing anything either. why you think jumping on mala for her interest in the other side of game is a valid point?
Because the ton of posts she has produced suggests that her not being concerned with anything but the patient is a sign of actually not even caring rather than just limited temporal resources. And then her posts give off a vibe of "just nice to have something innocuous to be talking about" while not really trying hard to actually diagnose and help the patient.
Tell me where I am wrong in my assessment of Heartless.
Difference is: I made one page one post before I went to bed. In it I specified my actions and placed a vote, which is really all you can reasonably expect at that state of the game.
and I fail to see where did they tried to play the mafia part? the only thing I can see is they voting you becuase your early game was off. so it felt like buddying.
Which is more than any one else has done so far. I am certainly not gonna let them coast through to late game just on that. But since the waggon to get out of RVS is also not happening, why leave my vote parked there in the first place?
and y I see what your saying about mala. is it make her scum though? you genuinely beleive is it scummy to state they have no interest in the mafia side of the game and they signed up for the flavor side?
It's not about what she stated but about how she behaved. I also joined just because of the flavour. That does not mean I do not attempt to play this as a mafia game. And if she is so keen about the flavour, how is it that in about a dozen posts she did not even manage to send in a complete set of actions? All she asks are two questions and even those are 1. very generic and 2. probably at least in part common knowledge (i.e. it should be in the patient file).
Is this a dead sure sign that she is scum? No. But it's the best place to start that I could find.
Post
Post #123 (isolation #7) » Thu Jun 16, 2016 6:10 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Okay, fair enough with regards to mala.
Right now I'd like to VOTE: Creature[/b]
His declaring a "townblock" out off thin air as well as his "bored" comment seem iffy.
In post 134, Charloux wrote:Then we have a bit of trolling by Creature. I don't like him creating a townblock; But it's a viable strategy if you ask me.
It is neither a strategy nor is it viable... (see below)
In post 136, BTD6_maker wrote:In my opinion Townblocs never work. If a scum gets into a Townbloc we are very likely to lose due to not lynching anyone in it. It seems that scum are more likely to want to force a Townbloc.VOTE: Creature
so you don't like that playstyle
if anyone has that playstyle is scum?
It is not a playstyle. Proclaiming a "townblock" is a meaningless action. Actual town blocks self organize dynamically through mutual reads during the course of a game, not by any one proclaiming them. And if there
is
and actual town block (which does not happen in a lot of games) explicitely proclaiming it as such is gravely anti-town.
Furthermore, proclaiming it two pages into the actual game is but meaningless drivel.
Post
Post #144 (isolation #10) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 6:54 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 140, Creature wrote:I am not proclaiming a townblock, I am saying who I would put in a townblock.
In post 140, Creature wrote:I am not proclaiming a townblock, I am saying who I would put in a townblock.
Either way you are needlessly outing your (alleged. You do not even explain where they stem from) town reads for no reason at all. Stop that. That is anti-town and useless for finding scum (unless you can narrow it down to maybe two or three people by pure PoE).
Simple: To keep this game appealing for every one involved. Keeps every one motivated and active. Motivated towns are better at finding scum.
If you are not planning on rather enjoying this game, I can arrange to make it more of an appalling experience for you, personally, if you want.
Put another way, if you think addressing people in a generally good mood is a sign of scum play, you definitely need to evolve as a player beyond the stage of arbitrarily applied one-dimensional "scum tells". If you are town, please do that fast.
and yes it is a playstyle to make a town block and poe scum. so many people play like that. not sure whats your point here.
"Many people" doing illogical, pointless and anti-town things does not make it the right thing to do. Duh.
In post 144, Shadow Dancer wrote:Put another way, if you think addressing people in a generally good mood is a sign of scum play, you definitely need to evolve as a player beyond the stage of arbitrarily applied one-dimensional "scum tells". If you are town, please do that fast.
You definietly don't know me and my play ; Like obviously at all.
when did I call you scum for it?
