[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 8774085 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 679: Double Day Unlimited Hydra Blitz! ~ Endgame - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #64 (isolation #5) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:07 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 62, Chihiro and Alter Ego wrote:PP why are you signing?
I get it's cool you wanna tell us which head is talking
but why give that information to scum?
I'm not signing. It's an emoji of a cyclops sticking his tongue out.
Post
Post #242 (isolation #17) » Fri Jan 27, 2017 4:28 pm
Postby Penguinos »
In post 238, MANTIS SHRIMP wrote:kankie hydra just has really slimey posts and pushes and once i talk to creature that's 100% where i want my vote to go. anyone townreading this slot needs to explain why asap
This is what we call a weak push. "Slimey [sic] posts and pushes" without reason or example. Why don't you explain the scum read instead of trying to pull this crap.
K...I'll let K respond to the rest since that was him, but I did put a hurt tag on A&E after I had a chance to speak to my partner for the first time this game. So...yeah. Cool.
In post 245, Penguinos wrote:K...I'll let K respond to the rest since that was him, but I did put a hurt tag on A&E after I had a chance to speak to my partner for the first time this game. So...yeah. Cool.
yes i noticed but like
why push something as scummy in the beginning of the day and not do anything about it immediately? the delayed tag is still weird.
Because I spent the majority of the day representing my hydra alone. Thought it might be nice to get some input before continuing.
I think your slot is scummy given the faux rage and it seems like you used it as an excuse to put a lot of votes on the table (which is a play you chastised earlier) which could end in a mislynch with limited suspicion.
Post
Post #288 (isolation #26) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:17 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 270, LewdandRude wrote:
I get that he's pretending like I'm not "presenting a case" on him
I'm not pretending. I have asked for your case and except muttering something about "inf" you haven't said a damn thing.
Are you voting me to lynch a townie, or to catch scum? If you are honestly trying to catch scum, why is it so hard for you put your reasoning into a post in plain words?
Post
Post #289 (isolation #27) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 1:20 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 275, LewdandRude wrote:And his justification was that nobody voted us when only 4 hours had passed
"that's forever in a blitz" time passes in the real world at the same pace, actually. And we've got a ton of time
It's just slimy
We have already had a lynch (thanks to you, for the record). In any normal game this would be day 2. If 4 hours isn't an eternity, well that just then makes you insane quick hammer look even worse.
If town quick hammerer like that, scum would jump on the easy lynch opportunity. Since that hasn't happened, it is safe to say they are scum.
That is my observation from a quick read, this is my first post. -k
shallow logic and kind of silly considering someone DID jump on the easy lynch oppurtunity
there's two scum if you're going to say that scum will jump at the opportunity that one person who jumps on could still be oppurtunistic
According to 207 , he didn't have any votes on him. Looking at timestamps, the vote sat for about an hour and a half and nobody else voted. If you are scum trying to get a miss lynch, why do you unvote like that?
TBH, after a nights sleep I feel a little less confident in my logic, but it is what it is. Penguin thinks lewd is town. I disagree. -k
Post
Post #335 (isolation #34) » Sat Jan 28, 2017 4:02 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 331, LewdandRude wrote:
PEDIT: PENGUIN
I AM LEWD (HUMAN SEQUENCER)
NOT RUDE (DUNNSTRAL)
PLEASE READ
Why are you acting like that makes your prior actions irrelevant?
Even if you are town, don't you realize your perception of me might be skewed because I (karnos) entered the game to find that your slot was voting me without any apparent case?
I think your slot is scummy given the faux rage and it seems like you used it as an excuse to put a lot of votes on the table (which is a play you chastised earlier) which could end in a mislynch with limited suspicion.
why you never mentioned this before then? guess that was mentis point?
took so long for you to explain this
#Elsa
I mean, I already answered this. I called out the faux rage in post 66, waited for K to show up so we could talk, and then put down the hurt.
Post
Post #474 (isolation #37) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:07 am
Postby Penguinos »
LewdandRude is scum.
Had some doubts about my initial read yesterday, but the refusal to explain his case just puts the nail in the coffin. That is scum play, period. Town is happy to present a case as it increases the likelihood of others joining the wagon and leading to an actual lynch, there no way this hydra is town.
47 posts, and some 40 hours later, you have apparently been "too tired" to make that case. I am starting to fear that you will be too tired until the game day ends. Maybe you should see a doctor if you are feeling this exhausted all the time.
