Micro 630: Grandest Idea uPick [ Take 2! ]
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
That wasn't what i meant, but what i meant is actually irrelevant due to a couple of other setup based things i've realized i was mistaken on: 1.) Misreading '6 have confirmed' at the start of the post on the 9 bastard elements that could be in the game (role pms) as 'there are 6 bastard roles', which made me think my/one of my bastard role(s) was more likely picked than my non bastard role(s), 2.) Not realizing it could be any number of my submissions, from 0-4 in the game, rather than exactly 1 as i was assuming.In post 36, McMenno wrote:
it's not a bastard role, thoughIn post 35, Hopkirk wrote:Based on possible bastard elements the mod posted, it seems unlikely my mafia pick is in the game.-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
So you hold the following positions:
-Sharing setup knowledge is bad.
yet you shared the setup knowledge i suggested sharing. This is compatible how?-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
What conversation?In post 49, gameplay506 wrote:I did it because there isn't anything else. It just lead the game conversation to a dead end. Now I am trying to revive it by voting you. And since I am the only one with a real argument here ( real enough for page 2) I suggest you sheep me.
More importantly, why are some people excluding post numbers from roles that are hard to find otherwise?-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
One of my role submissions was hated so this is possible.In post 66, ReubenWasFine wrote:I'm actually hated so make sure to start sending twilight actions in
Easier. Can you tell us yours?In post 55, ReubenWasFine wrote:why did some people include them?
Still harder than including. Plus we sent numbers- this means no numbers are slightly more likely to be fake, hence from scum.In post 56, McMenno wrote:
you can just search their names in the thread you dummyIn post 54, Hopkirk wrote:
What conversation?In post 49, gameplay506 wrote:I did it because there isn't anything else. It just lead the game conversation to a dead end. Now I am trying to revive it by voting you. And since I am the only one with a real argument here ( real enough for page 2) I suggest you sheep me.
More importantly, why are some people excluding post numbers from roles that are hard to find otherwise?
not wagoning this though-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
How is that even relevant?In post 73, ReubenWasFine wrote:
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p6303518In post 71, Hopkirk wrote:Easier. Can you tell us yours?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p7819673
If scum want to freak out town, they'll go to the effort of finding a scary role in the thread. What scum won't do is get caught by page 3. The whole "post your numbers" situation seems unnecessary and fake. VOTE: hopkirkIn post 71, Hopkirk wrote:Still harder than including. Plus we sent numbers- this means no numbers are slightly more likely to be fake, hence from scum.
'trying to subtly imply that you're town and Reuben is scum'In post 75, McMenno wrote:
^yeahIn post 69, Creature wrote:This isn't a good reaction test.
though it is more likely for town to do a stupid gambit like this
this post is godawful thoughIn post 71, Hopkirk wrote:
One of my role submissions was hated so this is possible.In post 66, ReubenWasFine wrote:I'm actually hated so make sure to start sending twilight actions in
Easier. Can you tell us yours?In post 55, ReubenWasFine wrote:why did some people include them?
Still harder than including. Plus we sent numbers- this means no numbers are slightly more likely to be fake, hence from scum.In post 56, McMenno wrote:
you can just search their names in the thread you dummyIn post 54, Hopkirk wrote:
What conversation?In post 49, gameplay506 wrote:I did it because there isn't anything else. It just lead the game conversation to a dead end. Now I am trying to revive it by voting you. And since I am the only one with a real argument here ( real enough for page 2) I suggest you sheep me.
More importantly, why are some people excluding post numbers from roles that are hard to find otherwise?
not wagoning this though
I mean, how are numbers more likely to come from town? what is scum supposed to do? make up roles, and hope they are in the gim thread? are you just trying to subtly imply that you're town and Reuben is scum? because that's pretty desperate.
VOTE: Hopkirk
1.) Do you know what 'slightly' means in 'slightly more'? Stop trying to misrepresent what i'm saying so you can paint a misleading narrative.
2.) Look at the page number. Look at how little has gone on in this game. Do you think i'm sure on things? I haven't moved away from my rvs vote yet, so you're pretty obviously talking rubbish.
Also really don't like the language you're using here - 'Godawful' is plain wrong. 'Dummy' is adversarial, potentially dangerous, and completely unconstructive. If you're town you have no reason to casually insult people for nothing.
VOTE: McMenno
And that's a problem why?In post 76, ReubenWasFine wrote:
nothing about post numbers in the original postIn post 29, Hopkirk wrote:It seems like a good idea to me for us to reveal what mafia (and maybe third party) roles we picked as they could potentially be in the game.
Are there any disadvantages to this (that outweigh the benefits)?
General response:
1.)Sending picks to modrequirednumbers.
2.)Posting picks in the thread- numbers would beoptional.
3.)Hence if you checks pm to see what you sent, you find numbers right next to names, so why not include them to make thing easy. If you make roles up, you're looking in the thread, but you wouldn't necessarily see the numbers.
Not sure what's even slightly hard to understand here.-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Same question, but on trying to out prs.In post 96, McMenno wrote:I TAKE THAT AS A YES
THIS IS A CRUMBIn post 47, gameplay506 wrote:*Hop lel-
-
Hopkirk Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 8699
- Joined: July 24, 2013
- Location: Britain
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.