I'm trying to understand how you develop your reads and behave and if their coming from town or scum.
Then maybe I misunderstood you. You seemed rather matter-of-factish about it, not merely inquisitive. There are unfortunately a lot of players around who have never refined their skills beyond the level of basic name calling and sound like "buddying, bussing, white-knighting, chainsawing, fence-sitting, [insert random wiki page title here]" for half of the game and expecially on day one and then quickly settle to tunnel hard on whoever their massive confirmation bias leads them to first, quite often me or another vocal player who disagreed with them; they are just an absolute nuisance to deal with.
In post 147, Creature wrote:How's it anti-town and why shouldn't I tell my town reads?
Because all it does is hand out a free kill list to scum. It achieves nothing with regards to any town goals.
I make townblocks on who I doubt is scum and it usually helps me get more town reads.
Do that. I do that too – in my head or on a piece of paper, then, when I can narrow it down further, I pursue the people I consider likely scum candidates.
Also, isn't we supposed to hunt scum and find town?
Yes, and kind of, if you want to go by PoE. But in the end lists of town reads without any reasoning behind them are not going to convince any one of anything. They are just a lazy way to feign activity at best.
Post
Post #165 (isolation #13) » Fri Jun 17, 2016 11:31 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
VOTE: Kop
Just as promised. Cannot have a lurker in a micro.
@Frozen: How does voting help you read people?
House also needs to explain his votes. Actually, he has yet to show any sign of actual reasoning for whatever he is trying to do here. His contributions so far boil down to hopping my waggon and making a little side insinuation about Kop's post timing.
In post 232, House wrote:You're not going to get that trust by being so blatantly obvious about wanting to form one.
Wrong, I already managed to make one townblock in a 7p game when I showed my intentions the entire game.
Just one last note on this: The problem is that things are much more complicated and chaotic than this. And if a single game is all the evidence you are acting on, then you are just massively confirmation biassed.
Post
Post #286 (isolation #23) » Tue Jun 21, 2016 11:58 pm
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 254, BTD6_maker wrote:Forming a Townbloc is a scumtell. In this game Creature formed a Townbloc. This specific Townbloc is a "Townbloc in general". Please explain how talking about it is active lurking.
Is it a scumtell though? What is your evidence for its being specifically indicative of some one being scum?
Post
Post #287 (isolation #24) » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:02 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 260, Creature wrote:I still think Heart, Shadow, Frozen, Mala and House are all town, so that leaves BTD6, Charloux and Kop.
Can you explain your town read on Mala, because at least by the point of this post she seems to merely give a consistent impression of watching from the sideline.
Post
Post #288 (isolation #25) » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:13 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
@Angel: I am still not satisfied about your explanation for your vote on me. You do not want to do disclose your "methods", which is whatever... But you should be able to justify your results. First you say that your voting me is not indicative of you scumreading me. Next you call me a "scum-lean". A scum-lean is still a scum read though.
Post
Post #289 (isolation #26) » Wed Jun 22, 2016 12:17 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
VOTE: BTD
Acting as a "voice of reason" kind of player, then disappearing from the radar for no apparent reason (while even posting elsewhere, as Heartless pointed out), then get wound up with some minor thing like creature's town-blocking, when the game has moved on from that already, in sum show a behavioural pattern that I have often seen coming from scum.
In post 304, Creature wrote:I townread Mala because she seemed to be interested in the game and I usually don't see scum interested.
She even explained that she was interested in the flavour/mechanics of this game, which has nothing to do with alignment (and people who actually enjoy playing as scum are not entirely unheard of either...) So this is completely alignment non-indicative. If anything her activity drop-off after the patient was cured should actually be a scum tell to you.
@mala: Congratulations to becoming an EMT.
As for your situation in general:
Do you actually lack the time to read along and keep up to date with your mafia games? Then you should probably replace out (or replace out of another game instead; I don't get how people can ever handle being in more than one game at a time anyway, though I suspect that most actually don't and just play badly in all of them...)
