Say it aint so!
VOTE: Creature makes me think of creatures in the night, seems guilty
That's AA-jIn post 21, Map Wolf wrote:Pretty sure it's Zapdos.
this is a bad postIn post 60, Gendaberry wrote:@Mod: Your VC is wrong, I was voting Dwlee not the other way around.
I'm down for this. Let's go friends, all aboard.
VOTE: ReubenWasFine
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p6303518In post 71, Hopkirk wrote:Easier. Can you tell us yours?
If scum want to freak out town, they'll go to the effort of finding a scary role in the thread. What scum won't do is get caught by page 3. The whole "post your numbers" situation seems unnecessary and fake. VOTE: hopkirkIn post 71, Hopkirk wrote:Still harder than including. Plus we sent numbers- this means no numbers are slightly more likely to be fake, hence from scum.
nothing about post numbers in the original postIn post 29, Hopkirk wrote:It seems like a good idea to me for us to reveal what mafia (and maybe third party) roles we picked as they could potentially be in the game.
Are there any disadvantages to this (that outweigh the benefits)?
it's relevant because i was saying your set up spec was beyond what was meaningful and rather than consider for a moment that it could be you stood your ground as if you had to defend yourself. continuing in the vein of set up spec for post numbers isn't bad. what is bad is the lack of scumhunting in favor of set up spec that won't do anything. thinking that presenting yourself that you're a) contributing and b) in no way not contributing by doing this was suspicious, and deserved a vote.In post 77, Hopkirk wrote:How is that even relevant?
consider for a moment that one of us had to PM the mod from another account to secure their slot and that person may have also sent their picks while doing so, you may understand why they may have been ticked off and willing to question your intent while having to fulfill the request of post numbers.In post 77, Hopkirk wrote:General response:
1.)Sending picks to modrequirednumbers.
2.)Posting picks in the thread- numbers would beoptional.
3.)Hence if you checks pm to see what you sent, you find numbers right next to names, so why not include them to make thing easy. If you make roles up, you're looking in the thread, but you wouldn't necessarily see the numbers.
Not sure what's even slightly hard to understand here.
i had five posts before being put to L-1, and two were about the game while neither had been serious. i wasn't about to give a serious reply, nor was I going to be hammered. claiming hated was about the only thing i could care to do, because there was nothing else in the thread to work with at the time.In post 78, Hopkirk wrote:Also @Rebun please explain hated fakeclaim.
Is there another role that could revive people as Ebola-chan? Googling "site:mafiascum.net grandest idea ebola" comes up with nothing, simply "ebola" comes up with too many nonsense results, whereas "third party ebola-chan" gives you this role from the thread.Third Party Ebola-chan
(Player must target a player every night. Has a 70% chance of killing. If the player is not killed, the user will die and the role of the target will have a modifier of ebola)
because you're scum too and i'm going to prove itIn post 279, gameplay506 wrote:This aside I don't see a fkin reason not to lynch menno
This is directed to you Reuben
well by the time i made that post your argument was pretty clear. it was a tongue-in-cheek comment.. because by the info menno gave us, if there's mafia, there is unlikely more than 1. which means there should be no pts the mod was referring to... unless there is a cult pt.In post 391, gameplay506 wrote:If.you are so fkin sure of a dead cult why tf aren't you voting berry?
My vote on him has been there for over 24 hours and no hammer has happened. From your pov he should be conf scum