For making this game take so long to start
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
As an aside, i think this is 100% scum thinking.In post 64, BTD6_maker wrote:If the day ends early a No Lynch is at least a better result than a highly probable Town lynch.In post 62, Aristophanes wrote:And end the day in a NL if it ends early, which accomplishes what exactly?
How is he not scum here, he is focusing his arguments on theory (and to me at least it looks like his pushing to keep them in theory talk) WHILE saying that the deadline can be extremely short.In post 74, Road Kamelot wrote:i don't find BTD scummy here, just wrong
Do you think a public(ish) double voter would be scum?
This is a bad excuse for hidden+Random deadline gamesIn post 139, Randomnamechange wrote:it started out as rvs, didnt really like the btd wagon so i stayed on someone who was on it. i wasnt expecting that quick an end tho and would probs have moved my vote soon.
This coming from someone who was trying to advocate that a short deadline was possible seems really fucking dumb.In post 157, BTD6_maker wrote:I thought that the Day 1 wagon would dissipate eventually.
I don't see how that works differently to voting apart, or just voting in general, or hell just letting all the townies place their votes and not voting is still trying to face the odds.In post 171, Nahdia wrote:honestly scum may just be planning to always end up voting together and play the odds. it's not a bad plan.
VOTE: JasonWazza
So how do you explain RK not voting yesterday under scum motivation?In post 183, Randomnamechange wrote:alright.In post 175, Nahdia wrote:try 2 explain
i dont think jason or btd are mafia. However as they are the most likely lynches mafia want to keep them alive and therefore vote for other townies. as i think NM is town RK's vote here makes sense from scum.
I also have a townlean on TTTT due tohis early posting which makes me think that RK is probably scum here.
*cough* just putting that out there.