Logically, between you being "too tired" or you just being bad scum unable to make a case because it didn't actually exist, I think the second is far more likely.
In post 476, LewdandRude wrote:
you do realize that increasing the likelihood of your lynch is what would motivate me in this situation if i were scum, right? so what about me 'refusing' to present a case (which I'm not even doing) is scum motivated, as opposed to NAI?
Are you kidding? Scum would love to see a player get lynched with minimal case/pushing, as it allows for an easy out the next day when suspicions are drawn based on the flip, because scum KNOWS it's a bad push. Town doesn't care, because town thinks it is actually pushing scum.
NO YOU FUCKING DIDN'T
I AM HUMAN SEQUENCER
NOT DUNN
STOP PULLING THIS BULLSHIT, PLEASE READ
You are both sharing a slot. Take your own advice: PLEASE READ. If you read the thread and understand the questions asked of your slot, you should understand that answers to them are expected.
Post
Post #603 (isolation #42) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:00 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 502, LewdandRude wrote:
484 was clearly referring to -one person-. He's implying it took -one person- 40 hours to respond which is just not true, and using it to paint me as scummy.
-Lewd
You've spewed so much BS I don't have time to respond to it all just yet, but this piece is especially precious.
So my complaint that one person can't respond in 40 hours is unfair, because in reality there are two of you?
W. T. F. It should be easier to find the time to explain a case given that there are two of you, not harder. Dunn didn't say a thing yo you about why he had the reads he had? This is a blitz game, and dunn hasn't checked in with you at all since I asked for a case? What kind of lie are trying to get me to believe, exactly?
Post
Post #606 (isolation #43) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:06 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 604, LewdandRude wrote:You can't even keep your own head straight. You twist your own previous meanings into any which way to justify yourself.
Your posts have no logical consistency whatsoever.
Ignoring penguin so that it doesn't shit up the thread.
-Lewd
Yeah, I reiterate that this is scum. Town would respond to me points. LewdandRude is avoiding them.
Post
Post #608 (isolation #44) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:10 am
Postby Penguinos »
One other point.
This is a blitz game, we have 2 more days until deadline.
LewdandRude has 2 votes. I know mine is coming from town, and I am reading transcendence as a town slot.
Would this be an irresistible wagon for scum to jump on and push? If LewdandRude is actually town, they get an easy lynch on one town today, and an excellent excuse to get my slot lynched tomorrow, 2 for the price of one.
I'm pretty much convinced that between transcendance and LewdandRude, one of them is scum. (Almost certainly LewdandRude).
In post 608, Penguinos wrote:LewdandRude has 2 votes. I know mine is coming from town, and I am reading transcendence as a town slot.
I've explained in an earlier post why this reasoning is weak.
Would you mind responding to that reasoning?
Your argument is senseless.
We have already had a lynch. The idea that scum are afraid to get their hands dirty suggests that you think the prior lynch was purely town driven. Do you really? If not, scum have already dirtied their hands.
You can't use reasoning based on a normal 14-day deadline game in a blitz, because decisions here happen much more rapidly.
Post
Post #626 (isolation #47) » Sun Jan 29, 2017 8:33 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 622, Transcendence wrote:
Are you reading the game? I'm hard townreading L&R and unvoted them forever ago
-Inf
Yes I am.
People freaked out when I voted lewd in the first place because you were "voting" them, even though you unvoted long before I placed my vote. So if that is the bizarre reasoning used in this game, I wanted to be sure to account for it in my posts.
Like I can't legitly think this is how anyone can think. That wagon was so mehh. It happened to fast to be AI in any manner and you bringing it up to make your tunnel look more good makes you look like a noob
and I'm starting to think you're faking it
#Elsa
It's weird. In many other games, players will freak out or even scum-read a person for something as minor as putting someone at L-1 without clear announcement. Nobody ever calls such logic naive.
Yet in this one, where not only did that happen but there was also an actual lynch, you are suggesting it's naive to even look at the hammer, much less whoever voted L-1.
We have already had a lynch. The idea that scum are afraid to get their hands dirty suggests that you think the prior lynch was purely town driven. Do you really? If not, scum have already dirtied their hands.
You can't use reasoning based on a normal 14-day deadline game in a blitz, because decisions here happen much more rapidly.
Claiming that there is scum on the lynch wagon is far, far different than saying that the hammerer was scum.