Otherwise, you don't actually need to put much extra time in for posting. Just give us a handful of lines every day, sharing some thoughts. You don't need to be major force in driving this game forward, but what I am wishing for right now are a few more thoughts to see where you stand and to allow others to read you.
In post 331, Heartless wrote:I kicked Shadow Dancer out of our townreads. Shadow Dancer is a tricky case. He knows how to turn on the charm and he's actually :efforting: in his posting. But I still can't shake this uneasy feeling about him. None of his votes (Post 98, Post 123, Post 165) are egregiously bad. (OK, that's not entirely accurate. I thought the Creature vote was pretty bad.) But that's not what gets me. What gets me is that in the serial vote hopping, there doesn't really seem to be that much introspection or evaluation of previous votes going on. There's justifications and votes but not much outside of that and it's starting to feel like he's more worried about finding a defensible home for his vote than actually forming quality reads
Fair enough I guess. I don't think I ever called any of those early votes definite scum reads though. there was not really much to even go after for that stretch of time. So I rather used my vote to sort out some bad habits and nudge more people into the game. This is why I immediately switched off Creature for example once he started making decent posts.
In post 346, BTD6_maker wrote:There must be something about me and Titus (aka RadiantCowbells) that means our play styles clash so much that I scumread Titus in every game and she (he in the case of RC) scumreads me in every game.
Either way, I am scumreading Titus in this game. I am readying a wall of reasons why. VOTE: Titus
So let me clarify: You know that your scum read on Titus is most probably a false positive by default, and yet you are willing to vote her over any one else after only a handful of posts by here at this point?
In post 354, Malakittens wrote:That's the first reason why you are disqualified in reading them. Secondly, house and I, have met Titus iRL so we both can read her due to that. And anti has played a number of games where I have seen him catch her quitenrasilyn
And we are to trust you on that? How does having met some one IRL translate to being able to better read them in a game exactly?
BTD's latest posts seem only concerned with mere self-preservation.
Post
Post #363 (isolation #29) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:04 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Spoiler: Could you please refrain from making posts like this where the quote walls are vastly longer than anything yu have to say? Paraphrasing is your friend.
You are trying to force other people to sheep your opinions, without any reason or content other than "lynch BTD6_maker".
In post 325, Titus wrote:Nah, I didn't read all 13 pages. I just looked at votes and recent content. Stopped when I found obvscum.
Now, are you actually going to vote BTD or tell me why I am wrong?
In post 332, Titus wrote:You know what's a good way to get BTD's attention? A vote for him.
In post 345, Titus wrote:Hey Kop, you scumread BTD6. Let's lynch him.
Yet more comments that boiled down to "I scumread BTD6_maker (without reasons). Everyone should now switch votes to him." If you are pushing my wagon, at least give reasons.
Well, it's Titus, though, and she really was never up for giving reasons so I doubt she will. She will probably remain stubborn and anti-Town regardless.
I have been in many games featuring a Titus alt (RC) or hydra. These include Newbies 1700 and 1708, and a few ongoing games I can't talk about. What makes you think I'm less qualified than the others at reading Titus?
The fact you think this is worthy of discussion makes you less qualified.
Post
Post #368 (isolation #30) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 7:23 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
@House: ...
Quote walls are a nuisance that no one needs... or even reads most of the time. Period.
...
After going through all the isos again I am pretty down with a BTD lynch. mala, Titus, Kop are still king of out there in no man's land for me, so I could kind of see compromising on them right now. But I'd rather keep them stick around for now and develop my reads on them.
Post
Post #370 (isolation #31) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 8:21 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Yes, you are right. I am a giant hypocrite. Post 358 is really but a screenful of quotes, several layers deep, followed by a one liner I made, addressing some non-specified thing going on somewhere in that wall I quoted.
I may have confused that with another post though, not sure...
Post
Post #401 (isolation #33) » Thu Jun 23, 2016 11:48 pm
Postby Shadow Dancer »
@Angel: I see some real endeavour to find scum in his posts, even though I don't agree with everything. Mostly he looks like an inexperienced player to me who has yet to find his footing, which is in line with his rather recent join date. If he were scum I'd expect him to make a major slip-up sooner or later, so far I haven't really anything of that kind from him.
Post
Post #408 (isolation #36) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:10 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 394, Frozen Angel wrote:and funny , I was thinking exactly the opposite about kop and BTD being a lynch bait. I'm not town reading eaither at all but why is BTD scum and Kop mislynch bait while I see you cornering BTD and just pushing for his death when you hate discussing it?
How can you think of any one as lynch bait if you are not town reading them in the first place?
Acting as a "voice of reason" kind of player, then disappearing from the radar for no apparent reason (while even posting elsewhere, as Heartless pointed out), then get wound up with some minor thing like creature's town-blocking, when the game has moved on from that already, in sum show a behavioural pattern that I have often seen coming from scum.
you are screaming that you voted him for active lurking in here
No. I am voting him for being concerned with only two things:
- survival by discrediting votes against him
- making a terribly justified vote on Creature with no other reads whatsoever.
I also vote him because earlier on when he was more active he was saying pretty reasonable things about Creature's town-block thing (obviously others, including me, have expressed similar opinions about it), but that's all he has done so far and when it comes to real scum hunting his activity just dropped off (while being active elsewhere on site).
All of this fits into the activity pattern of a scum player (yes, a bad one, you are right in this reagard!) It does not really give a full picture if you assume it coming from town.
If I'd vote for active lurking, I'd probably vote for Mala now.
In post 408, Shadow Dancer wrote:How can you think of any one as lynch bait if you are not town reading them in the first place?
becuase I'm definitely wrong about some of my scum reads atm and my read will change on some when I see some flips information.
is your process different?
I am not relying on flips too much in my reads. Sometimes they can help, but often they can be just as misleading, and changing reads on dead players is as trivial as it is useless...
My use of the word "lynch bait" is definitely different.
Post
Post #426 (isolation #41) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 12:35 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 422, Frozen Angel wrote:servival and omgussing are NAI. It seems no one will ever listen to me aboth these , w/e
the second might be coming from a really bad town.
There is a difference between some one going OMGUS on some one else for voting them (which is not even what BTD is actually doing, as Creatures is not on his wagon) and some one doing nothing but try to survive.
Or how about this: Take the whole situation into consideration: BTD looks like some one killing time until some game dynamic develops to hop onto. Because this game moved as slowly and cautiously as it did, that tactic simply fell off and he'd have to make it up on his own. So there his play just collapses. It looks like typical scum play though.
Post
Post #434 (isolation #42) » Fri Jun 24, 2016 1:04 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 427, Frozen Angel wrote:I was talking about his vote on Titus , not on creature.
and doing nothing to survive might be a scum tell in your pov and in so many people pov , but its not for me. I only look for the gaps and yes his play has gaps , enough to ensure my vote one him.
lets not discussing this further to help him to respond.
yes. It's definitely on him to respond right now. I am definitely not going to just let him
Post
Post #522 (isolation #45) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:00 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
@BTD
: Calling your performance here unsatisfying would be a major understatement. In the future, please refrain from joining games if you are not going to even try. I am really angry now as no one is to blame for this so much as yourself!
@Titus:
Explain why you were so overeager to get BTD lynched as quickly as possible.
Otherwise, I am willing to bet that scum is hiding within the lurkers (Mala, Kop). Cannot have that. I want to hear some major thoughts from them
now
. Claiming that Mala's dodgy responses start to annoy me would be another grave understatement on my part.
Post
Post #524 (isolation #46) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 11:57 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
That's the reason you scumread him. I have no problem with that. What irritates me is that your whole interaction with Frozen seemed forced and blown out of proportion.