Not everyone on that wagon had intent to lynch; in fact, I'd argue that there wasn't anyone on that wagon with actual intent to lynch aside from maybe a devious scum LnR, which means that your entire premise is completely ruined.
Has Penguin commented on your push or do you not think that his opinion matters?
Penguin did not think L&R was scum yesterday, but haven't seen him back since. I had doubts myself, but the inability to give me a straight answer about their case on my slot is really pinging me hard. I don't buy the fake rage from HS about me asking "dunnstral" questions. Whether you hydra or replace in you need to account for your slots actions in the game, you don't just get a fresh start because you are a new driver.
" I'd argue that there wasn't anyone on that wagon with actual intent to lynch aside from maybe a devious scum LnR, which means that your entire premise is completely ruined."
I don't agree. Scum "intend" to lynch anyone they can, they are neither picky nor selective. They might not have jumped on the wagon expecting to see an actual hammer, but they certainly wouldn't be disappointed with that result. The same *could* be true with LnR. Scum could have jumped on my wagon, not really "intending" to hard lynch L&R but they would be pretty happy if it led to a lynch anyway- unless L&R is scum.
Post
Post #1109 (isolation #50) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:19 am
Postby Penguinos »
Haven't read since Sunday, but I think I would be okay with a mantis shrimp lynch. I still know lewd is scum, but it seems they can get away with the most blatant anti-twon play without anyone else even caring so I don't see that lynch happening.
In post 641, Penguinos wrote:It's weird. In many other games, players will freak out or even scum-read a person for something as minor as putting someone at L-1 without clear announcement. Nobody ever calls such logic naive.
Yet in this one, where not only did that happen but there was also an actual lynch, you are suggesting it's naive to even look at the hammer, much less whoever voted L-1.
I think your approach is less naive and more overly simplified. If you were looking at the hammerer, that would not be so bad because it implies that you were taking into account all of Lewd's posting and forming a read independent of that hammer (since the hammer could come from either alignment). In this game, it feels like you're hinging too much on the hammer alone and less into the play outside of that; the doubt you had afterwards was good and it made it seem like you were legitimately reading the slot, but your posting after the fact shows you tipping back into a tunnel.
In the contrary, my read is strengthened by lewd's refusal to offer a case as to why I am scum, it's not merely about the hammer. Town might refuse to give a case, in some rare cases (though I can't recall a good example), but even then town is usually willing to outright SAY they are refusing to give a case. The lewd slot didn't even do that for the majority of the game (I haven't fully caught up, so this is based on what occurred prior to 649). Instead they complained that they apparently didn't communicate as a hydra to explain reads, or they just ignore my request for a case, or there was the initial bizarre response about "inf's push", as if an action by another player created the scum read on me.
It especially bothers me because it looks very much like an initial RVS vote, but they are sticking to it as if it's based on something more solid when it clearly isn't.
Post
Post #1115 (isolation #54) » Tue Jan 31, 2017 3:38 am
Postby Penguinos »
In post 650, Slaughterhouse Five wrote:
I don't agree. Scum "intend" to lynch anyone they can, they are neither picky nor selective. They might not have jumped on the wagon expecting to see an actual hammer, but they certainly wouldn't be disappointed with that result. The same *could* be true with LnR. Scum could have jumped on my wagon, not really "intending" to hard lynch L&R but they would be pretty happy if it led to a lynch anyway- unless L&R is scum.
To the first part, I haven't read your interactions with the slot in depth. I will do so when I have more time.
To the second part, "scum jumping on the wagon and not expecting to see a lynch" kills your premise, which is the point that I was making.[/quote]
I don't get your logic. It doesn't kill me premise at all. Scum will go for a chance if the risk is outweighed by the reward. "Not expecting to see a lynch" doesn't mean there is zero chance for a lynch. If there is even a small chance of a lynch, as long as the potential risk is even lower it's a perfectly logical scum strategy.
In post 209, Penguinos wrote:If town quick hammerer like that, scum would jump on the easy lynch opportunity. Since that hasn't happened, it is safe to say they are scum.
But it has happened; and not everyone has posted yet. Including you.
In fact, the two to jump on me were you and infinity, which is coincidentally the two people I am voting. How's the scum pt going with both members under heavy scrutiny?
I mean, just going through his iso, I can see his case: OMGUS. That is all it is, he essentially said so in 211. His refusal to admit that his case is based on such garbage screams scum to me. Do you think OMGUS is a valid case?