Post
Post #538 (isolation #48) » Sun Jun 26, 2016 8:33 pm
Postby Shadow Dancer »
I think I'll need to reread that whole Titus vs. Frozen argument again.
In the meantime VOTE: Mala
Sorry, I can no longer ignore the fact that as soon as there is a patient again she seems suddenly more productive again.
However, there is one question that needs to be asked:
Mala, why aren't you ordering any tests or procedures?
Post
Post #563 (isolation #49) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:41 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 540, Malakittens wrote:Nah SD. My hours are totally unreliable. I mean the night hit at the worse time because I'm a tad bit free more on the weekends than the week since I can stay up later and stuff /:
I mean you can bitch and moan and whatever, but I have actually given reads and thoughts out and not just patient sfuff.
You gave us one post worth of reads so far, and it's not very deep or thoughtful:
Spoiler:
In post 301, Malakittens wrote:Right now I'm reading the heartless hydra as town.
I'm also liking you as town.
House I'm not too sure of.
Shadow could potentially be town.
I haven't read much of BTD posts but I also didn't like the whole post re:patients, but I'm not sure if I think that's scum to say that /:
Everyone else can be null.
In post 545, Malakittens wrote:If anything I actually think SD is scum tbh.
Just a gut feeling.
Gut feeling: When you cannot even make up a proper reason.
Seems like majority of his targets this day are lurkers, for the most part.
The majority of players have been Lurkers for the most part. We cannot have that in a game that's probably only got two scum in it and only two potential mislynches and projected four game days to figure stuff out. Just ignoring Lurkers is a luxury that's not applicable in a micro game.
That's easy targets for scum to go after because it makes an easier case.
Then, if you are town, don't make it so easy. Do you seriously expect that I accept your being a Lurker as a valid reason to
not
vote you (or, likewise, Kop, for that matter)?
The point is that of the active players in this game I am pretty convinced by now that they are most likely town. I have some doubt about Titus still, but that's a trace I will investigate. However, I am convinced that there is at least one scum in {you, Kop} and I'd much rather probe you guys first before I start reconsidering all the reads I could build on the others during the course of D1.
Needless to say, unlike actually starting to be more open about your thoughts, voting me for suspecting you is not going to convince me of your townieness. At best that's just lazy, even as scum.
And please don't give me another talk about your 16h shifts. You obviously find the time to post more or less cheeky one-liners and long excuses for your not-contribution as well as some good content concerning patient care. So it seems like you actually have the time to post, after all. And then, as an EMT you probably have quite a bit of standby time, so if all is lost, do some phone reading/posting. What I don't want is another mislynch because some townie could not really be bothered...
Sorry if that came out a bit harsh, but I am trying to be constructive here. Mafia games require some blunt truth at times.
Post
Post #564 (isolation #50) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:44 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Also, Kop's vote looks really horrible as well. "Oh look, I can deflect a Lurker wagon on me and don't even need to stick my own head out for it, Mala already did it for me". And that is pretty much the upper visible bound of his thoughts at this point.
Post
Post #565 (isolation #51) » Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:59 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 541, Malakittens wrote:As for the test thing. I don't really have that much of a clue what's wrong with the patient, but let me ask you this. If you were sick, would you like your doctor to do tests just for the hell of it?
Don't worry, patient's not real ;D No little innocent girls will be hurt during the course of this game.
Post
Post #645 (isolation #56) » Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:32 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
Sorry for being less active than I need to be right now. I wrenched something in my neck or soemthing while asleep and can hardly sit straight without pain for any extended amount of time right now
Post
Post #646 (isolation #57) » Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:40 am
Postby Shadow Dancer »
In post 604, Titus wrote:She gave a meek as hell see where this goes after wanting my head yesterday. Might has well have claimed scum and she wanted a t v t.
What do you mean by t v t (probably not Terran vs Terran or Team vs. Team...)?